Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Contractual complexities

  • 03-02-2016 1:33am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭


    So... I have some questions about contract law.

    Does agreeing the terms of a contract and both parties stating an intention to sign such a contract in itself constitute a contract?
    Even when an actual contract was never written up or signed by either party?
    What effect does payment of consideration have in such a case?
    What effect would there be if a previous contract was in place that made such consideration due? Is the original contract usually held to be valid?
    If there is a mutually agreed change in consideration by either party or possibly a number of subsequent changes does that have an impact?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Homework? :)
    cros13 wrote: »
    Does agreeing the terms of a contract and both parties stating an intention to sign such a contract in itself constitute a contract?
    No, it is merely an intention. Absent other factors ("Go ahead and order the long-lead parts"), there is no contract.
    Even when an actual contract was never written up or signed by either party?
    One would almost say "especially so" in such cases, but note that buying a bar of chocolate in a shop is a contract and it would never be written and definitely not signed (a receipt isn't a contract).
    What effect does payment of consideration have in such a case?
    That very much depends on the evidence and what the payment was for. The mere payment of money could be for anything, e.g. last year's fee might be outstanding, it might be a loan, it might be an error.
    What effect would there be if a previous contract was in place that made such consideration due?
    You are entering the realm of making us guess what you are hinting at. :) One could say the payment was for that other contract, not the one at hand.
    Is the original contract usually held to be valid?
    Your language is self-confirming. You say there was a contract, then there was a contract. Especially so if the actions of the parties would tend to confirm this.
    If there is a mutually agreed change in consideration by either party or possibly a number of subsequent changes does that have an impact?
    If mutually agreed, then I would be inclined to say yes. However, there may be space between unilaterally applied and mutually agreed.


Advertisement