Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

North ireland

  • 04-11-2015 5:37am
    #1
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,644 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    A chap on reddit was asking... Why "Northern Ireland" as opposed to North Ireland in a similar manner to North Korea or North Carolina. I honestly have not heard any official answer, though I have my suspicions. Is there one?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭Terrontress


    It's English English, isn't it? Northern is an adjective for the proper noun of Ireland. North Carolina or North Anynoun is American English. To use just the word North would require an 'of' in there.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Second Toughest in_the Freshers


    Because it's apart off Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,989 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    It's a matter of usage and preference. Australia has the state of New South Wales (established as a colony with that name in 1788, but name first given to the area by Captain Cook when he claimed the place for Britain in 1770), Western Australia (established as a the Swan River Colony in 1829; renamed as Western Australia in 1832) and South Australia (established as a colony under that name in 1834). Then you have the Northern Territory, established as a territory of South Australia in 1863 (previously it had been a part of New South Wales, but had no special name). In 1911 it was transferred to the Commonwealth of Australia to become a federal, rather than state, territory. In 1926 it was divided into two separate territories, North Australia and Central Australia, but in 1931 they were joined back together again in into a single Northern Territory.

    Nobody at the time appears to have thought there was any discrepancy in the naming of these colonies and territories, so far as I know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,810 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Peregrinus wrote: »
    It's a matter of usage and preference. Australia has the state of New South Wales (established as a colony with that name in 1788, but name first given to the area by Captain Cook when he claimed the place for Britain in 1770), Western Australia (established as a the Swan River Colony in 1829; renamed as Western Australia in 1832) and South Australia (established as a colony under that name in 1834). Then you have the Northern Territory, established as a territory of South Australia in 1863 (previously it had been a part of New South Wales, but had no special name). In 1911 it was transferred to the Commonwealth of Australia to become a federal, rather than state, territory. In 1926 it was divided into two separate territories, North Australia and Central Australia, but in 1931 they were joined back together again in into a single Northern Territory.

    Nobody at the time appears to have thought there was any discrepancy in the naming of these colonies and territories, so far as I know.

    NSW was to be called 'New Wales', then Cook revised the wording to 'New South Wales' for some reason.

    The naming of the territories was very piecemeal.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_evolution_of_Australia


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 809 ✭✭✭filbert the fox


    A chap on reddit was asking... Why "Northern Ireland" as opposed to North Ireland in a similar manner to North Korea or North Carolina. I honestly have not heard any official answer, though I have my suspicions. Is there one?

    Ulster, the Six Counties, the North, the wee North, Norn Irn, up there, etc...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Northern Ireland is a region of the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.

    UK for short.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Second Toughest in_the Freshers


    it is also a part of the island of Ireland, not to be confused with the country, Ireland.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Second Toughest in_the Freshers


    ...but then of course, we are all part of the British Isles.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    ...but then of course, we are all part of the British Isles.

    Geographically speaking.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Second Toughest in_the Freshers


    not forgetting the Republic of Ireland, who are an association football team, representing the country of Ireland.

    and then of course theres 'eire' meaning load, or burden, not to be confused with Éire, which is the name of the state in the native language.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    Across the water we have North Wales and South Wales, but Northern and Southern Scotland. We also have Northern England, the West Country and Southeast England, not to mention the East End and West End.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,363 ✭✭✭KingBrian2


    To answer the original post the reason it is not called North Ireland is because the Unionists regard themselves as British not Irish. Korea be they north or south are still Koreans. East and West Germans are still Germans. North and South Vietnamese are still Vietnamese not so up there a considerable portion of the population have little or no interest in anything Irish.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    Because it's apart off Ireland.
    KingBrian2 wrote: »
    To answer the original post the reason it is not called North Ireland is because the Unionists regard themselves as British not Irish. Korea be they north or south are still Koreans. East and West Germans are still Germans. North and South Vietnamese are still Vietnamese not so up there a considerable portion of the population have little or no interest in anything Irish.
    not forgetting the Republic of Ireland, who are an association football team, representing the country of Ireland.

    and then of course theres 'eire' meaning load, or burden, not to be confused with ire, which is the name of the state in the native language.
    LordSutch wrote: »
    Northern Ireland is a region of the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.UK for short.

    Very remedial answering. From all of you. Especially Sutch.

    The question isn't about the politics of Northern Ireland, the British Isles or the Republic of Ireland soccer team, but why we say Northern Ireland rather than North Ireland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Very remedial answering. From all of you. Especially Sutch.

    The question isn't about the politics of Northern Ireland, the British Isles or the Republic of Ireland soccer team, but why we say Northern Ireland rather than North Ireland.

    I presume because the part of this island we are discussing is refered to in the statute books, in law, and in international terminology as... Northern Ireland.

    It's the official name written down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭Snickers Man


    Could it be because the most northerly part of the island of Ireland is in "Southern" Ireland? In fact large parts of Donegal are further north than the most northerly tip of "Northern" Ireland.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Second Toughest in_the Freshers


    LordSutch wrote: »
    I presume because the part of this island we are discussing is refered to in the statute books, in law, and in international terminology as... Northern Ireland.

    It's the official name written down.

    yes, but WHY?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,989 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    LordSutch wrote: »
    I presume because the part of this island we are discussing is refered to in the statute books, in law, and in international terminology as... Northern Ireland.

    It's the official name written down.
    Yes, but why? The official name could just as easily have been "North Ireland". In fact they chose "Northern Ireland". Was there some reason for this choice, or was it a mere whim, a caprice?

    If we're looking at official usage, there was some modest precedent for "North" rather than "Northern". The proclamations issued by James VI & I after the union of the crowns in 1603 regularly used "North Britain" and "South Britain" for Scotland and England (inc. Wales) respectively. And on the Act of Union in 1707, the Royal Regiment of Scots Dragoons was renamed the Royal North British Dragoons.


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Second Toughest in_the Freshers


    there have been official proposals to change the name of Northern Ireland to Ulster


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,989 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    NSW was to be called 'New Wales', then Cook revised the wording to 'New South Wales' for some reason.
    Not sure where this is coming from. My understanding is that Cook named the place "New South Wales" when he discovered it, because it reminded him of South Wales. I don't see how there could have been any earlier proposal to call the place "New Wales"; if they only had a hazy idea that the place might or might not be there, how could they have any firm idea about whether it looked like South Wales or just a bit like Wales in general?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    LordSutch wrote: »
    I presume because the part of this island we are discussing is refered to in the statute books, in law, and in international terminology as... Northern Ireland.

    It's the official name written down.

    We're wondering why.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,810 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Peregrinus wrote: »
    Not sure where this is coming from. My understanding is that Cook named the place "New South Wales" when he discovered it, because it reminded him of South Wales. I don't see how there could have been any earlier proposal to call the place "New Wales"; if they only had a hazy idea that the place might or might not be there, how could they have any firm idea about whether it looked like South Wales or just a bit like Wales in general?

    He added the 'South' to it before submitting it to the Admiralty.

    https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/c/cook/james/c77j/preface.html


    The name, “New South Wales,” was not bestowed without much consideration, and apparently at one stage New Wales was the appellation fixed upon, for in Mr. Corner’s copy it is so called throughout, whereas the Admiralty copy has “New South Wales.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,500 ✭✭✭tac foley


    It was called New South Wales because it was in the Southern hemisphere.

    As for people in Northern Ireland not considering themselves to be Irish, well, THAT is a lot of tosh. Our opposite neighbours are from Strabane [him] and Lisburn [her] and they consider themselves to be as Irish as anybody born south of the border - or west, in the case of Derry and Donegal. They don't go home every few months to Northern Ireland, they go back over to Ireland, full stop.

    They are not imperialists, colonialists, nationalists, unionists or republicans, just Irish.

    tac


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 809 ✭✭✭filbert the fox


    Could it be because the most northerly part of the island of Ireland is in "Southern" Ireland? In fact large parts of Donegal are further north than the most northerly tip of "Northern" Ireland.

    I'm always puzzling my friends with the question

    "what island's most northerly point is in the south?"

    Good one!


Advertisement