Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

fence repair

  • 30-06-2015 9:34am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,336 ✭✭✭✭


    looking for advice if that's allowed ?
    long story short a neighbour was clearing a right of way next to out house \site
    In the process the contractors digger brought down the entire back section of our fence (30m or so)
    I assumed when finished they would repair it but I was wrong.
    All I got told was my stakes were rotten and should be replaced! The fence was standing perfectly when I went to work .......
    Now there is no doubt some stakes were rotten but some were not including the main corner one which has been brought down .
    So I am now left with the site exposed on one side and am expected to foot the bill myself?
    I'd probably go as far as paying half but I dont even think he would be agreeable to that !
    So where do I stand from a legal point of view ? Not that I want to go down the solicitors road. Just want to know where I stand when talking to the 2 guys


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭NUTLEY BOY


    km79 wrote: »
    looking for advice if that's allowed ?
    long story short a neighbour was clearing a right of way next to out house \site
    In the process the contractors digger brought down the entire back section of our fence (30m or so)
    I assumed when finished they would repair it but I was wrong.
    All I got told was my stakes were rotten and should be replaced! The fence was standing perfectly when I went to work .......
    Now there is no doubt some stakes were rotten but some were not including the main corner one which has been brought down .
    So I am now left with the site exposed on one side and am expected to foot the bill myself?
    I'd probably go as far as paying half but I dont even think he would be agreeable to that !
    So where do I stand from a legal point of view ? Not that I want to go down the solicitors road. Just want to know where I stand when talking to the 2 guys

    Their initial response is well up to modern standards :rolleyes:

    The neighbour and or their contractor cannot damage your property and walk away. Tell them that you want the matter dealt with or that you will instruct a solicitor.

    BTW if it is 100% your fence I see no reason for you to stump up 50%.

    Ask your household insurers if this is covered i.e. damage to fence by mechanical vehicle. If you have accidental cover on your buildings that might well cover it also. If it is covered your insurers can seek recovery from the neighbour and or his contractor.

    As far as rotten posts go that is an argument in mitigation. If the neighbour decides to settle they may ask for a reduction on the grounds of betterment and that is fair enough. Simply saying that posts were rotten is not a defence to their negligence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,336 ✭✭✭✭km79


    NUTLEY BOY wrote: »
    Their initial response is well up to modern standards :rolleyes:

    The neighbour and or their contractor cannot damage your property and walk away. Tell them that you want the matter dealt with or that you will instruct a solicitor.

    BTW if it is 100% your fence I see no reason for you to stump up 50%.

    Ask your household insurers if this is covered i.e. damage to fence by mechanical vehicle. If you have accidental cover on your buildings that might well cover it also. If it is covered your insurers can seek recovery from the neighbour and or his contractor.

    As far as rotten posts go that is an argument in mitigation. If the neighbour decides to settle they may ask for a reduction on the grounds of betterment and that is fair enough. Simply saying that posts were rotten is not a defence to their negligence.

    thanks that was my feeling on it too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,809 ✭✭✭edanto


    One thing to add; I'd be loath to make a claim for it on my own insurance, this should be something paid for by the Public Liability insurance of the contractor.

    Make an ally of your neighbour, they should not be out of pocket either, the fault rests with the digger driver who will either be insured or pay for it themselves. (well, most of it after you settle the issue of betterment)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,336 ✭✭✭✭km79


    edanto wrote: »
    One thing to add; I'd be loath to make a claim for it on my own insurance, this should be something paid for by the Public Liability insurance of the contractor.

    Make an ally of your neighbour, they should not be out of pocket either, the fault rests with the digger driver who will either be insured or pay for it themselves. (well, most of it after you settle the issue of betterment)

    thanks I have it clear in my head what I'm going to do about it now and it will be fair and hopefully agreeable to all parties!
    thanks for the advice guys


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Take lots of photographs now. Write everything down.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭NUTLEY BOY


    Victor wrote: »
    Take lots of photographs now. Write everything down.
    +1


Advertisement