Still living with the Mammy

Mister Vain

With rent prices going up, is there still as much stigma with living at home? Adults living with their parents often get a hard time. I came across this article; its a few years old granted but is sums up the mentality of a lot of people:

What are you playing at? You get one life and you're living it in your parents' house, as a strangely tall child, presumably with secondary sexual characteristics.

I've always believed that people should have one of those things that start with a birth, end with a death and have lots of stuff going on in the middle. You know, a life.

Bar exceptional circumstances, this level of over-parenting is approaching child abuse.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jun/03/barbara-ellen-kick-out-stay-at-home-kids

This idea that someone still living at home doesn't have a life or is still a child is a bit ridiculous. Terms like "Mammy's boy" and "mollycoddled" are insulting. Yes some people are just lazy and I have seen examples of over parenting too, but not everyone's circumstances are the same. Some people just can't afford it. You wouldn't be as quick to insult someone who is in debt or has mortgage arrears.

Menas

Horses for courses. I left home at 16 and would not change that for the world.

everlast75

Girls don't want no scrubs!

Mint Aero

I left home when I was 12 to join the chimney sweeps. Declared myself against the euro by 14 went into the mines at 15. Was married with 3 children by 16 and divorced at 19. No way would I live with a relative. Not even the 3 childer.

fizzypish

Living abroad now and have lived up the country for work. If I was working around my home place I would totally live at home. Just me and the father. We get on like a house on fire. Couldn't live with the mother though.

rubadub

Mister Vain wrote: »

Some people just can't afford it.

yes, and not always the children. Her view is very one sided, like the only reason she can think of is that they cannot afford it and/or the need to be "mollycoddled", and a inferred presumption the parents want rid of them. When in many cases I would expect its the opposite, or the benefits are pretty much equal, i.e. the children "mollycoddling" the parents just as much by doing tasks which could not be done by eldery parents.

Lemming

So, somebody is living at home with the parents; could be for a variety of reasons. Maybe they moved out before, and have had to move home, maybe they can't afford it, maybe they're lazy, unsure, just haven't found somewhere, or whatever.

TL;DR: judgemental muppets need to get over themselves and look at their own lives instead.

the_monkey

Usual here for people to live with their parents in their 40s and 50s ... and Mammy still making them lunch/dinner everyday.

In fact , I know some people that BOUGHT apartments but rent it out to make money and still live with mammy getting lunch/dinner and laundry done for them everyday.

Perfectly normal here ... encouraged even.

Senna

What about parents moving in with the kids.
FFS man, you're 87 years old, start living your life.

Mister Vain

rubadub wrote: »

yes, and not always the children. Her view is very one sided, like the only reason she can think of is that they cannot afford it and/or the need to be "mollycoddled", and a inferred presumption the parents want rid of them. When in many cases I would expect its the opposite, or the benefits are pretty much equal, i.e. the children "mollycoddling" the parents just as much by doing tasks which could not be done by eldery parents.

Exactly. I know of a few cases where the "child" is the only one in the household who is working and earning money, or else their parent is ill and needs help. And yes, not all parents are desperate to get rid of their offspring either. Some people actually get on with their folks.

retro:electro

I still live at home but only because she recently has lost the power in her right arm and can't manage much around the house. It's just the two of us so its not too bad.

conorhal

Senna wrote: »

What about parents moving in with the kids.
FFS man, you're 87 years old, start living your life.

That's just the circle of life, they listen to you cry, wipe your arse raise you up and gently move you out. Then you gently move them in, listen to them cry, wipe their arse and eventually lower them down.

It depends on the reason. If you're perfectly capable of supporting yourself but live at home and hand up a pittance to your parents for upkeep and enjoy full service in terms of cooking, cleaning, laundry, bills paid, and do nothing but enjoy the fruits of their labour, you need to grow up and sort yourself out, for their sake. Or even if you prioritise a new car or accelerated savings at your parents expense while they foot your bills, then again grow up and sort yourself out.

If you're broke, in education, unemployed, or are needed to help with the everyday care of your parents or running of their home, hand up a reasonable rent and pull your own weight on the chore front, then it's not unreasonable. It's probably not ideal for an extended length of time, but it's not unreasonable in the short or medium term.

Tow

Sure it is grand. My neighbours still have their youngest son (late 30s') and his husband living with them. The good Irish mummy doing the cooking and laundry etc, and the dad saying nothing about it... No need for any voting tomorrow, it is happening in Ireland now :-)

Mister Vain

Candie wrote: »

If you're perfectly capable of supporting yourself but live at home and hand up a pittance to your parents for upkeep and enjoy full service in terms of cooking, cleaning, laundry, bills paid, and do nothing but enjoy the fruits of their labour, you need to grow up and sort yourself out, for their sake.

The bills paid for I wouldn't agree with. I think they should be contributing there, but I know some mammies who are happy to do all the other stuff. Force of habit maybe. Sometimes the situation can benefit both parents and the kids. Someone else mentioned living close to their work. Great convenience there. The mammy doing a bit of cooking and cleaning, nothing wrong with that.

Aint Eazy Being Cheezy

the_monkey wrote: »

Usual here for people to live with their parents in their 40s and 50s ... and Mammy still making them lunch/dinner everyday.

In fact , I know some people that BOUGHT apartments but rent it out to make money and still live with mammy getting lunch/dinner and laundry done for them everyday.

Perfectly normal here ... encouraged even.

Foxrock?

Mister Vain

Mister Vain wrote: »

The bills paid for I wouldn't agree with. I think they should be contributing there, but I know some mammies who are happy to do all the other stuff. Force of habit maybe. Sometimes the situation can benefit both parents and the kids. Someone else mentioned living close to their work. Great convenience there. The mammy doing a bit of cooking and cleaning, nothing wrong with that.

Ah there is. If the mammy has been at it all the kids life then she needs to be allowed retire from it. And it's better for the grown up kid to do their own stuff, for their own sake. Even if the mammy seems happy to do it, it's not fair to keep taking advantage of that, as an adult.

the_monkey

the_monkey wrote: »

Usual here for people to live with their parents in their 40s and 50s ... and Mammy still making them lunch/dinner everyday.

In fact , I know some people that BOUGHT apartments but rent it out to make money and still live with mammy getting lunch/dinner and laundry done for them everyday.

Perfectly normal here ... encouraged even.

oh yeah forgot to mention, amount of rent/maintenance handed to the parents : 0.00 - even when they have good jobs.

keithclancy

Mister Vain wrote: »

This idea that someone still living at home doesn't have a life or is still a child is a bit ridiculous. Terms like "Mammy's boy" and "mollycoddled" are insulting. Yes some people are just lazy and I have seen examples of over parenting too, but not everyone's circumstances are the same. Some people just can't afford it. You wouldn't be as quick to insult someone who is in debt or has mortgage arrears.

I think it's because we all know someone who's kids won't leave home or make a proper go of things because they always have the safety net of going home to their parents house.

IMO if the safety net isn't there and your in a job that you hate, you really think twice about saying "i quit" and walking out

Nothing wrong with it, just don't expect to be able to bring chicks home in your 30s and get the ride

muppetkiller

I recently broke up with my lady and moved home as we had been renting together. I'm 38 so hadn't lived at home in about 15 years.

Currently saving for a house so suits me for now to stay there for 6 months and save an extra 3k. Also gives me an opportunity to spend some quality time with the folks while I still have them around.

Can't say it's much fun though when it comes to privacy. Also mums will be mums , so when you are up watching Game of Thrones till 2am she'll be giving you the chat in the morning about how "you shouldn't be up late on a work night.... blah blah" lol

Mister Vain

Candie wrote: »

Ah there is. If the mammy has been at it all the kids life then she needs to be allowed retire from it. And it's better for the grown up kid to do their own stuff, for their own sake. Even if the mammy seems happy to do it, it's not fair to keep taking advantage of that, as an adult.

Well if she's doing 100% of the cooking and cleaning then fair enough. The kids should be chipping in there as well, doing the odd bit of cooking and so on, but some mammies will insist on doing the cooking because they're better at it.

keithclancy wrote: »

I think it's because we all know someone who's kids won't leave home or make a proper go of things because they always have the safety net of going home to their parents house.

IMO if the safety net isn't there and your in a job that you hate, you really think twice about saying "i quit" and walking out

Nothing wrong with it, just don't expect to be able to bring chicks home in your 30s and get the ride

Well there's always her place, or the back of the car.

Matt_Trakker

I think it's a bit sad when I hear of people still living at home.
Let go of the apron strings and man up.

Mr_Muffin

Have a child and get a council house - easy way to move out if your stuck.

JillyQ

Trigger Happy wrote: »

Horses for courses. I left home at 16 and would not change that for the world.

Left home at the same age wouldnt have it any other way

JoDunlop

If your happy with your with your situation leave well alone!!

Mister Vain

Matt_Trakker wrote: »

I think it's a bit sad when I hear of people still living at home.
Let go of the apron strings and man up.

Well...

JoDunlop wrote: »

If your happy with your with your situation leave well alone!!

anncoates

Mr_Muffin wrote: »

Have a child and get a council house after waiting for about 10 years or more at current waiting times.

Fixed.

Kinda ruins the splenetic moralizing a bit, though.

The Backwards Man

Matt_Trakker wrote: »

I think it's a bit sad when I hear of people still living at home.
Let go of the apron strings and man up.

I think it's a bit sad when I hear of people living in squalid hovels, living off takeaways because they can't cook and throwing out their secondhand clothes after wearing them because they can't wash them. But hey, at least they're 'manning up' right?

anncoates

I myself left home before I was even born.

zzfh

b-b-but i'm saving so much monies..

Mister Vain

keithclancy wrote: »

don't expect to be able to bring chicks home in your 30s and get the ride

Just going back to this bit actually. My folks live in the sticks. Going out to meet women usually involved heading into town, (which is a fair distance away.) If I was to meet a woman who was up for a bit of hanky panky, then getting a taxi all the way back to the bog for a shag was not really a viable option, regardless of whether or not I was living with the parents.

And that brings me back to the whole "secondary sexual characteristics." Yeah because everybody who has their own place is constantly riding. There's no such thing as a sexually inexperienced tenant.

keithclancy

Mister Vain wrote: »

Just going back to this bit actually. My folks live in the sticks. Going out to meet women usually involved heading into town, (which is a fair distance away.) If I was to meet a woman who was up for a bit of hanky panky, then getting a taxi all the way back to the bog for a shag was not really a viable option, regardless of whether or not I was living with the parents.

And that brings me back to the whole "secondary sexual characteristics." Yeah because everybody who has their own place is constantly riding. There's no such thing as a sexually inexperienced tenant.

Sexiest boards.ie post of 2015

swimming in a sea

Depends on the parents and the size of the house, terraced city house with only one TV room and a small kitchen, you can forget about it.

I remember spending the night with a girl in her late twenties, in what I thought was her place but in the morning I found out different as her mother had an extra place set for breakfast for me :eek:

This was in America but still it felt all a bit to liberal for me, I would have felt more comfortable been run out the front door with a shotgun than having her mother smiling across at me at the breakfast table.

If you have to live with parents or the in-laws then just don't be getting under their feet.

Andy-Pandy

I had to move home when I was 31. Combination of my mum having recently had a stroke and starting college again. It wasn't ideal and It had a serious affect on both my love life and confidence. It was a necessity though, I couldn't have gotten through those college years with out it.

I would have no problem living at home, in fact I hated moving out (at 24) and only did so as I was living too far from work to commute. We have a big house with loads of space and my parents love having the family around, in fact they regularly say how its a pity we (myself and my siblings) have to be out renting when we could be saving much more for our own houses. If I could have lived at home for the last 6 years the amount I would have saved on rent would be significant, add that on top of what was saved and the deposit is getting bigger and potential mortgage much smaller.

I never understood peoples rush to move out, suppose my parents were never bothered about what we did and never had the "where are you going" or "what time will you be back" etc etc carry on from them. I'd have no problem moving back in if I were to get a job near home either (30 now) and would quite enjoy being able to actually.

I think people moving out for the sake of it (i.e. renting when living close to home) are mad, its just throwing money away which could be saved towards buying. Never experienced any of the "can't believe your still living at home" stuff either. A lot of my friends never moved out and are only doing so now after getting married and building their own places.

readyletsgo

Matt_Trakker wrote: »

I think it's a bit sad when I hear of people still living at home.
Let go of the apron strings and man up.

Kinda hard too when you have no choice but to move back home at 31 to look after your slowly degrading Alzheimer's father for the next 6 to 10 years.

Man up yourself! Never make assumptions.

veryangryman

readyletsgo wrote: »

Kinda hard too when you have no choice but to move back home at 31 to look after your slowly degrading Alzheimer's father for the next 6 to 10 years.

Man up yourself! Never make assumptions.

I sympathise; however we all know countless examples of where the son/daughter is just being lazy/cheap. I have to say that the vast majority are this way.

c_man

Adelina Mango Granule wrote: »

A lot of my friends never moved out and are only doing so now after getting married and building their own places.

Jesus. What ages were they?

Mesrine65

Senna wrote: »

What about parents moving in with the kids.

I'm 50 & my 78 year old mother lives with me :eek:

Junkyard Tom

♫ My lovely Mayo mammy,
So gentle and so wise,
Rocking on your rocking chair,
Baking cakes and pies,
My lovely Mayo mammy,
My lovely lovely Mayo mam.♫

c_man

c_man wrote: »

Jesus. What ages were they?

Of the top of my head the couples were 29 and 27, both 28, and both 32. Only one of the 3 couples had actually moved into their own place before their wedding day (a week before hand) the other two only after the honeymoon. All inside the last year too.

Adelina Mango Granule

Adelina Mango Granule wrote: »

A lot of my friends never moved out and are only doing so now after getting married and building their own places.

I can't believe anyone would willingly marry an adult who's never taken care of themselves outside their parents home. Going straight from your parents house to a house you share with a spouse is a recipe for stunted personal growth.

Candie

Candie wrote: »

I can't believe anyone would willingly marry an adult who's never taken care of themselves outside their parents home. Going straight from your parents house to a house you share with a spouse is a recipe for stunted personal growth.

Not uncommon around me, neither the man or woman in the couples I mention above had lived out of home. I could find plenty of other examples of at least one if not both people not moving out until close to being if not married if I moved out from close friends to a wider net of people.

If I happened to have found long term work near home I wouldn't have moved out and possibly have ended up doing the same as above myself.

Adelina Mango Granule

Adelina Mango Granule wrote: »

Not uncommon around me, neither the man or woman in the couples I mention above had lived out of home. I could find plenty of other examples of at least one if not both people not moving out until close to being if not married if I moved out from close friends to a wider net of people.

If I happened to have found long term work near home I doubt I would have moved out either and possibly I would have ended up doing the same myself.

That doesn't mean its good for a person, a marriage, or that its in any way a good idea.

Candie

Candie wrote: »

That doesn't mean its good for a person, a marriage, or that its in any way a good idea.

I don't think its makes any difference to the person as I don't agree with the whole "you have to move out as soon as you reach a certain age" nonsense.

I agree it would be nice to move in with the person you are going to going out with for a while before getting married, however it may not make financial sense to do so if a deposit is being saved or a house being bought/built.

Adelina Mango Granule

Adelina Mango Granule wrote: »

I don't think its makes any difference to the person as I don't agree with the whole "you have to move out as soon as you reach a certain age" nonsense.

It would be nice to move in with the person you are going to going out with for a while before getting married however it may not make financial sense.

I don't believe in an arbitrary age for moving out. I do believe that being independent and learning to live as an adult is an important life skill, and that people who go from one house to another without every experiencing it are missing out on an important facet of personal growth that matures a person and rounds them out.

Money shouldn't be the bottom line in all lifes important decisions.

kfallon

As long as you have a job and you are not dependent on your parents (or them dependent on you thru ill-health etc) then it's time to flee the nest!

Staying at home to avoid living costs or have your meals served up to you and washing done is not an admirable trait imo

I wouldn't be put off by a man living at home, I would be very put off by a man living at home making no effort to move forward with his life and move out.

kfallon

Candie wrote: »

I wouldn't be put off by a man living at home, I would be very put off by a man living at home making no effort to move forward with his life and move out.

I also think that me parents put in enough effort bringing me up that they deserve a break from me too :pac:

kfallon

kfallon wrote: »

I also think that me parents put in enough effort bringing me up that they deserve a break from me too :pac:

And probably a medal as well.

kfallon

Candie wrote: »

And probably a medal as well.

Alright, alright....no need to put the boot in :mad:

:P