Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New drug laws in Ireland

  • 12-05-2015 12:48pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 356 ✭✭


    If I'm not mistaken, that accidental ban of drugs like ketamine and MDMA occured after an unconstitutional law blanket banning everything considered psychoactive was struck down. Is that correct? What are the current drug laws now then, is there a list like they have in most countries that states that only substances that appear on the list are banned?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    I think any thing that's a psychoactive substance and not generally used as a food/drink/nicotine is banned.
    Along with a list of certain scheduled drugs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭cobhguy28


    BogMonkey wrote: »
    If I'm not mistaken, that accidental ban of drugs like ketamine and MDMA occured after an unconstitutional law blanket banning everything considered psychoactive was struck down. Is that correct? What are the current drug laws now then, is there a list like they have in most countries that states that only substances that appear on the list are banned?


    Yes you are mistaken. The court said it was unconstitutional for the minister to add new drugs to the list because the legislation granted him too much power without the propper policys in place. it was an unconstitutional delegating of power. New legislation was pass fixing it stright away.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭nxbyveromdwjpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1 jellykelly


    hi all,a friend of mine was recently caught in possesion of a small amount of one of the newly banned substances covered by the amendment in 2015,it was 5 grams of a unknown headshop powder which after gardai analysis came back as "pyrrolidinovalerophenone also known as pvp",upon researching this chemical i found it to be actually called alpha-pyrrolidnovalerphenone and another few complete different names such as alpha-pvp, apvp,prolitanone,o-2387 but not just the first name mentioned by itself,the chemical itself is not named on the banned list but is included because its got similar chemical structure to pyrovalerone which is included in the list,does any one know if the fact its not named correctly have any legal implications in the case as its a fairly important aspect,the name pvp also refers to a chemical thats legal and also chemically similar thats used in glues,cosmetics and various other applications so both descriptions on the analysis are inaccurate,thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,638 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    The act lists several drugs classified into schedules. But it does not solely apply to the drugs listed. It also applies to certain derivatives of the drugs listed. The PDF linked to earlier goes into more chemistry than i care to. Also, how can you be sure that the garda analysis is incorrect? Of course if you are certain they are correct and that the actual substance is not covered by the 2015 act then your friend will be able to get the substance analysed privately at their own expense to determine this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,579 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    jellykelly wrote: »
    hi all,a friend of mine was recently caught in possesion of a small amount of one of the newly banned substances covered by the amendment in 2015,it was 5 grams of a unknown headshop powder which after gardai analysis came back as "pyrrolidinovalerophenone also known as pvp",upon researching this chemical i found it to be actually called alpha-pyrrolidnovalerphenone and another few complete different names such as alpha-pvp, apvp,prolitanone,o-2387 but not just the first name mentioned by itself,the chemical itself is not named on the banned list but is included because its got similar chemical structure to pyrovalerone which is included in the list,does any one know if the fact its not named correctly have any legal implications in the case as its a fairly important aspect,the name pvp also refers to a chemical thats legal and also chemically similar thats used in glues,cosmetics and various other applications so both descriptions on the analysis are inaccurate,thanks
    Someone needs a solicitor.

    The full rules set out in the acts and regulations need to be read, not just the schedules.


Advertisement