Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Anti-gay legislation proposed in Northern Ireland

  • 27-02-2015 12:12am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,867 ✭✭✭


    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-31076402


    Over 1,000 people gathered at Belfast's City Hall on Saturday to protest over the DUP's conscience clause bill.

    The crowd was addressed by politicians from Alliance, Sinn Féin and SDLP, as well as community leaders.

    Paul Givan's private member's bill aims to create a legal exemption on grounds of strongly held religious beliefs.

    He sought to introduce a "conscience clause" into equality law in NI, following legal action taken against a Christian-owned bakery.

    The Equality Commission has brought a civil case against Ashers Baking Company after it refused to bake a cake with a pro-gay marriage slogan.

    The row first emerged in July, when Ashers revealed it was facing possible legal action over its decision to decline a customer's request.

    The cake had been ordered in Belfast by a gay activist for a civic event in Bangor, County Down, marking International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia.

    Ashers Baking Company said it had declined the request because it was "at odds" with its Christian beliefs.

    Mr Givan argued that the law had to be rebalanced.

    He said it was a choice between a society "that can make space for difference or one that is intolerant".

    Mr Givan said the Equality Commission's legal action had "created a hierarchy of rights where all minorities are not to be treated equally".



    There is a petition against this bill here - https://go.allout.org/en/a/northern-ireland/?akid=4876.930814.Z_Tytv&rd=1&t=1&utm_campaign=northern-ireland&utm_content=english&utm_medium=email&utm_source=actionsuite


«13456710

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,734 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    Some people in that part of the island really are stuck in the dark ages.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,679 ✭✭✭AllGunsBlazing


    NI is fast becoming this island's equivalent of America's deep south.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 57 ✭✭Mr. Remote Control


    My name is Kevin. When I am older I want to be a biscuit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭O'Neill


    The North is stuck behind no doubt about it, but are you seriously judging the entire population over this?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 449 ✭✭CJ Haughey


    My name is Kevin. When I am older I want to be a biscuit.

    Why settle for being a biscuit when you could be a cake. Dream big.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 720 ✭✭✭DrGreenthumb


    My name is Kevin. When I am older I want to be a biscuit.


    Fitting choice, i bet you'll crumble under pressure though


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 57 ✭✭Mr. Remote Control


    CJ Haughey wrote: »
    Why settle for being a biscuit when you could be a cake. Dream big.

    Hmmmm. Yeah; yeah - I guess your right! Thanks!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,730 ✭✭✭Balmed Out


    Is a chocolate biscuit cake more cake or biscuit?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 57 ✭✭Mr. Remote Control


    Balmed Out wrote: »
    Is a chocolate biscuit cake more cake or biscuit?

    Moooooaar cake and biscuit!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,180 ✭✭✭hfallada


    Imagine trying to have functioning Dail if there was a unification of the 32 counties. Instead of discussing important economic matters. I have a feeling, there would be a lot of debating over **** like this. Like the only reason why this law is being proposed as its clearly the views of a sizeable minority of NI.

    How is that England is liberal and yet NI is so backwards. They both have Church of Ireland/Catholics. But their social views are literally polar opposites.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 2,922 ✭✭✭Egginacup


    osarusan wrote: »
    Some people in that part of the island really are stuck in the dark ages.

    Shouldn't they be bombed then, like the Russians and all Muslims?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 57 ✭✭Mr. Remote Control


    Moar cake!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 449 ✭✭CJ Haughey


    hfallada wrote: »

    How is that England is liberal and yet NI is so backwards.

    The backwards man has a strong voice up there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    hfallada wrote: »
    Imagine trying to have functioning Dail if there was a unification of the 32 counties. Instead of discussing important economic matters. I have a feeling, there would be a lot of debating over **** like this. Like the only reason why this law is being proposed as its clearly the views of a sizeable minority of NI.

    How is that England is liberal and yet NI is so backwards. They both have Church of Ireland/Catholics. But their social views are literally polar opposites.
    For many in the DUP, Anglican and Roman Catholic are more or less the same thing. Different demographic altogether.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭moxin


    Why don't ye say the obvious, the objections to equality come from Unionist reps not Nationalist or Alliance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,328 ✭✭✭conorh91


    hfallada wrote: »
    How is that England is liberal and yet NI is so backwards. They both have Church of Ireland/Catholics.
    NI is 60%+ Catholic and Presbyterian.

    Neither come from the English tradition.

    Only about 12% of Northern Ireland is Church of England (Ireland).

    The latter have a totally different ethos altogether to Presbyterians and Catholics


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 413 ✭✭postitnote


    The vocal crackpots up here are not representative of the rest of us. I am ashamed and appalled at the DUP and this 'Conscience' clause.

    Most of us prefer to keep our heads down and get on with life. It's these bigots that ruin it for everyone.

    I plead with everyone with an actual conscience to sign the petition and show these dinosaurs there's no place for their archaic views.

    https://go.allout.org/en/a/northern-ireland/?akid=4876.930814.Z_Tytv&rd=1&t=1&utm_campaign=northern-ireland&utm_content=english&utm_medium=email&utm_source=actionsuite


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭md23040


    hfallada wrote: »
    How is that England is liberal and yet NI is so backwards. They both have Church of Ireland/Catholics. But their social views are literally polar opposites.

    Not that I agree with this nonsense but why don't you go onto a Muslim cafe and demand a bacon buttie or else go into a kosher bakery and ask for a National Front style cake with a big swastika on it and see how far you get in Liberal UK or anywhere else for that matter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    O'Neill wrote: »
    The North is stuck behind no doubt about it, but are you seriously
    judging the entire population over this?

    Not the whole population just the large % who gave the DUP a vote.

    Unfortunately in a democracy you get the politicians you elect and in this case I think it's bringing NI's whole image abroad into disrepute
    This aspect of unionism is going to alienate itself from the UK as it seems to represent something totally "foreign" to modern British (and Irish) values.

    Are they planning a union with the US bible belt ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    I'd add on the plus side it removes NI as a serious competitor for FDI as with laws like that being proposed you'll make it very unattractive to companies wanting to recruit from abroad on areas like the IT sector, serious side of financial services, make it harder to recruit high level academics into universities etc etc etc

    So basically the DUP have just made Dublin, Cork, Galway and of course Glasgow, Edinburgh etc etc much more attractive.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,839 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    Anything that stops bitchy offence seekers from trumping up charges against hard working honest business people is fine with me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Herb Powell


    NI is fast becoming this island's equivalent of America's deep south.

    Becoming?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,151 ✭✭✭Daith


    padd b1975 wrote: »
    Anything that stops bitchy offence seekers from trumping up charges against hard working honest business people is fine with me.

    They're not honest business people if they're breaking equality laws when it comes to doing business.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,839 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    Daith wrote: »
    They're not honest business people if they're breaking equality laws when it comes to doing business.

    The law is clearly an ass given that such a thing as simply refusing business can create such a sh1testorm.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,151 ✭✭✭Daith


    padd b1975 wrote: »
    The law is clearly an ass given that such a thing as simply refusing business can create such a sh1testorm.

    Don't care. Calling them "honest" businessman is incorrect. You want to do business, operate a business, you follow the law.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    padd b1975 wrote: »
    The law is clearly an ass given that such a thing as simply refusing business can create such a sh1testorm.

    If you're in business why would you refuse business?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,275 ✭✭✭bpmurray


    padd b1975 wrote: »
    The law is clearly an ass given that such a thing as simply refusing business can create such a sh1testorm.
    If they were refused service because they were women or because they were black, would you think it was inappropriate then? What if because they had red hair? Or freckles?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,151 ✭✭✭Daith


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    If you're in business why would you refuse business?

    People can refuse business. The reason for refusing is the issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Daith wrote: »
    People can refuse business. The reason for refusing is the issue.

    List some valid reasons...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    List some valid reasons...

    'I don't like the look of you'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,839 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    If you're in business why would you refuse business?

    I wouldn't if at all possible.

    I would only refuse for purely practical reasons.

    Manpower, request not in my skillset, potential for job not to be profitable etc etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,586 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Its the unionists again, always the bloody unionists. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,151 ✭✭✭Daith


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    List some valid reasons...

    Sorry we can't fulfill that order.
    We are all booked up.
    We have no tables left.
    Members only.

    Saying we can't fulfill that order because you're a ****ing homo is different.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,839 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    Daith wrote: »

    Saying we can't fulfill that order because you're a ****ing homo is different.

    Incorrect.

    They disagreed with gay marriage, that is all.
    Don't think that should ever be considered a crime.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,402 ✭✭✭keeponhurling


    From the OP it seems to say the baker refused the cake cos it had a gay slogan, rather than because the customer was gay.

    The law doesn't seem that bad to me.

    The thread title "anti-gay legislation" also seems a bit misleading


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,151 ✭✭✭Daith


    padd b1975 wrote: »
    Incorrect.

    They disagreed with gay marriage, that is all.
    Don't think that should ever be considered a crime.

    I never said that's what the owners said. No need to put words in my mouth or jump to conclusions.

    The law doesn't seem that bad to me.

    The thread title "anti-gay legislation" also seems a bit misleading

    Hold on. The law they are talking about is a new law so you would be permitted to not to do business based on the sexuality of the customer. Not just slogans. That doesn't seem bad?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭md23040


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    List some valid reasons...

    Scenario - You are related to Alan Hennings, the British aid worker recently beheaded and you own a bakery. A bunch of Muslims come into your bakery and ask for a cake with an ISIS flag on it with the slogan Death to the West. Are you obliged to make that cake or should the full force of the law be used to pursue you?

    Or someone goes into Finglas bakery asks for a Union Jack cake with some derogatory anti-Irish or anti Catholic slogans. Neither of these things might be illegal under the terms of the law.

    Lets get this into context - someone went out of their way to be offended and knew the consequences. The Bakery didn't refuse to make them a cake on the grounds of their sexual orientation and where happy to bake the cake but not supply the slogan. They should be fully within their rights to refuse to not include any slogan - same as the above examples, or forcing a Muslim cafe to make you a bacon buttie even if you provide the bacon.

    The law will not be enacted because it is impossible to police something so subjective that can not be measured, but equally it is ridiculous the equality commission and PC brigade taking action. As said the laws as ass and other bakeries could consider the business.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,151 ✭✭✭Daith


    md23040 wrote: »
    Scenario - You are related to Alan Hennings, the British aid worker recently beheaded and you own a bakery. A bunch of Muslims come into your bakery and ask for a cake with an ISIS flag on it with the slogan Death to the West. Are you obliged to make that cake or should the full force of the law be used to pursue you?

    And the answer isn't to create a law that would mean you are free to discriminate against Muslims.

    The answer would be that business are not required to print slogans or messages they disagree with.

    It's quite an over reaction from the people behind the new bill.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,824 ✭✭✭floggg


    md23040 wrote: »
    Scenario - You are related to Alan Hennings, the British aid worker recently beheaded and you own a bakery. A bunch of Muslims come into your bakery and ask for a cake with an ISIS flag on it with the slogan Death to the West. Are you obliged to make that cake or should the full force of the law be used to pursue you?

    Or someone goes into Finglas bakery asks for a Union Jack cake with some derogatory anti-Irish or anti Catholic slogans. Neither of these things might be illegal under the terms of the law.

    Lets get this into context - someone went out of their way to be offended and knew the consequences. The Bakery didn't refuse to make them a cake on the grounds of their sexual orientation and where happy to bake the cake but not supply the slogan. They should be fully within their rights to refuse to not include any slogan - same as the above examples, or forcing a Muslim cafe to make you a bacon buttie even if you provide the bacon.

    The law will not be enacted because it is impossible to police something so subjective that can not be measured, but equally it is ridiculous the equality commission and PC brigade taking action. As said the laws as ass and other bakeries could consider the business.

    Depends. If you were happily make cakes wishing death to other people's or ethnic groups you could well have a problem. You'd need to have a clear and objective policy setting out what death cakes are and aren't acceptable which was applied equally and consistently, and show that the decision was one that wasn't based on race, religion or political* views.

    If however you had a general policy against death cakes applied equally to all then you wouldn't have any problem.

    Of course, actually considering what the law requires isn't half as much fun as coming up with far fetched and absurd scenarios. Pretty sure ISIS members in NI aren't dumb enough to actually order ISIS themes death cakes. Seems the quickest way to get on a terrorism watch list I can possibly think of.


    * I belive NI legislation covers discrimination on grounds of political views (which is prudent given the divisive political history there).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,647 ✭✭✭lazybones32


    Nobody will let them eat cake...so we need a Revolution!


    Didn't realise that Ashers were the only bakery in Belfast. It's not like this could be a specific target case...I'm sure that man/group has no specific agenda other than Justice.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,299 ✭✭✭spiralism


    The DUP in NI are by a distance the most far right party with any semblance of power in Europe, or anywhere i can think of from the top of my head for that matter. They'd make Nigel Farage cringe. Ideologically at the very least on a par with the likes of the BNP, Front National or PVV if not worse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,151 ✭✭✭Daith


    Didn't realise that Ashers were the only bakery in Belfast. It's not like this could be a specific target case

    Once again, the only victims of homophobia are the homophobes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 663 ✭✭✭FairytaleGirl


    But if I were to pass it would mean taking a huge step backwards for equality. It's cake now, it could be refusing me and my girlfriend a double room (or a room at all) in a hotel next week, or refusing to lease us a one bedroom apartment next month
    Etc etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭Uncle Ruckus


    hfallada wrote: »
    How is that England is liberal and yet NI is so backwards. They both have Church of Ireland/Catholics. But their social views are literally polar opposites.

    Most of the Protestants in N.I. are not Church of Ireland/England. They are Presbyterians/ Scottish dissenters. They take the bible literally and super serious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,299 ✭✭✭spiralism


    But if I were to pass it would mean taking a huge step backwards for equality. It's cake now, it could be refusing me and my girlfriend a double room (or a room at all) in a hotel next week, or refusing to lease us a one bedroom apartment next month
    Etc etc

    This is the main issue. It legally would allow a bar to put up a sign saying "no gays" for example


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,824 ✭✭✭floggg


    But if I were to pass it would mean taking a huge step backwards for equality. It's cake now, it could be refusing me and my girlfriend a double room (or a room at all) in a hotel next week, or refusing to lease us a one bedroom apartment next month
    Etc etc

    Or medical treatment...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,839 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    Daith wrote: »
    Once again, the only victims of homophobia are the homophobes.

    Having someone express the view they don't agree with gay marriage is homophobia??

    Jesus Christ!!!
    That term is so diluted and misused now, it's almost meaningless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,038 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    padd b1975 wrote: »
    Having someone express the view they don't agree with gay marriage is homophobia??

    Jesus Christ!!!
    That term is so diluted and misused now, it's almost meaningless.

    Well, I suppose your kind are trying anything to make yourselves feel better. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭arayess


    But if I were to pass it would mean taking a huge step backwards for equality. It's cake now, it could be refusing me and my girlfriend a double room (or a room at all) in a hotel next week, or refusing to lease us a one bedroom apartment next month
    Etc etc


    my neighbour is an old woman who has bedsits and refuses to let to unmarried couples.
    It has never caused a row people just move on.

    Taking her to court would be a travesty fo justice , she wants a certain (misguided imo ) level of decorum in her establishment (paid for by her earnings) I really don't see why people are going bananas over stuff like this.

    People getting upset over others not approving of this lifestyle is sensitive in the extreme .
    Yes you shouldn't abused over it or discriminated by state services.
    But if a shop doesn't want to make gay slogans so be it, go to the next one.

    Why this forcing of acceptance on people and not just leave them to it which is want I always understood gay people wanted anyway - to be left carry on living their lives. Why the desire to enforce that on people who would rather not get involved and want to be left alone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,446 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Daith wrote: »
    Hold on. The law they are talking about is a new law so you would be permitted to not to do business based on the sexuality of the customer. Not just slogans. That doesn't seem bad?


    No, that's not what the law is about at all. The 'conscience clause' being proposed is that nobody should be made to conduct their business in a manner in which they have an objection to, based on their religious beliefs. That's a good thing for some people, and a bad thing for other people. It just depends upon which side of the fence you're on.

    Personally I don't see any compelling reason to force a business owner to act in a manner which contravenes their religious beliefs, it's got nothing to do with equality, and more to do with how businesses which provide a service to the public are regulated.

    If a business refuses to offer their services to a person for any reason, that's an inconvenience to the person, granted, but there are many other service providers willing to provide their services to that person. The equality laws should only apply to employers and employees IMO, and who they choose to provide their services to should be their own business.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement