Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Wolf Hall [BBC]

  • 06-02-2015 11:41pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭


    Is anyone else watching this? An adaptation of Hilary Mantels books about the period when Henry 8th broke with Rome.

    Fascinating and a lavish production.

    Remarkable performance too by Mark Rylance as Thomas Cromwell (who was no relation to Oliver).



Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Yep I'm watching having not read the Mantel books. Very good, everyone is top notch esp Rylance who seems to have been born with the demeanour of a subtle 16th century schemer! The lighting is esp impressive - we've come along way from Barry Lyndon which required Kodak and Zeiss to develop better technology so the candle lit scenes could be filmed.

    The use of language in such a drama is interesting - they have kept with Mantels approach which is to use terms, idioms etc which are essentially modern whereas Ripper Street decided to go with genuine late Victorian English which although only 120-125 years ago sounds quite different. I suppose if everyone was "forsaking and forsoothing" it would be quite hard going,


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭SaveOurLyric


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    Remarkable performance too by Mark Rylance as Thomas Cromwell (who was no relation to Oliver).

    What's remarkable about it ? A complete expressionless blank for me and a total non event at the heart of it that sinks the series. His expressions span the range from wan to woebegone.
    3rd ep was a bit better than the first two but still no great shakes.
    British press seems to have decreed the series a masterpiece almost before it aired at at all, and none are prepared to call out the emperor's new clothes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    Mark Rylance is the Greatest Stage Actor Of His Generation. Oo say those that know these things. Personally, he makes Pat Kenny seem charismatic. He is a letdown in this just as in anything else I've ever seen him in. Damien Lewis is enjoying himself playing Henry though. I keep expecting Claire Danes to show up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭Wyldwood


    I think Rylance is portraying Cromwell very well based on the way he is described by Mantel in the books. She depicts him as a character who doesn't display emotions, even after he has become embittered by the goings-on in the Royal Courts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    Remarkable performance too by Mark Rylance as Thomas Cromwell (who was no relation to Oliver).

    Yes he was. Thomas was Oliver's great, great gran-uncle.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,185 ✭✭✭Snoopy1


    Well im really liking the show, and I think Cromwell is very good


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 148 ✭✭changepartners


    Nice to see a subtle Henry VIII performance!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Best thing on the box, it seems some were expecting a Tudors style tit and ass version of history rather than something made in the grand tradition of BBC Two historical dramas, well more fool them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    Best thing on the box, it seems some were expecting a Tudors style tit and ass version of history rather than something made in the grand tradition of BBC Two historical dramas, well more fool them.

    I was expecting something along the lines of The Godfather - which is exactly how twisted and murderous that period of history was. Anyone who has read serious non-fictional histories of the Tudor period knows it would be almost impossible to make it boring. We were wrong. It is possible.
    I wasn't expecting the leading characters to be barely awake. Rylance is asleep as he always is when challenged by a camera. Thomas More has the charisma of a yardbrush. Damien Lewis is playing Les Battersby excellently. It's hemorrhaging viewers weekly and deservedly so.
    This is no I, Claudius or Jewel In the Crown. Yawn With The Frown more likely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 112 ✭✭The Pooka


    I was expecting something along the lines of The Godfather - which is exactly how twisted and murderous that period of history was. Anyone who has read serious non-fictional histories of the Tudor period knows it would be almost impossible to make it boring. We were wrong. It is possible.
    I wasn't expecting the leading characters to be barely awake. Rylance is asleep as he always is when challenged by a camera. Thomas More has the charisma of a yardbrush. Damien Lewis is playing Les Battersby excellently. It's hemorrhaging viewers weekly and deservedly so.
    This is no I, Claudius or Jewel In the Crown. Yawn With The Frown more likely.

    Ouch! Can't say I agree with any of that - I find it's like watching a mini-Shakespeare play every week.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 148 ✭✭changepartners


    It's not great but it's better than some recent BBC attempts at historical drama much better than the Wars of the Roses one they did last year.

    If you want a brilliantly done historical series look up Les Rois Maudits from the '70s on YouTube, someone has put it up with English subtitles. It's not that tons happens in the show but thanks to the actors and pacing it isn't boring for 1 second.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭queensinead


    I'm enjoying it...great nuanced acting and lovely sets, but without Mantel's voice and prose it's missing something that the novel had

    For action packed drama and ham acting you can't beat the 1969 film Anne Of The Thousand Days with a swashbuckling Richard Burton playing a brilliant, over-the-top Henry, and the French Canadian actress Genevieve Bujold playing a pert, minx-like Anne Boleyn

    The BBC did a series called Elizabeth R in the 1970s with Glenda Jackson playing Elizabeth 1. It was the best period drama I ever saw--superb, brilliant acting from Jackson who owned the part..

    I still think I, Claudius, Brideshead Revisited and The Jewel In The Crown were outstanding in a way modern mini-series never seem to be

    Wolf Hall is good, but on a much, much smaller scale


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭queensinead


    I'm enjoying it...great nuanced acting and lovely sets, but without Mantel's voice and prose it's missing something that the novel had

    For action packed drama and ham acting you can't beat the 1969 film Anne Of The Thousand Days with a swashbuckling Richard Burton playing a brilliant, over-the-top Henry, and the French Canadian actress Genevieve Bujold playing a pert, minx-like Anne Boleyn

    The BBC did a series called Elizabeth R in the 1970s with Glenda Jackson playing Elizabeth 1. It was the best period drama I ever saw--superb, brilliant acting from Jackson who owned the part..

    I still think I, Claudius, Brideshead Revisited and The Jewel In The Crown were outstanding in a way modern mini-series never seem to be

    Wolf Hall is good, but on a much, much smaller scale


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    ^ Watch A Man for All Seasons.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060665/

    Paul Scofield as More, Robert Shaw as Henry. Written by Robert Bolt. Better actors. Better writer. You won't need anything to help you stay awake.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    I have no idea why you are having such problems staying awake, if its that bad don't watch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    I have no idea why you are having such problems staying awake, if its that bad don't watch.

    I'm implying its boring. I watch because I'm entitled to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,383 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    I'm implying its boring. I watch because I'm entitled to.

    Of course you're entitled to watch something that bores you :rolleyes:

    Anyway, I think it's great.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,115 ✭✭✭Expunge


    I'm enjoying it too, looks like the Beeb spent a nice few pound on it.

    It seems to have become a ratings flop, loosing a million viewers or a quarter of the audience after episode one.

    AA Gill in the Sunday Times reckoned it's typical Notting Hill 'Tristram types', as he calls them, BBC executives commissioning for themselves and not for the public.

    Might be unfair, but loosing a quarter of the audience is no joke.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Hardly matters with programmes like this - the media likes to make a noise but its getting 3 million viewers live since episode 2 and 4 million after a week. Prestige drama sells to every corner of the globe and will shift big units on DVD etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,246 ✭✭✭Good loser


    I think it's excellent through and through.

    The menace and tension at the centre of power excellently portrayed - lives constantly at risk!

    Henry's character well fleshed out.

    Love the natural lighting and settings.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    That French bird needs knocking off. :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Wolf Hall the most watched BBC Two drama since current ratings system began in 2002

    http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2015/mar/06/wolf-hall-is-bbc2s-most-popular-drama-since-modern-ratings-began-in-2002
    The six-part series, starring Mark Rylance as Thomas Cromwell, Damian Lewis as Henry VIII and Claire Foy as Anne Boleyn, had an average of 4.4 million viewers a week, a 15.8% share of the audience.

    It was just ahead of the channel’s previous biggest rating drama, its 2002 adaptation of Sarah Waters’ Tipping the Velvet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    Wolf Hall the most watched BBC Two drama since current ratings system began in 2002

    http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2015/mar/06/wolf-hall-is-bbc2s-most-popular-drama-since-modern-ratings-began-in-2002

    It was...but still only half the viewers of Death In Paradise (BBC1) or Call The Midwife (ITV). I wonder why the BBC didn't air it on BBC1.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭SaveOurLyric


    It was...but still only half the viewers of Death In Paradise (BBC1) or Call The Midwife (ITV). I wonder why the BBC didn't air it on BBC1.

    Cus then it wouldn't get headlines like " the most watched BBC Two drama since current ratings system began in 2002".
    Missed trick though, could have put it on BBC 4. Might have been 'the most watched BBC4 drama EVER!'. Which would have made it even better.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    It was...but still only half the viewers of Death In Paradise (BBC1) or Call The Midwife (ITV). I wonder why the BBC didn't air it on BBC1.

    Because it was commissioned for BBC Two, in the same way Call the Midwife was commissioned for BBC One. You appear not to have much understanding of how this sort of thing works. Stations have identities which while sometime a bit loose and too flexible tend to stand a channel in good stead. Dramas on BBC Two tend to be a bit more complex and darker (not literally!) in tone - hence stuff like The Fall, BBC One shows Death in Paradise and New Tricks (though the latter could delve into the grubby undergrowth it tended to be leavened by humour).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    Plenty of shows have been commissioned for one of the Beebs and subsequently moved to another. Some start out on BBC3 / BBC4 before getting promoted to one of the two main channels (Torchwood started on BBC3 as a Dr. Who spin-off). Similarly, demotions occur. Although with the imminent moving of BBC 3 to online only this route will be closed off to programmes "suitable for a younger audience".
    4.5m is respectable enough (it stayed consistent after the initial fall-off in live viewers) for Wolf Hall but they could have aired on the larger channel on the mainly dead Tuesday night and probably increased that to 6m.


Advertisement