Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact [email protected]

Eastenders [News, Spoilers and Discussion - from Feb 2015]

15681011347

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭Zippie84


    no. thats not how numbers work where i live anyway! otherwise there would be no privacy in the world!!!

    yep plus people / businesses move and take their numbers with them, also can depend on the phone provider setting up the phone number etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭Zippie84


    Ahmmmm..... yes?

    No, I was just clutching at straws.

    Thing is though, if it's a land line number Emma knew their mobile number too because she sent them that text. Narrows it down a bit?

    Yep I think there must be some significance in the fact that it's a landline rather than a mobile.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,142 ✭✭✭Katgurl


    when Lauren took the post-it from her shoe why did she go straight under the couch and take that file out? did she know it was there? is it hers? if so, why wasn't she keeping it in her room?


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,902 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    Katgurl wrote: »
    when Lauren took the post-it from her shoe why did she go straight under the couch and take that file out? did she know it was there? is it hers? if so, why wasn't she keeping it in her room?

    It wasn't a post it, it was the ripped corner of the page she already had.

    I'm not trying to be rude but were you paying attention at all? She was looking at the files when Max came home unexpectedly so she shoved them under the couch before he saw them. She hadn't gotten a chance to move them again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭Zippie84


    Looks more like an 8 to me? 8 O'clock? Maybe?

    Yep. I think the number is 0207 946 0221.

    Too many digits otherwise, and SOC would make sense.

    Here's an example of a format of a London number.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭Zippie84


    Yep, 0207 946 0221

    020 7946 0221 is a fictitious telephone number in the 020 dialling code.

    A fictitious number is one assigned for use by film and TV programme makers, so that they can have a valid-looking telephone number appropriate to the area in which the scene is set (for example, when someone in screen needs to be seen dialling a number, or looking up a number in a directory) without needing to use a number that may possibly belong to a real user.

    - See more at: http://www.telephonecodes.info/number/02079460221#sthash.3qTbcq7q.dpuf

    Guess at least that stops this type of thing: http://www.listandalucia.com/news/news-uk/mobile-phone-number-shown-on-eastenders-receives-2800-texts/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,573 ✭✭✭emanresu esrever


    Looks more like an 8 to me? 8 O'clock? Maybe?

    no definitely not 8 o clock, she evidently uses the digit form to script time, ie 8.00 or 8.30...... why would she suddenly use that terminology. ....

    lucy was on the bus at 8.00 anyway........


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,902 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    Zippie84 wrote: »
    Yep, 0207 946 0221

    020 7946 0221 is a fictitious telephone number in the 020 dialling code.

    A fictitious number is one assigned for use by film and TV programme makers, so that they can have a valid-looking telephone number appropriate to the area in which the scene is set (for example, when someone in screen needs to be seen dialling a number, or looking up a number in a directory) without needing to use a number that may possibly belong to a real user.

    - See more at: http://www.telephonecodes.info/number/02079460221#sthash.3qTbcq7q.dpuf

    It's the British equivalent of the 555 phone numbers in America.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,573 ✭✭✭emanresu esrever


    It wasn't a post it, it was the ripped corner of the page she already had.

    I'm not trying to be rude but were you paying attention at all? She was looking at the files when Max came home unexpectedly so she shoved them under the couch before he saw them. She hadn't gotten a chance to move them again.

    bit harsh!! maybe she/he missed it! lets not fight, noone died.....................oh wait, they did...........


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,902 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    bit harsh!! maybe she/he missed it! lets not fight, noone died.....................oh wait, they did...........

    Lauren's had those files for weeks, we've seen them before, we know she's missing a bit from them, we know it's under the press in the kitchen, we know it's stuck to her shoe etc. etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,573 ✭✭✭emanresu esrever


    Zippie84 wrote: »
    Yep, 0207 946 0221

    020 7946 0221 is a fictitious telephone number in the 020 dialling code.

    A fictitious number is one assigned for use by film and TV programme makers, so that they can have a valid-looking telephone number appropriate to the area in which the scene is set (for example, when someone in screen needs to be seen dialling a number, or looking up a number in a directory) without needing to use a number that may possibly belong to a real user.

    - See more at: http://www.telephonecodes.info/number/02079460221#sthash.3qTbcq7q.dpuf

    Guess at least that stops this type of thing: http://www.listandalucia.com/news/news-uk/mobile-phone-number-shown-on-eastenders-receives-2800-texts/


    a fictitious number used in a fictitious soap!!!:eek: i never!! the plot thickens! :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭Zippie84


    a fictitious number used in a fictitious soap!!!:eek: i never!! the plot thickens! :p

    who would've thought eh...?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,573 ✭✭✭emanresu esrever


    Lauren's had those files for weeks, we've seen them before, we know she's missing a bit from them, we know it's under the press in the kitchen, we know it's stuck to her shoe etc. etc.

    eh, i knew , you knew but i dont think its the end of the world if the other poster didnt know!! anyway, there is a crime to be solved!


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    Aargh for the first time in a long time I've been looking forward to EE lately...go to turn it on then remember it's not on tonight!! :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 828 ✭✭✭dogcat


    It wasn't the number of Mitchell Autos either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,573 ✭✭✭emanresu esrever


    dogcat wrote: »
    It wasn't the number of Mitchell Autos either.

    mitchell autos is the arches. i already covered that. i hope the number wasnt just plucked out of the air and has been on screen before......

    "doesnt add up"...... perhaps someone gave their wrong number to emma and she couldnt account for one of the numbers that was on her phone log. perhaps one of the voicemails she received was from someone who doesnt live in the house it was called from.......


  • Registered Users Posts: 828 ✭✭✭dogcat


    mitchell autos is the arches. i already covered that. i hope the number wasnt just plucked out of the air and has been on screen before......

    "doesnt add up"...... perhaps someone gave their wrong number to emma and she couldnt account for one of the numbers that was on her phone log. perhaps one of the voicemails she received was from someone who doesnt live in the house it was called from.......
    Sorry, I rarely watched Eastenders until January lol.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,573 ✭✭✭emanresu esrever


    dogcat wrote: »
    Sorry, I rarely watched Eastenders until January lol.

    christ npt the easiest time to start watching it with all thats going on!


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,534 ✭✭✭KKkitty


    None of us know who killed Lucy yet but is there anyone who ye wouldn't like it to be? I personally don't want it to be Peter. I'm not sure I want her twin to be the culprit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,186 ✭✭✭✭IvySlayer


    Abi, Lee, Whitney, Jay and Ben I wouldn't mind seeing leave, so one of them


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,902 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    KKkitty wrote: »
    None of us know who killed Lucy yet but is there anyone who ye wouldn't like it to be? I personally don't want it to be Peter. I'm not sure I want her twin to be the culprit.

    I think I said before that given how things played out after the murder I didn't want it to be Lauren or Peter. I thought there was some really great scenes between them immediately after Lucy's death and to have it turn out to be one of them would ruin all that. By now we can rule Lauren out, I assume, but I still hope it's not Peter.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,534 ✭✭✭KKkitty


    I think I said before that given how things played out after the murder I didn't want it to be Lauren or Peter. I thought there was some really great scenes between them immediately after Lucy's death and to have it turn out to be one of them would ruin all that. By now we can rule Lauren out, I assume, but I still hope it's not Peter.

    If it was Peter it wouldn't sit well with me. Hope it's not Lee either. Carters have enough storylines at the moment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,328 ✭✭✭✭starlit


    I think it be a bit weird if it were Peter. Based on his behaviour its possible but can't see it being him.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,902 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    doovdela wrote: »
    I think it be a bit weird if it were Peter. Based on his behaviour its possible but can't see it being him.

    I think the fact that there are pictures of Jay and Peter filming for the flashback episodes would rule them out? They've been very good at keeping things under wrap all year so it seems too convenient that those pics got out. Although they could be double bluffing us?


  • Registered Users Posts: 109 ✭✭tommer


    I reckon it's denise


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭danois


    Just spotted this on Facebook.




  • danois wrote: »
    Just spotted this on Facebook.

    Nice find




  • So Martin was just a cameo so ?

    Also full anniversary confirmed details over the football

    TUESDAY 17th FEBRUARY at 7.30pm: EastEnders (30’) with live inserts

    WEDNESDAY 18th FEBRUARY at 8pm: EastEnders (30’) with live inserts

    THURSDAY 19th FEBRUARY at 7.30pm: EastEnders (60’) with live inserts

    THURSDAY at 9.30pm Flashback episode (30’) with live inserts

    FRIDAY 20th FEBRUARY at 8pm: EastEnders fully live episode (30’)

    Holly Crap 90 Minutes EE on Thursday the 19th :D

    Ill be boiling the kettle a few times so


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 23,902 Mod ✭✭✭✭TICKLE_ME_ELMO


    danois wrote: »
    Just spotted this on Facebook.

    Forgive me, it's late and I'm drunk but..... it's not the same phone number, is it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 802 ✭✭✭KingJamsie


    How can there be another 2 weeks?? Ugh.

    Was just reading over old threads about "Who killed Archie?"
    Back in the day Stacy was 20/1...so wondering will they go with someone
    Considered an outsider again


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement