Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Sky picture edges off screen

  • 08-11-2014 1:26pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,261 ✭✭✭


    We have Sky multiroom here in the house with a mix of different Sky boxes (HD, Sky+, old white boxes).

    On the televisions with the old white boxes, the picture is marginally off the edges. The format is set correctly to 16:9 and the different zoom options on the televisions don't make it any better.

    Has anybody seen this before? Is it the Sky box? I don't particularly want to pay for an Sky engineer to come out for €100 and then start quoting for new, considering these boxes worked correctly for years.

    327742.jpg

    5/6 a side football

    Coolmine Sports Centre - Wednesdays - 8pm

    PM me for a game

    Thread



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,678 ✭✭✭swoofer


    i wonder have you chnaged from rgb output to pal on sky box, post a picture of the settings?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,490 ✭✭✭pegasus1


    on our main tv -panasonic..we have overscan...means you can see the full pic if switched off, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overscan

    only on some stations you see some edge atifacts when showing whats on next stuff etc...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭winston_1


    kenon wrote: »
    Is it the Sky box? I don't particularly want to pay for an Sky engineer to come out for €100 and then start quoting for new, considering these boxes worked correctly for years.

    You won't because sky don't use engineers for this. You might pay for one of their installers though.

    Looks like a case of box set to 4:3 and TV set to 16:9.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,547 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    winston_1 wrote: »
    You won't because sky don't use engineers for this. You might pay for one of their installers though.
    Sky staff always refer to them as engineers so that's good enough for me.

    Would your time not be better spent taking this matter up with Sky rather then pissing off people on a regular basis in this forum with your pedantic comments?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,261 ✭✭✭kenon


    Settings on the Sky box have never changed. The picture used to be fine, but one day I started noticing the edges were off the screen.

    327851.jpg

    Changing from PAL to RGB made no difference to the edges. I have tried changing the picture related settings on the TV to no avail.

    327852.jpg

    I have sent pictures like these to Sky but they never looked at them. Just asked me if I wanted an engineer for €100. I thought that it might have been a system change made by Sky but then I would have expected more people to have been affected.

    5/6 a side football

    Coolmine Sports Centre - Wednesdays - 8pm

    PM me for a game

    Thread



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭winston_1


    muffler wrote: »
    Sky staff always refer to them as engineers so that's good enough for me.

    Would your time not be better spent taking this matter up with Sky rather then pissing off people on a regular basis in this forum with your pedantic comments?

    Sky are wrong and so are you. In many countries it is illegal to call someone who does not have the relavent professional qualifications an engineer.

    I advised the OP of his mistake and also suggested what was wrong with his setup. That is what forums are for. He has not said he is pissed off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭greasepalm


    i would recheck setting on tv is it also setup for 16.9?dont have a skybox but one setting does make picture go off screen and its not on zoom panasonic also i have.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 366 ✭✭Mayo Yid


    Need the tv remote, it's the zoom button. Nothing wrong, just over scanning


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 611 ✭✭✭jay1988


    winston_1 wrote: »
    Sky are wrong and so are you. In many countries it is illegal to call someone who does not have the relavent professional qualifications an engineer.

    I advised the OP of his mistake and also suggested what was wrong with his setup. That is what forums are for. He has not said he is pissed off.

    Why does it bother you so much? Surely it's not that big of a deal for you to repeatedly post about it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭winston_1


    jay1988 wrote: »
    Why does it bother you so much? Surely it's not that big of a deal for you to repeatedly post about it?

    It is wrong. One purpose of forums is to help posters correct their mistakes.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,547 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    winston_1 wrote: »
    It is wrong. One purpose of forums is to help posters correct their mistakes.
    This is the satellite forum, not the grammar nazi forum


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,547 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    winston_1 wrote: »
    It is wrong. One purpose of forums is to help posters correct their mistakes.
    This is the satellite forum, not the English grammar forum. When you work out the difference perhaps your posts may become helpful although I wont hold my breath.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭winston_1


    muffler wrote: »
    This is the satellite forum, not the grammar nazi forum

    Sky are a satellite broadcaster. Sky are misusing a professional qualification. Nothing to do with grammar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,547 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    winston_1 wrote: »
    Sky are a satellite broadcaster. Sky are misusing a professional qualification. Nothing to do with grammar.
    As I said take it up with Sky please and stop spoiling threads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭winston_1


    muffler wrote: »
    As I said take it up with Sky please and stop spoiling threads.

    How, pray, is explaining people mistakes spoiling threads?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,015 ✭✭✭Ludo


    winston_1 wrote: »
    Sky are wrong and so are you. In many countries it is illegal to call someone who does not have the relavent professional qualifications an engineer.

    I advised the OP of his mistake and also suggested what was wrong with his setup. That is what forums are for. He has not said he is pissed off.

    Actually, you are the one that is wrong. Engineer is NOT a protected term in the UK so they can call it whatever the hell they want. You wanting it to be protected and it actually being protected are 2 different things. Get over yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 384 ✭✭durtybit


    Had the same issue myself.. overscan on the TV settings (as already stated) . Have a play around on the settings on the TV not the skybox


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,261 ✭✭✭kenon


    The TV and the Sky box are both set to 16:9, as it has been for years. None of the other picture formats on the TVs correct the issue. It's only in the last few months did the edges disappeared. The only common denominator in the issue is the old white Sky boxes. I think I will have to bite the bullet and get a Sky engineer out to look at it.

    5/6 a side football

    Coolmine Sports Centre - Wednesdays - 8pm

    PM me for a game

    Thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,678 ✭✭✭swoofer


    are these boxes very old? and what is the make? I take it you are using scart leads, did you switch them etc? I have a new samsung lcd tv and the picture is wider via scart than hdmi!! If sky charge 100 euro it would be cheaper to buy second hand. And are they sd boxes?

    Also can you prove its not the tv's ie plug in the newest box. I have a few boxes that I could look at and see if its a new software glitch? what are the makes/models of the TV's ? ie do they have HDMI inputs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,261 ✭✭✭kenon


    They are the SD boxes.

    sky-box-Large.jpg

    I was thinking about buying second hand Sky+ boxes as we don't have a problem with that one.

    One of the boxes plugs into a new Samsung flat screen. The other one plugs into an older flat screen telly (I can't remember the make). Both TV connect via scart. Both televisions have HDMI connections. I have plugged in a Sky+ box into one of the televisions and the picture was perfect. The problem follows the standard boxes.

    5/6 a side football

    Coolmine Sports Centre - Wednesdays - 8pm

    PM me for a game

    Thread



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭winston_1


    kenon wrote: »
    The TV and the Sky box are both set to 16:9, as it has been for years. None of the other picture formats on the TVs correct the issue. It's only in the last few months did the edges disappeared. The only common denominator in the issue is the old white Sky boxes. I think I will have to bite the bullet and get a Sky engineer out to look at it.

    Once again. Sky DO NOT use engineers. You will get an installer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭winston_1


    Ludo wrote: »
    Actually, you are the one that is wrong. Engineer is NOT a protected term in the UK so they can call it whatever the hell they want. You wanting it to be protected and it actually being protected are 2 different things. Get over yourself.

    Read my post. I never said engineer is a protected term in the UK. I said it was illegal to call someone without the relavent professional qualifications an engineer in many countries. The people sky use for installations are not engineers. They have minimal ladder training and how to align a dish. Give them a complex problem to install and they are completely lost.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,683 ✭✭✭Kensington


    kenon wrote: »
    The TV and the Sky box are both set to 16:9, as it has been for years. None of the other picture formats on the TVs correct the issue. It's only in the last few months did the edges disappeared. The only common denominator in the issue is the old white Sky boxes. I think I will have to bite the bullet and get a Sky engineer out to look at it.

    The reason as mentioned is "overscan".

    Up until a few months ago Sky adhered to the overscan "safe" area of the picture, essentially lines of the image that weren't intended to be shown on your screen. Sky only transmitted their picture within this safe area, whether it be on their HD or SD channel.

    (You probably saw in the past - and on some SD-only channels will still see - black borders or strange patterns at the extreme edges of the screen on HD TVs connected to a HD box over HDMI, primarily the top of the image. What you were seeing was this overscan area.)

    With their recent push to HD, which does away with the whole concept of overscan (technically the move to digital broadcasting did too - but Sky transmitted an "analogue safe" image within the DVB picture) they're now transmitting native 1:1 pixel mapping and filling the entire screen with the video image. Particularly evident on Sky Sports News HQ because they're trying to fit so much visible information onto the screen.

    This isn't a problem when you're running a HD box, to a HD TV, with HDMI, because it assumes you want a full 1:1 pixel rendition of the image arriving in. Therefore you see the full image right to the last pixel line at each edge of the screen.

    When you're running on SCART or any other analogue based connection though, your TV is assuming it should (correctly) compensate for overscan and chops off the extreme edges of the picture, as otherwise you'll see the VBI dots at the top of the screen amongst other "junk". Problem now is because sky no longer transmit the image allowing for overscan, your TV is visibly chopping off each edge of the picture.

    Note that your SD box is still sending the entire image to your TV over SCART, it's not the STB per se.
    Some TVs will allow you display this entire image - overscan and all - over SCART but from the sounds of your case, your TV doesn't have this option available.

    Your only choice will be to replace your TV with a model that allows the display of overscan on SCART, or replace your SD boxes with a HD box and feed the TV over HDMI instead. For any of the TVs that do not have any HDMI, then there is no way of overcoming this problem no matter what box you're using, bar convincing Sky to switch back to adhering to the overscan area (highly unlikely given they are pushing very hard to move everyone to HD).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,261 ✭✭✭kenon


    Kensington wrote: »
    The reason as mentioned is "overscan".

    Up until a few months ago Sky adhered to the overscan "safe" area of the picture, essentially lines of the image that weren't intended to be shown on your screen. Sky only transmitted their picture within this safe area, whether it be on their HD or SD channel.

    (You probably saw in the past - and on some SD-only channels will still see - black borders or strange patterns at the extreme edges of the screen on HD TVs connected to a HD box over HDMI, primarily the top of the image. What you were seeing was this overscan area.)

    With their recent push to HD, which does away with the whole concept of overscan (technically the move to digital broadcasting did too - but Sky transmitted an "analogue safe" image within the DVB picture) they're now transmitting native 1:1 pixel mapping and filling the entire screen with the video image. Particularly evident on Sky Sports News HQ because they're trying to fit so much visible information onto the screen.

    This isn't a problem when you're running a HD box, to a HD TV, with HDMI, because it assumes you want a full 1:1 pixel rendition of the image arriving in. Therefore you see the full image right to the last pixel line at each edge of the screen.

    When you're running on SCART or any other analogue based connection though, your TV is assuming it should (correctly) compensate for overscan and chops off the extreme edges of the picture, as otherwise you'll see the VBI dots at the top of the screen amongst other "junk". Problem now is because sky no longer transmit the image allowing for overscan, your TV is visibly chopping off each edge of the picture.

    Note that your SD box is still sending the entire image to your TV over SCART, it's not the STB per se.
    Some TVs will allow you display this entire image - overscan and all - over SCART but from the sounds of your case, your TV doesn't have this option available.

    Your only choice will be to replace your TV with a model that allows the display of overscan on SCART, or replace your SD boxes with a HD box and feed the TV over HDMI instead. For any of the TVs that do not have any HDMI, then there is no way of overcoming this problem no matter what box you're using, bar convincing Sky to switch back to adhering to the overscan area (highly unlikely given they are pushing very hard to move everyone to HD).
    Great post, thank you.

    5/6 a side football

    Coolmine Sports Centre - Wednesdays - 8pm

    PM me for a game

    Thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,678 ✭✭✭swoofer


    and look on adverts ie for amstrad hd + boxes, at least with a bit of perseverance we got the answer and learnt something new. You could sell those sd boxes as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,261 ✭✭✭kenon


    swoofer wrote: »
    and look on adverts ie for amstrad hd + boxes, at least with a bit of perseverance we got the answer and learnt something new. You could sell those sd boxes as well.
    Hehe, I went straight onto Adverts after Kensington's post and I am picking up a HD box today after work.

    I am much happier getting two second hand HD boxes than getting a Sky engineer out for €100 + whatever the new boxes would cost.

    5/6 a side football

    Coolmine Sports Centre - Wednesdays - 8pm

    PM me for a game

    Thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,490 ✭✭✭pegasus1


    Kensington wrote: »
    This isn't a problem when you're running a HD box, to a HD TV, with HDMI, because it assumes you want a full 1:1 pixel rendition of the image arriving in. Therefore you see the full image right to the last pixel line at each edge of the screen.

    Even with a Hd Tv with overscan settings and a Hd box you will on some channels gets some VBI dots and other junk..when they display whats next to show and promotional stuff after ad breaks..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 611 ✭✭✭jay1988


    winston_1 wrote: »
    Read my post. I never said engineer is a protected term in the UK. I said it was illegal to call someone without the relavent professional qualifications an engineer in many countries. The people sky use for installations are not engineers. They have minimal ladder training and how to align a dish. Give them a complex problem to install and they are completely lost.

    Are Ireland or the UK in that group of many countries? If not I really don't see the issue with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭winston_1


    kenon wrote: »

    I am much happier getting two second hand HD boxes than getting a Sky engineer out for €100 + whatever the new boxes would cost.

    How many times does it have to be said? Sky DO NOT use engineers for this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭winston_1


    jay1988 wrote: »
    Are Ireland or the UK in that group of many countries? If not I really don't see the issue with it.

    No, but that does mean it is not wrong. Sky are misleading their customers and insulting those that have gained the relavent professional qualifications.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,261 ✭✭✭kenon


    Update: Bought a second hand Sky HD box, got my old card paired to the box and now the picture fits perfectly. I now also have HD on that telly which I didn't have before. Getting a second hand HD box seems like a much better route than getting Sky to send out one of their engineers and then get new boxes.

    5/6 a side football

    Coolmine Sports Centre - Wednesdays - 8pm

    PM me for a game

    Thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,678 ✭✭✭swoofer


    and asking the question on here!! glad you are sorted. I noticed it on my lcd with scart but never dawned on me it was a software glitch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭winston_1


    [QUOTE=kenon;93002982
    Getting a second hand HD box seems like a much better route than getting Sky to send out one of their engineers and then get new boxes.[/QUOTE]

    You STILL don't get it. SKY DON'T USE ENGINEERS for this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,678 ✭✭✭swoofer


    who cares???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 794 ✭✭✭Berberis


    winston_1 wrote: »
    You STILL don't get it. SKY DON'T USE ENGINEERS for this.

    This is gone beyond tedious.
    Its just ruining the thread for everyone else.
    Give it up will you


  • Advertisement
Advertisement