Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Legislation related to demolision of derelict

  • 16-10-2014 8:20pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 589 ✭✭✭


    Is there any legislation that allows for the demolition of a derelict house and the build of a new house on the same site?

    Most county dev 'plans' have 'guidelines' and state a preference to 'extend or renovate' the derelict, or build on part of the footprint etc. But is there any law (SI) that allows 'a house for a house'?


Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,337 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    ArraMusha wrote: »
    Is there any legislation that allows for the demolition of a derelict house and the build of a new house on the same site?

    Most county dev 'plans' have 'guidelines' and state a preference to 'extend or renovate' the derelict, or build on part of the footprint etc. But is there any law (SI) that allows 'a house for a house'?

    Demolition and rebuilding requires planning permission and then subsequent lodgement of a commencement notice under the new building control amended regulations. Just gone through something similar in Dublin city.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 589 ✭✭✭ArraMusha


    kceire wrote: »
    Demolition and rebuilding requires planning permission and then subsequent lodgement of a commencement notice under the new building control amended regulations. Just gone through something similar in Dublin city.

    Yes I assume planning permission is required, but is there any statue instrument related to allowing replacement of a old un-inhabitable house with a new modern house?


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,165 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    ArraMusha wrote: »
    Yes I assume planning permission is required, but is there any statue instrument related to allowing replacement of a old un-inhabitable house with a new modern house?

    No


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,337 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    ArraMusha wrote: »
    Yes I assume planning permission is required, but is there any statue instrument related to allowing replacement of a old un-inhabitable house with a new modern house?

    Nope. just had it confirmed by a City Council Planning Enforcement Officer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,820 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    ...well there is a precedent for a 'replacement dwelling' that went to ABP a few years ago.........I'd have to search.

    It won't let you go out and build without permission, but it does establish that permission could not be denied for a building situate where the former was, hence 'replacement dwelling'.

    You'll still have paperwork to do, I'm afraid, along with all the BCMS stuff as well.


    There is also the material fact that for some old stuff it simply is not possible to rebuild/renovate and be in compliance with building regs, as would be required by new works.
    Foundations - depths, type etc. would be but one area. And engineer is not going to sign off a rebuild of (say) a 1940's house on it's foundations if they don't comply with current regs. There's only one option then, the nuclear one...........

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Advertisement
Advertisement