Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Carbon Frame Strength Test

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭ZiabR


    People always assume things that are lighter must be weaker. Carbon is an exception. If you have the money it is the one to go for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,308 ✭✭✭quozl


    For me the down-side to carbon is that you can't tell if it's been damaged by looking at it and that combines very badly with a failure mode of complete collapse rather than metal's buckling.

    I'd still rather have a carbon frame but that video doesn't address my (minor) concerns. I've always assumed that carbon fibre frames were very strong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,684 ✭✭✭triggermortis


    If they can make aircraft and cars out of CF, I'm sure a bike will be strong enough..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 469 ✭✭boege


    quozl wrote: »
    For me the down-side to carbon is that you can't tell if it's been damaged by looking at it and that combines very badly with a failure mode of complete collapse rather than metal's buckling.

    I'd still rather have a carbon frame but that video doesn't address my (minor) concerns. I've always assumed that carbon fibre frames were very strong.

    As an engineer I have to diagree, the tests show that the failure loads are way higher for the carbon frames. Given all designs have a margin of safety designed in, the tests confirm to me that the probability of a failure for normal design loads is far lower with carbon. Put another way; the carbon will shear if it fails but, based on these tests, it is far less likley to fail.

    I once witnessed an accident on a bike once where the front brake calibers came away from the frame (the nut holding them on worked loose- how many of us check that one!!!!!). When the calipers reached the end reach of the brake cable they whipped around, got pulled into the back of the forks, and sheared off the carbon forks. The bike dropped to the road and then the rider went over the bars and hit the road. The accident looked really bad but the rider was not seriously injured (he was hospitalised) as the failure of the forks absorbed some of the forces involved. Had the forks not sheared the riders stop may have been more sudden and the injuries greater.

    I work in a university that specialises in testing of carbon joints and joining of carbon components. We also specialise in aluminium. We do a lot of work with the aerospace industry and without any doubt the future is carbon. This is due to its weight advantages but more improtantly due to the ability to manipulate the properties of the material at locations where the loads differ significantly (e.g. bottom bracket).


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,887 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    If they can make aircraft and cars out of CF, I'm sure a bike will be strong enough..
    but in relation to cars - generally, you see the panels in high end cars made from carbon, but is the chassis (the load bearing structure) metallic or carbon fibre?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,397 ✭✭✭easygoing39


    the chassis is carbon fibre on very high end road cars and every formula 1/indy car is made of cf.


Advertisement