Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

when to stop heart rate monitor

  • 13-08-2014 1:40pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,842 ✭✭✭


    When I work out I am using a heart rate monitor to track how hard I am working and calories being burned during my workouts. My question is though when should I stop the heart rate monitor. Is it when I finish the workout or is it when my heart goes back to normal levels?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,390 ✭✭✭Stench Blossoms


    When you finish the workout.

    ....and if you want a really accurate result, just say you worked out for an hour, minus the amount of calories you burn in an hour just sitting down from the amount you burned when you worked out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,103 ✭✭✭misslt


    When you finish the workout.

    ....and if you want a really accurate result, just say you worked out for an hour, minus the amount of calories you burn in an hour just sitting down from the amount you burned when you worked out.

    Never thought of that :o


  • Subscribers Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭conzy


    It will make a negligible difference. And the calories burned even on a HRM are not always accurate so I hope you are not doing this in an effort to be able to eat more "earned" calories :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,390 ✭✭✭Stench Blossoms


    conzy wrote: »
    It will make a negligible difference. And the calories burned even on a HRM are not always accurate so I hope you are not doing this in an effort to be able to eat more "earned" calories :P

    Em are you telling me 158533 calories I burned doing lunges do not count?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,103 ✭✭✭misslt


    Nah I don't eat them, just like seeing the numbers. I'm a nerd :P


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,842 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    conzy wrote: »
    It will make a negligible difference. And the calories burned even on a HRM are not always accurate so I hope you are not doing this in an effort to be able to eat more "earned" calories :P

    Is that not the reason for working out so that you can eat earned calories. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,454 ✭✭✭mloc123


    conzy wrote: »
    It will make a negligible difference. And the calories burned even on a HRM are not always accurate so I hope you are not doing this in an effort to be able to eat more "earned" calories :P

    A HRM that uses the 'firstbeat' algorithm and is configured with correct weight and max HR (not 220-age) should be very very close to correct.

    Edit: for cardio


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,901 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    mloc123 wrote: »
    A HRM that uses the 'firstbeat' algorithm and is configured with correct weight and max HR (not 220-age) should be very very close to correct.

    Edit: for cardio
    If its configured with actual Max HR then it should be pretty accurate.
    But most people are jsut using it out of the box with 220-age.

    I've never done a MHR test, but I'd be pretty sure my max is > 220-age. So for me, my HRM is probably overestimating calories.


Advertisement