Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Does anyone play their games at a lower resolution?

  • 20-06-2014 10:17am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,630 ✭✭✭


    ...Instead of the max resolution your monitor can withstand? I play my games at 1920x1080, but sometimes it can stress the frame-rate out and cutting down to a lower resolution - while improving the fps - makes the game look rather blurry.

    This has been a dilemma of mine for quite a while now and only with graphically-intense games do I find it hard to decide which to sacrifice.

    Does anyone here sacrifice quality for performance?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,710 ✭✭✭✭Skerries


    no, I just buy a new card
    not what you want to hear but your card must be fairly old if you need to drop resolution these days


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,743 ✭✭✭blatantrereg


    You can usually tweak other settings as well as resolution. I think I remember the level of anti-aliasing making a significant difference when I played TF2 on an older laptop.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 537 ✭✭✭Yeti Beast


    I'd lower the resolution all the time back in the good old CRT days, but it just looks crap on most modern LCDs. You're better off turning off AA, AF, shadows etc. I'd rather a decent framerate with little to no eye candy than vice versa.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,630 ✭✭✭Gamer Bhoy 89


    Skerries wrote: »
    no, I just buy a new card
    not what you want to hear but your card must be fairly old if you need to drop resolution these days

    It's an Nvidia Geforce GTS 250. So yes, it is a bit old. But it does what I want it to do, just the resolution can be a bit problematic on one or two games


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 28,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Shiminay


    You need a new card man :)Pop onto Adverts, you'd be amazed at what you'd pick up for a song.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 23,282 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kiith


    I've had to in the past, but it's always a sign that i need an upgrade.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    Shiminay wrote: »
    You need a new card man :)Pop onto Adverts, you'd be amazed at what you'd pick up for a song.

    What he said.

    That card is ancient m8, and you can pick some very nice older cards for pennies. Last few gens mid range gpus are pretty much in same band of performance. You can buy old gen card with same performance as mid range modern card for a lot less.

    I have not dropped resolution on any of my games since I gone off crt monitors. It's a bit bizarre for me even go to resolution settings. Some games even piss me off when they launch as default for the first time on some retarded resolution.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,878 ✭✭✭Robert ninja


    I considered it recently for the first time when I really wanted to get 120fps on Far Cry 3 without dropping the specific graphic settings I really value.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,558 ✭✭✭✭dreamers75


    I use my monitor to control my gaming pcs upgrades, its 1920 last few years and no intention of changing.

    Tbh 1920 in pc terms is low resolution, i will hold onto it a while longer maybe 18 months to 2 years. Then move to higher.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,381 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    My PC is hooked up to a relatively old Bravia, so the max i can go is 1920x1080. I usually don't go with that setting though, as usually when i do i can't read text on the screen because it goes so small. So i've been sticking to 1360x768. Never had higher resolution than that before so i don't notice any downfall to it.

    New tv is next on the books though.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    Sell the GTS250 for about 30 euro, then buy a GTX750, unbelievable performance for a 100 euro card.

    2nd hand market is a joke these days, I've looked at so many 2nd hands cards and ended up buying brand new became the prices people are asking for cards like 6850, 6870, GTX670, GTX680 etc are taking the piss, can actually buy faster new cards for the same money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    Sell the GTS250 for about 30 euro, then buy a GTX750, unbelievable performance for a 100 euro card.

    2nd hand market is a joke these days, I've looked at so many 2nd hands cards and ended up buying brand new became the prices people are asking for cards like 6850, 6870, GTX670, GTX680 etc are taking the piss, can actually buy faster new cards for the same money.

    That too. Adverts.ie is amazing place. Some people expect to get the price adjusted to how much they paid for parts, not how much performance is worth at the moment of sale.

    edit: I just checked gtx 680 prices on adverts.... Some people still trying to get 300eu for it... oh lord...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭..Brian..


    I had to drop the resolution down on my monitor to 1080p from 1440p in Total War: Shogun 2 cause everything was too small and I couldn't see anything! Lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    ..Brian.. wrote: »
    I had to drop the resolution down on my monitor to 1080p from 1440p in Total War: Shogun 2 cause everything was too small and I couldn't see anything! Lol

    This.

    It's rare but occasionally it happens when you play a badly programmed game that doesn't include any UI scaling.

    StarDrive and Sins of a solar empire are two games that suffer from this. At 1200p, the tooltips and text are quite simply too small to see so I had to play at 1680x1050.....which is a shame.

    Every game should have UI scaling. Every single one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 173 ✭✭Status Offline


    I've turned down the resolution a few times on games like Crusader Kings just so I can read the bloody small text from the couch.Christ even some of it is still hard to read even with my nose touching the screen :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    On a regular monitor, not for a very long time. 7 or 8 years back at least (again, it was easier to get away with on a CRT monitor). Gaming on a 27" monitor at 1440p, yeah, I had to drop to 1080p occasionally as others have mentioned due to a poorly coded game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 649 ✭✭✭Steviemoyne


    :pac: There's a lower option for resolution? I never even noticed!

    In short I don't anyway, the higher the better in my book.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭lmimmfn


    sometimes i have to play @ 1680x1050 instead of 5040x1050 to keep the settings on ultra lol

    Ignoring idiots who comment "far right" because they don't even know what it means



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,880 ✭✭✭Raphael


    Frequently, because I do my PC gaming on a laptop with an integrated graphics card. I also mainly just play older and indie stuff on the PC, though, so it balances out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,140 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    In fairness my rig can play the games I play at max res and settings fine, but out of habbit I tend to play some games at a lower resolution, and lower graphical settings.

    Since getting back into CSGO I've definitly lowered the resolution and details, did the same with SC2, and do the same with LoL.

    Just a force of habbit, where I want as little distraction and sparkle as possible to focus the target etc.

    I've got a Radeon R270x which is doing me grand, although of course there is always my annual summer temptation of a new GPU, but I don't feel a real need at the moment


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,405 ✭✭✭Lukker-


    TheDoc wrote: »
    In fairness my rig can play the games I play at max res and settings fine, but out of habbit I tend to play some games at a lower resolution, and lower graphical settings.

    Since getting back into CSGO I've definitly lowered the resolution and details, did the same with SC2, and do the same with LoL.

    Just a force of habbit, where I want as little distraction and sparkle as possible to focus the target etc.

    I've got a Radeon R270x which is doing me grand, although of course there is always my annual summer temptation of a new GPU, but I don't feel a real need at the moment

    Understandable for competitive MP games. I do the same myself, especially if its an FPS. I'd never lower the resolution though, as I feel that actually takes away from the image quality and my ability to spot things, it muddies the image.

    On my old build I'd occasionally have to lower the resolution in singel player games from 1080p to 1680x1050, which isn't a drastic change really. It also allowed me to turn all the other settings up to ultra.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    TheDoc wrote: »
    In fairness my rig can play the games I play at max res and settings fine, but out of habbit I tend to play some games at a lower resolution, and lower graphical settings.

    Since getting back into CSGO I've definitly lowered the resolution and details, did the same with SC2, and do the same with LoL.

    Just a force of habbit, where I want as little distraction and sparkle as possible to focus the target etc.

    I've got a Radeon R270x which is doing me grand, although of course there is always my annual summer temptation of a new GPU, but I don't feel a real need at the moment

    I'd never turn down resolution but I do and have turned down or off effects in competitive games.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 692 ✭✭✭breadbin


    jeez i wouldnt want to lower my resolution anymore - i play games at 1024x768!! i still using my 17" sony trinitron. i do have a fairly decent 26" samsung lcd but imo the sony blows it out if the water. so nice to look at.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭Glebee


    Might be a silly question but how do you know the max res of your monitor


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    Glebee wrote: »
    Might be a silly question but how do you know the max res of your monitor

    Control Panel > Display > Change Resolution (with LCD screens the max res of the monitor will be marked as "Recommended")

    You can make a guess based on the diagnonal width of a monitor, e.g. 24" monitors are usually 1080p or more rarely 1200p but can be 720p if they are older or budget models. 30" monitors have the same issue.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I play on an aging gaming laptop so yeah, I do this all the time. Framerate is absolute paramount for me. If its not above 70, it really grates on me. Fluid gameplay is far more important to me. These days it means I play most games on minimal settings. I'm not made of money but maybe soon I'll get a new rig.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,583 ✭✭✭EoinHef


    I play on an aging gaming laptop so yeah, I do this all the time. Framerate is absolute paramount for me. If its not above 70, it really grates on me. Fluid gameplay is far more important to me. These days it means I play most games on minimal settings. I'm not made of money but maybe soon I'll get a new rig.

    A solid 60fps should be fine,your laptop screen is most likely 60Hz anyway so can only display 60 images a second so anything over 60 is a little pointless.

    I agree though,framerate is paramount,id lower any setting if it meant 60fps


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,710 ✭✭✭✭Skerries


    but the human eye can't see above 30fps!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Skerries wrote: »
    but the human eye can't see above 30fps!

    That cannot be true. I can see the difference easily.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    Skerries wrote: »
    but the human eye can't see above 30fps!

    What do you mean by see? And, source?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,710 ✭✭✭✭Skerries


    I was trolling console peasants who are all saying that the eye can only see 30fps

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrfkX7J_LVs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    Skerries wrote: »
    I was trolling console peasants who are all saying that the eye can only see 30fps

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrfkX7J_LVs

    Wrong forum for that. :P


Advertisement