Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

WHat Law/Statute Applies in this case?

  • 05-04-2014 9:07pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,048 ✭✭✭✭


    I attempted to get an answer to my question in another thread, but it got locked because of a fear it might go off topic and into some illegal train.

    So I thought to ask here ....... because all I wish to do is to identify the act that applies (IF one exists) and don't want to go discussing any other aspects of the situation.

    My apologies if the above sounds a bit stilted or harsh ... I am trying to stay within the bounds of the rules.

    For information here is a link to the other thread ...

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=89653920&postcount=1

    ***

    Now to the question ......

    If someone serves up an unapproved (illegal?) internet stream of RTÉ 2 and I as an individual, view that stream, what is my legal status?

    Let us accept that I have a valid TV licence and reside in Ireland.
    I can ordinarily receive RTÉ 2 but my TV/STB/whatever is broken.


    I am attempting to find the act or part of the act that determines what law I have broken and hopefully provides information about the punishment on conviction.

    Thank you for your assistance.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭234


    If you didn't have a TV licence then s.371 of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000 would apply.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,048 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    234 wrote: »
    If you didn't have a TV licence then s.371 of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000 would apply.

    Yes, but that is not the case. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,048 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    I must be failing somewhere ..... I have been repeatedly told it is illegal for someone to receive a stream in the circumstances I have described, but I have failed miserably to find any relevant 'law' that deals with it. :o

    This is frustrating! :mad:

    ...... else of course it is possible that it is not illegal to receive such streams under those circumstances .....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭234


    I must be failing somewhere ..... I have been repeatedly told it is illegal for someone to receive a stream in the circumstances I have described, but I have failed miserably to find any relevant 'law' that deals with it. :o

    This is frustrating! :mad:

    ...... else of course it is possible that it is not illegal to receive such streams under those circumstances .....

    I'm not very conversant in this area of law so I can't rule out the possibility that there is some relevant provision. But don't listen to most of what people say about piracy. People usually equate dishonest with illegal when it comes to IP related issues. Next time somebody tells you that it is illegal, ask them to point out how.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,048 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    234 wrote: »
    I'm not very conversant in this area of law so I can't rule out the possibility that there is some relevant provision. But don't listen to most of what people say about piracy. People usually equate dishonest with illegal when it comes to IP related issues. Next time somebody tells you that it is illegal, ask them to point out how.

    First I must apologise for not thanking those who read and especially responded to this thread. To put that right ....

    Thank you ;)

    This subject came up during a discussion and has since intrigued me.
    Most people are indeed confused about the copyright situation and lawfullness of streaming.
    There is a difficulty when everything on Youtube is regarded as lawful; full films can be streamed from there, and yet people are told that if they go to another site and stream a film, that is unlawful.
    Lots of confusion.

    It is unfortunate that no one I have so far been in contact with can say for definite if the situation I described is either lawful or not, with any certainty ..... as those claiming it is unlawful are unable to point to which statute it breaches, and the others cannot really prove it is not covered by some statute they have not accessed.

    So, for me, confusion remains ....... although it seems to me, now, that it is indeed lawful to receive such a stream but I cannot be certain.

    As a last resort, is there any organisation/group/whatever, something like a law society, that would be able to definitively state the situation?

    .... I hate the uncertainty :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,781 ✭✭✭amen


    ianal but surely given the example in your original post you are most likely breaking the terms and conditions of your license and maybe be guilty of receiving stolen goods :)

    Say for instance you need a license to drink Beer because of its very high alcohol content. You have the license and are allowed to drink.

    Person B steals some of Beer A and gives it you. So while you have the license to drink beer A and can legally consume the alclcholo you have received stolen goods and may be guilty of a criminal offense.

    It might be similar to some mulinational shops imported gray market goods ( jeans) where they have a license to sell jeans but only those purchased through the correct channels.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,087 ✭✭✭Pro Hoc Vice


    amen wrote: »
    ianal but surely given the example in your original post you are most likely breaking the terms and conditions of your license and maybe be guilty of receiving stolen goods :)

    Say for instance you need a license to drink Beer because of its very high alcohol content. You have the license and are allowed to drink.

    Person B steals some of Beer A and gives it you. So while you have the license to drink beer A and can legally consume the alclcholo you have received stolen goods and may be guilty of a criminal offense.

    It might be similar to some mulinational shops imported gray market goods ( jeans) where they have a license to sell jeans but only those purchased through the correct channels.

    Grey market goods are perfectly legal see cases in the EU involving Sky and drugs. Basically you can use a Greek sky card to receive sports for your pub and you can happily import say Viagra from Poland.

    The example of the pint of beer is simply theft as it deprives the real owner of that beer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,048 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    amen wrote: »
    ianal but surely given the example in your original post you are most likely breaking the terms and conditions of your license and maybe be guilty of receiving stolen goods :)

    Say for instance you need a license to drink Beer because of its very high alcohol content. You have the license and are allowed to drink.

    Person B steals some of Beer A and gives it you. So while you have the license to drink beer A and can legally consume the alclcholo you have received stolen goods and may be guilty of a criminal offense.

    It might be similar to some mulinational shops imported gray market goods ( jeans) where they have a license to sell jeans but only those purchased through the correct channels.

    None of us "consumes" broadcast or streamed services ....... despite the recent tendency to label it so.

    We do not deprive anyone else of the service content when we view it.
    There is no theft.
    There is no consumption. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭234


    First I must apologise for not thanking those who read and especially responded to this thread. To put that right ....

    Thank you ;)

    This subject came up during a discussion and has since intrigued me.
    Most people are indeed confused about the copyright situation and lawfullness of streaming.
    There is a difficulty when everything on Youtube is regarded as lawful; full films can be streamed from there, and yet people are told that if they go to another site and stream a film, that is unlawful.
    Lots of confusion.

    It is unfortunate that no one I have so far been in contact with can say for definite if the situation I described is either lawful or not, with any certainty ..... as those claiming it is unlawful are unable to point to which statute it breaches, and the others cannot really prove it is not covered by some statute they have not accessed.

    So, for me, confusion remains ....... although it seems to me, now, that it is indeed lawful to receive such a stream but I cannot be certain.

    As a last resort, is there any organisation/group/whatever, something like a law society, that would be able to definitively state the situation?

    .... I hate the uncertainty :D

    Well since this is just a general discussion I will go out on something of a limb. I can't find anything in the 2000 Act which creates an offence which applies to what you are describing. I believe that generally watching streamed content doesn't involve an offence. However, if you are providing, selling, etc the copyrighted content then there would obviously be an offence.

    My answer would be that in the circumstances described you would be committing no offence though the person providing the streaming would.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,048 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    234 wrote: »
    Well since this is just a general discussion I will go out on something of a limb. I can't find anything in the 2000 Act which creates an offence which applies to what you are describing. I believe that generally watching streamed content doesn't involve an offence. However, if you are providing, selling, etc the copyrighted content then there would obviously be an offence.

    My answer would be that in the circumstances described you would be committing no offence though the person providing the streaming would.

    Presently that is my interpretation also.

    If there is anyone reading this thread who disagrees, maybe they would provide some reason for me to change my mind, which would help greatly.

    Ta.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement