Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

fly 747

  • 28-02-2014 7:40am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,065 ✭✭✭


    I would love to fly ON a 747.can anyone tell me the best
    Way of going about it.don't worry about the money factor for now. But can it be done out of Ireland? I presume it can definitely be done from London.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Dacian


    No B747 pax services from Ireland. You would have to book long haul flight out of London Heathrow.....even then I would expect BA or Virgin would be your best option.

    Look up the BA or Virgin website and look at the timetable/flight details section...it will allow you to see what flights use B747... EG Virgin fly their B747's on the LHR-JFK route.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,429 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    I would love to fly ON a 747
    Why??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    As far as I remember, BA use a 747 to Moscow DME once a day which would be the physically shortest route you'd get one on if all you want to do is a 747 rotation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,820 ✭✭✭billie1b


    I believe Virgin also fly a 747 from MAN to MCO, that could be another option. Would love to go on a 747 also, always on my bucket list


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭fricatus


    smurfjed wrote: »
    Why??

    Why not? Flying is a marvel and planes are cool - and who wouldn't want to fly on one of the world's most iconic and identifiable airliners, and go to New York or somewhere in the process?

    OP, I flew LHR-SFO on a 744 for my honeymoon. It started out as a bad day's travel, as that flight was cancelled due to a strike in BA. We were booked to fly as far as Boston on BA and then to San Fran on United, but then our connection from Cork to LHR was late and we missed the flight to Boston :(

    (Now the happy bit) Then, our direct SFO flight was reinstated, and because practically all the passengers were on other flights, the plane was half empty and we got a whole middle row to ourselves. As we were honeymooners, we got fed champagne and orange juice, and I spent ages chatting about rugby and aviation to a really sound cabin attendant from Wales called Rhodri. While we were chatting, the captain came down for a wander and I was chatting to him for 5 minutes. Really down-to-earth, no-nonsense guy.

    To top it off, we got to move to window seats on the left for the end of the flight where we came in really high over the Golden Gate, then turned in the southern part of the bay for the final approach.

    Haven't topped that yet! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,065 ✭✭✭crazygeryy


    smurfjed wrote: »
    Why??

    What a ridiculous question.

    But if you want an answer because its a thing of beauty and I've never been on one. Same reason id love to fly on an a380.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,370 ✭✭✭b757


    crazygeryy wrote: »
    I would love to fly ON a 747.can anyone tell me the best
    Way of going about it.don't worry about the money factor for now. But can it be done out of Ireland? I presume it can definitely be done from London.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks.

    http://www.thechartercompany.co.uk/airliner-boeing-747.php


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,011 ✭✭✭Storm 10


    smurfjed wrote: »
    Why??

    It never ceases to amaze me some of the replies to a very ordinary question, there is always one


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭iusedtoknow


    fricatus wrote: »
    Why not? Flying is a marvel and planes are cool - and who wouldn't want to fly on one of the world's most iconic and identifiable airliners, and go to New York or somewhere in the process?

    OP, I flew LHR-SFO on a 744 for my honeymoon. It started out as a bad day's travel, as that flight was cancelled due to a strike in BA. We were booked to fly as far as Boston on BA and then to San Fran on United, but then our connection from Cork to LHR was late and we missed the flight to Boston :(

    (Now the happy bit) Then, our direct SFO flight was reinstated, and because practically all the passengers were on other flights, the plane was half empty and we got a whole middle row to ourselves. As we were honeymooners, we got fed champagne and orange juice, and I spent ages chatting about rugby and aviation to a really sound cabin attendant from Wales called Rhodri. While we were chatting, the captain came down for a wander and I was chatting to him for 5 minutes. Really down-to-earth, no-nonsense guy.

    To top it off, we got to move to window seats on the left for the end of the flight where we came in really high over the Golden Gate, then turned in the southern part of the bay for the final approach.

    Haven't topped that yet! :D

    I live in SF and never get tired of this approach. I flew in yesterday and had a bizarre approach where we cut down the coast, across downtown, down the bay to Oakland then back across. Beautiful.

    OP- BA and virgin are your best bet, both have pretty substantial 747 fleets. Air France, Lufthansa have some as well.

    I had the luck recently of 747 San Francisco- JFK with united, I think the aircraft was being repositioned


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 821 ✭✭✭eatmyshorts


    billie1b wrote: »
    Would love to go on a 747 also,
    crazygeryy wrote: »
    I would love to fly ON a 747..
    fricatus wrote: »
    flew LHR-SFO on a 744 for my honeymoon.

    I don't know about you lot, but I'd rather fly IN a 747. Probably a bit too windy and chilly ON it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭sully2010


    Cant see why anyone wouldn't want to fly on a 747. My first time on a plane was EI-BED back in the day and I will never forget it, a great experience.

    OP, BA dont show what aircraft fly where on the booking process on their website anymore(only after paying) so you'll have to find their timetables elsewhere but Ive flown to JFK a couple of times on their 744(last time was a few years back so may be another aircraft now), it was well priced and I think Id prefer NY city than Moscow for a long weekend!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    sully2010 wrote: »
    OP, BA dont show what aircraft fly where on the booking process on their website anymore(only after paying)

    Click the flight number ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭sully2010


    Ahh cheers, still is the 744 to JFK


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,321 ✭✭✭Foggy43


    sully2010 wrote: »
    OP, BA dont show what aircraft fly where on the booking process on their website anymore(only after paying) so you'll have to find their timetables elsewhere

    Not sure what you mean. On the BA website, after selecting origin/destination and dates you get all flights for the days in question. Just click on the flight number. It will tell what aircraft and it's confiuration and if it is a codeshare flight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,217 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    I flew on a 747 Luthhansa to Tokyo. Hadn't been retrofitted. Loud, uncomfortable with a few drop-down screens for the entertainment. Was not pleasant. However, I'm not really into planes, just want a relatively comfortable flight. Having said that, it's cool to have flown one..... Just don't think I'd like to do it again.

    Also flew on an A380 (Think it was Air France) from Charles De Gaul to Narita. Much more comfortable. Not much more room but quieter and more room to walk about etc. However I was at the back and I think the terminal only had one disembarkation tunnel so it took ages to get off the plane. Given that I was flying to Japan, I assumed that most of the passengers would have been blase about flying on the A380 but as I got off I noticed that most were snapping shots of the plane as they left.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,321 ✭✭✭Foggy43


    Beat me to it MYOB. :D
    Perhaps we should mention that in the small print the aircraft type can change at the last minute. Believe me I have seen it! Luckily not very often but passengers turning around and walking off because it wasnt the aircraft type they expected.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,700 ✭✭✭tricky D


    smurfjed wrote: »
    Why??

    It's a bucket list item for many of us. Not all of us slf are fortunate enough to get access to so many types as you do - lucky for you:).

    Item ticked off last autumn:) and 747 specifically selected when booking on BA (lovely flying experience but unimaginably bad customer service when bags lost, still trying to sort stuff out; so bad it gets a -5/10)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,644 ✭✭✭cml387


    I flew on an El Al 747 from LHR to Tel Aviv last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84 ✭✭padski08


    This has being on my bucket list for many years

    Finally this year I get to fly on a 747 for two separate return journeys!

    AMS-MEX in two weeks and then LHR to SFO in May

    Cant wait :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,820 ✭✭✭billie1b


    padski08 wrote: »
    This has being on my bucket list for many years

    Finally this year I get to fly on a 747 for two separate return journeys!

    AMS-MEX in two weeks and then LHR to SFO in May

    Cant wait :)

    I don't know what it is about the 747, I just once in my life wish to travel on one but i'm not too pushed about the A380, its strange


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 226 ✭✭oak5548


    Flew on the 747 and A380.
    The 747-400 I was on was a filthy beast from the early 80's. It still had an older style interior which was dull and full of atmosphere, easy to relax and be comfortable in!
    The outside was caked in grime and decay staining down each door and cargo latch, you could really see the years were catching up with her.
    The 4 engines made a massive amount of noise as it thrusted down the runway and soared into the sky with deadly wing flex!

    Best flight I've ever been on. An absolute beautiful aircraft!

    This is one of my favorite pictures that really highlights how great of a machine she is: http://i.imgur.com/mJGxu5E.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,429 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Interesting to see the responses that a simple question of “why” elicits, considering that this is an aviation forum, its only obvious that people have a desire to fly on certain aircraft types, but for me the question of “why” still remains, is it because its going out service, or because of its uniqueness, size, comfort, technology or because you can!

    My fascination with the B747 started many years ago when I got to fly DUB-SNN in EI-BED, my last flight in a B747 was a -400 BBJ with full VVIP interior and 3 levels, my next will be in a -8F if I get the required permission. I have flown in the –SP, 100,200,300 and 400 series with about a dozen airlines.

    Unfortunately in most cases the aircraft is showing its age, the interior generally sucks with poor entertainment systems, old tattered looks and certainly for a number of airlines, extremely poor legroom.

    So if you just want to close a tick on your bucket list, go for it, but for comfort, the older 747’s shouldn’t be your first choice, unless of course they are BBJ's :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    smurfjed wrote: »
    ....B747 was a -400 BBJ with full VVIP interior and 3 levels, ...

    Whats on the three levels?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭sully2010


    smurfjed wrote: »
    Interesting to see the responses that a simple question of “why” elicits, considering that this is an aviation forum, its only obvious that people have a desire to fly on certain aircraft types, but for me the question of “why” still remains, is it because its going out service, or because of its uniqueness, size, comfort, technology or because you can!

    My fascination with the B747 started many years ago when I got to fly DUB-SNN in EI-BED, my last flight in a B747 was a -400 BBJ with full VVIP interior and 3 levels, my next will be in a -8F if I get the required permission. I have flown in the –SP, 100,200,300 and 400 series with about a dozen airlines.

    Unfortunately in most cases the aircraft is showing its age, the interior generally sucks with poor entertainment systems, old tattered looks and certainly for a number of airlines, extremely poor legroom.

    So if you just want to close a tick on your bucket list, go for it, but for comfort, the older 747’s shouldn’t be your first choice, unless of course they are BBJ's :)

    Jaysus id say that was something else! Did you take any pics?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,429 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Was it this?
    Similar but in the cargo compartment rather than the ceiling.

    No pics allowed :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭yermandan


    Used to work ground staff for EI in Dub and was flying staff travel back from JFK. For whatever reason, EI had to commission an Argentinian Airways 747 and all of the staff on stand-by got up in business as there was no-one booked up front. Amazing experience


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭sully2010


    smurfjed wrote: »
    Similar but in the cargo compartment rather than the ceiling.

    No pics allowed :(

    Was thinking that may have been the case, so few pics of those interiors around apart from the stock ones.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,036 ✭✭✭murphym7


    I have flown on the 747 loads of times. Still my favourite aircraft, mostly due to sentimentality more than practicality TBH. Have been lucky to be in business class upstairs, PE in the middle, the very few 2X2's at the back and my best trip ever seat 1A. The size of the thing still amazes me. When I was in seat 1A, I took a stroll from my seat right to the back of the aircraft and back, it took a while! While I'm sure the A380 is a aviation marvel etc etc.... The 747 just seems to have "soul", cheesy I know!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭peter1892


    I got a present of a flight on a 747 for my 10th birthday - back then Aer Lingus did a ticket for a child for around £15 one way DUB-SNN. So I was brought to the airport, got brought on board as an 'unaccompanied child' and was met off the flight by a member of Shannon's Airport Police who brought me out to be met by my Grandparents.

    It was only a 25 minute flight but it was great :)

    (I've flown on them since!)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 572 ✭✭✭relaxed


    smurfjed wrote: »
    is it because its going out service,

    I hadn't realised that, has production stopped?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,050 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    relaxed wrote: »
    I hadn't realised that, has production stopped?
    No but orders for passenger versions are very weak.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    See the DC10 is bowing out too.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2570047/Bowing-style-Final-chapter-history-jet-age-icon-DC10-airliner-makes-passenger-flight-scrapped.html

    Used to get the DC10 on similar routes to the 747. I think I was on a DC10 a few times, to the States and such.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,657 ✭✭✭brandon_flowers


    If you are specifically looking for a 747 flight experience then you might as well go for the 747-8I. Lufthansa use it on Frankfurt to Hong Kong, Seoul, Mexico City, LAX and a few more routes. The missus has been on it in business to Hong Kong, said it was amazing. Haven't made it myself yet but it is on the bucket list along with the 787.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,370 ✭✭✭b757


    If you are specifically looking for a 747 flight experience then you might as well go for the 747-8I. Lufthansa use it on Frankfurt to Hong Kong, Seoul, Mexico City, LAX and a few more routes. The missus has been on it in business to Hong Kong, said it was amazing. Haven't made it myself yet but it is on the bucket list along with the 787.

    The 748 will be around for a long time, should get the older models in first before they are retired. :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,429 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    The airline that I work for has operated about 30 B747's over the years, so I have some great memories of the aircraft, and of course some not so good memories, such as sitting in the back of a full aircraft with no air conditioning on the ground ...ugh, certainly no fun. On the fun side tech stop in Shannon, flight attendants got catering to deliver Irish newspapers :) or jumpseting and watching crew taxiing around JFK in winter and wondering how on earth they found their way around, the place is a mess, all concrete no grass anywhere so at least for me impossible to see taxiways.... Or having my parents onboard when one by one 5 flight attendants walked down one by one and introduced themselves as my wife :) or the first time that my parents ever flew in First Class, thanks to these same flight attendants or the first time that I watched a landing on RWY23 in LHR from the jump seat. Or sitting with Boeing negotiating the purchase of a -8 BBJ.....

    From a performance point of view, the older versions were really limited, in a lot of cases the takeoff performance was calculated on 115% of the all engine takeof performance, so you would see them scraping off the end of the runway! as for stopping from V1, well if the simulator is anything to base this on, the stopping would be interesting :)

    I used to love flying the B747 classic simulator as it was loaded with the old Hong Kong approach, that was so much fun in good weather :)

    As a kid camping in Shannon watching Aer Lingua, Pan Am, TWA, Flying Tigers etc, I always dreamt of flying the B747 and Gulfstreams....... At least i got to fly one :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 181 ✭✭KarlFitz01


    Just back from my honeymoon and flew on a B747 to Orlando from London - Gatwick


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    beauf wrote: »
    See the DC10 is bowing out too.

    As will the MD11 later in the year:

    http://www.airportspotting.com/klm-brings-md11-retirement/

    Got myself booked to Montreal for a spin, working out not hugely dearer than going more direct to my final destination (Portland) luckily.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,548 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    MYOB wrote: »
    As will the MD11 later in the year:

    http://www.airportspotting.com/klm-brings-md11-retirement/

    Got myself booked to Montreal for a spin, working out not hugely dearer than going more direct to my final destination (Portland) luckily.

    Had a return on the KLM MD11 a couple of months back to YYZ. Hadn't expected it to be retired so soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,780 ✭✭✭jamo2oo9


    smurfjed wrote: »
    Interesting to see the responses that a simple question of “why” elicits, considering that this is an aviation forum, its only obvious that people have a desire to fly on certain aircraft types, but for me the question of “why” still remains, is it because its going out service, or because of its uniqueness, size, comfort, technology or because you can!

    My fascination with the B747 started many years ago when I got to fly DUB-SNN in EI-BED, my last flight in a B747 was a -400 BBJ with full VVIP interior and 3 levels, my next will be in a -8F if I get the required permission. I have flown in the –SP, 100,200,300 and 400 series with about a dozen airlines.

    Unfortunately in most cases the aircraft is showing its age, the interior generally sucks with poor entertainment systems, old tattered looks and certainly for a number of airlines, extremely poor legroom.

    So if you just want to close a tick on your bucket list, go for it, but for comfort, the older 747’s shouldn’t be your first choice, unless of course they are BBJ's :)

    Wow, that sounds like an experience to live for. How did you come by getting on the -400 BBJ? Were you flying it or were you just visiting on ground?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭pclancy


    After years of long distance travel I was able to use some points last year to upgrade myself to the upper deck of a Qantas 747-400. Fantastic experience, mainly because it was my second time ever in business class and the service/seat was great, but also because I've realised the 747 is one of the last remaining birds to still make you feel like take off is exciting and powerful.

    Take off in a modern long range twin like the 777s and A330s that make up the majority of fleets these days is a subdued experience, and very much the same in an A380. But the 747-400 still feels like it has to work to get itself in the air and this translates into a much more dramatic and fun experience, well for flying nerds like us anyway!

    The upper deck actually felt a bit cramped and small compared to what I thought it would, especially compared to the huge spacious A380. Even downstairs, a 747 almost feels smaller then a 777 due to its 60's design.

    Best old 747 memory is of going to Orlando with BA when I was 10 and being shown around the flight deck of a 747-300. The pilot showed me a postcard of another 747 and asked could I tell the difference between our plane and the postcard- I couldnt, but when he pointed closely I could see the RR logos on the engines which he said were different to our Pratt and Whitney powered 747. Must have been a pain to BA to operate the one type of plane with two types of engines! I remember there being a huge pull down cinema screen in the cabin too :)


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,663 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    I've been fortunate to fly with BA in Club, PE and obviously economy and unfortunately it's a plane that best enjoyed from the outside! That's not a negative comment, I love the 747, it's the sexiest plane ever. But it's looks at it's best being watched from the outside!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,429 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    How did you come by getting on the -400 BBJ? Were you flying it or were you just visiting on ground?
    Visited one on the ground, flew in another :)
    Take off in a modern long range twin like the 777s and A330s that make up the majority of fleets these days is a subdued experience,
    Most likely caused by DERATED thrust, the 777 can happily takeoff using about 45% of its available thrust if the weight is low.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭iusedtoknow


    smurfjed wrote: »
    Visited one on the ground, flew in another :)

    Most likely caused by DERATED thrust, the 777 can happily takeoff using about 45% of its available thrust if the weight is low.

    Is this the same as on an a340? Was on one a couple of weeks ago (iberia - chicago->madrid) and not only was the take over pretty quiet, the climb out was really slow, seemed to take forever to get to 10000 far less cruising


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 97 ✭✭robbieVan


    Is this the same as on an a340? Was on one a couple of weeks ago (iberia - chicago->madrid) and not only was the take over pretty quiet, the climb out was really slow, seemed to take forever to get to 10000 far less cruising

    If it was an a340-300 the climb performance is dreadful


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭circular flexing


    b757 wrote: »
    The 748 will be around for a long time, should get the older models in first before they are retired. :)

    While the 748 will be around for a while, it looks like they will be way less common than the old series 747 with many previous major 747 customers (BA, JAL) not ordering any.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,965 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    The best "aircraft" memory I have is from way back in 1979, flying to Oz as a child with BA on a 747. A few hours into the flight, myself and my sister were invited to visit the flight deck as we flew over the Middle East, the captain pointing out how the instrument displays related to what we were seeing below. All of us children received a tiny gift-pack, in which I found a BA-branded deck of cards. Still have it to this day (on the mantlepiece about, about 2m from where I'm sitting).

    Apart from the return trip a year later, I've never been back on board a 747 and I'm not sure I'd want to over-write the magic of that memory with a 21st century experience. The A380 does T&G practice up the road from me now, so that's holding my attention, although my daughter has her hopes set on the "Lord of the Rings" B777. Sometimes it seems like the airlines forget that it's not just spotters who get excited about different types of aircraft, for reasons that have nothing to do with the seat price or destination.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,519 ✭✭✭ozzy jr


    My first 747 trip was on a Saudi Arabian Airlines from Manchester to Barcelona in May 99 (26th to be precise).

    Flew with BA from Heathrow to Tokyo for 2002 World Cup and flew home with Korean from Seoul to Heathrow.

    Was due to fly on a Malaysia Airlines from Kuala Lumpur to Sydney recently, but my first leg flight from Bangkok was delayed, so I was put on the Thai Airlines flight direct from Bangkok to Sydney. Couldn't really complain about that, but was a bit gutted not to get on a 747 again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Zonda999


    I've only flown flown on a 747 twice, both times with BA on their 744's, first time was to Mauritius in 2006 and again in 2012 from LHR to JFK.

    They are truly a magnificent bird and stand out more than others in my honest opinion because they originate from the late 60's. One of the my favourite sights of last year was when transiting from T1 to T4 at LHR. Was on the transfer bus going around between T2 (Currently under construction) and T3, just as a BA 744 was lifting off and seeing that from such close proximity is an unbelievable sight to see.

    Speaking of that feeling of power you get on take off, the sensation is definitely better in the small jets IMO. When on an A380, you barely feel it. Personally though, I think that feeling of raw power is better on the narrow bodies, my favourite being the 737 and 757. That feeling of power when the pilot fires up the engines, and you're pushed back into your seat is better on those jets than any others I think..


Advertisement