Low Latency/Ping Internet Providers in Ireland - Dublin 5

gab999 · 14-02-2014 1:08am #1

Good Evening,

I am looking for a Low Latency/Ping time Internet Service Provider (ISP) in Ireland - Dublin 5. I need around 20 Ping or less on French servers, 30 or less on German servers, 10-20 on UK and around 5 - 10 on Irish and a maximum of say 100 in the US. I would also like you to do a ping test/tracert to the following IP's and re-send the results of the screenshots here. Your help is greatly appreciated.
Ping test in command prompt via the ping "the ip address" -t
77.111.206.125 - FR | 79.133.35.13 - DE
87.98.142.49 - FR | 94.23.159.87 - UK (I think)
178.33.47.59 - FR | 78.110.163.196 - UK
31.28.170.115 - Ukraine | 193.192.58.34 - DE (I think)

The following need to be done through command prompt via the tracert command: 64.25.39.111 - US & 206.127.158.66 - Europe (DE/FR)

Regards
gab

moonboy52 · 14-02-2014 1:26pm

I am not at home at present gab, but from my experience with UPC and online gaming the pings are roughly:

UK - 25ms-35ms
France - 40ms
Germany - 50ms
U.S - (New York, 100ms-110ms), (Texas, 140ms), (California, 170ms)

In my opinion the pings you are looking for are not achievable, but would love to be proven wrong.

gab999 · 14-02-2014 11:56pm

Your reply is greatly appreciated. Anyone else bump please :-).

Hank Scorpio · 15-02-2014 12:06am

25-30 fr
25-30 uk
35-45 de
10-16 ie

Eircom with fastpath enabled, your line needs to be able to support the highest package to get this enabled

Smart telecom used to have the lowest pings around but I don't even know if they exist anymore

Chris The Hacker · 15-02-2014 12:16am

nuxxx wrote: »

Smart telecom used to have the lowest pings around but I don't even know if they exist anymore

I believe Digiweb bought them.

gab999 · 19-02-2014 6:45pm

Thanks very much for the replies they are greatly appreciated. Is there anyway you could also do some ping tests through the command prompt and tracerts and put the screenshots here.

Bump, need more choices and some more facts/proof.

bealtine · 19-02-2014 7:19pm

gab999 wrote: »

Thanks very much for the replies they are greatly appreciated. Is there anyway you could also do some ping tests through the command prompt and tracerts and put the screenshots here.

Bump, need more choices and some more facts/proof.

There are only 2 choices really...cable or telephone.
The "choices"/stats on telephone are all much the same with some minor differences in backhaul and routing.
UPC is well UPC

ED E · 19-02-2014 8:44pm

gab999 wrote: »

Thanks very much for the replies they are greatly appreciated. Is there anyway you could also do some ping tests through the command prompt and tracerts and put the screenshots here.

Bump, need more choices and some more facts/proof.

EDIT: F'ck, just refreshed the wrong tab and wiped my whole response. Time to rewrite.

The premise of this thread is a bit flawed. Just because one user gets good latency on a certain ISP doesnt mean you will get the same. They also wont necessarily stay the same. The internet is dynamic. Big iron routers route traffic on the fly and adaptively. 5 packets you send to a host may all take a different route to get there. Thats how the internet functions. If a link becomes congested your traffic will be sent another way(usually longer) to compensate. The location of your exit point from your ISP to the public net can also change at their will. None of this is predictable.

A great example was the Cable and Wireless break in the irish sea. Suddenly two ISPs had their traffic all rerouting north to get to the UK and on to europe causing a sudden jump in latency.

Pick a decent ISP thats in your area, get a good router if you're able and that should be enough. Theres no point picking your ISP based on other users pings though, some DSL users are going over decade old microwave links and some are on VDSL right next to their BRAS. Its apples and oranges. Same goes for cable depending where in the country you are.

FWIW Im on UPC, 50/5, bridged to WNDR3800, 35 to Lyon, 50 to Nuremberg.

JFKIRELAND · 19-02-2014 9:00pm

Hi Gab,

FR 29-35
UK 32 -39
DE 39 -49
US 111 - 148

UPC Horizon Complete in D5

Regards
JK

moonboy52 · 19-02-2014 9:00pm

I am back home gab999. I will do tests tomorrow

ymclynn · 21-02-2014 8:04am

OK I have shares in Vodafone, so i thought, ok i will go with them. Changed from Eircom to vodaphone. they told me it would be seamless.
First phone was migrated over, all went well, bill came down happy bunny, but i kept getting bills from eircom, finally 3 months later i contacted eircom, they told me, well yes, but you still have broadband with us. (that is why it was seamless)
So contacted vodafone, who in fairness to them said they would honour the payments i made to eircom. Changeover happened. I used to have ping with eircom of about 50-60 and download of 1.76 or there abouts, ok to do what we all do in the house. I now have ping of no less than 111 and download of 0.986 or there abouts (im being optimistic about the download) upload dissarpears to .10 if they dont fix it soon, im going to OfCom

ArthurG · 21-02-2014 8:07am

ymclynn wrote: »

..... if they dont fix it soon, im going to OfCom

Let us know how that goes.

moonboy52 · 21-02-2014 12:34pm

I am based in Waterford City gab, on the UPC 120Mb package.

It is a brief period of time i pinged each address so not very conclusive but it gives you an idea of pings from UPC in Waterford City at least

77.111.206.125 - France

Packets: sent=70, rcvd=70, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 34.530459 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 28.332 / 29.885 / 31.173 / 0.525
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.121, rcvd=0.121

87.98.142.49 - France

Packets: sent=95, rcvd=95, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 47.045380 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 43.596 / 45.203 / 49.122 / 1.034
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.121, rcvd=0.121

178.33.47.59 - France

Packets: sent=112, rcvd=112, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 55.544060 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 43.341 / 45.135 / 53.323 / 1.359
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.120, rcvd=0.120

79.133.35.13 - Germany

Packets: sent=86, rcvd=86, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 42.543516 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 40.833 / 42.085 / 50.569 / 1.031
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.121, rcvd=0.121

94.23.159.87 - UK

Packets: sent=101, rcvd=101, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 50.049128 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 47.978 / 49.015 / 65.633 / 1.771
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.121, rcvd=0.121

78.110.163.196 - UK

Packets: sent=103, rcvd=103, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 51.032618 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 31.063 / 32.151 / 35.203 / 0.591
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.121, rcvd=0.121

31.28.170.115 - Ukraine

Timeout - 100% Packet Loss

193.192.58.34 - Germany

Packets: sent=133, rcvd=133, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 66.038986 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 36.822 / 38.784 / 48.699 / 1.539
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.120, rcvd=0.120

Traceroutes:

tracert 64.25.39.111

Tracing route to 64.25.39.111 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 11 ms 10 ms 10 ms ************
3 39 ms 8 ms 9 ms *************
4 95 ms 95 ms 95 ms 84.116.238.110
5 96 ms 96 ms 98 ms 84.116.137.74
6 95 ms 95 ms 94 ms 84.116.137.34
7 96 ms 116 ms 95 ms 84.116.137.38
8 96 ms 96 ms 94 ms us-was02a-ri1-ge-4-1-0.aorta.net [84.116.130.206
]
9 96 ms 96 ms 95 ms te-4-1.car3.Washington1.Level3.net [4.79.168.201
]
10 126 ms 127 ms 125 ms vlan80.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net [4.69.149.190
]
11 128 ms 126 ms 126 ms ae-81-81.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net [4.69.134.1
37]
12 * * * Request timed out.
13 126 ms 126 ms 126 ms ae-7-7.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.134.21]
14 126 ms 127 ms 126 ms ae-63-63.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.151.133]

15 125 ms 126 ms * ae-1-60.edge2.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.145.11]
16 126 ms 134 ms 126 ms 4.59.197.34
17 127 ms 126 ms 127 ms 64.25.32.9
18 * 128 ms 126 ms 64.25.32.26
19 127 ms 127 ms 127 ms 64.25.32.82
20 * * 64.25.32.82 reports: Destination net unreachable.

Trace complete.

tracert 206.127.158.66

Tracing route to 206-127-158-66.plaync.com [206.127.158.66]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 9 ms 8 ms 10 ms *********
3 10 ms 8 ms 7 ms *********
4 12 ms 12 ms 11 ms 84.116.238.110
5 13 ms 13 ms 11 ms 213.46.165.94
6 39 ms 39 ms 38 ms xe-0-1-0.fra23.ip4.tinet.net [141.136.110.125]
7 39 ms 39 ms 38 ms 89.149.164.42
8 38 ms 39 ms 38 ms 206-127-157-86.plaync.com [206.127.157.86]
9 40 ms 38 ms 39 ms 206-127-157-102.plaync.com [206.127.157.102]
10 * * * Request timed out.
11 * * * Request timed out.
12 * * * Request timed out.
13 * * * Request timed out.
14 * * * Request timed out.
15 * * * Request timed out.
16 * * * Request timed out.
17 * * * Request timed out.
18 * * * Request timed out.
19 * * * Request timed out.
20 * * * Request timed out.
21 * * * Request timed out.
22 ^C

pizzahead77 · 21-02-2014 12:48pm

ymclynn wrote: »

OK I have shares in Vodafone, so i thought, ok i will go with them. Changed from Eircom to vodaphone. they told me it would be seamless.
First phone was migrated over, all went well, bill came down happy bunny, but i kept getting bills from eircom, finally 3 months later i contacted eircom, they told me, well yes, but you still have broadband with us. (that is why it was seamless)
So contacted vodafone, who in fairness to them said they would honour the payments i made to eircom. Changeover happened. I used to have ping with eircom of about 50-60 and download of 1.76 or there abouts, ok to do what we all do in the house. I now have ping of no less than 111 and download of 0.986 or there abouts (im being optimistic about the download) upload dissarpears to .10 if they dont fix it soon, im going to OfCom

OfCom can't do anything - they are the UK regulator.

You need to get in touch with ComReg once you've exhausted the formal complaints procedure with Vodafone

ymclynn · 21-02-2014 1:11pm

Thank you for that info, ComReg it is then, but I am not going to stress myself out, they either fix it fast or I cancel my direct debit as far as I am concerned, I told them what I expected, they told me they can deliver, if they dont deliver then my contract with them can be broken.

ymclynn · 22-02-2014 6:55am

ArthurG wrote: »

Let us know how that goes.

I contacted them yesterday again when my signal was gone completely and they told me I had been turned down to 1mb/s. When there was a fault on my line. The fault has been fixed and i have now been turned up to the max my line will allow. Ping is now between 25-50 and download between 3and10. So all is working fine now. Better in fact than my last ISP. So big thank you to Vodafone for fixing it in the end. My friends have always told me I could b**CH anyone into submission lol.

gab999 · 27-02-2014 9:09pm

Thank you very much for your time and responses they are greatly appreciated.

Bump!

gab999 · 10-03-2014 9:13pm

Bump to the top!

gab999 · 09-04-2014 2:32pm

Bump my post up!

bloodyhawk · 19-04-2014 11:27am

gab999 wrote: »

Bump my post up!

How about eircom efiber? Im getting 6-10ms to Irish servers and 15-25ms to
Uk servers.

gab999 · 19-04-2014 2:42pm

Good Afternoon,

bloodyhawk,

Thanks very much for your response. I would like to ask you a small favor could you do some tracerts and ping tests to the following IP's and post the screenshot results here please? Your help is greatly appreciated!

77.111.206.125 - FR | 79.133.35.13 - DE
87.98.142.49 - FR | 94.23.159.87 - UK (I think)
178.33.47.59 - FR | 78.110.163.196 - UK
31.28.170.115 - Ukraine | 193.192.58.34 - DE (I think)
64.25.39.118 - US | 206.127.158.40 - FR/DE

bloodyhawk · 19-04-2014 5:46pm

France

PING 87.98.142.49 (87.98.142.49): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: seq=0 ttl=59 time=24.830 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: seq=1 ttl=59 time=24.817 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: seq=2 ttl=59 time=24.728 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: seq=3 ttl=59 time=24.667 ms

--- 87.98.142.49 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 24.667/24.760/24.830 ms

France

PING 77.111.206.125 (77.111.206.125): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: seq=0 ttl=56 time=35.368 ms
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: seq=1 ttl=56 time=35.140 ms
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: seq=2 ttl=56 time=35.333 ms
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: seq=3 ttl=56 time=34.997 ms

--- 77.111.206.125 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 34.997/35.209/35.368 ms

France

PING 178.33.47.59 (178.33.47.59): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: seq=0 ttl=59 time=24.710 ms
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: seq=1 ttl=59 time=24.927 ms
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: seq=2 ttl=59 time=24.855 ms
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: seq=3 ttl=59 time=24.764 ms

--- 178.33.47.59 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 24.710/24.814/24.927 ms

Ukraine

PING 31.28.170.115 (31.28.170.115): 56 data bytes
Request timed out
Request timed out
Request timed out
Request timed out

--- 31.28.170.115 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

US

PING 64.25.39.118 (64.25.39.118): 56 data bytes
Request timed out
Request timed out
Request timed out
Request timed out

--- 64.25.39.118 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

DE

PING 79.133.35.13 (79.133.35.13): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: seq=0 ttl=61 time=36.268 ms
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: seq=1 ttl=61 time=36.181 ms
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: seq=2 ttl=61 time=36.587 ms
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: seq=3 ttl=61 time=36.296 ms

--- 79.133.35.13 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 36.181/36.333/36.587 ms

DE

PING 193.192.58.34 (193.192.58.34): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: seq=0 ttl=60 time=37.071 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: seq=1 ttl=60 time=37.088 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: seq=2 ttl=60 time=37.005 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: seq=3 ttl=60 time=36.914 ms

--- 193.192.58.34 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 36.914/37.019/37.088 ms

UK

PING 94.23.159.87 (94.23.159.87): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: seq=0 ttl=123 time=25.892 ms
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: seq=1 ttl=123 time=25.383 ms
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: seq=2 ttl=123 time=25.341 ms
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: seq=3 ttl=123 time=25.220 ms

--- 94.23.159.87 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 25.220/25.459/25.892 ms

UK

PING 78.110.163.196 (78.110.163.196): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: seq=0 ttl=58 time=38.841 ms
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: seq=1 ttl=58 time=38.869 ms
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: seq=2 ttl=58 time=39.033 ms
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: seq=3 ttl=58 time=38.998 ms

--- 78.110.163.196 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 38.841/38.935/39.033 ms

FR/DE

PING 206.127.158.40 (206.127.158.40): 56 data bytes
Request timed out
Request timed out
Request timed out
Request timed out

--- 206.127.158.40 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

Ireland

PING 86.43.38.8 (86.43.38.8): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 86.43.38.8: seq=0 ttl=59 time=6.165 ms
64 bytes from 86.43.38.8: seq=1 ttl=59 time=6.170 ms
64 bytes from 86.43.38.8: seq=2 ttl=59 time=6.626 ms
64 bytes from 86.43.38.8: seq=3 ttl=59 time=6.201 ms

--- 86.43.38.8 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 6.165/6.290/6.626 ms

Another UK

PING 212.58.244.20 (212.58.244.20): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 212.58.244.20: seq=0 ttl=57 time=20.128 ms
64 bytes from 212.58.244.20: seq=1 ttl=57 time=19.258 ms
64 bytes from 212.58.244.20: seq=2 ttl=57 time=18.900 ms
64 bytes from 212.58.244.20: seq=3 ttl=57 time=19.200 ms

--- 212.58.244.20 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 18.900/19.371/20.128 ms

I hope this is what you're looking for

Jonathan · 20-04-2014 1:21am

UPC 120Mbps.

jonathan@lambda:~$ for ip in $(cat /tmp/iplist); do ping -c10 $ip; done
PING 77.111.206.125 (77.111.206.125) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=26.6 ms
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=29.6 ms
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=28.5 ms
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=26.7 ms
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=30.1 ms
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=28.4 ms
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=28.4 ms
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=25.4 ms
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=28.7 ms
64 bytes from 77.111.206.125: icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=37.7 ms

--- 77.111.206.125 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9014ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.463/29.062/37.725/3.193 ms
PING 79.133.35.13 (79.133.35.13) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=39.7 ms
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=37.9 ms
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=40.7 ms
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=38.9 ms
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=37.2 ms
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=40.9 ms
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: icmp_seq=7 ttl=55 time=38.8 ms
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: icmp_seq=8 ttl=55 time=37.2 ms
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 time=40.6 ms
64 bytes from 79.133.35.13: icmp_seq=10 ttl=55 time=38.9 ms

--- 79.133.35.13 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.215/39.128/40.926/1.331 ms
PING 87.98.142.49 (87.98.142.49) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=42.5 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=40.9 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=43.9 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=41.9 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=40.0 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=38.9 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=42.6 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=40.3 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=44.0 ms
64 bytes from 87.98.142.49: icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=42.7 ms

--- 87.98.142.49 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9014ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.958/41.808/44.010/1.618 ms
PING 94.23.159.87 (94.23.159.87) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: icmp_seq=1 ttl=112 time=47.7 ms
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: icmp_seq=2 ttl=112 time=46.0 ms
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: icmp_seq=3 ttl=112 time=45.0 ms
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: icmp_seq=4 ttl=112 time=43.8 ms
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: icmp_seq=5 ttl=112 time=47.0 ms
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: icmp_seq=6 ttl=112 time=45.9 ms
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: icmp_seq=7 ttl=112 time=44.0 ms
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: icmp_seq=8 ttl=112 time=42.9 ms
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: icmp_seq=9 ttl=112 time=46.0 ms
64 bytes from 94.23.159.87: icmp_seq=10 ttl=112 time=45.0 ms

--- 94.23.159.87 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 42.913/45.375/47.781/1.431 ms
PING 178.33.47.59 (178.33.47.59) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=41.0 ms
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=39.9 ms
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=43.0 ms
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=42.4 ms
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=40.4 ms
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=43.9 ms
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=42.0 ms
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=40.9 ms
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=42.5 ms
64 bytes from 178.33.47.59: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=43.5 ms

--- 178.33.47.59 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.948/41.992/43.950/1.300 ms
PING 78.110.163.196 (78.110.163.196) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=19.7 ms
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=22.7 ms
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=20.9 ms
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=23.9 ms
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=23.2 ms
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=21.9 ms
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: icmp_seq=7 ttl=54 time=19.7 ms
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: icmp_seq=8 ttl=54 time=23.3 ms
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: icmp_seq=9 ttl=54 time=21.3 ms
64 bytes from 78.110.163.196: icmp_seq=10 ttl=54 time=20.2 ms

--- 78.110.163.196 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9014ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.762/21.742/23.977/1.477 ms
PING 31.28.170.115 (31.28.170.115) 56(84) bytes of data.

--- 31.28.170.115 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9072ms

PING 193.192.58.34 (193.192.58.34) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=38.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=36.3 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=39.9 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=38.9 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: icmp_seq=5 ttl=53 time=38.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: icmp_seq=6 ttl=53 time=37.2 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: icmp_seq=7 ttl=53 time=36.0 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: icmp_seq=8 ttl=53 time=39.9 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: icmp_seq=9 ttl=53 time=38.9 ms
64 bytes from 193.192.58.34: icmp_seq=10 ttl=53 time=37.9 ms

--- 193.192.58.34 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9009ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.005/38.158/39.989/1.301 ms
PING 64.25.39.118 (64.25.39.118) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 64.25.32.82 icmp_seq=1 Packet filtered
From 64.25.32.82 icmp_seq=9 Packet filtered

--- 64.25.39.118 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 9002ms

PING 206.127.158.40 (206.127.158.40) 56(84) bytes of data.

--- 206.127.158.40 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9072ms

gab999 · 22-04-2014 1:59pm

Good Afternoon,

A big thanks to bloodyhawk and Jonathan for taking the time and helping me out, I really appreciated. And yes bloodyhawk it was exactly what I was looking for. If I could ask you another small favor could you do a traceroute to these few IP's not a ping test but a traceroute if you have time. Command Prompt > Type "Tracert 206.127.158.65". The IP's that I would like you guys to do these tests are as follows 206.127.158.44 - 206.127.158.40 - 206.127.158.65 FR/DE | 64.25.39.118 US. Thanks again for your help!

regards
gab999

gab999 · 25-05-2014 3:06pm

Bump to the top.

gab999 · 13-06-2014 3:12am

Bump, anyone else have some suggestions please?

gab999 · 20-06-2014 7:05am

Bump, anyone else have some recommendations? :-)

ArthurG · 20-06-2014 7:25am

gab999 wrote: »

Bump, anyone else have some recommendations? :-)

Given that you started this thread over 4 months ago, why don't you just sign up to a provider yourself?. If you can wait this long for randomers on the internet to provide you information, I wonder how serious a request it is.

Cabaal · 24-06-2014 9:23am

No more bumping on this, if people wanted to respond by now they would have.
Repeated bumping is not on.

Low Latency/Ping Internet Providers in Ireland - Dublin 5

Comments