Would you rather?

OU812

Say you go exploring in a group of four people, none of whom know each other. The place you go to is pitch black, but you all have torches.

At one point, all the torches go out & you're left in the black for one minute. You can see nothing. Everyone stops moving and there is no sound.

When the torches come back on, would you rather there be five people in your group or three?

AnonoBoy

>>> GO NORTH INTO FOREST.

Satriale

Three

old hippy

I don't want to explore any strangers at this moment in time

Duff

I've a torch on my phone though, can I use that?

Mena

Five. KILL IT!

DoctorEdgeWild

For 3 people, turn to paragraph 312.
For 5 people, turn to paragraph 64.
To draw your broadsword and attack, turn to paragraph 12.

Jester252

Five. He might be a nice guy who got lost.

Meangadh

Five. If the new person was a threat then he/she would be outnumbered anyway so hopefully it'd all be ok. The hell of having to cope with having someone you know go missing would be horrific.

(If the 5th person happened to be Johnny Depp/Hugh Jackman/Jake Gyllenhaal that would be all the better.)

MugMugs

What about four and a half? Why discriminate against little people?

Idle Passerby

So its a choice between everyone being present (you went with four other people so 5 originally in the group) or two people missing. Everyone still there seems less hassle so I pick that.

Alf Veedersane

OU812 wrote: »

Say you go exploring in a group of four people, none of whom know each other. The place you go to is pitch black, but you all have torches.

At one point, all the torches go out & you're left in the black for one minute. You can see nothing. Everyone stops moving and there is no sound.

When the torches come back on, would you rather there be five people in your group or three?

5.

The extra person is probably the chap that fixed the torches. He'll be useful to keep with you on the expedition.

Mammanabammana

Is it a person or a dog like in the famous five?

I never understood why the dog was part of the famous five but wasn't part of the secret seven.

preston johnny

Alf Veedersane wrote: »

5.

The extra person is probably the chap that fixed the torches. He'll be useful to keep with you on the expedition.

Or he may be the fcuker that did punch their lights out!

Duggy747

Roll dice.

If below 6, turn to page 27.

If over 6, turn to page 51.

If you still have the Wizard's cloth, turn to page 30.

old hippy

Mammanabammana wrote: »

Is it a person or a dog like in the famous five?

I never understood why the dog was part of the famous five but wasn't part of the secret seven.

Timmy wasn't part of that posse

Fizman

I'd have to ask the fifth guy how he managed to join us without making a sound. That's pretty unnerving, if a little impressive.

fergiesfolly

There would only be two.
I scattered the minutes the lights went out and took the best lookin woman.

Annasopra

Idle Passerby wrote: »

So its a choice between everyone being present (you went with four other people so 5 originally in the group) or two people missing. Everyone still there seems less hassle so I pick that.

Not with 4; in a group of 4 so it's one person missing

Annasopra

Don't care about Daddy I'll have chips please.

Alf Veedersane

preston johnny wrote: »

Or he may be the fcuker that did punch their lights out!

If that was the case, he would probably have been spotted earlier.

Unless he has 4 hands and could punch out 4 torches simultaneously.

Dyr

In this situation it should be obvious that the other two/four are plotting against you and you need to make plans to kill them all

Mammanabammana

old hippy wrote: »

Timmy wasn't part of that posse

No no I mean the secret seven's dog, Scamper or Ballsack or whatever he was called.