Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Canon SLR Lens Difference

  • 15-11-2013 10:36am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 387 ✭✭


    In simple terms can someone explain what the difference between an IS II and a DC III lens. This is in relation to an 18-55 lens kit for a Canon EOS 600D.

    Would one be a step ahead of the other or for the average amateur is the difference negligible.

    Thanks


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 885 ✭✭✭Splinters


    The IS bit stands for Image Stabilisation, and is Canon's terms for....you guessed it....image stabilisation. Tamron call this VC, Sigma call this OS.

    The II and III bit simply signify its version or 3 of this particular lens. It has no bearing on how good or bad it is if you're comparing 2 different lens. Version 3 of a very cheap budget lens will not be comparable to the first version of a high end Canon L lens.

    The DC bit is Sigma's term to signify the lens is made for APS-C sensor cameras, basically crop sensors.


Advertisement