Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Match Thread: Newport Gwent Dragons vs Leinster Rugby, Fri 01st Nov 19:05, RTE/BBCW

  • 31-10-2013 3:46pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭


    logo-rabopro12.jpg

    A Test of Depth


    Leinster are currently without 17 players due to international commitments. Add to that injuries to Richardt Strauss, Leo Cullen, Jordi Murphy and Andrew Goodman and that's nearly a full match day squad absent for the trip to Rodney Parade this week. There are very few sides in world rugby that could field a competitive side missing so many players. Yet from the team sheet below there are still a couple of international names, as well as a couple of internationals in the making. Leinsters starting XV, while not an intimidating line-up, is by no means a dud side. And again though the bench may not have the impact we're used to from Leinster sides it's important to note that it contains yet more home grown front-row talent. They may not be there yet, but games like these will provide these guys with the opportunity to learn the ropes of senior rugby without the same pressure of expectation given our threadbare squad.

    This week they travel to Rodney Parade to face the Dragons, who sit just 1 place behind Leinster in the league but ARE trailing by 5 points. The Dragons bought wisely over the summer and have won all of their home games so far this season. They have also lost all of their away games though. Rodney Parade is never an easy place to travel to and with a weakened side this could be a really tough encounter for Leinster.

    Michael Bent has moved to LH with Martin Moore starting at TH. The young Landsdowne man has really impressed this season and should be cementing himself as our back-up TH, and possibly over the next year or so challenging Mike Ross for the number 3 jersey. Tom Denton partners Quinn Roux in the second row. Denton is a significant drop over both Toner and McCarthy and really needs to be putting in a few good performances now as he has yet to justify his place in the squad. Shane Jennings captains the side and will hopefully be a lot closer to match fitness after a sub-par performance last week (albeit coming in at the last minute for SOB for his first game post injury). Rhys Ruddock has looked strong so far this season but questions will remain about his ability to control ball at the back of the scrum.

    Leinsters back line has a very unfamiliar look about it. Cooney partners Gopperth at half back with the Reid-Fitzgerald mid-field again getting the nod. Leinsters options at 12 are severly limited, and the 13 shirt was pretty much a straight shoot out between Fitzy and Macken. The only other real option would have been selecting Reid and Macken in the centre with Fitzy at 11 and Tuqiri at 14. Zane Kirchner gets his first start in a Leinster jersey and will be hoping to make an impression.

    This will not be an easy task for Leinster and having not been able to hit form with a far stronger squad they could really struggle against the Dragons tomorrow. I think the best that Leinster fans can realistically hope for is a LBP from what will likely be a very poor spectacle. If they can come through this game with points, or even a win, though it would be invaluable to the players themselves. And could also end up being invaluable to the team come May.

    20.gif
    ||
    19.gif

    Zane Kirchner|
    15
    |Hallam Amos
    Darragh Fanning|
    14
    |Tom Prydie
    Luke Fitzgerald|
    13
    |Pat Leach
    Noel Reid|
    12
    |Ross Wardle
    Lote Tuqiri|
    11
    |Adam Hughes
    Jimmy Gopperth|
    10
    |Jason Tovey
    John Cooney|
    9
    |Richie Rees
    ||
    Michael Bent|
    1
    |Owen Evans
    Aaron Dundon|
    2
    |Sam Parry
    Martin Moore|
    3
    |Dan Way
    Quinn Roux|
    4
    |Adam Jones
    Tom Denton|
    5
    |Matthew Screech
    Dominic Ryan|
    6
    |Jevon Groves
    Shane Jennings CAPTAIN|
    7
    |Lewis Evans CAPTAIN
    Rhys Ruddock|
    8
    |Netani Talei
    ||
    James Tracy|
    16
    |Hugh Gustafson
    Jack O'Connell|
    17
    |Nathan Williams
    Tadhg Furlong|
    18
    |Francisco Chaparro
    Ben Marshall|
    19
    |Rob Sidoli
    Leo Auva'a|
    20
    |Ieuan Jones
    Luke McGrath|
    21
    |Jonathan Evans
    Cathal Marsh|
    22
    |Kris Burton
    Brendan Macken|
    23
    |Dan Evans


«13456710

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    molloyjh wrote: »
    The only other real option would have been selecting Reid and Macken in the centre with Fitzy at 11 and Tuqiri at 14.

    Which is what MOC should have done. Macken gets the HEC games, then unsighted, while Fitz wasn't exactly great at 13 last week.

    In my 7 deadly sins for rugby, paramount is chopping and changing the midfield too often: too many centres used this season so far, and it showed last week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    Which is what MOC should have done. Macken gets the HEC games, then unsighted, while Fitz wasn't exactly great at 13 last week.

    In my 7 deadly sins for rugby, paramount is chopping and changing the midfield too often: too many centres used this season so far, and it showed last week.

    Yeah Macken at 13 and Fitz at 11 would have been my preference all right. I wonder is MOC just not happy with any of our options at 13 particularly??? Drico aside obviously,


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,309 ✭✭✭former legend


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    In my 7 deadly sins for rugby, paramount is chopping and changing the midfield too often: too many centres used this season so far, and it showed last week.

    Would that not argue for keeping faith with Reid and Fitz this week? i.e. give them a chance at continuity?

    @molloyjh; fair play for doing a write-up on what must be the least glamourous tie of the season.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    Would that not argue for keeping faith with Reid and Fitz this week? i.e. give them a chance at continuity?

    @molloyjh; fair play for doing a write-up on what must be the least glamourous tie of the season.

    What I was trying to say is I wouldn't have had Fitz at 13 last week in the first place. I count BOD, Macken, Fitz & Tuqiri so far this season at 13, and I'm fairly sure Darcy +/- McFadden played there in the pre-season friendlies.

    BOD available => BOD
    BOD not available => Macken

    But the silliest selection of all was playig Tuqiri at 13


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Would that not argue for keeping faith with Reid and Fitz this week? i.e. give them a chance at continuity?

    @molloyjh; fair play for doing a write-up on what must be the least glamourous tie of the season.

    In our matches so far this season:

    Opposition:|Midfield
    Scarlets|Darce-Macken
    Ospreys|Darce-Macken
    Glasgow|Darce-Macken
    Cardiff|Reid-Drico
    Munster|Darce-Tuqiri
    Ospreys|Darce-Macken
    Castres|Darce-Macken
    Connacht|Reid-Fitz
    Dragons|Reid-Fitz

    If continuity was MOCs concern then Macken would be getting the nod at 13.

    And yes the preview was a little difficult to write this time around..... :D


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    apart from Tovey, i know none of that dragons team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,153 ✭✭✭Glass Prison 1214


    Good to see our 20 year old TH Tadhg Furlong in the 23 for the first time, hopefully he gets a run out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    But the silliest selection of all was playig Tuqiri at 13

    What's worse was the fact the guy had to be injured before MOC took him off. He wasn't fit, wasn't being utilised and was a complete non-entity in that game. Fitz was the only cover we had for him and while that wouldn't have been an ideal substitution it would have been a damn sight better than leaving it as it was.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,309 ✭✭✭former legend


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    What I was trying to say is I wouldn't have had Fitz at 13 last week in the first place. I count BOD, Macken, Fitz & Tuqiri so far this season at 13, and I'm fairly sure Darcy +/- McFadden played there in the pre-season friendlies.

    BOD available => BOD
    BOD not available => Macken

    But the silliest selection of all was playig Tuqiri at 13

    I don't think MOC rates Macken at all tbh. I thought he did well in the HC but...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    molloyjh wrote: »
    In our matches so far this season:

    Opposition:|Midfield
    Scarlets|Darce-Macken
    Ospreys|Darce-Macken
    Glasgow|Darce-Macken
    Cardiff|Reid-Drico
    Munster|Darce-Tuqiri
    Ospreys|Darce-Macken
    Castres|Darce-Macken
    Connacht|Reid-Fitz
    Dragons|Reid-Fitz
    If continuity was MOCs concern then Macken would be getting the nod at 13.

    And yes the preview was a little difficult to write this time around..... :D

    Cheers, and yes 4 midfield combos. I think Darce/Reid share 12, BOD/Macken share 13 and leave Tuqiri & Fitz on the wings. Otherwise, I wouldn't mind seeing Fitz get a concerted run at 12, but in that case leave Reid well out of it. I really did not think Fitz looked like a natural ouside centre last week.


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    Cheers, and yes 4 midfield combos. I think Darce/Reid share 12, BOD/Macken share 13 and leave Tuqiri & Fitz on the wings. Otherwise, I wouldn't mind seeing Fitz get a concerted run at 12, but in that case leave Reid well out of it. I really did not think Fitz looked like a natural ouside centre last week.

    i think judging Fitz on last week so far is a bit harsh. No one looked good last week (SOB apart as usual).

    Give him a few games at 13 where he can expose space and i think we would see a lot more from him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,632 ✭✭✭ssaye2


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    i think judging Fitz on last week so far is a bit harsh. No one looked good last week (SOB apart as usual).

    Give him a few games at 13 where he can expose space and i think we would see a lot more from him.

    Even when he doesn't play he looks good

    :D


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    ssaye2 wrote: »
    Even when he doesn't play he looks good

    :D

    man crush?? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    Cheers, and yes 4 midfield combos. I think Darce/Reid share 12, BOD/Macken share 13 and leave Tuqiri & Fitz on the wings. Otherwise, I wouldn't mind seeing Fitz get a concerted run at 12, but in that case leave Reid well out of it. I really did not think Fitz looked like a natural ouside centre last week.

    I'd be ok with Fitz at 13 (even if he didn't look like a natural in his first appearance) if there was some continuity (and experience) at inside centre at the same time. Having himself and Reid there together though isn't ideal.

    I suppose we have to look at player welfare and injuries too though. Drico and Tuqiri weren't available to play at 13 for the first 3 weeks or for the HEC and Fitz picked up another injury at the start of the season. Macken was really the only option for the majority of the season so far. It seems that as soon as he is no longer the only real option he gets dropped. He was dropped entirely for the Munster and Connacht games and is only really in the 23 for tomorrow because there's nobody else fit and available.

    MOC must not rate the guy, and if not then we have a very big problem at 13.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    man crush?? :D

    I'll allow it....

    I+ll+allow+it+_44e11a12a8eed02ebc6518fe1ff94768.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    molloyjh wrote: »
    I'd be ok with Fitz at 13 (even if he didn't look like a natural in his first appearance) if there was some continuity (and experience) at inside centre at the same time. Having himself and Reid there together though isn't ideal.

    I suppose we have to look at player welfare and injuries too though. Drico and Tuqiri weren't available to play at 13 for the first 3 weeks or for the HEC and Fitz picked up another injury at the start of the season. Macken was really the only option for the majority of the season so far. It seems that as soon as he is no longer the only real option he gets dropped. He was dropped entirely for the Munster and Connacht games and is only really in the 23 for tomorrow because there's nobody else fit and available.

    MOC must not rate the guy, and if not then we have a very big problem at 13.

    Yeah, well whatever the case, it's one of these self-evident truths that the midfield needs continuity to thrive. Stick with Fitz then, but if I see Macken at 13 next week...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    Yeah, well whatever the case, it's one of these self-evident truths that the midfield needs continuity to thrive. Stick with Fitz then, but if I see Macken at 13 next week...

    We've 3 weeks off now after this one so hopefully they'll use that time to sort out some of these issues. But even then there's just 1 game before the internationals are back and if Drico comes through unscathed there'll only be the Edinburgh game between then and February to see who MOC selects where. I'm not sure we're going to get much clarity until February at this stage. Unless ofcourse something happens to Drico in the mean time.....touch wood..... :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    apart from Tovey, i know none of that dragons team.

    Rees, Prydie, Talei are all good players too, I think Way is decent enough too. Lots of inexperience but they have some talent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    I'm glad to see them persist with Fitz, you can't throw someone in at 13 one week and then immediately drop them the next if they don't instantly set the world on fire (he wasn't awful). At the same time I do wonder if MOC has a serious lack of faith in Macken. Too early to say of course but it has become a trend, hopefully it's just case of seeing what Fitz can offer.

    Also great to see Tadgh Furlong in a Leinster squad, even if he only gets 5 mins it will be great to see him in the jersey for the first time, one for the future


    EDIT: Although looking at the forecast it's due to be hammering it down in Newport which is a shame


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    Yeah, well whatever the case, it's one of these self-evident truths that the midfield needs continuity to thrive. Stick with Fitz then, but if I see Macken at 13 next week...

    This is continuity to an extent, Darcy-Macken played for two weeks and now the pair of Reid-Fitz are getting two weeks. I think many people including Fitz himself want to see him having a go at 13 and this is a chance for him to see what he can do.

    Not sure a Reid-Macken combo would fill me with confidence defensively either if Fitz was stuck out to the wing. I’d nearly actually be more open to a Fitz-Macken combination.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    So are any other side in the Pro12 even remotely as badly hit as us due to the AIs? Looking at some of the squads announced so far most are missing several but that's about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    molloyjh wrote: »
    So are any other side in the Pro12 even remotely as badly hit as us due to the AIs? Looking at some of the squads announced so far most are missing several but that's about it.

    Blame Joe for not releasing some fringe players.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Fireball07 wrote: »
    Blame Joe for not releasing some fringe players.

    The only people to blame are the large number of Leinster players that are so damn good. :D

    The core Irish squad needs time to gel under Schmidt I’d expect him to release more as the side settles.

    Ireland > Leinster (both happy and sad to say it's probably the first time I've felt that in the last couple of years)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    And you still have a very good chance of winning.....3/5 of the outside backs are experienced internationals, it's a decent half-back pairing, a strong back row and the Dragons are decent, but not fantastic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,632 ✭✭✭ssaye2


    Fireball07 wrote: »
    And you still have a very good chance of winning.....3/5 of the outside backs are experienced internationals, it's a decent half-back pairing, a strong back row and the Dragons are decent, but not fantastic.

    That's why winning the league was brilliant last year with so many players are away from the first team. The squad is stronger for it. Its a tricky balance to rotate and compete with players elsewhere etc but thankfully so far we are still competitive on all fronts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭Sprog 4


    I bet Kirchner gets injured and it ruled out for the season


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    Definitely feeling confident here. Backline looks patchy but full of quality. Denton is my big worry in the side.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    matthew8 wrote: »
    Definitely feeling confident here. Backline looks patchy but full of quality. Denton is my big worry in the side.

    I'd have thought Bent at 1 would be the biggest worry...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,632 ✭✭✭ssaye2


    Big scrum boom


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,718 ✭✭✭Taco Corp


    good first scrum, needed that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    Wtf? That was clearly still going forward


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,997 ✭✭✭Grimebox


    Why did the ref shout "use it"? They were making ground


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    Great start for the props.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    Try coming up here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,718 ✭✭✭Taco Corp


    so cooney hit jenning on the arse when ref called use it, should he just of gone for the ball and took it or was it up to jennings to give it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,071 ✭✭✭✭wp_rathead


    Some scrum


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    So why is Tuqiri wearing 14 when he was named as 11?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 326 ✭✭Woody1997


    Cooney with two silly mistakes early on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,632 ✭✭✭ssaye2


    Lineout good Ruddock taking everything


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,847 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    Ref very whistle happy. Lot of penalties so far.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,632 ✭✭✭ssaye2


    Ffs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,632 ✭✭✭ssaye2


    Need to score early Leinster look better


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,264 ✭✭✭✭Fireball07


    Very poor kick from Gopperth tbh. And then an even worse kick from the Dragons player, was it Wardle?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,632 ✭✭✭ssaye2


    Peno again there will be cards


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,632 ✭✭✭ssaye2


    3 nil dead centre


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    Interesting analysis from COS


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 326 ✭✭Woody1997


    What did 10 do that was unacceptable? Was it when he started complaining to the ref?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭Ugo Monye spacecraft experience


    some of the fielding in this game has been comically bad


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,632 ✭✭✭ssaye2


    Poor under high ball breeze peon to dragon's 50m


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,718 ✭✭✭Taco Corp


    Woody1997 wrote: »
    What did 10 do that was unacceptable? Was it when he started complaining to the ref?
    yeah, pretty sure it was mouthing to the ref


  • Advertisement
Advertisement