Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Hello All, This is just a friendly reminder to read the Forum Charter where you wish to post before posting in it. :)
Hi all, The AutoSave Draft feature is now disabled across the site. The decision to disable the feature was made via a poll last year. The delay in putting it in place was due to a bug/update issue. This should serve as a reminder to manually save your drafts if you wish to keep them. Thanks, The Boards Team.
Hello all! This is just a quick reminder to ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere.

M21 - Limerick to Rathkeale/Foynes [approved by An Bord Pleanala]

12223242527

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 382 ✭✭ Limerick74


    High Court Judicial Review period is 8 weeks from the ABP decision or advertisement of same (whatever is later).



  • Registered Users Posts: 197 ✭✭ specialbyte


    You're dead right. Don't know why I said it was 4 weeks. I'm certainly praying for a quiet an uneventful few weeks with no trips to the High Court.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,766 ✭✭✭✭ Cookiemunster


    Well there has been nothing negative in the local media since the decision was announced, so fingers crossed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 841 ✭✭✭ Hibernicis


    Very frustrating. It will be very interesting to see who is behind this and what the grounds are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 572 ✭✭✭ MICKEYG


    There must be some bar a claimant has to meet to get a judicial review. Hopefully it is not just filling out a form.

    Seeing as the project is approved, maybe progress can continue on tendering etc. While this is underway?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,281 ✭✭✭ Chris_5339762


    Look to the M28 for the timeline of judicial reviews. High court, appeal to Supreme Court, Supreme Court generally won't be going near it. I don't think it'll stop the road, but it will delay it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 796 ✭✭✭ corm500


    This country is a joke.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,558 ✭✭✭ hans aus dtschl


    I think some of what you suggest is slightly dangerous because some undeserving things seem to slip into the "strategic infrastructure" bracket since they brought it in. I've seen some wholly private power generation projects getting put through as "strategic" for instance. I'm definitely in favour of the decision deadlines though, I think that's badly needed. And reduced access to JR's too seems to make sense to me.

    Despite all the "tools" etc at the disposal of environmentalists to completely stop or delay projects, there still aren't a lot of good tools to enforce good roads design. Things like the current iteration of Shannonpark Roundabout in Carrigaline, or the Tivoli dual carriageway realignment etc: these projects shouldn't be getting approved and I have no idea how they're passing safety audits. So I definitely don't like the idea of allowing roads to progress through planning as "strategic" as there's just too many basic mistakes as it is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 806 ✭✭✭ KrisW1001


    Have you ever filed an objection to a project? Sometimes, the reason can simply be that nobody raised the issue...



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,558 ✭✭✭ hans aus dtschl


    Absolutely. I've had them ignore my submissions (in writing) before being slapped down by the regulator, NTA or politicians. They'll also hilariously often try and "ghost" you, if you point to the relevant standards: they'll communicate plenty if they think you know nothing, fobbing you off about how designs meet all the standards, and they go silent if you point out the relevant standards!

    The process is really bad. Like surprisingly bad. You would think that professionals would appreciate you flagging basic mistakes, but it's like they consider it an insult to their profession or something. I can only assume there's a bad culture in Irish road engineering: it wouldn't fly in the industries I work in - people get rewarded for pointing out mistakes.

    And as a recent example in terms of approvals, no matter what side of the Galway ring road you're on, most people will agree that it's actually astounding that it was approved, but that they didn't subsequently attempt to defend it's approval. Whatever you think of the grounds for the objection (whether you think it's right or wrong) it was really well known at the time ABP were "reviewing" it and approving it. It wasn't some vague fine-print text clause on a document, it was something that was regularly being discussed and debated in public. And the project was approved without even attempting to deal with the issue.

    So yes, I would have fears about putting roads through as strategic infrastructure for that reason. We need to improve the process definitely so that projects progress way faster, but I think pushing roads through planning with the good old ABP as our expert eyes and ears would possibly be a step in the wrong direction!



  • Registered Users Posts: 503 ✭✭✭ Limerick91


    How long will this delay the project by, months/years??



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,716 ✭✭✭ Pete_Cavan


    Depends. If it reaches the High Court then likely two years, maybe more or even indefinitely if those takingtheJR are successful. They could be thrown out or withdrawn before getting there, it which case it would be months.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 4,570 Mod ✭✭✭✭ spacetweek


    This project isn't due to commence until 2025, which is ample time for JRs to be dealt with.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,716 ✭✭✭ Pete_Cavan


    But advanced works need to be completed first, not sure if they can proceed with a JR is progress.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14 nearlybroke


    What’s the latest on this road it seems a certain hotel has lodged an objection



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 503 ✭✭✭ Limerick91


    Which hotel



  • Registered Users Posts: 560 ✭✭✭ annfield1978


    Whats the latest on the judicial reviews?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 4,570 Mod ✭✭✭✭ spacetweek


    Don't hold your breath, could take ages.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 13,496 Mod ✭✭✭✭ marno21


    3 separate judicial reviews according to TII in the Oireachtas last week.



  • Registered Users Posts: 560 ✭✭✭ annfield1978




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,716 ✭✭✭ Pete_Cavan


    i had a look for them in the project CPO schedule;

    Most of the land listed as them owning is stated as part of public road and/or part of river, with LCC or OPW list as Occupier. Basically, they may own the land but its not usable. Looks to be about 0.5Ha from them listed as "Land" and them as the Occupier.

    Looking on Google Maps, the motorway passes through an agricultural field north of their stud farm. Their land seems to extend south east from there, away from the proposed motorway. There is a house with a gate into the Equestrian Centre right beside that field. I wonder is there real concern that a motorway on embankment will be right next to this house?



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 13,496 Mod ✭✭✭✭ marno21


    Is it a case of racket from the motorway disturbing the horses? Sounds like that’s a job for noise barriers rather than stopping the project altogether.

    On the plus side anyone arriving into Shannon or from anywhere north of Munster doesn’t have to go through Adare coming to visit the stud. A massive plus in my opinion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 560 ✭✭✭ annfield1978




Advertisement