British Military involved in the death of diana

Sunnyisland

http://www.rte.ie/news/2013/0818/468808-diana-reports/


Police in Britain police say they are assessing new information over the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed in a car crash in Paris in August 1997.
Reports suggest that officers are looking into an allegation that the British military might have been involved.
Police are also examining if the information has come from a British Army source.
Scotland Yard said the probe was not a re-investigation of the deaths.
However detectives were assessing the "relevance and credibility" of the information.
An inquest jury found the couple had been unlawfully killed due to 'gross negligence' on the part of their driver Mr Henri Paul and paparazzi who chased them at high speed from the Ritz Hotel in Paris.
Mr Paul's drink-driving, the paparazzi pursuit and failure to wear seatbelts contributed to the deaths, the jury said.


So the British military might have been involved ? What you think Ah ?

Wouldent be surprised myself they couldent have Diana getting married to Dodi could they.

kneemos

Not a tall man.

btard

realies wrote: »

However detectives were assessing the "relevance and credibility" of the information.

When they do this I'll give you an opinion.

The Pheasant2

Slightly misleading thread title...

franklyon

Conspiracy forum that way

---

>

RachaelVO

Conspiracy theories abound on this...

Sure wasn't there one theory that Prince Philip had made some arrangement with MI5 or MI6 or summit like that, loada cack frankly all down to drink driving and the paps chasing them.

Sunnyisland

Aah yis can close this now, The match between limerick & clare is starting now...

shane9689

this is how many fcuks i give >>> <<< that many right there

pablomakaveli

I heard that the other shooter from the grassy knoll that really shot JFK caused them to crash because Diana knew too much about the moon landings being faked and that Elvis was an alien.

Yellow121

What were the reasons for wanting her dead?

Yellow121

realies wrote: »

Aah yis can close this now, The match between limerick & clare is starting now...

Yeah, I'm off to watch this too. Ignore my question in this thread.

Sunnyisland

shane9689 wrote: »

this is how many fcuks i give >>> <<< that many right there

Now now temper temper, that's what can cause car crashes

Femme_Fatale

Yellow121 wrote: »

What were the reasons for wanting her dead?

Muslim boyfriend was the only solid one I heard of... and even that seems pretty spurious.

Zebra3

Yellow121 wrote: »

What were the reasons for wanting her dead?

In case she married a muslim.

And the fact that her second sprog wasn't Charlie's.

beertons

Yellow121 wrote: »

What were the reasons for wanting her dead?

She was preggers, apparently. And still married to Charlie.

kneemos

realies wrote: »

Aah yis can close this now, The match between limerick & clare is starting now...

Are they wearing wellies?

Sunnyisland

kneemos wrote: »

Are they wearing wellies?

Nope And don't be trying to derail this very important thread :P

Dancor

beertons wrote: »

She was preggers, apparently. And still married to Charlie.

I thought the divorce was finalised by then. I'm going with the pregnancy theory. They didn't want the future king to have a Muslim brother.

Yellow121

Femme_Fatale wrote: »

Muslim boyfriend was the only solid one I heard of... and even that seems pretty spurious.

Really? They couldn't come up with something better than that?

A more cynical man may think that these latest rumours are quite nicely timed to coincide with the upcoming release of the film about her. After all nothing guarantees bums on seats like a little controversy.

longshanks

What ever became of the bodyguard who survived the crash?

Mr.Crinklewood

Yellow121 wrote: »

What were the reasons for wanting her dead?

Necrophilia.

Yellow121

Mr.Crinklewood wrote: »

Necrophilia.

Prince Charles is a necrophiliac? Or who? The muslim? I need more detail but I think this theory has merit.

mike65

Why would you employ the military rather than a lone hit man? - A hit man you could then kill?

Big Nasty

I heard Gerry Ryan was actually murdered and Today FM were behind it! :eek:

Chucken

beertons wrote: »

And still married to Charlie.

They were divorced in July 1996.

kneemos

mike65 wrote: »

Why would you employ the military rather than a lone hit man? - A hit man you could then kill?

Can't beat an old cut brake lines style car crash.
I'm sure they learnt their lesson from the JFK assassination.

Mr.Crinklewood

Yellow121 wrote: »

Prince Charles is a necrophiliac? Or who? The muslim? I need more detail but I think this theory has merit.

You know, you know!!!


"Prince Charles is a necrophiliac" is an anagram for "Paris car crash Incipience Hello"

Lock your doors....

paddy147

A royal baby is born and a few weeks later Diana's death come back into the media spotlight.


Funny that.

paddy147

MCMLXXV wrote: »

I heard Gerry Ryan was actually murdered and Today FM were behind it! :eek:

I also heard that cocaine killed Katie French.


Dont know who actually did it though.


Oh wait....

mad muffin

IT WAS THE ILLUMINAZI'S! :pac:

Big Nasty

paddy147 wrote: »

I also heard that cocaine killed Katie French.

Who?

Royal Irish

Could you imagine Prince William having a half brother called Mohammad. I couldn't and Royal's couldn't either, so they killed her.

Big Nasty

Royal Irish wrote: »

Could you imagine Prince William having a half brother called Mohammad. I couldn't and Royal's couldn't either, so they killed her.

FACT!

FYP

kneemos

Mr.Crinklewood wrote: »

You know, you know!!!


"Prince Charles is a necrophiliac" is an anagram for "Paris car crash Incipience Hello"

Lock your doors....

Incipience you say.

paddy147

MCMLXXV wrote: »

Who?

Exactly...;):pac:




Katie French.........you know the wannabe Z lister who would do more or less anything to be on the pages of the newspapers.

Now everyone and anyone else is to blame for her death,apart from Katie herself.:rolleyes:

Addle

paddy147 wrote: »

A royal baby is born and a few weeks later Diana's death come back into the media spotlight.


Funny that.

Even in death she hogs the media limelight.

Chucken

paddy147 wrote: »

A royal baby is born and a few weeks later Diana's death come back into the media spotlight.


Funny that.

What?

NinjaK

Wouldn't be surprised, they have so much innocent blood on their hands

kneemos

NinjaK wrote: »

Wouldn't be surprised, they have so much innocent blood on their hands

Eh?

Big Nasty

kneemos wrote: »

Eh?

This for a start, was surprised at it myself to be honest - maybe it's BS?

The Only 22 Countries in the World Britain Has Not Invaded

paddy147

Chucken wrote: »

What?

WHAT???

NinjaK

kneemos wrote: »

Eh?

Maby you should open a history book!

Scrag

Another conspiracy theory

jill_valentine

Somebody has to.

Fratton Fred

MCMLXXV wrote: »

This for a start, was surprised at it myself to be honest - maybe it's BS?

The Only 22 Countries in the World Britain Has Not Invaded

it is a very loose definition. For example, it includes Germany, Belgium the Netherlands, etc, which was due to a small matter of the nazi occupation there. It also includes places like Spain and Portugal, where Britain went to fight Napoleon. So it should really be 22 countries where britain hasn't fought a war, rather than actually invaded.

The shinner bots will love it though.

Chucken

paddy147 wrote: »

WHAT???

Ive no idea what thats about.

Can you explain your post about the new royal baby and Diana being in the media now?

Fratton Fred

Zebra3 wrote: »

In case she married a muslim.

And the fact that her second sprog wasn't Charlie's.

Lol.

You've been reading too many gossip magazines. Harry was a baby when she first met Hewitt, it is well known. The only connection is the red hair, which he gets from his uncle.

Yellow121

Fratton Fred wrote: »

it is a very loose definition. For example, it includes Germany, Belgium the Netherlands, etc, which was due to a small matter of the nazi occupation there. It also includes places like Spain and Portugal, where Britain went to fight Napoleon. So it should really be 22 countries where britain hasn't fought a war, rather than actually invaded.

The shinner bots will love it though.

You've ruled out a few countries. I wonder what the real number is. Quite a big number though.

paddy147

Chucken wrote: »

Ive no idea what thats about.

WHAT??????

NuckingFacker

It's funny how laid back people are about this, I'd have thought there would be uproar at the suggestion that she'd been murdered by the Military(which I reckon she was) - she might not have been so well loved after all. "Murdered was she? Ah well.."