Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Anyone else here disturbed by latest Garda revelations/actions?

  • 25-05-2013 01:20AM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭


    This thread is not about penalty points/individual corruption or incompetency. Nor is it about individual Guards such as the one in the papers for forging documents or the ex-guard who's patio was going to be excavated in the last week or so looking for a body that current Guards think is buried there. We all know about these stories. There are bad apples in every barrel.

    There has been a lot in the media recently about their interactions with politicians and I find this disturbing. I am not talking about the politics here. I want to talk about it from the other angle.

    1) Claire Daly incident: This one is most innocuous of the three but I'll mention it as some people shouted "conspiracy". Whatever the matter of transmission it still remains that it entered the public domain very quickly although it could easily have been via a bystander or third party. (Disclaimer, I can't stand this bint)
    2) Ming's magical disappearing penalty points made the news a few years after it happened
    3) Wallace "discretion": Squad car pulls up beside Micko. Micko drops the phone and has a bit of banter. Squad car drives away. Now, shouldn't every law-abiding citizen not be asking why the Guards in question did not do their job and enforce the law? And furthermore, when they passed this information up through the chain (presumably recently) were they reprimanded for not doing their job? To my mind, if a normal person went to their boss and admitted not doing their job, they would get reprimanded.
    4) Shatter's latest incident: Again we are hearing stuff like they have a record of this on file.

    It begs the question as to whether the Guards compile information on people who get to make decisions in this country in case that information ever comes in handy further down the road in "negotiations". Conspiracy? Maybe so, but it's a bit of a coincidence that those most vocal in their criticism of the Guards recently seem to have been the ones outed. How many of the rest of them are keeping quiet because they remember the time that the Guard didn't give them the fine for speeding?

    It is a bit disturbing, albeit not 100% unexpected. Of course we'd expect individuals to act in this way, but as a group, and through the official chain of command, I think I'd expect proper procedure to be followed and sanctions to be handed back down the chain of command to those responsible.

    Opinions? Again, I'm not focusing on the politicians. I just used them for examples. I think it's an abuse of power in many ways. How do you think that should things be tightened up? I'm not against the exposing of crimes or wrong-doing, I'm against the hoarding of such information, potentially with the knowledge that it could become a valuable bargaining tool or weapon in the future.

    TL:DR version : Actually, don't worry about it princess. If the paragraphs are too big, the ideas might hurt your poor little head anyway


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,879 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    I say get over it, its just guards have a gossip like most people do about other people's lives. I have just about had enough of this playground crap he was stopped here and you were stopped there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭yore


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    I say get over it, its just guards have a gossip like most people do about other people's lives. I have just about had enough of this playground crap he was stopped here and you were stopped there.

    Gossip is fair enough. But passing this stuff up the ranks through official channels is more than gossip.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,742 ✭✭✭dirtyden


    Your post is pure conjecture so I am not at all disturbed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭yore


    dirtyden wrote: »
    Your post is pure conjecture so I am not at all disturbed.


    What is conjecture? That it was reported that the Garda Commissioner told a minister that a Guard saw a politician using a mobile phone a few years ago but didn't do his job and give him a "ticket" for it?


    Do you think that the Garda Commissioner would be telling a minister that a Guard saw "DirtyDen" using a mobile without a handsfree a few years back but didn't do anything about it apart from a bit of banter?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,359 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    It is weird,how would an individual guard remember what happened at a routine traffic stop years earlier unless it was noted down.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,362 ✭✭✭Sergeant


    No. We live in a damn fine example of democracy. The vast majority of our police force do a great job.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,879 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    kneemos wrote: »
    It is weird,how would an individual guard remember what happened at a routine traffic stop years earlier unless it was noted down.

    If I was a guard and I stopped a TD's its something I wouldn't forget.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭yore


    Sergeant wrote: »
    No. We live in a damn fine example of democracy. The vast majority of our police force do a great job.


    Sergent, (I hope your name does not imply partiality) I'm not focusing on individual guards. I'm not saying they are or aren't all corrupt. But does it not seem unnerving to you that they seems to be getting involved in politics through their top management.

    Yes, I will say that the guard who saw Wallace should have fined him. But the important thing to my mind is that when he reported that to his superiors, it was able to go straight to the top to be used as a weapon. What would I have expected in an ideal world

    Guard: "I saw Mick Wallace driving with his phone through a dangerous junction but I didn't bother me hole to enforce the law"
    Superintendent: "Right so. Official warning. The next time this happens it's going on your record that you aren't doing your job"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    Why was shatter not dragged to the nearest station to piss in a pot or have a doctor take blood when he twice failed to give a breath sample?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    yore wrote: »
    Now, shouldn't every law-abiding citizen not be asking why the Guards in question did not do their job and enforce the law?

    Heard a story in the pub the other night (bastions of folk wisdom) about a Guard who was transferred out of a particular area for doing his job 'too thoroughly'.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭Jimoslimos


    Part of AGS remit is in intelligence gathering, which is itself a dirty job. OK if you can keep it in-house and use it properly, but the problems arise when the media and politicians have access to this information, both these groups are well-versed in using sensitive information for political or business gain.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,188 ✭✭✭wil


    foggy_lad wrote: »
    Why was shatter not dragged to the nearest station to piss in a pot or have a doctor take blood when he twice failed to give a breath sample?
    I'd suspect they used common sense, considering it was just a routine checkpoint and there was no indication or suspicion that he had even been drinking.

    Why do people seem to be getting their knickers in a twist over relatively minor indiscretions and minor discretions and the correct use of warnings.
    Dont people realise politicians love these distractions away from much bigger issues.

    From what I see there is much blatant and reckless disregard for handheld mobile phone use while driving laws, so Joe Public might be better served by frequent/regular noted warnings than token small number of prosecutions which invariably take up police and court time better served elsewhere. Making an example of some is no example if the risk of getting stopped is very low.
    First strike should require proof of installation of bluetooth in car.

    Cant believe the number of luxury car drivers that cant afford a relatively inexpensive bluetooth kit/stereo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,743 ✭✭✭blatantrereg


    "Law and order are always and everywhere the law and order which protect the established hierarchy"
    Herbert Marcuse

    This is true. The things you refer to are the tip of the iceberg. They don't disturb me because I expect them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,844 ✭✭✭carzony


    foggy_lad wrote: »
    Why was shatter not dragged to the nearest station to piss in a pot or have a doctor take blood when he twice failed to give a breath sample?

    I was thinking that myself earlier, I'd imagine he had a sly drinky that night before jumping in the car. anyway, surely been breathalysed isnt that difficult even if you do have asthma? You only blow into the maching for a few seconds.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭WhatNowForUs?


    carzony wrote: »
    I was thinking that myself earlier, I'd imagine he had a sly drinky that night before jumping in the car. anyway, surely been breathalysed isnt that difficult even if you do have asthma? You only blow into the maching for a few seconds.

    It can be very hard to do. He should have however gone down to the station to give a sample. Having said all that this is getting away fron the real issue of what files are being held by who and who has access to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,844 ✭✭✭carzony


    It can be very hard to do. He should have however gone down to the station to give a sample. Having said all that this is getting away fron the real issue of what files are being held by who and who has access to them.


    I never thought it'd be that difficult:eek: Looking at the news lately it's almost like everyone has access to 'confidential' files.

    Saying that though, If I was in that position i'd probably wanna look up a few mates names and see if they'd gotten up to anything :p:p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43 TheDB


    WTF was Garda Commissioner collecting information on TD's. This has not been hightlighted enough. He interfered in the political process, he crossed the line and should be sacked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,742 ✭✭✭dirtyden


    yore wrote: »
    What is conjecture? That it was reported that the Garda Commissioner told a minister that a Guard saw a politician using a mobile phone a few years ago but didn't do his job and give him a "ticket" for it?


    Do you think that the Garda Commissioner would be telling a minister that a Guard saw "DirtyDen" using a mobile without a handsfree a few years back but didn't do anything about it apart from a bit of banter?

    That is one incident you are describing. But you seem to be alluding to some kind of instututional statsiesque level of organised spying.

    The incident above I would put down more to the vagaries of human nature. Wallace and Ming were going after the Garda and I would imagime the indivdual gardai involved in those cases were annoyed at the hypocrisy so perhaps passed that info up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    foggy_lad wrote: »
    Why was shatter not dragged to the nearest station to piss in a pot or have a doctor take blood when he twice failed to give a breath sample?

    Because he told them he had left the dail and apparently it is unconstitutional to arrest a TD travelling to or from the Dail

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,550 ✭✭✭davetherave


    Because he told them he had left the dail and apparently it is unconstitutional to arrest a TD travelling to or from the Dail
    I thought it was only on the way to the Dail. So that that they couldn't be stopped from voting.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,463 ✭✭✭CruelCoin


    wil wrote: »
    Cant believe the number of luxury car drivers that cant afford a relatively inexpensive bluetooth kit/stereo.

    If i'd paid a fortune on this lovely new car, why would i want to ruin it with a tacky bolt on accessory?

    It's like buying prada and modifying it with tweed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,234 ✭✭✭✭Cee-Jay-Cee


    I think your over-thinking non stories. Most of them are word of mouth stories that the media get hold off. I do t think its in any way suspicious and I certainly don't believe there is any conspiracy.

    If guards were to carry out their duties to the letter of the law and prosecute every single offence they detected or was reported to them then the complete policing system would collapse as there would be no guards available to do outdoor duties as they'd all be stuck in offices completing court and investigation files. Discretionary powers are needed to allow minor offences be dealt with by way of a warning/caution.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    wil wrote: »
    I'd suspect they used common sense, considering it was just a routine checkpoint and there was no indication or suspicion that he had even been drinking.


    If they went to the bother of breathalysing him, why didn't they follow up on it? Fair enough if he couldn't provide enough breath for the machine, but they should have then did a blood test or urine test.

    I don't think it is a trivial matter that laws that should apply to everyone equally seem to be subjectively applied depending on who the individual is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭KyussBishop


    There is an entire 'secret service' in Ireland I believe, that we have very little knowledge of, who likely do phone tapping and such without much in the way of due process.

    Would anyone really be surprised at all to learn that illegal wiretappings and accessing of records, goes on all the time in Ireland? Every once in a while you hear of (yet another) laptop full of a companies customer records going missing, and nothing being done about it, and companies largely don't give a toss about DPC requirements (and enforcement of regulation is really poor), so it's not much of a step to consider that exactly the same crap goes on in government all of the time, as it seems to be a part of our corrupt/criminogenic political/business 'culture'.

    If people can get away with it, without being caught (which is pretty easy where it comes to inadequately secured records, and even wholesale monitoring of telephone/internet data if you have the right 'friends'), and if there is money to be made (or political gain in) doing it, then (in this country in particular) there will be people who will do it.


    It's not just that either, but it's so ingrained in this country that for a lot of people their snap-reaction when it's brought up is "stop making a big deal of it", "happens all the time, nothing you can do about it" and sometimes "mind your own business"; there aren't just people willing to engage in that crap, but completely unrelated people who are willing to act as apologists for it.

    If we have had governments where there has been institutionalized tacit protection of child abusers in the church for well over half a century, and that this has only recently been investigated and pointed out, then that sets a pretty low standard for what other institutionalized corruption there may be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,313 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    BattleCorp wrote: »
    If they went to the bother of breathalysing him, why didn't they follow up on it? Fair enough if he couldn't provide enough breath for the machine, but they should have then did a blood test or urine test.

    I don't think it is a trivial matter that laws that should apply to everyone equally seem to be subjectively applied depending on who the individual is.

    If reports are to be beleived and Shatter told the Garda that he was coming from the Dail then it would have been against the law to arrest him and bring him to the station.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    That "Dail business" is a get out of jail free card is the disgrace here. Also Shatter would have been out on his ear in any functioning democracy and the senior Guard who supplied him with the information suspended pending an inquiry.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,414 ✭✭✭kraggy


    CJC999 wrote: »
    I think your over-thinking non stories. Most of them are word of mouth stories that the media get hold off. I do t think its in any way suspicious and I certainly don't believe there is any conspiracy.

    If guards were to carry out their duties to the letter of the law and prosecute every single offence they detected or was reported to them then the complete policing system would collapse as there would be no guards available to do outdoor duties as they'd all be stuck in offices completing court and investigation files. Discretionary powers are needed to allow minor offences be dealt with by way of a warning/caution.

    In the case of Shatter, if you or I failed to provide a breath sample, we'd be asked to go to the station for a blood or urine sample.

    Also, as Vincent Brown asked the other night, how did the Garda Commissioner, someone who 99% of the Gards have no dealings with, find out about Mick Wallace having been stopped? It does seem strange.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭yore


    CJC999 wrote: »
    I think your over-thinking non stories. Most of them are word of mouth stories that the media get hold off. I do t think its in any way suspicious and I certainly don't believe there is any conspiracy.
    Commissioner telling his boss, the Minister for Defence, some old nugget of information about a political rival is more than word-of-mouth.
    CJC999 wrote: »
    If guards were to carry out their duties to the letter of the law and prosecute every single offence they detected or was reported to them then the complete policing system would collapse as there would be no guards available to do outdoor duties as they'd all be stuck in offices completing court and investigation files. Discretionary powers are needed to allow minor offences be dealt with by way of a warning/caution.

    On the spot fine taking up court and investigation? More like the guards in question were too lazy. Perhaps they just weren't traffic corp and decided that's not their job. However they felt ok to report it to their superiors. And that information passed up through the chain as it served a purpose. No offence, but this paragraph sounds like it is spoken with someone who has the connections to get these "small" offences "waived" i.e. relation in the Guards who will take care of it for you!

    How many politicians are there now that might otherwise voice a negative opinion about something related to the Guards but won't because they know that they were in the past simply stopped at a checkpoint? Or that some guard can make up a claim that they say him/her committing an offence but did nothing about it?

    How can the Commissioner be ok with the fact that one of his men on the ground failed to do his job?
    Is there a record of the "incident" kept? Most people know that in any workplace scenario, records but be kept and incidents documented for them to be used at any later stage. The Guards apparently didn't stop or formally identify Wallace. How did the Commissioner know that it was him and not someone like him? There must be something other than "Hey Commissioner, Guard Murphy said he saw Wallace on the phone a few years ago. No official record of this now but please feel free to use it as a political lever".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭Busted Flat.


    yore wrote: »
    This thread is not about penalty points/individual corruption or incompetency. Nor is it about individual Guards such as the one in the papers for forging documents or the ex-guard who's patio was going to be excavated in the last week or so looking for a body that current Guards think is buried there. We all know about these stories. There are bad apples in every barrel.

    There has been a lot in the media recently about their interactions with politicians and I find this disturbing. I am not talking about the politics here. I want to talk about it from the other angle.

    1) Claire Daly incident: This one is most innocuous of the three but I'll mention it as some people shouted "conspiracy". Whatever the matter of transmission it still remains that it entered the public domain very quickly although it could easily have been via a bystander or third party. (Disclaimer, I can't stand this bint)
    2) Ming's magical disappearing penalty points made the news a few years after it happened
    3) Wallace "discretion": Squad car pulls up beside Micko. Micko drops the phone and has a bit of banter. Squad car drives away. Now, shouldn't every law-abiding citizen not be asking why the Guards in question did not do their job and enforce the law? And furthermore, when they passed this information up through the chain (presumably recently) were they reprimanded for not doing their job? To my mind, if a normal person went to their boss and admitted not doing their job, they would get reprimanded.
    4) Shatter's latest incident: Again we are hearing stuff like they have a record of this on file.

    It begs the question as to whether the Guards compile information on people who get to make decisions in this country in case that information ever comes in handy further down the road in "negotiations". Conspiracy? Maybe so, but it's a bit of a coincidence that those most vocal in their criticism of the Guards recently seem to have been the ones outed. How many of the rest of them are keeping quiet because they remember the time that the Guard didn't give them the fine for speeding?

    It is a bit disturbing, albeit not 100% unexpected. Of course we'd expect individuals to act in this way, but as a group, and through the official chain of command, I think I'd expect proper procedure to be followed and sanctions to be handed back down the chain of command to those responsible.

    Opinions? Again, I'm not focusing on the politicians. I just used them for examples. I think it's an abuse of power in many ways. How do you think that should things be tightened up? I'm not against the exposing of crimes or wrong-doing, I'm against the hoarding of such information, potentially with the knowledge that it could become a valuable bargaining tool or weapon in the future.

    TL:DR version : Actually, don't worry about it princess. If the paragraphs are too big, the ideas might hurt your poor little head anyway


    Nothing new, things were far worse in the seventies, the good thing about today's events, we have the internet to let people know what is going on, we no longer have to depend on lazy embedded journos. Not all mind you, there's still a small few who are courageous and carry out their responsibilities professionally.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 47 bus_driver


    CJC999 wrote: »
    I think your over-thinking non stories. Most of them are word of mouth stories that the media get hold off. I do t think its in any way suspicious and I certainly don't believe there is any conspiracy.

    If guards were to carry out their duties to the letter of the law and prosecute every single offence they detected or was reported to them then the complete policing system would collapse as there would be no guards available to do outdoor duties as they'd all be stuck in offices completing court and investigation files. Discretionary powers are needed to allow minor offences be dealt with by way of a warning/caution.


    where do you think the media get these stories from ( in the main ) ?

    paul Williams owes his entire career to loose tongued cops


Advertisement