Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Problem Question Moot PLEASE HELP :)

  • 12-03-2013 11:27pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21


    Would anyone be able to help me with this? I'm on the respondent side and I'm really stuck, I was thinking that Brendan should be suing the courier rather than the company and terms and exclusion clauses but that's all that i've got. Thanks
    Baggott v. Toyz On-Line Ltd.
    Brendan Baggott is an advertising executive with a love of electronic gadgets. After
    attending the “Toys for Overgrown Boys” exhibition in the R.D.S. in November, he
    decides that he simply has to have the “Robo Doberman” he sees in the show. He
    finds an Irish company, Toyz On-Line Ltd., that sells the product from its website and
    has a closer look at the product description which is as follows:
    Brendan has always wanted a Doberman but his girlfriend is allergic to dogs so the
    Robo Doberman is the perfect compromise! On 29 November 2012 he, clicks on the
    icon for the product, then proceeds to the purchase page. He enters his own e-mail
    address, his credit card details and directs that the product be delivered to his best
    friend’s house because he is planning a holiday and won’t be at home to take delivery.
    His best friend had purchased a product from a competing Irish company costing
    twice the price of Brendan’s purchase but which was entirely satisfactory, according
    to his best friend.
    The next morning, he receives an e-mail from Toyz On-Line Ltd. which confirms his
    order and states that the contract is subject to the terms and conditions of the website.
    There is a link to these at the bottom of every page of the website but Brendan never
    bothered clicking on it. He had never bought anything from Toyz On-Line before but
    he had bought products from many other websites with similar displays of links to
    LIFE SIZE, LIFE LIKE ROBO DOBERMAN!!! LOOKS,
    SOUNDS AND EVEN SMELLS REAL!!! ROBO
    DOBERMAN CAN BE FED AND TAKEN FOR WALKS.
    JUST WATCH OUT FOR HIS SUPERSHARP TEETH!!!
    THIS IS ONE DOG WHOSE BITE IS WORSE THAN ITS
    BARK.
    EXCELLENT AS A FAITHFUL COMPANION AND
    FEARSOME GUARD DOG. MOTION SENSORS ON
    THE ROBO DOBERMAN DETECT INTRUDERS AND
    Moot Problem Hilary Term 2013
    their terms and conditions. The terms and conditions of Toyz On-Line contained
    provisions which included the following:
    1.1 By ordering a product from this website, you accept all of the following terms and conditions.
    These are subject to change at any time and it is your responsibility to check them regularly before
    ordering in case of any changes.
    1.2 The website does not accept any responsibility for damage to the goods which occurs during
    transit or delivery.
    When Brendan got back from his holiday, his best friend dropped over the Doberman
    which he had not removed from the protective packaging in which it arrived. It turned
    out that the Doberman was not very life-like in appearance: it was the size of a small
    puppy rather than an adult Doberman. Furthermore, it did not make any noise at all as
    the button for that function had broken off and was in the bottom of the box in two
    pieces. The dog was also unable to move as the motor inside it was missing a part.
    Toyz On-Line had already taken payment from Brendan’s credit card. It initially
    ignored Brendan’s e-mails complaining about the product and eventually responded
    by post a month later stating that the terms and conditions excluded liability for the
    matters complained of. In the letter, Toyz On-Line enclosed a copy of their terms and
    conditions, the heading of which read:
    Terms and Conditions of Sale – 28th November 2012 Version
    Highlighted with a marker, was the following section:
    Amendments
    Clause 1.2 is hereby amended by the addition of subclause 1.2A
    Clause 1.2A No liability shall be accepted where a product ordered is smaller than
    advertised
    Brendan is very angry and takes an action for breach of contract against Toyz On-
    Line in the High Court. He loses and appeals the case to the Supreme Court.


Comments

  • Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    Sorry for your troubles!

    Moot .... Usually a competition or adversarial.

    Get your opponent to join, or put them on notice of your query.

    I've closed this thread, not to be mean, not to make life difficult for you, but to encourage you to head off, read up, decide your weak/strong points and compete with your adversary fairly and squarely.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement