(Women) 10 Round Numbers- how many of these can you run in 2013?

menoscemo

Come on girls, time for this to start up. I know a good few of you have already hit several of the targets this year

Name|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

a||||| |||||
b||| |||| |||

HelenAnne

menoscemo wrote: »

Come on girls, time for this to start up. I know a good few of you have already hit several of the targets this year

Name|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

a||||| |||||
b||| |||| |||

Hello! I know this is a stupid question, but since I didn't hit any targets last year, how do I fill in the table?

menoscemo

HelenAnne wrote: »

Hello! I know this is a stupid question, but since I didn't hit any targets last year, how do I fill in the table?

Quote my original post. Remove 'quote' tags so there are just table tags. Post your name under 'name'. Post your time under the appropriate distance...hopefully get a bit of competitiveness going amongst the ladies...

HelenAnne

|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

HelenAnne||||| |34.51||||
b||| |||| |||

Marthastew

|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

HelenAnne||||| |34.51||||
Marthastew||| |||33.07| ||89.18|



I expect to see you back here after the MSB 5K on March 16th HelenAnne:)

Thanks Meno for starting this:D
I know of at least two more females who should be in here (CL, CM:)) and I'm sure there's plenty more....

HelenAnne

You should ask for an Ultra time to be added!
I'm still struggling to get below 21 for 5k, but maybe this year!

career_move

|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

HelenAnne||||| |34.51||||
Marthastew||| |||33.07| ||89.18|
career_move|||||||||96.34|
Thanks Meno and MS:D
I was happier with the HM in Waterford even though it was over 2 minutes slower because I had to work so hard. I really feel like I didn't try hard enough for the last 4 or 5 miles in Bohermeen. Good me was saying "come on you're not even near your limit" but bad me was saying "ya but i'm not bovvered" and then bad me threw a bin bag over good me and took her to the back of my head so I couldn't hear her anymore :pac:[/QUOTE]

menoscemo

career_move wrote: »

|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

HelenAnne||||| |34.51||||
Marthastew||| |||33.07| ||89.18|
career_move|||||||||86.34|
Thanks Meno and MS:D

Wow, 86:34, that's good going

career_move

menoscemo wrote: »

Wow, 86:34, that's good going

:P

Marthastew

]|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

HelenAnne||||| |34.51||||
Marthastew||| || 19.48|33.07| ||89.18|
career_move|||||||||96.34|


Spotted Krusty adding his phenomenal 5K time to the boys' table so I thought I'd add my not-so phenomenal 5K time from the MSB 5K:D
Anyone else care to add to the list? Anyone got any races coming up?
Fingers, toes and everything else crossed I hope to be adding my marathon time here after London:)

HelenAnne

Well done!! I was hoping last night might be my mile night, but I just couldn't get going at the start and ended up with 6.11. Will try again in 2 weeks!

And best of luck in London, Marthastew!

jcsmum

|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

HelenAnne||||| |34.51||||
Marthastew||| || 19.48|33.07| ||89.18|
career_move|||||||||96.34|
jcsmum||||| |34.04||||

DOCO12

Great idea! I'm hoping Ill be adding my name to this list over the next months. Just one thing does anyone else thing that a sub 40 10k is allot more difficult to get than say a sub 20 5k or sub 35 5mile? Maybe it's just me?!

rom

DOCO12 wrote: »

Great idea! I'm hoping Ill be adding my name to this list over the next months. Just one thing does anyone else thing that a sub 40 10k is allot more difficult to get than say a sub 20 5k or sub 35 5mile? Maybe it's just me?!

Of course sub 40 10k is harder. you have yo do 2 x sub 20 5k's together. Sub 35 is 7min/mile so that would be a 21+min 5K so the order is hardest first

10k
5k
5M

sub 40min 10k would have you places in a lot of smaller races

Pisco Sour

I don't think anybody on the women's thread had a shot at the 400m last year. Would be good to see some of you give it a go this year, if not in a race then in a time trial. 70 seconds is not slow but it is very achievable.

menoscemo

DOCO12 wrote: »

Great idea! I'm hoping Ill be adding my name to this list over the next months. Just one thing does anyone else thing that a sub 40 10k is allot more difficult to get than say a sub 20 5k or sub 35 5mile? Maybe it's just me?!

Just like in the mens thread where the sub 60 10 mile is by far the hardest of the 'long distance' races. It is good to have some targets harder than others.

For the womens I'd say the Sub 40 10k is the toughest target. The 5 mile and the HM are easiest and the others are someway in between.
The 800m target is also very achievable.

DOCO12

Thanks for the replies. I def do agree that around here anyways a sub 40 10k would def have me placed if not winning 😊 I can't see myself getting anywhere near that for a few years but over the next few months the aim will be to get my name on the list for the 5k, 5mile and half marathon. Theres plenty of 5k and 5mile races around but could be a while before an opportunity to run a half marathon comes along. As you said Meno it's good to have one tougher aim. I can't see myself ever doing any 400/800/1 mile races but perhaps a few time trials are called for.

claralara

menoscemo wrote: »

The 5 mile and the HM are easiest...

The only 2 I have this year...

menoscemo

claralara wrote: »

The only 2 I have tried this year...

fyp;)

Anyway. Let's see them

claralara

menoscemo wrote: »

fyp;)

Anyway. Let's see them

Haha thanks

Can't do it from the phone but I will tomorrow when I'm on the lappie... I'm a techno remo!!

Ososlo

Always wonder why the speedier females on this forum are so slow to put their times up here. Guess the ladies in general are less competitive than the lads. This thread is always so inactive compared to the males' and I don't think it's 'cause the times aren't being achieved. Shame:(
If I ever got one of those times I'd be shouting it from the papal cross:D:D:D
Well done girls this year so far. The year is young;)

HelenAnne

rom wrote: »

Of course sub 40 10k is harder. you have yo do 2 x sub 20 5k's together. Sub 35 is 7min/mile so that would be a 21+min 5K so the order is hardest first

10k
5k
5M

sub 40min 10k would have you places in a lot of smaller races

This is exactly what I'm finding! Broke the 5 mile one in January, am inching closer to the 5k one, but the 10k one still seems very far out of reach!

rom

HelenAnne wrote: »

This is exactly what I'm finding! Broke the 5 mile one in January, am inching closer to the 5k one, but the 10k one still seems very far out of reach!

sub 40 10k would be similar to a 19:15 5k.

claralara

If there was a 2 mile round number, what do you reckon it would be?

RayCun

claralara wrote: »

If there was a 2 mile round number, what do you reckon it would be?

12 minutes, you wouldn't have 3k and 2 mile on the list

claralara

RayCun wrote: »

12 minutes, you wouldn't have 3k and 2 mile on the list

Missed it so....

And now to open the debate on whether the first mile of the 2 mile race counts for inclusion on the table...?! It was marked and official split given by steward...

Krusty_Clown

claralara wrote: »

Missed it so....

And now to open the debate on whether the first mile of the 2 mile race counts for inclusion on the table...?! It was marked and official split given by steward...

Sounds ok in my book (as long as the steward knew when the gun went off).
Does that explain why you didn't go sub 12 for the 2 miles? Over-cooked it in the first mile?!

Marthastew

claralara wrote: »

Missed it so....

And now to open the debate on whether the first mile of the 2 mile race counts for inclusion on the table...?! It was marked and official split given by steward...

I vote we accept it for the table:) Well done you!
And fill in your other slots, as Ososlo said this thread is too quiet and needs some more love and attention.

claralara

Krusty_Clown wrote: »

Sounds ok in my book (as long as the steward knew when the gun went off).
Does that explain why you didn't go sub 12 for the 2 miles? Over-cooked it in the first mile?!

The plan was that there was no plan - go out hard and hold on! A final blow out before the big day

RayCun

claralara wrote: »

Missed it so....

And now to open the debate on whether the first mile of the 2 mile race counts for inclusion on the table...?! It was marked and official split given by steward...

far be it for us to argue with that

claralara

RayCun wrote: »

far be it for us to argue with that

Fair enough so! Up she goes... caveated to the hilt ;)

claralara

Pisco Sour wrote: »

I don't think anybody on the women's thread had a shot at the 400m last year. Would be good to see some of you give it a go this year, if not in a race then in a time trial. 70 seconds is not slow but it is very achievable.

I definitely want to give a couple of the shorter distances a go this year. Boston next week and then I'm in for at least a few months of shorter, faster and harder efforts

|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

HelenAnne||||| |34.51||||
Marthastew||| || 19.48|33.07| ||89.18|
career_move|||||||||96.34|
jcsmum||||| |34.04||||
claralara|||5.55|||33.15|||88:44||

claralara

HelenAnne wrote: »

This is exactly what I'm finding! Broke the 5 mile one in January, am inching closer to the 5k one, but the 10k one still seems very far out of reach!

Well done today HelenAnne. Great to see you again. Have you seen us side-by-side on the start line ready for action?! http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomhealy/8625121612/in/set-72157633180457692

HelenAnne

Well done you today! Great running! Mine was a 1-second PB, I think, which I'm happy with as I was moaning for the last few days about having a cold / a cough etc etc (getitng my excuses in early!)

I think that's Aileen Hooper, my clubmate, beside you - I can see my blue socks behind your feet though and my husband took loads of pics & I think we're both in some of them!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/86489211@N00/sets/72157633174849641/with/8625843296/

like here you're leading the field & I'm just coming into shot on the right (blue socks again, and Lord Mayor Team t-shirt).

http://www.flickr.com/photos/86489211@N00/8624852976/in/set-72157633174849641/

Best of luck in the marathon - it sounds from your log like you've really put the work in.

Marthastew

|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

HelenAnne||||| |34.51||||
Marthastew||| || 19.48|33.07| ||89.18|3.19.49
career_move|||||||||96.34|
jcsmum||||| |34.04||||
claralara|||5.55|||33.15|||88:44||

I had to work VERY hard on Sunday to get this one so I'm proudly updating:D
Claralara, I believe you've a nice addition to this table also?

HelenAnne

Well done, Marthastew! Great running & great race report!

claralara

|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

HelenAnne||||| |34.51||||
Marthastew||| || 19.48|33.07| ||89.18|3.19.49
career_move|||||||||96.34|
jcsmum||||| |34.04||||
claralara||2:45.||5.55|||33.15|||88:44||3:06.21


Marathon & 800m updated....random I know

Story to follow!!!

claralara

If somebody is at a real computer could they change my mile time - i clearly did not run 3k in 5.55!!

Having cursor issues on the old mobile tabular device!!

RayCun

|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

HelenAnne||||| |34.51||||
Marthastew||| || 19.48|33.07| ||89.18|3.19.49
career_move|||||||||96.34|
jcsmum||||| |34.04||||
claralara||2:45.|5.55||||33.15|||88:44||3:06.21

rom

|400m<70 secs|800m<3min|1 mile<6 min|3k<12min|5k<20min|5mile<35min|10k<40m|10miles<70min|Half Marathon<100mins|Marathon<200min

HelenAnne||||| |34.51||||
Marthastew||| || 19.48|33.07| ||89.18|3.19.49
career_move|||||||||96.34|
jcsmum||||| |34.04||||
claralara||2:45|5.55|||33.15|||88:44|3:06.21


I think you mean ?

RacoonQueen

Haha CL you div. 33:15 for 10K my foot. :P

claralara

RacoonQueen wrote: »

Haha CL you div. 33:15 for 10K my foot. :P

Haha... but what a speedy div I is!!

TRR

claralara wrote: »

If somebody is at a real computer could they change my mile time - i clearly did not run 3k in 5.55!!

Having cursor issues on the old mobile tabular device!!

Where did you do the mile? Was that part of the 2 miler in Raheny, if so it's not allowed has to be a stand alone mile race. My work here is done

RacoonQueen

TRR wrote: »

Where did you do the mile? Was that part of the 2 miler in Raheny, if so it's not allowed has to be a stand alone mile race. My work here is done

Yeah she's counting it out of the split that was shouted at her in Raheny.

If that counts my 19:52 5k in Dunboyne counts, my first half of London counts and my first 5 miles in Mallow counts and the sub 40 10k I did in my dream last night also counts.

Stop cheating CL.

claralara

TRR wrote: »

Where did you do the mile? Was that part of the 2 miler in Raheny, if so it's not allowed has to be a stand alone mile race. My work here is done

Earlier discussion refers. It was sanctioned by KC. I doubted the validity of same. I am happy to remove and prove my time at a later date. I will not engage in protracted sh1t-stirring correspondence which I suspect, knowing you as I do, is the sole intention of your post.

TRR

claralara wrote: »

Earlier discussion refers. It was sanctioned by KC. I doubted the validity of same. I am happy to remove and prove my time at a later date. I will not engage in protracted sh1t-stirring correspondence which I suspect, knowing you as I do, is the sole intention of your post.

I'm offended at that charge. I'm just trying to hold up the integrity of this table. I will gladly remove the times if you want

claralara

TRR wrote: »

I'm offended at that charge. I'm just trying to hold up the integrity of this table. I will gladly remove the times if you want

Remove away. Then off up to Marlay with you for another training run!

menoscemo

All doubts can be removed here :
http://bhaa.ie/events/bhaa-mile-2013/

FWIW I think that it's ok to use times in races where you get an officially timed split (e.g. the 5 mile mark in Ballycotton or half way in a marathon).

rom

menoscemo wrote: »

All doubts can be removed here :
http://bhaa.ie/events/bhaa-mile-2013/

FWIW I think that it's ok to use times in races where you get an officially timed split (e.g. the 5 mile mark in Ballycotton or half way in a marathon).

Yes but it has to from a stationary start so the final 5 miles of a 10 mile race wouldn't count.

menoscemo

rom wrote: »

Yes but it has to from a stationary start so the final 5 miles of a 10 mile race wouldn't count.

Krusty will be delighted to hear that; now he can use his faster downhill downwind split from Ballycotton

RacoonQueen

rom wrote: »

Yes but it has to from a stationary start so the final 5 miles of a 10 mile race wouldn't count.

What if you stop at halfway, stand for a second and then start again?