Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Nearly half of all US farms now have superweeds

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,343 ✭✭✭bob charles


    its part of nature, organisms change to adapt to their circumstances. If your into sensationalism you call grass and a few other weeds "superweeds"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭reilig


    These 'superweeds' have grown in response to Roundup, used on plants genetically engineered to resist Roundup http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2013/02/report-spread-monsantos-superweeds-speeds-12-0

    This story was written by a blogger who has a long history of writing reports which criticise Monsanto. Now I'm not supporting or criticising Monsanto because I don't know an awful lot about them - most of it is what I read by bloggers like this guy. He makes his living by writing critical reports about this company. Like many things in life, we never hear both sides of the story. Paper never refuses ink and if a person shouts loud enough and for long enough, people start to believe what they are saying whether it is right or wrong!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 931 ✭✭✭Manoffeeling


    But nature has its ways over overcoming breeding obstacles. Remember Jurassic Park!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,410 ✭✭✭bbam


    Rushes have to be a super weed, round these parts anyway !!
    And any politician that calls to the door !


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,824 ✭✭✭Qualitymark


    reilig wrote: »
    This story was written by a blogger who has a long history of writing reports which criticise Monsanto. Now I'm not supporting or criticising Monsanto because I don't know an awful lot about them - most of it is what I read by bloggers like this guy. He makes his living by writing critical reports about this company. Like many things in life, we never hear both sides of the story. Paper never refuses ink and if a person shouts loud enough and for long enough, people start to believe what they are saying whether it is right or wrong!

    On the other hand, large companies will generally sue like a shot if anyone writes anything that might by any stretch be considered untruthful about them.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭reilig


    On the other hand, large companies will generally sue like a shot if anyone writes anything that might by any stretch be considered untruthful about them.

    Do some research on it - I think you'll find that that's already happening!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 886 ✭✭✭bb12


    so GM crops basically will lead to the use of stronger pesticides rather than using less of them...God help the remaining bees.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,343 ✭✭✭bob charles


    bb12 wrote: »
    so GM crops basically will lead to the use of stronger pesticides rather than using less of them...God help the remaining bees.

    the opposite is in actual fact what happening using GM tech


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,824 ✭✭✭Qualitymark


    reilig wrote: »
    Do some research on it - I think you'll find that that's already happening!

    Naah. You do the research, and post your links here, to cases taken and to cases won.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Conflats


    bb12 wrote: »
    so GM crops basically will lead to the use of stronger pesticides rather than using less of them...God help the remaining bees.

    No, the use of GM is not just for herbicide tolerance it has being shown to work for resistance to fungal diseases and no better one for Ireland then Potato Late Blight. People gave out when the potatoes were being sprayed too much now they complain over the thought of potatoes which have Naturally occurring genes taking from the relative of the potato.

    The use of Glyphosate tolerant crops only helped speed up the natural phenomenon of selection pressure, look at the sulfonylurea herbicides used in Ireland plenty of known cases of resistance or in the fungal population with septoria and the commonly used fungicides like triazoles or the case in 2002 were strobilurins failed completely.

    Glyphosate resistant crops that are in current form are of no benefit to Irish agriculture.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,824 ✭✭✭Qualitymark


    Conflats wrote: »
    People gave out when the potatoes were being sprayed too much now they complain over the thought of potatoes which have Naturally occurring genes taking from the relative of the potato.

    I'm giving out because I prefer to choose what to eat. If I choose to eat beef, I don't want horse. If I choose to eat potato, I want to eat potato, not some relative of the potato. If I choose to marry, I want to marry a human, not something with extra genes sewn in from a tomato or a pear.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭reilig


    I'm giving out because I prefer to choose what to eat. If I choose to eat beef, I don't want horse. If I choose to eat potato, I want to eat potato, not some relative of the potato. If I choose to marry, I want to marry a human, not something with extra genes sewn in from a tomato or a pear.

    I'm not being critical towards you. I take it from this post that you prefer natural things. Things that have naturally evolved over time to survive threats against them. Not things that have been genetically modified. It might not seem like it, but I'm not in favour of genetically modified foods either. I can see some of the advantages of GM, but I don't like something which has been tampered with by scientists and of which we don't know what future consequences will be.

    In linking all of this back to your post which you started this thread with. The superweeds are a natural response to their changing environment. They grow naturally. They haven't been developed by modifying their genetics. In fact, they have grown in response to genetic modifications of plants around them and are therefore natural. They have modified themselves in order to survive. Isn't this what plants, animals and humans have been doing for millions of years????


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,343 ✭✭✭bob charles


    I'm giving out because I prefer to choose what to eat. If I choose to eat beef, I don't want horse. If I choose to eat potato, I want to eat potato, not some relative of the potato. If I choose to marry, I want to marry a human, not something with extra genes sewn in from a tomato or a pear.

    best not eat any current day potato so as there is a huge amount of plant breeding gone into them. Mixing and matching different traits to try and produce what sort of a potatoe is most desirable by the consumer. You dont have to use gm to get other plant genes into a plant


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,824 ✭✭✭Qualitymark


    best not eat any current day potato so as there is a huge amount of plant breeding gone into them. Mixing and matching different traits to try and produce what sort of a potatoe is most desirable by the consumer. You dont have to use gm to get other plant genes into a plant

    I've nothing at all against plant breeding.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,185 ✭✭✭nilhg


    I've nothing at all against plant breeding.

    How much do you know about some of the techniques used in "old style" non GM crop breeding?

    Have a read of the after WW2 section here,

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_breeding

    Quite a lot of the stuff that is being done with the "GM" techniques can be done the old way with the various methods outlined there but the problem is its very scattergun, there is no way of knowing that you have all the properties you are hoping to combine in any new variety without testing thousands of potential offspring.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,343 ✭✭✭bob charles


    GM really speeds up plant breeding, what used to take 15 years to bring a variety to field scale production can be done with GM in a fraction of the time and using no crazy techniques


Advertisement