Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Did humans really evolve from fish?

  • 03-02-2013 10:01pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,047 ✭✭✭


    Is it conceivable that a random prawn or mackerel swimming around in our seas today, will have a distant relative who, in 3 or 4 million years time will have invented their equivalent of the iPad?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    Kettleson wrote: »
    Is it conceivable that a random prawn or mackerel swimming around in our seas today, will have a distant relative who, in 3 or 4 million years time wil have invented their equivalent of the iPad?

    No. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

    /end of thread


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,943 ✭✭✭smcgiff


    Kettleson wrote: »
    Is it conceivable that a random prawn or mackerel swimming around in our seas today, will have a distant relative who, in 3 or 4 million years time will have invented their equivalent of the iPad?

    Why would they bother inventing something that was invented 3 or 4 million years ago. Dumb future Prawn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,817 ✭✭✭pebbles21


    Steve Cods maybe?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    One thing I have noticed recently is the fairly limited knowledge a decent number of Irish people have about evolution and how it works. It has to be because we mostly went to church affiliated schools. I had a decent teacher in primary school that explained it pretty well and didn't load on the Adam and Eve stuff when doing religion.

    I was at the Natural History Museum in London at the weekend and I visited the Darwin centre. It's fairly immense. Millions of different examples of every species you can think of pickled and stored. Worth checking out if anyone is ever over there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,047 ✭✭✭Kettleson


    I hope there was a section on Thai Curried Prawns.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,829 ✭✭✭Gloomtastic!


    You have 83% of a banana's DNA because you are related to a banana. You are related to every living thing on this planet. It's mind boggling but true.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 965 ✭✭✭Doctor Strange


    Kettleson wrote: »
    Is it conceivable that a random prawn or mackerel swimming around in our seas today, will have a distant relative who, in 3 or 4 million years time will have invented their equivalent of the iPad?

    No. We share a common ancestor hundreds of millions of years ago. People really need to understand evolution better. If you have any questions, post them and I'll do my best to answer them.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Kettleson wrote: »
    Is it conceivable that a random prawn or mackerel swimming around in our seas today, will have a distant relative who, in 3 or 4 million years time will have invented their equivalent of the iPad?

    You have got to be codding!

    Hang on - I'll ask the actor Paul Rudd.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,047 ✭✭✭Kettleson


    You have 83% of a banana's DNA because you are related to a banana. You are related to every living thing on this planet. It's mind boggling but true.

    No! Really! That's nuts! Could we be related to pecans as well?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Kettleson wrote: »
    No! Really! That's nuts! Could we be related to pecans as well?

    Well some of us are nuts! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Of all of the books, of all of the scientific studies, of all of the peer reviewed pieces of work, of all the material you could've looked up to find an answer for this question............... you decided to ask it on After Hours?

    THIS is why you don't know much!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    One thing I have noticed recently is the fairly limited knowledge a decent number of Irish people have about evolution and how it works. It has to be because we mostly went to church affiliated schools.
    There's always one. As much as I hate defending the church, being against evolution and science in general is not among their many sins, so you are full of shite my friend.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,102 ✭✭✭Stinicker


    No, God created people haven't you ever heard of creationism?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    You have 83% of a banana's DNA because you are related to a banana. You are related to every living thing on this planet. It's mind boggling but true.

    Curiously, and this is only something I've learned recently, but genetically, paedophiles have more in common with crabs than they do with you or me. It's not scientifically proven, it's just fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    There's always one. As much as I hate defending the church, being against evolution and science in general is not among their many sins, so you are full of shite my friend.

    I think you'll find it is, at least at certian levels.

    The RCC DO NOT believe that human beings evolved from anything. They believe Human Beings were created. Is this not true?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,159 ✭✭✭✭phasers


    no some of them stayed in the water and some of them jumped out and turned into monkeys.

    Then some of the monkeys decided to stay as monkeys and some decided that they didn't like being hairy and eating bananas so they turned into people.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,047 ✭✭✭Kettleson


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    Of all of the books, of all of the scientific studies, of all of the peer reviewed pieces of work, of all the material you could've looked up to find an answer for this question............... you decided to ask it on After Hours?

    THIS is why you don't know much!

    You have a point, however my relatives, the Dover Soles, we're not blessed with high levels of intelligence. You cant escape genetics.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,943 ✭✭✭smcgiff


    No. We share a common ancestor hundreds of millions of years ago. People really need to understand evolution better. If you have any questions, post them and I'll do my best to answer them.


    I think people are picking up the OP incorrectly. Nothing of what he has said contradicts evolution.

    His hypothesis is correct. Except, I think it unlikely it could happen in 4 million years more like 200 million years. Also, humans would most likely have to have become extinct as it's not likely that another species could evolve with humanity ruling the roost.

    Think humanity evolving from a rodent like animal 65 million years ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Kettleson wrote: »
    You have a point, however my relatives, the Dover Soles, we're not blessed with high levels of intelligence. You cant escape genetics.

    I think I saw them open for The Temptations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    There's always one. As much as I hate defending the church, being against evolution and science in general is not among their many sins, so you are full of shite my friend.

    You seem lovely, pleased to meet you.

    I'm not necessarily blaming the church here. I'm more saying that, in my day anyway, some teachers struggled to balance religion and evolution, resulting in some weird bastardised version that doesn't really mean anything. Maybe just my experience.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,058 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    I know a lad called Mickey GILL and a John Finn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,159 ✭✭✭✭phasers


    I know a lad called Mickey GILL.
    Definitive proof? I think so.


    Take that theists!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    I think you'll find it is, at least at certian levels.

    The RCC DO NOT believe that human beings evolved from anything. They believe Human Beings were created. Is this not true?
    Even that lunatic Schönborn accepts the science behind evolution. The only ones against evolution are protestant American sects. Look up the details yourself. I was certainly never taught intelligent design in school, many years ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Maybe just my experience.
    It would appear to be entirely in your own head alright. This whole creationism lark hitting the mainstream is a very post 2000 affair, and mostly confined to the US.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    phasers wrote: »
    Definitive proof? I think so.
    Better proof.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    It would appear to be entirely in your own head alright. This whole creationism lark hitting the mainstream is a very post 2000 affair, and mostly confined to the US.

    Again, a lovely passive aggressive rebuttal. I'll leave you at it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 965 ✭✭✭Doctor Strange


    smcgiff wrote: »
    I think people are picking up the OP incorrectly. Nothing of what he has said contradicts evolution.

    He's hypothesis is correct. Except, I think it unlikely it could happen in 4 million years more like 200 million years. Also, humans would most likely have to have become extinct as it's not likely that another species could evolve with humanity ruling the roost.

    Think humanity evolving from a rodent like animal 65 million years ago.

    That's true. I did misread based on other responses. So, to answer the OP correctly;

    No, not that short a time :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Again, a lovely passive aggressive rebuttal. I'll leave you at it.
    Yeah that's usually the best move when you get caught out accusing an entire country of being backwards religious primitives.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,603 ✭✭✭Mal-Adjusted


    fooking prawns.


    okay, if anything's going to do it next, it's the cuttlefish*




    *seriously


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    Even that lunatic Schönborn accepts the science behind evolution. The only ones against evolution are protestant American sects. Look up the details yourself. I was certainly never taught intelligent design in school, many years ago.

    I notice you never answered the question.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,968 ✭✭✭✭Praetorian Saighdiuir


    I thought we came from a Jesus? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    I notice you never answered the question.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_evolution#Pope_Benedict_XVI_and_today
    A five-day conference, Biological Evolution: Facts and Theories, held in March 2009 by the Pontifical University in Rome, marking the 150th anniversary of the publication of the Origin of Species, generally confirmed the lack of conflict between evolutionary theory and Catholic theology, and the rejection of Intelligent Design by Catholic scholars.[39]

    The Church has deferred to scientists on matters such as the age of the earth and the authenticity of the fossil record. Papal pronouncements, along with commentaries by cardinals, have accepted the findings of scientists on the gradual appearance of life. In fact, the International Theological Commission in a July 2004 statement endorsed by Cardinal Ratzinger, then president of the Commission and head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, now Pope Benedict XVI, includes this paragraph:

    Don't ask me to look up anything further for you, it leaves a bad enough taste defending these types as it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    Yeah that's usually the best move when you get caught out accusing an entire country of being backwards religious primitives.

    Okay, I'll bite. Firstly, I didn't accuse an entire country of anything. I said "a decent number of Irish people." It's hard to engage with somebody who is hard of reading and likes strawmen.

    Secondly, if you are saying that you went to a Catholic school and didn't get the whole "God has a hand in everything, he helps to shape nature" thing, then fair enough, but I certainly did. It's not quite along the same lines as intelligent design or even there to have the same effect.

    It was mostly an innocent thing from teachers I had trying to balance two fairly complex and, to them, conflicting ideas. One teacher I had was pretty excellent, as I said, but I'd be surprised if more people didn't have a similar experience. If people didn't, that's cool, no need to get your knickers in a twist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Okay, I'll bite. Firstly, I didn't accuse an entire country of anything. I said "a decent number of Irish people."
    Do you have any evidence for this assertion, or does it reside amongst the lordly leavings in the London Natural History Museum. I mean anything, really.
    Secondly, if you are saying that you went to a Catholic school and didn't get the whole "God has a hand in everything, he helps to shape nature" thing, then fair enough, but I certainly did. It's not quite along the same lines as intelligent design or even there to have the same effect.
    Religious classes were strictly seperated from the rest of the curriculum, I'd imagine they are more so now. No teacher ever once mentioned god or religion outside of those classes.
    If people didn't, that's cool, no need to get your knickers in a twist.
    It's a pity more people don't get their knickers in a twist whenever someone tries to characterise the Irish as bumpkins/drunks/violent/backwards/whatever. The world would be a better place for it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_evolution#Pope_Benedict_XVI_and_today



    Don't ask me to look up anything further for you, it leaves a bad enough taste defending these types as it is.

    So, what you're saying is, certain Catholic scholars reject Intelligent Design right?

    Didn't the Pope himself say:
    "If man were merely a random product of evolution in some place on the margins of the universe, then his life would make no sense or might even be a chance of nature," the pontiff said. "But no, Reason is there at the beginning: creative, divine Reason."

    As I said, being against Evolution is still alive and well on certain levels.

    For every Bishop you will find who accepts Intelligent Design in rubbish, you will find another who believes we were created by God.

    Also, I don't know where you went to school but you were one of the lucky ones. I was taught Intelligent Design in school.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    Do you have any evidence for this assertion, or does it reside amongst the lordly leavings in the London Natural History Museum. I mean anything, really.

    You're not living in the real world if you don't acknowledge that there are a lot of people in Ireland who don't know the first thing about Evolution.

    The amount of times i've heard the question "If we evolved from Apes, then why aren't the apes in the zoo changing into humans now?" is mind-boggling!

    Religious classes were strictly seperated from the rest of the curriculum, I'd imagine they are more so now. No teacher ever once mentioned god or religion outside of those classes.

    Again, you were the lucky one. I once got kicked out of an Irish class for writing Xmas and "taking the Christ out of Christmas"

    It's not as if I went to school in the 50s either, i'm in my 20s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    So, what you're saying is, certain Catholic scholars reject Intelligent Design right?

    Didn't the Pope himself say:



    As I said, being against Evolution is still alive and well on certain levels.

    For every Bishop you will find who accepts Intelligent Design in rubbish, you will find another who believes we were created by God.

    Also, I don't know where you went to school but you were one of the lucky ones. I was taught Intelligent Design in school.
    MrStuffins wrote: »
    You're not living in the real world if you don't acknowledge that there are a lot of people in Ireland who don't know the first thing about Evolution.

    The amount of times i've heard the question "If we evolved from Apes, then why aren't the apes in the zoo changing into humans now?" is mind-boggling!




    Again, you were the lucky one. I once got kicked out of an Irish class for writing Xmas and "taking the Christ out of Christmas"

    It's not as if I went to school in the 50s either, i'm in my 20s.
    Evidence appears to be in short supply around here, except from me. The official position of the church is very much pro science and evolution, I don't care if you like it. They even have an observatory and a science department.

    Unless you have some, toddle on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,959 ✭✭✭✭scudzilla


    If my ex is anythin to go by then yes, she smelt really fishy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    Do you have any evidence for this assertion, or does it reside amongst the lordly leavings in the London Natural History Museum. I mean anything, really.
    Nope. Nothing at all. It was a fairly throwaway comment based on anecdotal evidence.
    Religious classes were strictly seperated from the rest of the curriculum, I'd imagine they are more so now. No teacher ever once mentioned god or religion outside of those classes.

    Not in primary school. After that, you'd have to do biology classes to really get a good idea of evolution and how it works. I didn't do biology but did general science until 3rd year before it splinters off and we didn't do a whole heap of work on evolution. Also, to get two conflicting messages in separate classes is going to confuse some people. Again, I'm not saying we were taught intelligent design, but it was some bastardised version trying to incorporate something that negates a lot of what they are saying. It was a fairly cack-handed approach.

    It's a pity more people don't get their knickers in a twist whenever someone tries to characterise the Irish as bumpkins/drunks/violent/backwards/whatever. The world would be a better place for it.
    And now I see why you are so pissed off. That wasn't my intention at all, just an observation. I'm also glad that people don't have a level 5 knicker twist whenever they misinterpret somebody or try to find meaning where it isn't there. That'd be a ****ing horrible existence.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 745 ✭✭✭Extinction


    Did humans really evolve from fish?

    Yes and the female of our species have retained that distinctive aroma. That's proof enough proof for me.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,207 ✭✭✭The King of Moo


    There are plenty of legitimate sticks to beat the Catholic Church with, but evolution isn't one of them.
    As already stated, intelligent design's more of an evangelical Protestant thing. I went to regular Irish Catholic primary and secondary schools, and the theory of evolution was accepted as fact.

    It's probably best to keep religion out of the thread; it's not really relevant.
    I'm much more interested in prawns making iPods anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Again, I'm not saying we were taught intelligent design, but it was some bastardised version trying to incorporate something that negates a lot of what they are saying. It was a fairly cack-handed approach.
    Honestly from your comment I'd have doubts you went to school in this country at all. The place is according to the census mostly catholic, more's the pity, and the catholic church robustly rejects intelligent design. Does that not seem at odds to you.

    I call bullshit and collect my fifty euros.
    And now I see why you are so pissed off. That wasn't my intention at all, just an observation. I'm also glad that people don't have a level 5 knicker twist whenever they misinterpret somebody or try to find meaning where it isn't there. That'd be a ****ing horrible existence.
    It's pretty hard to misinterpret this:
    One thing I have noticed recently is the fairly limited knowledge a decent number of Irish people have about evolution and how it works. It has to be because we mostly went to church affiliated schools.
    Complete nonsense on both fronts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    Evidence appears to be in short supply around here, except from me. The official position of the church is very much pro science and evolution, I don't care if you like it. They even have an observatory and a science department.

    Unless you have some, toddle on.

    What kind of evidence are you looking for? Links to Wikipedia like you provided for me? You're aware of Bishop Donal Wuerl right?

    Here's a Wiki link:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Wuerl

    With regard to school, what kind of proof would you like me to give you with regard to learning about Intelligent Design?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,047 ✭✭✭Kettleson


    Extinction wrote: »
    Did humans really evolve from fish?

    Yes and the female of our species have retained that distinctive aroma. That's proof enough proof for me.

    Even In my wildest state of madness will I ever understand why "people" think this in any way humorous. It's moronic and sickening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    I went to regular Irish Catholic primary and secondary schools, and the theory of evolution was accepted as fact.

    This too.

    When I went to school, the theory of evolution was accepted as fact.

    When Religion came around, creationism was accepted as fact.

    The answers you got to the follow up questions you asked about such contradictions depended on who you asked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    What kind of evidence are you looking for? Links to Wikipedia like you provided for me? You're aware of Bishop Donal Wuerl right?

    Here's a Wiki link:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Wuerl
    wtf is that, a bishop strangely in favour of publicly prosecuting child molesters and not a word about evolution? Are you recruiting for the church or something?
    MrStuffins wrote: »
    With regard to school, what kind of proof would you like me to give you with regard to learning about Intelligent Design?
    Give it up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 745 ✭✭✭Extinction


    Kettleson wrote: »
    Even In my wildest state of madness will I ever understand why "people" think this in any way humorous. It's moronic and sickening.

    Start a thread on it in after hours and find out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    Honestly from your comment I'd have doubts you went to school in this country at all. The place is according to the census mostly catholic, more's the pity, and the catholic church robustly rejects intelligent design. Does that not seem at odds to you.

    I call bullshit and collect my fifty euros.


    It's pretty hard to misinterpret this:

    Complete nonsense on both fronts.

    Okay, why would I be lying about this, Sherlock? You do realise that not everybody had the same experiences as you, right? And again, for the hard of reading, I am not saying that I was taught intelligent design in school. I am saying that certain teachers, in primary school, had a fairly cack-handed approach to evolution, due in part to how it conflicted with what they were teaching us in religion.

    I do know that I have met a decent number of people who fundamentally misunderstand evolution and really aren't sure of how it works in the slightest. And I'm not talking about anything in depth, just the basics.

    Again, it wasn't an entirely well thought-out or serious post, I'm mostly just replying because your posting style is atrocious and ur mad bro.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Doc Ruby wrote: »
    wtf is that, a bishop strangely in favour of publicly prosecuting child molesters and not a word about evolution? Are you recruiting for the church or something?

    Well I provided a wiki link, that's what you wanted right?

    Are you not aware of his stances on intelligent design?

    Here, have a look.

    Give it up.

    Wait, you've given out about the lack of evidence. I've asked you what kind of proof would satisfy you. What's wrong with that? You either want evidence or you don't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,956 ✭✭✭Doc Ruby


    Okay, why would I be lying about this, Sherlock?
    Internet sarcasm, well that's my week wrecked.
    I am saying
    This is what you're saying
    One thing I have noticed recently is the fairly limited knowledge a decent number of Irish people have about evolution and how it works. It has to be because we mostly went to church affiliated schools.
    What I'm saying is you'd have to be off your head to imagine this resembles reality in any way, shape or form. I'm also saying that you've never actually been to an Irish school. By the way I'm the queen of england, I just troll these forums to get a rise out of people, it lights my eighty six year old fires. Amazing what you can claim with anecdotal nonsense in semi anonymous discussions.
    Again, it wasn't an entirely well thought-out or serious post, I'm mostly just replying because your posting style is atrocious and ur mad bro.
    The backpedalling certainly is entertaining.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement