Fastest way to examine 24 million files.

drdeadlift

http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/anglo-trial-cant-proceed-until-24-million-files-are-examined-3363439.html




I will give it to the son of a bitch he has a good legal team!

In all reality i would love to know where this **** ends and when
will the truth come out.

uch

Outsource it to India

seantorious

You can't analyze whats on fire.

the groutch

what are the odds on these files being "accidentally" shredded?

Custardpi

Put them all online & crowdsource the work.

AnonoBoy

Kids in Iran are good at piecing together shredded documents.

I seen on a film what was made by the guy who was in Gigli.

Calibos

AnonoBoy wrote: »

Kids in Iran are good at piecing together shredded documents.

I seen on a film what was made by the guy who was in Gigli.

Argowayouttathat will ye!!

Calibos

Upon reading the thread title, I had to ask myself one very important question. Why in the name of fook would anyone need to examine 24 million flies??

donvito99

Ye wikileak it. Or put the unemployed to work.

24,000,000 / 450,000 = 53 documents for those on the dole.

CreepingDeath

drdeadlift wrote: »

In all reality i would love to know where this **** ends and when will the truth come out.

He's playing for time and doing a Jimmy Saville, hoping it will all come out posthumously.

juan.kerr

Not sure, but if they need them printed then Aengus Ó Snodaigh is your man.

kippy

24 millions files?
I call bull****.

Sofiztikated

Just leave them, someone else will do it.

Go for a walk around the office, hopefully they'll be done by the time you get back.

Lyra Fangs

Thought the thread title said 'Fastest way to examine 24 million flies'

Was intrigued by such a random topic

NotInventedHere

Scan the lot using OCE and then search by keyword after a human analysis some of the key files.

squod

drdeadlift wrote: »

I will give it to the son of a bitch he has a good legal team!

What he has is collusion and co-conspirators in the Anglo bail-out fraud. Arrest him and imprison him pending trial. His crimes are that serious. Draft up legislation of change the constitution. Whatever it takes to get some of these people behind bars.

tmc86

I'd be more interested in the cost to the taxpayer of examining these files rather than how they are going to go about it.

gnfnrhead

Lyra Fangs wrote: »

Thought the thread title said 'Fastest way to examine 24 million flies'

Was intrigued by such a random topic

I did the same. Was thinking "what the hell?"

bluecode

Of course you don't have to examine all 24 million. There are relevent files and irrelevent files. But you only need one or two that point the finger.

It always seem to me that the more guilty someone is the better his defence. If there were a couple of documents clearing him they would be found immediately.

The usually delaying tactics from a crook with no conscience and no regrets for his behaviour.

squod

tmc86 wrote: »

I'd be more interested in the cost to the taxpayer of examining these files rather than how they are going to go about it.

They're being stored in a warehouse (voting machine schtyle) owned by a Fine Fail politician who charges €10,000 a week for the privilege no doubt.

JOKING!


They're being stored in 10 warehouses owned by several Fine Gael & Fine Fail politicians who charge €10,000 a week .

Kylo Ren

ctrl + 'f'

smash

Send em to Wikileaks

starlings

AnonoBoy wrote: »

Kids in Iran are good at piecing together shredded documents.

I seen on a film what was made by the guy who was in Gigli.

Before the ePuzzler program in the link below, since the fall of the Berlin Wall people were putting shredded Stasi files together, piece by piece, in the world's biggest and most painstaking jigsaw.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19344978

Son Of A Vidic

The following key search words, should help shorten the search time significantly I think.

“The taxpayer will cover the costs.”

“Shaft them with abandon.”

“They’ll take it up the árse for us.”

“The money will be resting in many, many accounts.”

AnonoBoy

starlings wrote: »

Before the ePuzzler program in the link below, since the fall of the Berlin Wall people were putting shredded Stasi files together, piece by piece, in the world's biggest and most painstaking jigsaw.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19344978

And they get to the end and there's still about 5 pieces of sky and a corner piece missing!

minidazzler

the groutch wrote: »

what are the odds on these files being "accidentally" shredded?

It won't be.... the files are keeping them off trial, they are likely to be dead or infirmed by the time they are all analysed and a comprehensive report is issued. This sh1t is gonna take 15 years and sort nothing out. It will however, line the pockets of a lot of Lawyers.

ITS_A_BADGER

Control alt delete - Job done all files examined in a shot

juan.kerr

smash wrote: »

Send em to Wikileaks

Why, will they help exonerate Julian Assange?

Sofiztikated

ITS_A_BADGER wrote: »

Control alt delete - Job done all files examined in a shot

Yeah, i don't think that means what you think it means.

donegal_road

its as simple as this... 'please Mr. Fitzpatrick, could you tell us which files are most relevant to this investigation? thanks'

ITS_A_BADGER

Sofiztikated wrote: »

Yeah, i don't think that means what you think it means.

whoops you are correct i meant Control + A+ delete lol

Sofiztikated

donegal_road wrote: »

its as simple as this... 'please Mr. Fitzpatrick, could you tell us which files are most relevant to this investigation? thanks'

Try this one

"Mr Fitzpatrick, is there any particular file you DON'T want us to look at? That one? Right lads, someone go to college for 15 years, to figure out how to open a word document. What, it won't open? What the hell is a .docx file?"

Elfinknight

donegal_road wrote: »

its as simple as this... 'please Mr. Fitzpatrick, could you tell us which files are most relevant to this investigation? thanks'

And then look at the rest i presume.

Gummy Panda

smash wrote: »

Send em to Wikileaks

Wikileaks is dead. Lemmiwinks killed him.

Serves wikileaks right for saying Catatafish was going bass to mouth with a young salmon

Capt'n Midnight

seantorious wrote: »

You can't analyze whats on fire.

:rolleyes:


In this country it's traditional to use a flood to destroy paper work.

Fire are soo hard to backdate, but a flood in a basement could have happened yonks ago "and we only found out when we opened the boxes"

My name is URL

One tribunal and 6 million Hail Marys

Ted_YNWA

have they printed these double sided ?

Basic defense technique, bombard the prosecution with information (90% of which is probably print outs of random websites & copies of Fifty Shades thrown in for good measure)

Boombastic

If they put them up in After hours, we'd have it done by midnight

3ndahalfof6

12 wemon in a room and tell them there is a rumour in here somewhere find it.

ejmaztec

Make a big heap and set fire to it, and throw anyone who breathes a sigh of relief into the flames.

3ndahalfof6

ejmaztec wrote: »

Make a big heap and set fire to it, and throw anyone who breathes a sigh of relief into the flames.

But not together as they may put the flame out.

Pottler

donvito99 wrote: »

Ye wikileak it. Or put the unemployed to work.

24,000,000 / 450,000 = 53 documents for those on the dole.

Ahem. That might be a bit ambitious in some cases. I can see the returns on the "why didn't you do your 53 pages" form;

Please tick the applicable box:
Illiterate...() Can't be 4rsed....()
Was busy doing a nixer....() Kids ate them...()
Dog ate them...() Got drunk and lit fire with them...()
Didn't get them in the first place...() Got them and was traumatised and stressed and will now sue...() Got them and sold them to "The Sun"...()
Had no idea what ye wanted...() Found three typos, was that the task?..()

etc etc. Might be easier and cheaper just to burn them.

Boombastic

Pottler wrote: »

Ahem. That might be a bit ambitious in some cases. I can see the returns on the "why didn't you do your 53 pages" form;

Please tick the applicable box:
Illiterate...() Can't be 4rsed....()
Was busy doing a nixer....() Kids ate them...()
Dog ate them...() Got drunk and lit fire with them...()
Didn't get them in the first place...() Got them and was traumatised and stressed and will now sue...() Got them and sold them to "The Sun"...()
Had no idea what ye wanted...() Found three typos, was that the task?..()

etc etc. Might be easier and cheaper just to burn them.

I couldn't afford ink for the pen;):pac:

ejmaztec

3ndahalfof6 wrote: »

But not together as they may put the flame out.

Not when their fat heads start sizzling they won't.:P