Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Private profiles - please note that profiles marked as private will soon be public. This will facilitate moderation so mods can view users' warning histories. All of your posts across the site will appear on your profile page (including PI, RI). Groups posts will remain private except to users who have access to the same Groups as you. Thread here
Some important site news, please read here. Thanks!

Norwegian ladies soccer team June 9th 2011

  • 19-12-2012 7:14pm
    #1
    Site Banned Posts: 5,676 jayteecork
    Banned


    So I'm reading that an post guy put 40k on the match.

    What I can't find out is whether or not Norway won


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭ P_1
    Registered User


    Had a quick look through the Norwegian FA's website.

    Now unless my Norwegian is horrifically bad this link seems to have details of all their fixtures

    http://www.fotball.no/System-pages/TabellTermin/?tournamentId=39900

    It seems they didn't play a match on the 9th of June 2011

    However...
    they lost 3-0 to Germany on the 16th
    they beat Equatorial Guinea 1-0 on the 29th
    they lost 3-0 to Brazil on the 3rd of July
    they lost 2-1 to Australia on the 6th of July

    So sadly for said postman, that was a lot of money offered to Paddy if indeed he had a wager on the ladies of Norway to win on the 6th of July


  • Registered Users Posts: 757 colly_06
    Registered User


    The court heard O’Reilly had developed a chronic gambling problem and he had an account called “Tony Ten” with Paddy Power Bookmakers. When the account was examined it was found that over the period in question it had a turnover of €10 million, with €8.3 million in winnings and €1.7 million in losses.

    Am I missing something? He was up 8.3 million, should have left him at it.. :eek:


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,676 jayteecork
    Banned


    colly_06 wrote: »

    Am I missing something? He was up 8.3 million, should have left him at it.. :eek:

    Just poor journalism. It means he wagered 10 million and had returns of 8.3 million


Advertisement