Use of RFID Tracking Technology To Be Mandatory In US Food Stamp Program.

Run_to_da_hills

Not alone do they want to electronically tag your child at school, they now want to start electronically tagging those receiving food stamps.

This is further evidence that Obama his forcing his invasive biometric technology tracking powers on the most vulnerable in society.

The USDA is now considering biometric identification for all individuals who will want to benefit from their Food and Nutrition Services. The RFID chip may just soon be a must for everyone who does not want to starve!

The following is an excerpt of the executive summary of the FINAL REPORT of the Use of Biometric Identification Technology to Reduce Fraud in the Food Stamp Program:

Biometric identification technology provides automated methods to identify a person based on physical characteristics—such as fingerprints, hand shape, and characteristics of the eyes and face—as well as behavioral characteristics—including signatures and voice patterns.

Use of Biometric Identification Technology to Reduce Fraud in the Food Stamp Program: Final Report

Nutrition Assistance Program Report Series

Use of RFID Tracking Technology To Be Mandatory In US Food Stamp Program

Jonny7

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

they now want to start electronically tagging those receiving food stamps.

Where in either report is there any mention of this?

Genghiz Cohen

Isn't RFID obsolete now and NFC the new tech?
Or is it that RFID now carries a lot of conspiracy baggage that NFC doesn't

Run_to_da_hills

Jonny7 wrote: »

Where in either report is there any mention of this?

RFID technology and Biometrics go hand in hand just like like bread and butter.

Below is a depiction of what a food stamp card would look like, it would contain rfid technology that would correspond with your biometric records on the national database. Eventually these cards will combine with Obmacare and National Real ID cards. It would be from this stage that Obama will eventually move on to the microchip implant.

Genghiz Cohen wrote: »

Isn't RFID obsolete now and NFC the new tech?
Or is it that RFID now carries a lot of conspiracy baggage that NFC doesn't

No, to answer your question, NFC builds upon RFID systems by allowing two-way communication between endpoints.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_field_communication

gibraltar

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Below is a depiction of what a food stamp card would look like,

Would look like? according to who?, source please.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Eventually these cards will combine with Obmacare and National Real ID cards. It would be from this stage that Obama will eventually move on to the microchip implant.

Eventually is a very vague word, tell us the timeframe for this to occur please

Jonny7

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

RFID technology and Biometrics go hand in hand just like like bread and butter.

Nope, the reports mention e.g. fingerprinting, so people can't commit fraud. It's like using a social welfare card to get the social welfare. The card has your details on it, this tech has existed for a long time.

There is nothing about human beings being implanted with micro-chips.

Cookie_Monster

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

it would contain rfid technology that would correspond with your biometric records on the national database. Eventually these cards will combine with Obmacare and National Real ID cards.

what exactly is wrong with this? sounds like it'll cut down on fraud and government duplication which can only be good news

MarkR

Biometric makes it sound like the terminator. We're talking about hand scanners, like some work places have to clock in and clock out? The RFID technology is already in use all across europe and the US in passports.

So, they'll have to have id. :eek:

Father Damo

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

:pac: x 1 billion

You do realise that outside of North Korea pasting the great leader on government issued gear died with Saddam.

Again, more rubbish that even you yourself do not believe (the card layout that is)

Run_to_da_hills

Father Damo wrote: »

:pac: x 1 billion

You do realise that outside of North Korea pasting the great leader on government issued gear died with Saddam.

Again, more rubbish that even you yourself do not believe (the card layout that is)

WE may not see his face on the card but we can be sure to see some variant of his Nazi Obamacare logo. .

hooradiation

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

WE may not see his face on the card but we can be sure to see some variant of his Nazi Obamacare logo. .

The Caduceus is not a nazi symbol.
Stop being dishonest.

Father Damo

So.....he is a black neo nazi?

Ive heard it all now!

Penn

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

WE may not see his face on the card but we can be sure to see some variant of his Nazi Obamacare logo. .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caduceus

"The caduceus is sometimes used as a symbol of medicine and/or medical practice, especially in North America."

Run_to_da_hills

hooradiation wrote: »

The Caduceus is not a nazi symbol.
Stop being dishonest.

Penn wrote: »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caduceus

"The caduceus is sometimes used as a symbol of medicine and/or medical practice, especially in North America."

Limbaugh compares Obama's new healthcare logo to Nazi swastika



http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/08/rush-limbaugh-compares-new-health-care-logo-to-nazi-swastika.html

Father Damo wrote: »

So.....he is a black neo nazi?

Ive heard it all now!

Barack Obama is a Nazi by nature.

Only a Nazi would carry out a policy of assassinations without fair trials and sporadic drone attacks.

LeinsterDub

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Only a Nazi would carry out a policy of assassinations without fair trials and sporadic drone attacks.

Your right only an Nazi would . Stalin , Pol Pot ,Idi amin ,etc not Nazis hence are a great bunch of lads

hooradiation

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Limbaugh compares Obama's new healthcare logo to Nazi swastika



http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/08/rush-limbaugh-compares-new-health-care-logo-to-nazi-swastika.html

He's wrong.
It's the Caduceus and it is a symbol that has a meaning.
That meaning has nothing to do with the Nazi's.

There is no discussion to be had on this.
In fact, the link you so kindly provided demonstrates what you've been told twice now. The Nazi link is a fevered imagining

Run_to_da_hills

hooradiation wrote: »

He's wrong.
It's the Caduceus and it is a symbol that has a meaning.
That meaning has nothing to do with the Nazi's.

There is no discussion to be had on this.
In fact, the link you so kindly provided demonstrates what you've been told twice now. The Nazi link is a fevered imagining

You are confusing his logo with this one.




Obama dose not have two serpents wrapped around a staff on his Obamacare logo, Instead he has the phoenix with its wings spread securing his own Obamacare logo

Hitler did the exact same except he used his own logo ie the swastika.

We must also take note that Barack Obama and Adolph Hitler were / are two unique leaders in that utilized their own personal logos.

Monty Burnz

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Hitler did the exact same except he used his own logo ie the swastika.

Hitler and Stalin had moustaches. Therefore people with moustaches are likely to become dictators.

QED.

humanji

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Obama dose not have two serpents wrapped around a staff on his Obamacare logo,

Yes he does. You posted an image of it and it's clearly a slightly modified version of the caduceus. Hitlers logo, on the other hand, is very different. But they both have birds and they both stand on top of a circle. Hardly conclusive evidence of anything.

But it's completely irrelevant to the mocked up image of a non-existent, electronically tagged food stamp.

Monty Burnz

humanji wrote: »

Yes he does. You posted an image of it and it's clearly a slightly modified version of the caduceus. Hitlers logo, on the other hand, is very different. But they both have birds and they both stand on top of a circle. Hardly conclusive evidence of anything.

What I don't understand is why a secret Nazi/the Anti-Christ would deliberately plant the clues that the far-right think they are seeing. Just for a laugh?

Run_to_da_hills

humanji wrote: »

Yes he does. You posted an image of it and it's clearly a slightly modified version of the caduceus. Hitlers logo, on the other hand, is very different. But they both have birds and they both stand on top of a circle. Hardly conclusive evidence of anything.

It's enough to raise some concerns as I have already pointed out.

Monty Burnz

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

It's enough to raise some concerns as I have already pointed out.

It will only raise concerns if you already have a bizarre worldview that makes no logical sense. Can you address the question as to why the Anti-Christ Obama can't help himself by tipping off the far right with these little clues all the time?

hooradiation

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

You are confusing his logo with this one.




Obama dose not have two serpents wrapped around a staff on his Obamacare logo, Instead he has the phoenix with its wings spread securing his own Obamacare logo

You're actively lying to me now.
The bloody serpents are right there, use your eyes to see.
it's the Caduceus.
That's all it is.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Hitler did the exact same except he used his own logo ie the swastika.

Nope.
Wrong.
The Swastika is not his own logo (it's been around for ages) and it was also the symbol of the Nazi party - not of Hitler himself.
Also FYI -the Nazi party pre-dated Hitler

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

We must also take note that Barack Obama and Adolph Hitler were / are two unique leaders in that utilized their own personal logos.

Not even remotely true, because candidate logo's are not a new thing in US presidential elections.
Here's a few others, you may even recognise the names.

The Obama logo stands out in that it's a very well designed one, but other than that it's entirely unremarkable.

And even if your claim was true, it means nothing, because it's the definition of reductio ad hitlerum - a logical fallacy.

Penn

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Obama dose not have two serpents wrapped around a staff on his Obamacare logo, Instead he has the phoenix with its wings spread securing his own Obamacare logo

Hitler did the exact same except he used his own logo ie the swastika.

Please excuse my crudely drawn picture:


Green = Serpent 1
Purple = Serpent 2
Red = Staff
Blue = Wings
Which then has the circular Obama logo under it

The Nazi symbol was a Pheonix standing on the circular Nazi logo. The only similarities are the circular logo and the wings, however, the ObamaCare logo clearly does not show a Pheonix, but instead shows the rod with two serpents and wings, as per the typical Caduceus symbol which denotes medical care.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

We must also take note that Barack Obama and Adolph Hitler were / are two unique leaders in that utilized their own personal logos.

http://www.polderdash.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/pawlenty-logo.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-x6qYP6IRKNU/TkmVqOxnLWI/AAAAAAAAAHo/vNiJoMK4JvM/s1600/Herman+Cain+2012+campaign+logo.jpg
http://api.ning.com/files/kuVZk532HrhBxul1KtXpO3T8XRZW1pBJw6lWgCa8pCiWw*k1WncAx4dmZ*lNclCWHl6Q82zBgl2w5zVMxJTokuCfHE9nm5px/SantorumLogo.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-MCP9y-SP3OA/TitM4X3aujI/AAAAAAAAEZ0/9_X2eN1-LH4/s1600/Bachmann+2011+logo+detail%252C+from+campaign+site.jpg
http://www.seeklogo.com/images/H/Hillary_Clinton_for_President_2008-logo-053D239165-seeklogo.com.gif

In these days of election advertising, social media and advertising, many many many politicians use personal logos. And the Swastika wasn't Hitler's, it was that of the Nazi Party. As such, the only comparison would be the logo for the US Democratic Party

Run_to_da_hills

Penn wrote: »

Please excuse my crudely drawn picture:


Green = Serpent 1
Purple = Serpent 2
Red = Staff
Blue = Wings
Which then has the circular Obama logo under it

I didn't have my glasses on when I was studying this logo.

I wonder what ever happened to the bottom half of the two snakes that are depicted in Obamacare's logo.

Sarky

So now because you can't see the bottom third of the two snakes it's still evil? Can you not just admit you were wrong about it?

hooradiation

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I didn't have my glasses on when I was studying this logo.

And yet, you felt compelled to argue with people on what was depicted on a logo you couldn't see properly.

Simply stunning.

gibraltar

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I didn't have my glasses on when I was studying this logo.

I wonder what ever happened to the bottom half of the two snakes that are depicted in Obamacare's logo.

Ok so you were wrong because you did not have your glasses on... but its still an evil symbol because Obama is associated with it.... just for fun could you describe any symbol that Obama could use that you would not consider sinister?

LeinsterDub

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I didn't have my glasses on when I was studying this logo.

I wonder what ever happened to the bottom half of the two snakes that are depicted in Obamacare's logo.

You have been harping on about this logo for months. That's a long time not to be wareing your clearly needed glasses. I hope you don't need them to drive

Run_to_da_hills

I have started a new thread on this subject and request mods to merge posts from this one.

humanji

Good thinking, RTDH. Just to note though, since the new thread (http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056818387) already has over 20 posts in it, I'm not going to merge the above posts with it as it'll mess up the thread and cause no end of confusion. So we have this thread for discussing the OP and symbolism can be discussed in the thread linked above.

Genghiz Cohen

You may have a point RunTo.



Oh wait no you are still completely wrong.