Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Standard or Widescreen?

  • 12-11-2012 9:16am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,771 ✭✭✭


    Which do you prefer??


    I prefer Standard as i have always loved it!!

    Widescreen is nothing more than a WIDER PICTURE.. A marketing scam to get people to get stuff THEY DONT REALLY NEED!!


    What are your thoughts??


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,169 ✭✭✭rednik


    Widescreen so I can watch movies the way they were meant to be seen in their original aspect ratio.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,163 ✭✭✭ZENER


    Dude111 wrote: »
    Which do you prefer??


    I prefer Standard as i have always loved it!!

    Widescreen is nothing more than a WIDER PICTURE.. A marketing scam to get people to get stuff THEY DONT REALLY NEED!!


    What are your thoughts??

    It's not simply a wider picture ! There is extra information in the extra width. That said I despair when I see huge widescreen TVs attached to Sky or UPC boxes set to 4:3 aspect output meaning the TV (set to AUTO) stretches the picture in a most peculiar way ! To make things worse they're connected using a composite connection :(

    The majority of output from TV and movie companies is Widescreen so in reality you do need a widescreen set to get the best from the majority of programmes.

    Ken


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,089 ✭✭✭henryporter


    I prefer widescreen as it's the only way I can get to see the scores on Sky Sports football :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,026 ✭✭✭✭adox


    is this even a valid question in 2012? Its a bit like saying you dont like colour tv and prefer black and white.:confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,323 ✭✭✭Slaphead07


    I suspect the "dude" is trolling... or worse.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,582 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    rednik wrote: »
    Widescreen so I can watch movies the way they were meant to be seen in their original aspect ratio.
    *hugs Film4 letterbox*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,169 ✭✭✭rednik


    Cropped images are a no no.;) Photos, film etc just so much lost info.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,771 ✭✭✭Dude111


    Slaphead07 wrote:
    I suspect the "dude" is trolling... or worse.
    I dont quite know what that means but i can assure you I AM SERIOUS..

    I prefer standard and im wondering if others do also.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    Dude111 wrote: »
    I dont quite know what that means but i can assure you I AM SERIOUS..

    I prefer standard and im wondering if others do also.....

    4:3 is a relic of cheap television production. Cinema has traditionally (for the better part of a century) been shot in a 1.85:1 or 2.35:1 ratio, meaning very wide, wider than the normal 16:9 television. The switchover from standard to wide isn't a new fad, it is television standards finally catching up with the rest of the screen-using world. All professional content is produced in 16:9 or wider these days, so you can't watch anything in standard anyway - all you'll get is an image that has been warped or an image that has to be shrunk down to fit your dated screen with tons of black padding on the top and bottom. 4:3 is too claustrophobic (and has actually been used deliberately to that effect in some more modern films). 16:9 is much closer to how people actually view the world and the change-over was long due.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    Dude111 wrote: »
    Which do you prefer??


    I prefer Standard as i have always loved it!!

    Widescreen is nothing more than a WIDER PICTURE.. A marketing scam to get people to get stuff THEY DONT REALLY NEED!!


    What are your thoughts??

    Pffff...

    You youngens and your Television. I still prefer the Gramophone…


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61 ✭✭Porkchop McGee


    4:3 all the way. I lost an eye in an accident as a kid so widescreen is just a mess for me, either I miss half of what's going on or I try to zoom around the screen seeing everything and my eye gets really tired like I'm watching a tennis match or something. 4:3 is the one for me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 702 ✭✭✭JonathonS


    That sums it up nicely.

    1 eye - go for 4x3
    2 eyes - choose widescreen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    JonathonS wrote: »
    That sums it up nicely.

    1 eye - go for 4x3
    2 eyes - choose widescreen.

    And what about four eyes? 3D? 21:9 ultra wide screen? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61 ✭✭Porkchop McGee


    mad muffin wrote: »
    And what about four eyes?
    I would be happy with two, son, but you know how hard it is to get stem cell treatment without resorting to the black market.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,771 ✭✭✭Dude111


    4:3 all the way. I lost an eye in an accident as a kid.....
    Im so sorry buddy icon9.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭3rdDegree


    Dude111 wrote: »
    Which do you prefer??


    I prefer Standard as i have always loved it!!

    Widescreen is nothing more than a WIDER PICTURE.. A marketing scam to get people to get stuff THEY DONT REALLY NEED!!


    What are your thoughts??

    Widescreen is one of the biggest leaps forward in television in recent years. It is much more than a different shaped screen. For movies, it is closer to the correct and original aspect ratio of the movie. A lot of TV programmes are now made in 16:9, so a widescreen TV is the correct shape for the programme. If you use standard TV, you either need to zoom in the picture and then lose part of it on each side, or preserve the correct ratio and have back bars top and bottom.

    I suspect the vast majority of people neither understand or care about any of the above. Maybe they are they lucky ones!


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,582 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    It's important to remember where 4:3 came from.

    The very first films were square - look very first silent films.

    Later on they went wider to cover the area where the vision from each eye overlaps. But that meant you needed bigger lenses to cater for the extra width. 4:3 was a compromise.

    After TV took off in the 1950's cinema moved to wider formats to distinguish itself from TV.


Advertisement