Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Opinion on this unearthed block please

  • 21-10-2012 12:05pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭


    Hi

    My husband recently unearthed this block from our land - we live in a rural area of Connacht, and the land as far back as we know, 3 or 4 generations anyway, has been used for agricultural purposes. Well, my husband found this unusual block a couple of feet down in the ground, with these really well defined holes in it, I hope the photos are clear enough - the holes are the depth of an average index finger, the block is approx. the same length as breeze blocks used in houses and of a depth of about 9 inches. Any clues please? We're fascinated.

    Thanks.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,574 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    One block or more?

    It looks like the holes that would hold the bolts for a gate in place. It is likely that it is no older than 200 years.

    Some of the photos are really small.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭morebabies


    Just one block, yes I'm sorry, I took them with a phone and am not computer literate enough to figure out how to put them properly in my message - apologies. But your theory is a possibility, I must have a closer look and see if there's any rust in the holes, if that would be an indicator. It just seemed so random where he found it. Thanks.
    225267.jpg
    225269.jpg225270.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭morebabies


    OK, I can't tell if there's rust in the holes, but whether this gives any more clues, as you may be able to see in the image, one hole is rectangular, while the other is more circular. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,019 ✭✭✭davycc


    As an occasional farmer it does look like a part of a gate ....
    that would lie flat with the 2 holes facing vertically upright.. & then the gates would be dropped in & able to swing their arc as needed to open/close a gap into a field etc..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 772 ✭✭✭baaba maal


    If it is for a gate, I think they are called spud stones- can't see too many refences to it but:
    http://irishantiquities.bravehost.com/glossary.html


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭morebabies


    baaba maal wrote: »
    If it is for a gate, I think they are called spud stones- can't see too many refences to it but:
    http://irishantiquities.bravehost.com/glossary.html

    Thank you! Much much appreciated. I know it's only a block and nothing fancy to look at but we were so curious about it, thanks. How would I get an idea of dating it, or would you go for the 200 yr old suggestion another poster has offered?

    Thanks again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭Paddysnapper


    IMHO.. It's a pegged lintel, from either a doorway or window opening.. From a previous well constructed house or barn!!!! Let me know, I'm intrigued?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 772 ✭✭✭baaba maal


    morebabies wrote: »
    Thank you! Much much appreciated. I know it's only a block and nothing fancy to look at but we were so curious about it, thanks. How would I get an idea of dating it, or would you go for the 200 yr old suggestion another poster has offered?

    Thanks again.

    Paddysnapperseems to know his terminology better than me- so I'd go with his term!
    I would also be really pleased to find a piece of the "story" of your field if I were you. Be they long-dead relatives or whoever, somebody shaped that piece for a specific purpose and it gradually became forgotten until you re-found it. If I were you, I would be very curious to know if there is any more material of interest from the same area.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭morebabies


    baaba maal wrote: »
    Paddysnapperseems to know his terminology better than me- so I'd go with his term!
    I would also be really pleased to find a piece of the "story" of your field if I were you. Be they long-dead relatives or whoever, somebody shaped that piece for a specific purpose and it gradually became forgotten until you re-found it. If I were you, I would be very curious to know if there is any more material of interest from the same area.

    I definitely intend to, as soon as I get opportunity, I can't wait to find out more. I've done some random digs around the field before we found this stone and just came across lots of bits of broken clay pipes, also bits of broken pottery, not ancient pieces, because you can see the design very clearly on it, maybe 100-200yrs old I'd guess. I was told that sometimes domestic rubbish would be scattered in fields, so I'm guessing that's why we have bits of pottery around the place.

    There's also some earthworks on the land which could be from earlier farming, we're not sure. There's a small mound for example, not very raised up, quite low-lying, I'm estimating about 500 sq ft is the area on top, but with a very clear ditch dug round its base, now overgrown with grass of course, but still very clearly defined as some sort of boundary at its base. :confused:


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,223 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    A picture or two of the mound and earthworks would be appreciated :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭Paddysnapper


    I agree more info. would be brilliant.. I'm only sorry I don't live in your area, pottery was my speciality!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭morebabies


    OK will post photos, probably tomorrow of earthworks as it's very dull here now. Looking forward to hearing from knowledgeable folk on this, the extent of my experience is watching Time Team (superfan)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,516 ✭✭✭Maudi


    IMHO.. It's a pegged lintel, from either a doorway or window opening.. From a previous well constructed house or barn!!!! Let me know, I'm intrigued?
    probably..something sat in them for sure..if you visit early christian church ruins op and if any windows survive.check the lintel stone and head stone you should see small round holes they housed a metal (or wood)bar.sometimes you find them each side too..but they are only ever a few cm's deep..ive looked at lots of them...the holes in yours are too deep to be window bar holes..i.m.o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭morebabies


    Below some images of the pottery pieces I found while digging a vegetable garden in the field behind our house. Apologies for poor quality, is it enough to gain an idea of date of these pieces, I'm guessing 19th century, but only guessing. The second image is only a closer image of those pieces with designs on them, if these help identify the period:

    225749.jpg

    225750.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭morebabies


    Mound images follow. As you'll see, my photography skills are non-existent, but I tried to get an image of the mound from a distance - it's not very high as you can see, but in other shots I tried to get a clear image of this ditch around its base. I haven't a clue - maybe it's only an animal path or something, in which case apologies for my ignorance, but the ditch does circle the base of the mound:


    225826.jpg

    225828.jpg

    225829.jpg

    225830.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,516 ✭✭✭Maudi


    morebabies wrote: »
    Below some images of the pottery pieces I found while digging a vegetable garden in the field behind our house. Apologies for poor quality, is it enough to gain an idea of date of these pieces, I'm guessing 19th century, but only guessing. The second image is only a closer image of those pieces with designs on them, if these help identify the period:

    225749.jpg

    225750.jpg
    looks like fairly modern bits of patterned plates to my untrained eye..and what looks like a pipe stem maybe..the orange and dark brown piece is identical to a piece i picked up recently field walking here in wicklow..i had someone take a look at it..their tip was when pottery is glazed both sides its indicitive of being fairly modern..have you used google earth to see your feature from above?might just show up better..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,574 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Whatever about the mound, the rest sounds like demolition waste.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭morebabies


    Victor wrote: »
    Whatever about the mound, the rest sounds like demolition waste.

    I don't mind, it made my kids happy when they were digging with me, they thought it was fascinating that they were finding these old bits and pieces. The only frustrating thing was I couldn't tell them how old they were. All I can say for certain is that the land hasn't been ploughed up for a few generations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭Paddysnapper


    I think what you are looking at with the pottery fragments is a very wide range of dating.. Without seeing them (in person) I would hazard between 1700 ish and 1950 ish.. I think you live on what has been a long established dwelling site, all kitchen and domestic waste seemed to be chucked on to veg. garden areas... I think without seeing them in person that the mound could well be natural. The Ice Age did create odd looking deposits, the Drumlins being a fine example.

    Thank you for this post it's great fun... PM sent!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,223 Mod ✭✭✭✭slowburner


    Maybe it is demolition waste but equally,
    a spread of pottery sherds from different periods, combined with high quality masonry, could also indicate prolonged habitation.
    Learning about the people who lived there before you through the bits and pieces they left behind, is what archaeology is all about. Assuming, that is, the remains are in situ.

    Have a look at the mound using some of the aerial imagery available. Bing is probably the best for most areas.
    It would be worthwhile too, to look at the first edition OSI maps.
    See the links thread.

    The ditch looks promising imho, especially if it encircles the mound.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 772 ✭✭✭baaba maal


    Personally, I'm convinced that there were vast factories set up in the 18th and 19th centuries to make and then smash up milions of cups, saucers etc and then spread them far and wide across the land! I could show you almost identical shards from my family home in rural west Dublin.

    My understanding is that a lot of the waste from the home (including broken crockery) would be piled up on the midden or dunstead, and would then be carted out inadvertently onto the field or veg patch to fertilise it. Hence it seems to show up over a wide area.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,541 ✭✭✭Gee Bag


    Howya Morebabies,

    My first impression when i saw the large block was that it is a spud stone. Have found them before near gates or entry points to farmesteads. They are difficult to date without knowing where they were found.

    The pottery looks to be all of ninteenth century or later date. Generally on digs you collect it to indicate that a site or layers on a site are of relativley modern date. The majority of it looks to be slipware (whitish in the middle with design on the outside). Archaeologists also call this stuff grannyware 'cos it looks like the sort of pottery your granny might have had.

    The fragment with the dark brown/black glaze and orange fabric (middle bit) is probably blackware. It is of 18-19th century date. This was the type of pottery used by the common chap.

    The white tube thing is a clay pipe stem used to smoke tobacco. By the size of it (thickness of walls; width of bore) I'd reckon its 19th century in date. Earlier pipe stems were a lot smaller because both tobacco and meerschaum (the type of clay used to make the pipe) were a lot more expensive in the preceeding centuries.

    Don't know about the mound thingie, its hard to tell from the pics. You could maybe use the following websites to see if you can identify the shape of it......

    http://webgis.archaeology.ie/NationalMonuments/FlexViewer/ (shows known archaological sites)
    http://www.bing.com/maps/ (has very pretty aerial pictures)
    http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/ (Has old and new maps and aerial photos)


    KPyQt.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭morebabies


    Gee Bag wrote: »
    Howya Morebabies,

    My first impression when i saw the large block was that it is a spud stone. Have found them before near gates or entry points to farmesteads. They are difficult to date without knowing where they were found.

    The pottery looks to be all of ninteenth century or later date. Generally on digs you collect it to indicate that a site or layers on a site are of relativley modern date. The majority of it looks to be slipware (whitish in the middle with design on the outside). Archaeologists also call this stuff grannyware 'cos it looks like the sort of pottery your granny might have had.

    The fragment with the dark brown/black glaze and orange fabric (middle bit) is probably blackware. It is of 18-19th century date. This was the type of pottery used by the common chap.

    The white tube thing is a clay pipe stem used to smoke tobacco. By the size of it (thickness of walls; width of bore) I'd reckon its 19th century in date. Earlier pipe stems were a lot smaller because both tobacco and meerschaum (the type of clay used to make the pipe) were a lot more expensive in the preceeding centuries.

    Don't know about the mound thingie, its hard to tell from the pics. You could maybe use the following websites to see if you can identify the shape of it......

    http://webgis.archaeology.ie/NationalMonuments/FlexViewer/ (shows known archaological sites)
    http://www.bing.com/maps/ (has very pretty aerial pictures)
    http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/ (Has old and new maps and aerial photos)


    KPyQt.jpg

    Thank you SO much for going to all that trouble. I know they're not historically significant or anything, but just to be able to have a better idea about what they are, how old, etc. is all I wanted - now I can pretend to sound really knowledgeable to my highly inquisitive children. Much much appreciated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭morebabies


    baaba maal wrote: »
    My understanding is that a lot of the waste from the home (including broken crockery) would be piled up on the midden or dunstead, and would then be carted out inadvertently onto the field or veg patch to fertilise it. Hence it seems to show up over a wide area.

    Yes, I heard something like that, and it really wouldn't make much sense otherwise, especially when as far back as my husband's family know, ie. 3 generations or so, the land was primarily used for agricultural purposes. Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,516 ✭✭✭Maudi


    Gee Bag wrote: »
    Howya Morebabies,

    My first impression when i saw the large block was that it is a spud stone. Have found them before near gates or entry points to farmesteads. They are difficult to date without knowing where they were found.

    The pottery looks to be all of ninteenth century or later date. Generally on digs you collect it to indicate that a site or layers on a site are of relativley modern date. The majority of it looks to be slipware (whitish in the middle with design on the outside). Archaeologists also call this stuff grannyware 'cos it looks like the sort of pottery your granny might have had.

    The fragment with the dark brown/black glaze and orange fabric (middle bit) is probably blackware. It is of 18-19th century date. This was the type of pottery used by the common chap.

    The white tube thing is a clay pipe stem used to smoke tobacco. By the size of it (thickness of walls; width of bore) I'd reckon its 19th century in date. Earlier pipe stems were a lot smaller because both tobacco and meerschaum (the type of clay used to make the pipe) were a lot more expensive in the preceeding centuries.

    Don't know about the mound thingie, its hard to tell from the pics. You could maybe use the following websites to see if you can identify the shape of it......

    http://webgis.archaeology.ie/NationalMonuments/FlexViewer/ (shows known archaological sites)
    http://www.bing.com/maps/ (has very pretty aerial pictures)
    http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/ (Has old and new maps and aerial photos)


    KPyQt.jpg
    blackware..thats what 'eminent'friend called my piece..it must be really widespread ?was it from plates or cups or both?the piece i found has the same 'rib' as morebabies piece..also would spud holes be that deep?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭morebabies


    slowburner wrote: »
    Maybe it is demolition waste but equally,
    a spread of pottery sherds from different periods, combined with high quality masonry, could also indicate prolonged habitation.
    Learning about the people who lived there before you through the bits and pieces they left behind, is what archaeology is all about. Assuming, that is, the remains are in situ.

    Have a look at the mound using some of the aerial imagery available. Bing is probably the best for most areas.
    It would be worthwhile too, to look at the first edition OSI maps.
    See the links thread.

    The ditch looks promising imho, especially if it encircles the mound.

    Yes, thanks for the links info, I will check out the maps. I wouldn't be as confident digging around the mound because I wouldn't have the keenly-trained archaeological eye to identify layers of history in the earth or burnt material, etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 539 ✭✭✭morebabies


    I think what you are looking at with the pottery fragments is a very wide range of dating.. Without seeing them (in person) I would hazard between 1700 ish and 1950 ish.. I think you live on what has been a long established dwelling site, all kitchen and domestic waste seemed to be chucked on to veg. garden areas... I think without seeing them in person that the mound could well be natural. The Ice Age did create odd looking deposits, the Drumlins being a fine example.

    Thank you for this post it's great fun... PM sent!

    Thanks. I have the combined ignorance and enthusiasm of a true amateur!


Advertisement