Olympic Games turn London into ‘ghost town’

Run_to_da_hills

First it was empty seats, now it is empty streets.

Going by media reports London is empty, roads, shops, hotels and top attractions all complaining they are empty and well down on business by at least 30%.

Is it because:

1, People being freaked out by the OTT military presence
2, The warnings and hype to keep away due to overloaded transport logistics.
3, Sponsored dignitaries not showing up at event's. Did many of these even
bother coming to the UK or the capital at all?
4, People are just fed up with the whole event, inflated prices, hotel charges,
etc and won't go near it with a barge pole
5 People are wising up to the possibility that something might happen.


http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/olympics-host-london-is-ghost-town-as-tourism-struggles-16192329.html

who the fug

People are watching working from home, high hotel prices scared off advance bookings. (have been telling anyone in our company not to come to London since last December)

Not the cluster **** I was expecting, and will say well done Locog, now **** off Boris

People going to events are on the whole away from centre of London, so that is another plus

gibraltar

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

First it was empty seats, now it is empty streets.

Going by media reports London is empty, roads, shops, hotels and top attractions all complaining they are empty and well down on business by at least 30%.

Is it because:

1, People being freaked out by the OTT military presence
2, The warnings and hype to keep away due to overloaded transport logistics.
3, Sponsored dignitaries not showing up at event's. Did many of these even
bother coming to the UK or the capital at all?
4, People are just fed up with the whole event, inflated prices, hotel charges,
etc and won't go near it with a barge pole
5 People are wising up to the possibility that something might happen.


http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/olympics-host-london-is-ghost-town-as-tourism-struggles-16192329.html

Strange, the whole thing was a NWO display yet they have not managed to get the people there to see it and then they allow their media to report it... sloppy work from the NWO, silly old elites - always shooting themselves in the foot.

al28283

It's hardly a ghost town as the streets are more packed than ever and the central line is pretty crowded but
everyone who lives here has been hearing for months about how crowded things will be during the olympics so we all took our holidays during these 2 weeks.

It's fairly simple. No conspiracy here.

Run_to_da_hills

gibraltar wrote: »

Strange, the whole thing was a NWO display yet they have not managed to get the people there to see it and then they allow their media to report it... sloppy work from the NWO, silly old elites - always shooting themselves in the foot.

That's called playing good cop bad cop.

You won't get the NWO telling us the real reason why numbers are down.

I wonder will the NWO investigate this?

al28283

Military presence is visibly no more than usual, visiting dignataries not being here doesn't account for anything, and the general public don't scour nonsense conpiracy websites so most of them aren't aware of all the attempted scaremongering.

Run_to_da_hills

al28283 wrote: »

Military presence is visibly no more than usual, visiting dignataries not being here doesn't account for anything, and the general public don't scour nonsense conpiracy websites so most of them aren't aware of all the attempted scaremongering.

But they do scour Facebook and UTube which are awash with this stuff, the number of hits on some of them would indicate.

Corkfeen

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

But they do scour Facebook and UTube which are awash with this stuff, the number of hits on some of them would indicate.

On what exactly? Any old crap garner millions of hits... I put up a couple of videos a few years back that are atrocious, still have a couple of hundred thousand views on them....

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

But they do scour Facebook and UTube which are awash with this stuff, the number of hits on some of them would indicate.

But number of views don't indicate that all of those people took the ideas seriously.
Just look at how many people read and respond to your propaganda and notice how absolutely no one takes you seriously.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

But number of views don't indicate that all of those people took the ideas seriously.
Just look at how many people read and respond to your propaganda and notice how absolutely no one takes you seriously.

I'm sure they take that BBC Code 9 documentary very serious.

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I'm sure they take that BBC Code 9 documentary very serious.

That's not really a response to what I wrote.
The point was about the conspiracy theories you regurgitate and how the vast vast vast majority of people don't put any stock in them or don't watch the videos you copy pasta for any reason beyond laughing at the paranoid ramblings.
And given how you've been striking out all week, that seems very justified.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

That's not really a response to what I wrote.
The point was about the conspiracy theories you regurgitate and how the vast vast vast majority of people don't put any stock in them or watch the videos you copy pasta for any reason beyond laughing at the paranoid ramblings.
And given how you've been striking out all week, that seems very justified.

I started a civilised thread with a title which has appeared right across Mainstream media. Almost immediately yourself and the usual posters launched into your usual condescending rants. You shouldn't be here if you can't comprehend the concept of CT.

Canis Lupus

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I started a civilised thread with a title which has appeared right across Mainstream media. Almost immediately yourself and the usual posters launched into your usual condescending rants. You shouldn't be here if you can't comprehend the concept of CT.

Nothing wrong with a conspiracy theory but it helps to have a shred of plausibility behind it.

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I started a civilised thread with a title which has appeared right across Mainstream media. Almost immediately yourself and the usual posters launched into your usual condescending rants. You shouldn't be here if you can't comprehend the concept of CT.

Nonsense.
You posted a blog post, then people expressed their opinion and provided facts against the conspiracy theory. Then as usual you did not address any of those points aside from random, nonsensical one-liners.

If you want people to engage in a civilised thread, you actually need to participate.

If of course you are going to use the canard that "they're conspiracy theories" to avoid addressing the fact that those theories are nonsense, then you should not be so offended when people call them out as such. Especially since you are unwilling or unable to address any points made to you.

So again, you made the point that people are not going to the olympics because they are afraid of some sort of NWO attack.
We've pointed to the fact that the vast majority of rational people do not take those conspiracy theories seriously.

Do you agree or disagree with that?

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

Nonsense.
You posted a blog post, then people expressed their opinion and provided facts against the conspiracy theory. Then as usual you did not address any of those points aside from random, nonsensical one-liners.

What facts?

King Mob wrote: »

If you want people to engage in a civilised thread, you actually need to participate.

I have participated but I will continuously ignore condescending comments .

King Mob wrote: »

So again, you made the point that people are not going to the olympics because they are afraid of some sort of NWO attack.

We've pointed to the fact that the vast majority of rational people do not take those conspiracy theories seriously.

And again its not any of the spin off conspiracies I am on about.

How do you know?

Did you go over to London and interview people on the streets or did you pick it up from the main stream media.?

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

What facts?

Please read the posts people have made.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I have participated but I will continuously ignore condescending comments .

No you haven't. You have not substantively addressed any point made to you on this thread, or on any of your latest scarmongering about the olympics. The posts you seem to consider "condescending" suspiciously seem to coincide with the ones that point out the giant holes and logical mistakes you make.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

And again its not any of the spin off conspiracies I am on about.

Yes you are:

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

5 People are wising up to the possibility that something might happen.

So since you believe that anything bad that happens in a false flag, that "something" that might happen is a conspiracy.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

How do you know? Did you go over to London and interview people on the streets or did you pick it up from the main stream media.?

Because the vast majority of people are able to see how claims like the ones you repost are utter nonsense. They realise that they are paranoid and totally lacking in evidence and logic. And since they have all been failing miserably so far there's even less of a chance rational people are going to buy them.

So what precisely leads you to believe that people are worried about these claims in any significant number, let alone numbers enough to effect attendance at the olympics?

Run_to_da_hills

RTTH 80030434 wrote:

And again its not any of the spin off conspiracies I am on about.

Yes you are:

Again repeating myself, its that Rockefeller Foundation PDF & BBC Code 9 documentary that the root of everything.

King Mob wrote: »

Because the vast majority of people are able to see how claims like the ones you repost are utter nonsense. They realise that they are paranoid and totally lacking in evidence and logic. And since they have all been failing miserably so far there's even less of a chance rational people are going to buy them.

People make their own judgement and yes I would be quite concerned (Not paranoid ) as would many about again the content of that Rockefeller Foundation PDF & BBC Code 9 documentary.

King Mob wrote: »

So what precisely leads you to believe that people are worried about these claims in any significant number, let alone numbers enough to effect attendance at the olympics?

We will see, early days yet.

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Again repeating myself, its that Rockefeller Foundation PDF & BBC Code 9 documentary that the root of everything.

Which describes either 1) a NWO attack or 2) a terrorist attack, which regardless you will claim is a NWO attack.
So you are talking about people being afraid of an NWO attack. Please stop pretending otherwise.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

People make their own judgement and yes I would be quite concerned (Not paranoid ) as would many about again the content of that Rockefeller Foundation PDF & BBC Code 9 documentary.

And most people unlike you are not concerned because they don't see conspiracies everywhere.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

We will see, early days yet.

This again is disjointed from the section of my post you quoted and did not actually address the point.
You have not provided any reason at all to support the idea that anyone is avoiding London due to any fear of any attack.
It's not about "early days". You either have a solid reason to believe the claim, or you don't.
Most likely since you've avoided the question as usual, that you don't and like all of your previous theories will prove to be absolute nonsense.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

Which describes either 1) a NWO attack or 2) a terrorist attack, which regardless you will claim is a NWO attack.
So you are talking about people being afraid of an NWO attack. Please stop pretending otherwise.

Both those documentaries refer to mass killings which is the concern, be it false flag or not, let those viewing make their own judgements as I have been repeating saying but you don't seem to be able to comprehend that.

King Mob wrote: »

You have not provided any reason at all to support the idea that anyone is avoiding London due to any fear of any attack.

People not hanging about is as good as any reason.

King Mob wrote: »

It's not about "early days". You either have a solid reason to believe the claim, or you don't.
Most likely since you've avoided the question as usual, that you don't and like all of your previous theories will prove to be absolute nonsense.

It is because many claim that numbers will increase as the games progress, so I assume this will also refer to activity in the city of London.

I had to laugh at this statement. "Those venues are stuffed Olympic committee responds to storm over empty seats". Its like a statement coming straight out of North Korea. LOL.

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Both those documentaries refer to mass killings, be it false flag or not, let who are viewing them make their own judgements as I have been repeating saying but you don't seem to be able to comprehend that.

And you don;t seem to comprehend that your distinction does not effect my point.
You claim that people are staying away because they fear an attack.
You've yet to show how this is a possible reason when most people 1) would not have seen the documentary or similar paranoid tripe 2) would not take it seriously.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

People not hanging about is as good as any reason.

Except it's not as there are other explanations for the supposed absence of people. And these explanations are far more reasonable and do not rely on paranoid conspiracy theories.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

It is because many claim that numbers will increase as the games progress, so I assume this will also refer to activity in the city of London.

But this does not change whether or not you currently have anything to support your claim.
You do not.
And given your track record you will not.

ouncer

as a relaxed irish person i thought the opening ceremony (other than paul mccartney) was mind blowing it was so good. on top of that i have 24 high def channels to watch all the stuff that is going on. what a feckin achievement. fair play.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

And you don;t seem to comprehend that your distinction does not effect my point.
You claim that people are staying away because they fear an attack.
You've yet to show how this is a possible reason when most people 1) would not have seen the documentary or similar paranoid tripe 2) would not take it seriously.

People have also got to contend and draw conclusions of a possible false flag on the following piece of scaremongering tripe.

Israel Fears Iranian Attack at Olympics

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

And you don;t seem to comprehend that your distinction does not effect my point.
You claim that people are staying away because they fear an attack.
You've yet to show how this is a possible reason when most people 1) would not have seen the documentary or similar paranoid tripe 2) would not take it seriously.

People have also got to contend and draw conclusions on the following piece of scaremongering tripe.

Report: Israel fears Iranian terror attack at London 2012 Olympics

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

People have also got to contend and draw conclusions of a possible false flag on the following piece of scaremongering tripe.

Israel Fears Iranian Attack at Olympics

So again you've avoided points you can't answer.

Please tell use what's different between that scaremongering and yours?
Please tell us how many people took this any more seriously than your scaremongering tripe?

Of course in addition to the other points you're ignoring.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

Please tell use what's different between that scaremongering and yours?

That is state sponsored scaremongering.

Mine is exposing it.

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

That is state sponsored scaremongering.

Mine is exposing it.

No yours is scaremongering.
You claim that there is going to be attacks at the olympics, but offer no evidence or rational reasoning for it. (In fact you know you can't provide such evidence and likely don't care you can't.)
And you very much have political motivations for trying to get people to be afraid of the scary boogeymen out to get us.

So again, what's different?

And again please answer the questions you are dodging. Ignoring them doesn't make them go away, it just make you look like you aren't honest enough to answer them.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

No yours is scaremongering.
You claim that there is going to be attacks at the olympics.

I never claimed that there was ever going to be attacks on the Olympics.

Even the title of that thread in question, Possible. false flag attacks. :rolleyes:

I have produced official information that had appeared on media channels along with various conspiracy theories spun off them and then left it up to the individual to decide.

You seem to have a huge problem understanding that.

King Mob wrote: »

But offer no evidence or rational reasoning for it. (In fact you know you can't provide such evidence and likely don't care you can't.)

The only evidence I could possibly provide would be if the thing happened and it was proven a false flag. :rolleyes:

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I never claimed that there was ever going to be attacks on the Olympics.

Even the title of that thread in question, Possible. false flag attacks. :rolleyes:

Lol, ok, let's pretend that's the case then.
Which do you think is more likely there being an attack, or there not being an attack?

Do you think that an attack is at all a serious possibility, yes or no?

And I believe that the Israelis were just concerned about a "possible" terrorist attack as well....

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I have produced official information that had appeared on media channels along with various conspiracy theories spun off them and then left it up to the individual to decide.

You seem to have a huge problem understanding that.

No, you present links to various news stories and twist and spin them and claim they say stuff they don't, then you never respond when people point this out.

If you just want to post that stuff and "leave it up to the individual to decide" why are you posting it on a discussion forum?
Why not get a blog where you can do that to your hearts content and you never have to hear anyone point out your dishonesty and bad logic?

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

The only evidence I could possibly provide would be if the thing happened and it was proven a false flag. :rolleyes:

No you can provide the evidence you've used to determine that the possibility of an attack is a serious possibility.

But you don't use evidence to reach that conclusion so you can't provide it.

You still have not addressed my points.
If you would like to be true to your words about wanting a civil on topic discussion, please go back to them.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

Lol, ok, let's pretend that's the case then.
Which do you think is more likely there being an attack, or there not being an attack?

Do you think that an attack is at all a serious possibility, yes or no?

I can't give a direct answer to that.

But obviously there is going to be a far less chance of anything happening if there is wind of something about.

King Mob wrote: »

And I believe that the Israelis were just concerned about a "possible" terrorist attack as well....

I wouldn't take a chance with any of their statements and would take it as an immediate threat whether it could be genuine or not.

King Mob wrote: »

If you just want to post that stuff and "leave it up to the individual to decide" why are you posting it on a discussion forum?

Because people can discuss their opinions on it. Unfortunately people like yourself take stuff far too serious and usually end up getting upset.

King Mob wrote: »

No you can provide the evidence you've used to determine that the possibility of an attack is a serious possibility.

From the evidence that I have provided in some of those videos such as the patterns of subliminal messages etc I would be certainly be vigilant and would naturally avoid large gatherings in certain urban spaces, televised parks etc.

studiorat

Perhaps it's because the Chinese badminton team have been kicked out and there's no reason for anyone else to bother staying.

freyners

Lots of people taking holidays while its on more than likely. Tourism Ireland for example have had a campaign going for weeks called "escape the madness" to try and get londoners to come here during the olympics. I doubt its only tourism Ireland that are doing this.

http://www.discoverireland.com/gb/campaigns/escape-the-madness-video/?WT.lbicg_n=gb_redirects&WT.lbicg_s=escapethemadness&

Coupled with Boris's comments it seems most are taking a holiday until its all over

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/london-2012-olympics-boris-johnsons-hello-folks-travel-chaos-warnings-axed-from-london-transport-7998046.html

Sacksian

Actually, this phenomenon of lower tourist numbers happens to every Olympics host city and country.

In Beijing -

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/09/12/1220857792996.html

Previous Olympics -

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/sep/20/london-olympics-tourism-warning

Father Damo

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I started a civilised thread with a title which has appeared right across Mainstream media. Almost immediately yourself and the usual posters launched into your usual condescending rants. You shouldn't be here if you can't comprehend the concept of CT.

There is nothing wrong with a conspiracy theory if it has some sort of realistic speculation at the very least.

Example: there are several reasonably plausible, if unproven, conspiracy theories about, say, the deaths of JFK, Princess Diana, the Norwegian massacre, Bush rigging the 2000 election, Area 51, Roswell Incident. 9/11 at a stretch (the story has holes, but I still would 100% believe the official version in all truth). All of these events (bar 9/11) have major discrepencies, serious motive, or numerous eyewitness accounts that challenge official views. I am not saying that I believe alternative views on all of the above incidents, but they are certainly worth a consideration before rushing to the most popular government issued conclusions.

On the other hand, you have your theories on the Aurora massacre, Biblical prophecies, Obama being the anti christ, Obama seeking to set up a one leader dictatorship, Olympic false flag plots, illuminati communication via pop music and other such tripe that does not contain one shred of credible evidence. In the Aurora case the usual idiots were cooking up their story two minutes after the news broke. There is a difference between events that contain enough circumstantial evidence to allow for a reasonably credible alternative theory, and then there is absoloute bull like your Olympic, Aurora, Obama and popular culture theories.

al28283

In my office in Central London many, almost half, of the people here on holiday this week or next.

Absolutely none, not one, of them have mentioned anything about being afraid of something happening during the olympics, the reason they have waited till these weeks to take their holidays is fear of congestion and a packed tube in the morning.

The olympics is a natural break point during the summer which everyone knew was coming and seemed an obvious time for everyone to take holidays.

al28283

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Did you go over to London and interview people on the streets or did you pick it up from the main stream media.?

I live and work in Central London so that's where I'm getting my info from.
I'd also like to point out that this "mainstream media" you keep on about it where you get many of your links from. You pick and choose whichever happens to fit into whatever delusion you happen to be indulging at the time.

At least be consistent, and not deride sources of media you yourself use when it suits you.

luketitz

Loving the battle of wits and opinions between OP and King Mob.. do you guys live in different time zones or did you genuinely stay up all night composing compelling counter-claims?!

Sarky

London was grand when I was there last week. Bit packed with tourists not used to the underground, and bloody hot, but nope, no fear, no worries about terrorists or evil government types pretending to be terrorists. Some lovely street performing actually. Ooh, and blimps! I <3 blimps!

OP's "official information" is just plain incorrect. Nobody's panicing, police numbers are only a little higher to deal with the influx of people (and there is quite an influx of people, despite the rubbish posted otherwise), locals are either on holiday or going to work earlier to beat the crowds. Everything is looking fine.

hooradiation

If this is London as a ghost town, ghosts have far more mass and are far more tangible than we've all been previously been led to believe.

JustinDee

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

First it was empty seats, now it is empty streets.

Going by media reports London is empty, roads, shops, hotels and top attractions all complaining they are empty and well down on business by at least 30%.

Is it because:

1, People being freaked out by the OTT military presence
2, The warnings and hype to keep away due to overloaded transport logistics.
3, Sponsored dignitaries not showing up at event's. Did many of these even
bother coming to the UK or the capital at all?
4, People are just fed up with the whole event, inflated prices, hotel charges,
etc and won't go near it with a barge pole
5 People are wising up to the possibility that something might happen.


http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/olympics-host-london-is-ghost-town-as-tourism-struggles-16192329.html

You really are grasping at straws.
London is expensive. London is more expensive when the world's biggest sporting event comes to town.
No conspiracy. No surprise.
Also, crowds traidtionally pick up when the track and field events start at the beginning of the second week.

Lastly though, have you actually been in London??

al28283

http://sports.yahoo.com/video/why-central-london-empty-030000677.html

No mention of the NWO or fear of terrorist attacks.

Attabear

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I never claimed that there was ever going to be attacks on the Olympics.

Even the title of that thread in question, Possible. false flag attacks. :rolleyes:

I have produced official information that had appeared on media channels along with various conspiracy theories spun off them and then left it up to the individual to decide.

The only evidence I could possibly provide would be if the thing happened and it was proven a false flag. :rolleyes:

Ah, I see.

If nothing happens: "I never said anything would happen"

If something happens: "Told You!"

Very convenient.

al28283

Attabear wrote: »

Ah, I see.

If nothing happens: "I never said anything would happen"

If something happens: "Told You!"

Very convenient.

But no matter what does happen, it only happened because the NWO planned it that way

Jonny7

al28283 wrote: »

But no matter what does happen, it only happened because the NWO planned it that way

Or was thwarted because some people posted online about it.

At this stage its turning into a serious case of the "boy who cried wolf".

Attabear

Jonny7 wrote: »

Or was thwarted because some people posted online about it.

At this stage its turning into a serious case of the "boy who cried wolf".

You know, if this were a film, the scene would cut to "Breaking News from the Olympic village".:pac:

dharma200

ouncer wrote: »

as a relaxed irish person i thought the opening ceremony (other than paul mccartney) was mind blowing it was so good. on top of that i have 24 high def channels to watch all the stuff that is going on. what a feckin achievement. fair play.

aha, but Ive been reading paul mcartney is acually dead and has been so for years.. which then led me to read about some journalist who exposed 9/11 attacks and is now denying he is kidnapped, even though it appears he is, even though he denys it.... my god my whole morning has been taken up with this all because of Paul mcartney... who was possibly the worst live act I have ever seen and I actually wanted to do myself in when I saw him live ten years ago...... god I hate Paul/Faul mcbleedingcartney

Jonny7

Attabear wrote: »

You know, if this were a film, the scene would cut to "Breaking News from the Olympic village".:pac:

I'm talking about the 4 years worth of posts on here

That's a lot of crying wolf if you ask me

enno99

al28283 wrote: »

http://sports.yahoo.com/video/why-central-london-empty-030000677.html

No mention of the NWO or fear of terrorist attacks.

It's hardly a ghost town as the streets are more packed than ever

So which is it ?

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I can't give a direct answer to that.

....would be certainly be vigilant and would naturally avoid large gatherings in certain urban spaces, televised parks etc.

So you can't give a direct answer to that, but you are genuinely afraid of an actual attack....
You are not being honest so you can avoid giving an answer that will be provably wrong when there is no attack on the Olympics.

Also your "evidence" of patterns of subliminal messages is nonsensical as is repeatedly pointed out which you then ignore.
Like you continue to do with my points on this thread.

al28283

enno99 wrote: »

So which is it ?

depends where you are in the city, the centre and west end areas which are usually the busiest are a fairly empty compared to usual. That's the area featured on that video.

The east of the city out towards the stadium is busier than I've ever seen it

fkt

I've never seen Oxford St. or Kensington as quite as they were today. You just have to pick up the E.Standard to see how unahppy business owners in the West End are. 'Ghost town' is a fairly reasonable description IMO.

enno99

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

That is state sponsored scaremongering.

Mine is exposing it.

looks like they want to keep the Golders Green residents on their toes

http://www.hiiraan.com/news4/2012/july/24980/terrorist_planned_attacks_on_jewish_areas.aspx

A statement from the Community Security Trust, a charity that monitors anti-semitic attacks in the UK said the information was discovered at the time of Mohammed’s death, but has remained confidential until now

“We urge the Jewish community to remain alert, but not to be alarmed and to ensure that it continues leading its communal life to the full. We ask community members to fully co-operate with existing security measures and to report any suspicious activity to the police and to CST.”


http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4067585,00.html

Mossad helps UK secure Olympics

The UK's entire defense establishment, including the emergency services, participated in the massive drill, which was held secretly by the British Defense Ministry.


But British intelligence officials were not satisfied, and invited their Mossad counterparts to share their experience