Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

75-300mm Vs 70-300mm IS USM

  • 01-08-2012 12:33pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 347 ✭✭


    I have a 75-300mm canon from my film days. I used it the other day at the zoo, and while the pic's were fine, they were a bit 'soft' (if that makes sense.)

    I was thinking of upgrading it to the 70-300mm IS USM, and was wondering if i'll notice a huge difference in image quality, and auto-focus speed (help catch moving animals!)? I can't afford an L lens, and i'd like the range of the 300mm.

    Is this a good buy, or am I spending money on a lens when I don't really need to spend it.... :-)


Comments

  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    Any zoom lens, even an L, is a compromise optically. The lens isn't going to be as sharp as a prime and so your images will look soft. Most lenses have a sweet spot however so it's not all bad news.

    There are some very positive reviews of the 70-300 here:
    http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=294

    Also the vanilla 70-200 f/4 L is relatively cheap and very sharp for a zoom. Might be worth looking at the second hand market.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,944 ✭✭✭pete4130


    Were you at 300mm end of the lens? I'd guess so being at the zoo. These lenses aren't great between 200-300mm.


Advertisement