Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Private profiles - please note that profiles marked as private will soon be public. This will facilitate moderation so mods can view users' warning histories. All of your posts across the site will appear on your profile page (including PI, RI). Groups posts will remain private except to users who have access to the same Groups as you. Thread here
Some important site news, please read here. Thanks!

Who will light the Olympic cauldron bet??

  • 28-07-2012 9:47pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 8,696 ✭✭✭ sudzs
    Registered User


    I'm flippin' annoyed at the fact that I had a bet on who would light the olympic cauldron, I bet on the second fav, Bannister.

    In the end none of those listed in the book actually lit the thing, instead it was 7 young people.

    I heard today that all UK bookies were refunding bets but my bet was with Paddy Power and they are not refunding but instead paying out on the "mentors" who mentored the 7 young people
    we're paying out in full on the 7 mentors involved in lighting the flame. We're paying out in full on: Steve Redgrave, Kelly Holmes, Mary Peters, Daley Thompson, Duncan Goodhew, Lynne Davies and Shirley Thompson

    I never placed a bet on mentors, I bet on who would light the cauldron. Some of those people weren't even in the betting.

    What a swizz. :mad:

    Anyone else in the same boat??


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 29,728 ✭✭✭✭ NIMAN
    Registered User


    Betting on silly things?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,696 ✭✭✭ sudzs
    Registered User


    NIMAN wrote: »
    Betting on silly things?

    A bet's a bet!


  • Registered Users Posts: 263 ✭✭ redhill
    Registered User


    A bets a bet, you bet on Bannister, he didn't light it, your bet is a loser , it's clear cut.
    just because the eventual "winners" weren't listed doesn't count unless it is specifically mentioned in either that individual bets rules or the bookmakers general rules, did u check these before placing the bet or even posting here?? Don't think so, in this instance PP have actually been generous enough in their settlement


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,546 ✭✭✭✭ okidoki987
    Registered User


    Backed Redgrave but with Sky Bet :mad:.
    ****ers refunded my bet, if I had it with Ladbrokes or PP, I would have been paid as a Winner.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,696 ✭✭✭ sudzs
    Registered User


    okidoki987 wrote: »
    Backed Redgrave but with Sky Bet :mad:.
    ****ers refunded my bet, if I had it with Ladbrokes or PP, I would have been paid as a Winner.

    At least you got a refund.

    I'll heve to avoid these "silly bets" in future and stick to very serious bets. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,546 ✭✭✭✭ okidoki987
    Registered User


    At least you got a refund

    Don't think anybody would be daft enough to try settling any of those bets as Losers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,200 jjll


    okidoki987 wrote: »
    Backed Redgrave but with Sky Bet :mad:.
    ****ers refunded my bet, if I had it with Ladbrokes or PP, I would have been paid as a Winner.


    im sure it was paid out stake divide by 7


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,546 ✭✭✭✭ okidoki987
    Registered User


    im sure it was paid out stake divide by 7

    Nope
    I checked both Ladbrokes & PP paid to full stakes!


Advertisement