Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

NPWS recent publication on ancient woodlands in Ireland

Comments

  • #2
    about 3 fity
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 ✭about 3 fity


    have to wonder are reports like this worth the money and staff investment


  • #3
    Oldtree
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,109 ✭✭✭Oldtree


    I think that a report like this brings about recognition of what we have and will hopefully lead to better protection and highten awareness in the future of these (imo) valuable areas.

    we dont have a great record generally speaking in this regard:

    http://www.npws.ie/publications/euconservationstatus/


  • #4
    robp
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,934 ✭✭✭robp


    We have lost plenty of species of flora and fauna in the past because of their fragmentation. Not all forests are equal. If we know whats there we can much more efficiently target areas which need additional measures or expansion etc.


  • #5
    Silvics
    Closed Accounts Posts: 128 ✭✭Silvics


    about 3 fity wrote: »
    have to wonder are reports like this worth the money and staff investment

    Agree. Does the NPWS have an actual forester on its staff? Have had dealings of late with a so-called local authority "biodoversity" officer-I'd venture that a pre-schooler would be as informed if not better informed than him.
    Reports like this can be prepared just as well and probably more objectively by the private sector.
    I'd like to see protection of out native forest ecosystems, and an expansion where cost-effective and practical.


  • #6
    Oldtree
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,109 ✭✭✭Oldtree


    Silvics wrote: »
    Does the NPWS have an actual forester on its staff?

    The report was prepared by what look to be suitably qualified and experienced personnel:

    http://www.botanicalenvironmental.com/about-us/

    All BEC staff members are trained ecologists

    The report was about ancient woodlands and not a planted forest, I am unsure as to what else a forester could bring to this report or to the NPWS? I would however ask if they have an arborist on staff?


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Silvics
    Closed Accounts Posts: 128 ✭✭Silvics


    Oldtree wrote: »
    The report was prepared by what look to be suitably qualified and experienced personnel:

    http://www.botanicalenvironmental.com/about-us/

    All BEC staff members are trained ecologists

    The report was about ancient woodlands and not a planted forest, I am unsure as to what else a forester could bring to this report or to the NPWS? I would however ask if they have an arborist on staff?[/QUOTE
    Do we preserve for the sake of preserving, or can they be functional too?
    It might throw the spotlight on forestry education in Ireland-certainly I learned only about plantation forestry. Native woodlands were taught by a botanist, who actually favoured a holistic approach to forestry, whereas UCD Forestry dept at the time was quite insular and limited in outlook.


  • #8
    Oldtree
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,109 ✭✭✭Oldtree


    It is great that your tutor passed on a wider view than UCD forestry, it is also great that you were able to learn from that tutor. Arborists are taught about plantation forestry, woodlands and ecology umong other subjects and I had some fantastic progressive tutors as well.

    I was not having a personal go at foresters, their job is to deal with a crop, I was just having an indirect gripe at the clearfell policy almost universely implemented here rather than a sellective felling policy implemented elsewhere, not to mention the non commercial and non sustainable coups planted here there and everywhere in the past.


  • #9
    Silvics
    Closed Accounts Posts: 128 ✭✭Silvics


    How to define "forester"? For me, it's more than just plantation forestry (and there's nothing wrong with plantation forestry), it's all trees growing in whatever community, whether natural or man-made, and must take account of all overlapping disciplines. Tall order perhaps, but an open mind, travel and listening to and questioning others and some decent books are a great help.
    Clearfell vs selection.....on the right soils should work, but earlier thinning regimes, possible mixing of species, ground prep techniques all factor in. For example, I'm slowly clear-felling SMB sites-there's no way to selectively fell and expect a standing crop with this sort of ground preparation, and anyhow with the inherent instability there is creeping w/throw.
    Another concern I have is the expectation that natural regeneration will occur with selective felling-from what I've seen it's sparse and one problem is the phenomenal growth of grass that occurs once you open up a site and the seedlings have no chance.


Advertisement