Meet the Ruling Faces of Evil.

Run_to_da_hills

I have to give this guy credit for compiling this list.

"Politicians and many other public figures, if you’ve ever seen a professional one up close, have almost a waxen stiffness and sheen to their phony, memorized expressions, as well as eyes that emanate something wrong. Most public and power characters need to be caught off guard to reveal their true nature, but it’s not necessary. Usually it’s in plain sight".

http://www.zengardner.com/meet-the-ruling-faces-of-evil/

hooradiation

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I have to give this guy credit for compiling this list.

"Politicians and many other public figures, if you’ve ever seen a professional one up close, have almost a waxen stiffness and sheen to their phony, memorized expressions, as well as eyes that emanate something wrong. Most public and power characters need to be caught off guard to reveal their true nature, but it’s not necessary. Usually it’s in plain sight".

http://www.zengardner.com/meet-the-ruling-faces-of-evil/

He needs to step the fuck away from photoshop before he hurts himself.

JustinDee

Hilarious. As if put together by a bored agoraphobic child.
How on earth are Robert Zoellick and Rupert Murdoch "zionists", by the way???

Jonny7

Hey, how does Bill Gates make the list!

JustinDee

Jonny7 wrote: »

Hey, how does Bill Gates make the list!

There was more that hadn't loaded on my phone that I just saw now.
It appears to have been 'compiled' by a very anti-Jewish individual safe behind anonymity.
Talk about issues! lol

CiaranMT

Run-to-da-hills, I've decided after long deliberation, and a number of ridiculous threads, that you're trolling to high heavens. I can't see any other explanation.

Brown Bomber

JustinDee wrote: »

How on earth are Robert Zoellick and Rupert Murdoch "zionists", by the way???

:D:D That reminds me of the time someone asked me how on earth is Eugene Terre Blanche racist.

Times 'censors stories to please proprietor'


Sam Kiley, who resigned last month as the Times's Middle East correspondent, claimed yesterday that his reports were regularly censored by editors living in "terror" of irritating Mr Murdoch.



In a stinging attack in the London Evening Standard Mr Kiley wrote that Mr Murdoch's friendship with Ariel Sharon, Israel's prime minister, and Mr Murdoch's extensive Israeli investments led executives to extensively rewrite copy.



"Middle managers flew into a hysterical terror every time a pro-Israeli lobbying group wrote in with a quibble or complaint, and then usually took their side against their own correspondent," he wrote.
Mr Kiley wrote that he was asked not to describe the killing of Israel's opponents as "assassination", and was directed to use less emotive phrases such as "targeted killing" instead.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2001/sep/06/pressandpublishing.uknews

Netanyahu's 'list of millionaires'


http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3973366,00.html

JustinDee

Brown Bomber wrote: »

:D:D That reminds me of the time someone asked me how on earth is Eugene Terre Blanche racist

Nothing even close.
Explain how the two names I mentioned are "Zionists". What do they do that propagates Zionism? Rupert Murdoch has investments in Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and even Pakistan. Does that make him an Islamist?
Every premier he meets on national visits still gives him the royal treatment, even following in this Leveson age.
Only people The Digger looks after and that's himself and his own.

You'd better read up on that list you link about, by the way. Find it strange that Netanyahu allegedly compiled it in English? Not even in the slightest? Happy reading.

Give it a rest with the digging up of old, irrelevant and out-of-date tat for news.

Corkfeen

While that list contains people who are unquestionably evil, there's a ton of random people and some seem to be based solely on a bad picture of the person. Firstly, RTDH, you recently said Russia wasn't so bad for totalitarian rule yet Putin made it onto the list. (He is evil but RTDH seemed to be fine with him a few weeks back)

Hilary Clinton, Bill Gates , David Axelrod (an advisor to Bill Clinton who was a rather fantastic president and did wonders for the US economy while he was in office), Mark Zuckerburg, it basically consists of people who have been in any way successful in life while there are some evil bastards hidden amongst them. It reflects more upon the creator of the site that he spent his time contorting the faces of everyone that is prominent in the public eye and labelling them as evil. Putting Al Gore next to a picture of Ted Bundy, :pac: awareness about global warming is bad, m'kay?

NegativeCreep

Al gore looks the absolute opposite of Ted Bundy. This site is actually hilarious :L Gonna bookmark it for when I need cheering up :L
The current Pope, I'll admit, is a scary lookin yoke though in all fairness :L

Brown Bomber

JustinDee wrote: »

Nothing even close.
Explain how the two names I mentioned are "Zionists". What do they do that propagates Zionism?

I've just shown how Rupert Murdoch uses his global media empire to censor Israeli criminality. This propagates Zionism. As well as being a close friend of war criminal Ariel Sharon he is also someone who Israeli PM and warmongering, extremist, Zionist Netanyahu considers likely to support him financially.

During an acceptance speech for and ADL award Murdoch receiving he quoted Zionist terrorist Jabotinsky. You cannot get any more "Zionist" than that!

Murdoch admitted he attempted to shape public opinion on the illegal Iraq invasion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JF9HpuZm6-g

Not only that he pressured Bliar.
Rupert Murdoch pressured Tony Blair over Iraq, says Alastair Campbell

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jun/15/rupert-murdoch-tony-blair-iraq-alastair-campbell


I don't know so much about him but didn't comment but he also lobbyed heavily for the illegal war against Iraq which benfitted Zionism greatly.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm

Sonics2k

I like how it's basically a list of anyone who's gotten successful with their lives.

Brown Bomber

Sonics2k wrote: »

I like how it's basically a list of anyone who's gotten successful with their lives.

You were expecting a list of unknowns?

Father Damo

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I have to give this guy credit for compiling this list.

"Politicians and many other public figures, if you’ve ever seen a professional one up close, have almost a waxen stiffness and sheen to their phony, memorized expressions, as well as eyes that emanate something wrong. Most public and power characters need to be caught off guard to reveal their true nature, but it’s not necessary. Usually it’s in plain sight".

http://www.zengardner.com/meet-the-ruling-faces-of-evil/

Apart from the Pope, who has a nasty look about him the whole time, you believe that a compilation of photos taken at bad angles show the persons true intent?

:pac::pac:

JustinDee

Brown Bomber wrote: »

I've just shown how Rupert Murdoch uses his global media empire to censor Israeli criminality . . .

You've shown nothing but one particular notch on Rupert Murdoch's beating stick. Murdoch serves Murdoch and no-one else. The Iraqi war had eff all to do with Zionism ffs. Nor had his previous business with Malaysian and Indonesian governments (both Muslim).

He is a proponent of whatever gets NewsCorp or NewsInternational etc to the fore. Y'see, Murdoch, whom you admit to knowing very little about, happens to be more powerful than all those people you mention hence his royal welcomes whenever arriving on their shores. Even in the times of Leveson.

Now, Zoellick . . .

Run_to_da_hills

Even without the photoshopped hat.

Oracle

Very funny..... just goes to show, not everyone has the advantage of being physically attractive. Although its the opposite prejudice that's more insidious; attributing honesty and trustworthiness to everyone who is physically attractive.

Jonny7

Oracle wrote: »

Very funny..... just goes to show, not everyone has the advantage of being physically attractive. Although its the opposite prejudice that's more insidious; attributing honesty and trustworthiness to everyone who is physically attractive.

Actually its a level lower than that.. its assuming evil in someone who has a bad photo day

SIR PEADO BAILOUT

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Even without the photoshopped hat.

I`m lovin it

Run_to_da_hills

Dude111

Run_to_da_hills wrote:

I have to give this guy credit for compiling this list.

Yes its a good list!!

I have shared this on several other sites im on!


Thank you RTDH! (Its important to know WHO THE ENEMY IS)

Run_to_da_hills

A clear and unphotoshopped depiction.

gibraltar

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

A clear and unphotoshopped depiction.

Of what? imaginary pizza making? bad boxing? forgotten sign language?

Brown Bomber

Proof hate makes you ugly:

from that list John D Rockefeller



the twin of Swedish Defense League leader Isak Nygren. Nygren was emailed by Breivik half and hour before his attacks. Neo-Zionist Nygren was defending Sweden at the time in a kibbutz on stolen Palestinian land that he'd call Israel.



on the right.

Run_to_da_hills

The ruling faces of Evil in collage form.

anniemcl

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Proof hate makes you ugly:

from that list John D Rockefeller



the twin of Swedish Defense League leader Isak Nygren. Nygren was emailed by Breivik half and hour before his attacks. Neo-Zionist Nygren was defending Sweden at the time in a kibbutz on stolen Palestinian land that he'd call Israel.



on the right.

Maybe he saw this video....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rA7Ymki71fM

Torakx

Honetly i think its just inbreeding.You might find the same issues within royalty also.

JustinDee

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2DMjefDtk8

This is how deluded people are. Sadly some here agree with them.
Some people really need to get laid.

Monty Burnz

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Are we back to just posting propaganda pictures?

Brown Bomber

Torakx wrote: »

Honetly i think its just inbreeding.You might find the same issues within royalty also.

and the Irish

Monty Burnz

This is genuinely the lamest thread I can remember on the CT forum - a bunch of unflattering pictures of politicians/successful business people/religious leaders...and that's it.

Ok.

Brown Bomber

JustinDee wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2DMjefDtk8

This is how deluded people are. Sadly some here agree with them.

"some here"... What total bollox. Name one.

Run_to_da_hills

Monty Burnz wrote: »

This is genuinely the lamest thread I can remember on the CT forum - a bunch of unflattering pictures of politicians/successful business people/religious leaders...and that's it.

Ok.

Here's another one for you without any propaganda,

seannash

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I have to give this guy credit for compiling this list.

"Politicians and many other public figures, if you’ve ever seen a professional one up close, have almost a waxen stiffness and sheen to their phony, memorized expressions, as well as eyes that emanate something wrong. Most public and power characters need to be caught off guard to reveal their true nature, but it’s not necessary. Usually it’s in plain sight".

http://www.zengardner.com/meet-the-ruling-faces-of-evil/

Genuine question,not posting it for the lulz but whats the conspiracy.Is it that there not human(dont want to bandy about the lizard thing incase you think I'm taking the piss)

Monty Burnz

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Here's another one for you without any propaganda,

But I can find plenty of bad photos of people on my own. Most ordinary people also look pretty bad in photos - look around you.

What the hell is all this about?

seannash

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Here's another one for you without any propaganda,

he has a bit of a mutant look about him in that picture

Monty Burnz

Torakx

I dont know about you folks but Icke looks ok there.
That stare from Hillary would scare the devil away.Holy Sh1t lol

seannash

Torakx wrote: »

I dont know about you folks but Icke looks ok there.
That stare from Hillary would scare the devil away.Holy Sh1t lol

yeah of course he looks okay,thats the point,most of the other pictures aren't any worse than the icke one.
You could argue that Icke looks slightly green,his eyes have a yellow tint around them.his lips look inflated etc etc.

I tell you one thing the stare of hillary is no match for most of the irish mothers I've known.doesnt make them evil ****ers.

what do these pictures prove and whats the CT

Brown Bomber

How about we compare them against people generally considered good to see if evil reflects on a persons outward appearance

seannash

Brown Bomber wrote: »

How about we compare them against people generally considered good to see if evil reflects on a persons outward appearance

Yeah lets do that here one thats generally considered good



He stacks up pretty well against those other guys in this picture,how can that be!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BB I know your not stupid,why are you even putting forward that proposal to compare pictures of good people to see if it shines through in there photos.Your insulting your own intelligence

Brown Bomber

seannash wrote: »

Yeah lets do that here one thats generally considered good



He stacks up pretty well against those other guys in this picture,how can that be!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BB I know your not stupid,why are you even putting forward that proposal to compare pictures of good people to see if it shines through in there photos.Your insulting your own intelligence

Why not? It's not supposed to be a scientific test.

I can throw a spanner in the works though.


Sam Harris - Evil


Ben Stiller - Good


John Terry - Evil


The heroic Glenn Greenwald - Good

seannash

I think I'll bow out of this one now.

Brown Bomber

seannash wrote: »

I think I'll bow out of this one now.

For the best. But remember: ugly = evil. Smiley = nice :pac:


evil


good

anniemcl

JustinDee wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2DMjefDtk8

This is how deluded people are. Sadly some here agree with them.
Some people really need to get laid.

What I don't understand about secular / atheistic Jews is their determination to promote multiculturalism throughout America and Europe but not in Israel.

Israel describes itself as secular democratic and Jewish state but then we see things like this...

Interior Minister says migrants do not recognize that Israel 'belongs to the white man.'

Israeli daily Maariv published an interview with Interior Minister Eli Yishai, in which he stated that most of the "Muslims that arrive here do not even believe that this country belongs to us, to the white man."

Is this a racist comment?
Is this something we'd hear from Apartheid South Africa 25 years ago?

Yishai also claims there's a gene in DNA that belongs to the Jews....

'Jewish gene' theories make waves in Germany, go unnoticed in Israel

If we are to believe in the ideology of Zionist group Im Tirtzu which believes Israel should remain a Jewish majority at all costs, then what business do Jewish funded organisations have promoting multiculturalism throughout Europe and America which is predominantly white?

Isn't promotion of multiculturalism a reason for whiners like Pat Condell talking about why multiculturalism is a failure and sarcastically blaming Jews for it?

Why is Israel "The Jewish State" and "belongs to the white man"?

Why is Ireland not called "The Catholic State" and "belonging to the white man"?

Monty Burnz

Brown Bomber wrote: »

For the best. But remember: ugly = evil. Smiley = nice :pac:

I may accidentally have shoe-horned Mitt Romney into the 'nice' category.

Brown Bomber

anniemcl wrote: »

What I don't understand about secular / atheistic Jews is their determination to promote multiculturalism throughout America and Europe but not in Israel.

Israel is by definition a racist/apartheid state but that doesn't mean every Jew or even Israeli supports racism or apartheid. Many of the leading voices against Israeli state racism are Jewish Israelis or diaspora Israelis. Many of the leading voices against South African apartheid were white South African Jews. Israel being an apartheid state doesn't diminish a Jewish individual's right to call for egalitarianism everywhere (unless it excludes Israel as a special case).

anniemcl

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Israel is by definition a racist/apartheid state but that doesn't mean every Jew or even Israeli supports racism or apartheid. Many of the leading voices against Israeli state racism are Jewish Israelis or diaspora Israelis. Many of the leading voices against South African apartheid were white South African Jews. Israel being an apartheid state doesn't diminish a Jewish individual's right to call for egalitarianism everywhere (unless it excludes Israel as a special case).

I know not every Jew or Israeli supports racism/apartheid just as not all white people concerned about immigration into their country belong to the Aryan brotherhood.

I just find it a little conspiratorial that Jews be at the forefront of promoting multiculturalism throughout predominantly white christian countries but not in Israel.

Zionists from what I can tell are not ultra-orthodox Jews, would you agree they are more secular/atheistic in their beliefs?

The wars in Islamic countries appear to be a catalyst for mass emigration into Europe and America which is then causing problems domestically because of the major cultural differences and why this is promoted by mainly Jewish groups strikes me as a little strange.

Brown Bomber

anniemcl wrote: »

I know not every Jew or Israeli supports racism/apartheid just as not all white people concerned about immigration into their country belong to the Aryan brotherhood.

I just find it a little conspiratorial that Jews be at the forefront of promoting multiculturalism throughout predominantly white christian countries but not in Israel.

Zionists from what I can tell are not ultra-orthodox Jews, would you agree they are more secular/atheistic in their beliefs?

The wars in Islamic countries appear to be a catalyst for mass emigration into Europe and America which is then causing problems domestically because of the major cultural differences and why this is promoted by mainly Jewish groups strikes me as a little strange.

Think of it like a venn diagram. I think it's fair to say that a portion of Jews, Israeli and diaspora, are progressive/Liberal/egalitarian/multiculturalists etc and they are one circle. In the other circle are pro-Jews only in the Jewish state Jews. It's only the ones in the intersection that are hypocrites, though I do agree with you on that point, but that wouldn't be all of them.

Zionists can be range from atheists to Ultra-orthodox to gentiles. Most of Israel's founders were secular, there is religious Zionism though. Likud are secular for example. Their extremism stems from their ultra-nationalism. Their religion is the state.

JustinDee

anniemcl wrote: »

I just find it a little conspiratorial that Jews be at the forefront of promoting multiculturalism throughout predominantly white christian countries but not in Israel

This is quite a lazy generalism. Have you truthfully ever lived in Israel or even been there for more than a few days?

JustinDee

Brown Bomber wrote: »

"some here"... What total bollox. Name one.

Hardly "bollox".
Read through some of the threads in Politics or this forum covering anything to do with the Arab/Israeli wars and aftermath or Israel's cold war vs Iran. You will find plenty of blinkered, pro-agendaic paranoid bullsh about Jews.