Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New Motorways - design flaw in heavy rain?

  • 08-06-2012 8:21am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 190 ✭✭



    Does anyone else agree that the new motorways in this country retain a lot of water on their surface during heavy rain? Maybe it’s just me but I think that when there is any substantial amount of rain a layer of water just sits on the motorways! I don’t notice the same thing on the few older motorways that we have – i.e. this morning I drove from Kilkenny to Dublin. The M9 had a layer of water sitting on it up until the Kilcullen exit where you are on the older section of motorway. There was still water on this older section but no where near as much! Is this my imagination or does anyone else agree? If so this surely should not be the case – have these motorway been designed incorrectly?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    Matt406 wrote: »

    Does anyone else agree that the new motorways in this country retain a lot of water on their surface during heavy rain? Maybe it’s just me but I think that when there is any substantial amount of rain a layer of water just sits on the motorways! I don’t notice the same thing on the few older motorways that we have – i.e. this morning I drove from Kilkenny to Dublin. The M9 had a layer of water sitting on it up until the Kilcullen exit where you are on the older section of motorway. There was still water on this older section but no where near as much! Is this my imagination or does anyone else agree? If so this surely should not be the case – have these motorway been designed incorrectly?

    Not just Ireland, Germany and Belgium have motorways where this happens too.

    Its all down to the maintenance at the side of the road, making sure the drainage is clear.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash


    All the way down the M7 there's signs "Road liable to flooding"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,158 ✭✭✭✭Berty


    Roads, having worked on them before, are built to EU standards with an incline built into them to handle a certain amount of water.

    Not a months rain in 24 hours of course so the motorways will have standing water. No escaping it really.

    The roads have an incline so the water will run off to the side, also the centre median barrier have bore holes in them to allow heavy water(and small animals sometimes) to move through the holes rather than building up along the barrier.
    smash wrote: »
    All the way down the M7 there's signs "Road liable to flooding"

    Does that include the N7 though because that is a fairly old national route that nearly always floods by Citywest?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    Is it the same uniform EU standard for all countries? Seems unusual when some would clearly get more rain than others.

    The matter that I would take issue with is not how much water can run off the motorway, but where does it go afte that?
    In most cases I find there is no where for the water to go once it has flown off the road and eventually just builds up.

    Should there not be something more in terms of drainage at the edgse of the road?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,363 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    The best drainage systems in the world would struggle with the rain we have had in the last 24 hours.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,688 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Is it the same uniform EU standard for all countries? Seems unusual when some would clearly get more rain than others.

    The matter that I would take issue with is not how much water can run off the motorway, but where does it go afte that?
    In most cases I find there is no where for the water to go once it has flown off the road and eventually just builds up.

    Should there not be something more in terms of drainage at the edgse of the road?
    There are drainage systems at the roadside. Also there is a certain permeability to the road surface. I feel that older surfaces tend to drain through better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,249 ✭✭✭pippip


    mickdw wrote: »
    There are drainage systems at the roadside. Also there is a certain permeability to the road surface. I feel that older surfaces tend to drain through better.

    True but at the cost of road noise


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,326 ✭✭✭Farmer Pudsey


    Beer Baron wrote: »
    Not a months rain in 24 hours of course so the motorways will have standing water. No escaping it really.
    QUOTE]

    We got the amount of rain that we normally get in the whole of june in the last 36 hoursnot a normal months rain we often get 8-10" (200-250mm) in a month in winter. It is quite common to get 2"(50mm) of rain in Ireland in that time frame it usually happen at least once every year and maybe 3-4 times. Getting around an inch (20-30mm) is very very common

    It amazes me the inability of engineers to allow for that. Every winter it happens and we get the excuse that it is one off or global warming it has been happening since I was knee high.

    We then get the excuse European standards every country should use the European standards as a minimum and adapt them for there own situtation. In Ireland we average around 40" (1000mm) of rain in any year however it varies from as much as 80" (2000mm) in the south west to around 28" (700mm) in places in the east so in doing any engineering job it sould be taken into account.

    It would be like putting a dirt track between two new small town centres and saying it was european standards you have to take local conditions imto account.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    mickdw wrote: »
    There are drainage systems at the roadside. Also there is a certain permeability to the road surface. I feel that older surfaces tend to drain through better.

    But are they adequate?
    What might seems adequate for Spain or Italy may not be adequate for UK or Ireland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,464 ✭✭✭furtzy


    Seems to depend on the surface type. The M2 was built in 2 sections. The first section Dublin to Ashbourne has a surface water problem but the last section north of Ashbourne is fine as it has a different surface finish.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭senordingdong


    Isn't the Dublin - Ashbourne part just a matter of the hills that the road traverses?
    I mean that dip at Kilshane Cross is HUGE! So even if the drainage is built to standard, they can't ignore gravity.

    And an utter nightmare when the road freezes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,464 ✭✭✭furtzy


    Theres a distinct surface change after the Ashbourne South exit. All surface spray stops instantly. You'll even notice less tyre noise as well


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70 ✭✭Organic Cavity


    Didn't they make a new type tarmac so there was less surface water?


  • Subscribers Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭conzy


    I actually find the newer stretches of the M9 more liable to retaining surface water. As soon as you get to the older rougher tarmac of the M7 there seems to be less surface water, the car definitely feels more planted anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 722 ✭✭✭urajoke


    Didn't they make a new type tarmac so there was less surface water?

    =

    image-268383-galleryV9-hgxh.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭GavMan


    It's not just rain like we've had the last 2 days. Even a standard amount of rain we'd see in winter leave a lot of standing water


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 190 ✭✭Matt406


    conzymaher wrote: »
    I actually find the newer stretches of the M9 more liable to retaining surface water. As soon as you get to the older rougher tarmac of the M7 there seems to be less surface water, the car definitely feels more planted anyway.

    I agree 100% conzymaher. That was my experience this morning!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭Paddy@CIRL


    Actually, for anyone who regularly travels the M9, have you noticed that the driving lane seems to hold a lot more water than the overtaking lane?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,253 ✭✭✭Boscoirl


    the stretch of the M7 just before the first exit for Nenagh when coming from Limerick is lethal, it is a bit downhill, so that will affect it, but you have very little say where your car is going sometimes, not just in extremely heavy showers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,012 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    Paddy@CIRL wrote: »
    Actually, for anyone who regularly travels the M9, have you noticed that the driving lane seems to hold a lot more water than the overtaking lane?

    You need somebody to drive in the lane to displace water.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭the culture of deference


    The N4 lucan inbound (from under the woodies/foxhunter exit up to liffey valley) is awful with the run off coming down the hill.

    People are still driving up each others arses at 80 + kmh.
    Its Crazy. Whats wrong with people.


Advertisement