Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

ryanair single toilet.

  • 05-06-2012 8:01pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 264 ✭✭


    Hi has anyone read abot MOL talking today to Boeing about a 200 seat plane with 1 toilet. theres something in the financial times but cant get the page up...


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,142 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    zone 1 wrote: »
    Hi has anyone read abot MOL talking today to Boeing about a 200 seat plane with 1 toilet. theres something in the financial times but cant get the page up...

    Its not going to happen.

    He has claimed to be trying to get it allowed for years, but its bollox for about 100 different reasons.

    Starting from the top:

    *One toilet would be impractical in terms of the usage levels for 189 passengers, let alone 200+
    *200 passengers = another cabin crew member = another cost
    *The exit configuration of the 737-800 allows a maximum of 189 passengers. This is why 737-900 non-ER variants with the same exit configuration are also limited to 189
    *The IAA has said they won't allow it
    *The EASA is highly unlikely to allow it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 264 ✭✭zone 1


    so another PR stunt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,618 ✭✭✭IngazZagni


    That's something he has being claiming for a couple years now. I think the FT article today was about comments from Boeing expressing doubts that they would be able to provide Ryanair with aircraft in that configuration.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 63 ✭✭finchkerry


    This has been spoken about for quite some time, nothing new really

    http://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/globalpost-blogs/weird-wide-web/ryanair-toilet-michael-oleary-boeing

    Never going to happen for the reasons outlined by another poster. Then again Michael has achieved what set out to do, get people talking about it thus getting free publicity.

    By the way must book those Paris flights when I come to think of it....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 328 ✭✭Bebop


    I cannot see the value of these stunts and I am sure MOL knows the drawbacks quite well, what if the single toilet were to malfunction? Ryanair fly some long sectors like DUB-FUE (4.5Hrs) unless they plan to use these aircraft only on short flights but this would create difficulties with fleet utilitisation etc,


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,924 ✭✭✭✭BuffyBot


    Free publicity is as low cost publicity as it gets, which suits Ryanair's model fine. Why pay for big ad campaigns when you can get your company mentioned in every media outlet for weeks at the mere drop of a sentence?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 407 ✭✭LLU


    And here's betting that all the sheep - sorry I mean hard hitting tough talking uncompromising radio journalists - on all the national radio stations will feature this before the week is out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,332 ✭✭✭Mr Simpson


    Never going to happen, even if by some miracle, they got permission to operate with a single toilet, afaik if that toilet went out of service, they would have to ground the aircraft.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭View Profile


    You don't need any functioning toilet as long as the airlines chief engineer gives it the thumbs up. :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,332 ✭✭✭Mr Simpson


    You don't need any functioning toilet as long as the airlines chief engineer gives it the thumbs up. :(

    Really :eek: I thought they were required by law


  • Advertisement
Advertisement