Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dublin marathon 29/10/2012

  • 21-05-2012 2:20pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭


    Race website

    Last year's thread

    Garmin track of last year's route
    This year's route

    This thread is for general discussion of the event - the route, predicted times, where to meet for pints afterwards, etc. (Note - number swaps are against the forum charter. Don't post here looking to buy or sell a number)

    If this is your first marathon, and you have questions about your training, ask them in the Dublin Marathon 2012 Mentored Novices thread. Any questions about when to run, how far to run, what to wear, what to eat... should go to that thread. Trained operators are standing by to take your questions. :)

    There is also a thread for marathon 'improvers' - people who have run one or two marathons, are no longer novices, but still have questions and issues to discuss about their training.

    There are phone apps you can download, run with your phone and other people can track your progress on their phones -
    Dublin Marathon app on Android:
    On the iPhone

    You can also register for live tracking with the chip timing company.
    This will send out a facebook update or tweet every time you cross a timing mat (so, 4 or 5 times altogether). You can use it to track the progress of runners from mat to mat, even if they don't have a phone app.

    Here's a video of the race route


    List of Pacers for DM 2012

    3:00
    Robert W
    Abhainn
    Pronator

    3:15
    liamo123
    Surewhynot!
    Ray Lanigan
    TFBubendorfer

    3:30
    Wounded Knee
    JackyBack
    Grellan
    Robinph

    3:45
    Menoscemo
    CorkRunning
    Paul D
    Claralara

    4:00
    Oisin11178
    RunningCoach
    Ruthann S
    Breffni Blue

    4:15
    Kandikane
    Marthastew
    digger2d2
    ankers99

    4:30
    Ultraman1
    Moneystealer1
    Izoard
    tHEvAGGABOND

    5:00
    Clareman07
    Belcarra
    Hot to trot

    Following the success of the pacers over the past few years we have included them again this year. There will be pacers for the following times: 3.00, 3.15, 3.30, 3.45, 4.00, 4.15, 4.30 and 5.00. They will run the race at a steady pace throughout, and aim to finish a few seconds under each time band. To be paced by them during the race, just turn up at the start, look for the runners wearing backpacks with large flags, and stand behind the corresponding time. (Note that 3:45 will start at the front of Wave 2, 4:15 will start at the front of Wave 3. All others will start in their appropriate starting zone).

    If you want to break 4 hours then run with the 4 hour pacers and stick with them. If you are fit enough to run a 4-hour marathon, you won't fall behind.

    If, on the other hand, you are not fit enough to run a 4 hour marathon then starting at an even faster pace will only hurt you and result in an even slower time.

    The marathon is not about running fast, it is about preserving energy. If you waste energy early on by running faster, you are only going to run into even bigger problems later on. Every minute run too fast in the first half will cost you at least 2 in the second.

    The same applies for every other time target as well, obviously.


«13456720

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 345 ✭✭curraghyid


    Has the route been finalised yet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    Not as far as I know


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,170 ✭✭✭Hard Worker


    curraghyid wrote: »
    Has the route been finalised yet

    Nearly finalised. We didn't get the route we wanted. It could be more of the same.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,196 ✭✭✭PaulieC


    Nearly finalised. We didn't get the route we wanted. It could be more of the same.

    any hints ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,433 ✭✭✭sideswipe


    any hints ?
    Originally Posted by Hard Worker
    Nearly finalised. We didn't get the route we wanted. It could be more of the same.
    :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,545 ✭✭✭tunguska


    Nearly finalised. We didn't get the route we wanted. It could be more of the same.

    So long as you're not adding more hills its cool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 brando1980


    just wondering if anyone knows the average number of ppl that run the DCM unofficially? doing research and just need a ball park figure. thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    brando1980 wrote: »
    just wondering if anyone knows the average number of ppl that run the DCM unofficially? doing research and just need a ball park figure. thanks

    "Unofficially"? Do you mean people who want to run a marathon with lots of other people, on closed roads with first aid standing by, with water stations and gels laid on, but don't want to pay for it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 brando1980


    yeah, i'd like to get an idea of how many bandits run it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2 petermannion


    anyone any advice on this marathon as a potential debut race?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    brando1980 wrote: »
    yeah, i'd like to get an idea of how many bandits run it.

    I don't know of anyone who collects those figures, or how you'd even go about it...
    anyone any advice on this marathon as a potential debut race?

    It's a good first marathon - not too tough a course, lots of support along the way, pace groups to follow, good organisation. The only downside is that it can get a bit crowded in places.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,361 ✭✭✭Kurt Godel


    brando1980 wrote: »
    just wondering if anyone knows the average number of ppl that run the DCM unofficially? doing research and just need a ball park figure. thanks

    Your research won't be very accurate if you're relying on unofficial ballpark figures from an internet forum. Here's a previous thread about cheating in marathons. Anecdotally I'd say the figure is miniscule. Some do get manhandled off before the finish, and others have been banned from future entries after being found wearing homemade numbers. Jerks, one and all- either pay the entry (which pays for the facilities), or run the course yourself another day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,932 ✭✭✭huskerdu


    Kurt Godel wrote: »
    Your research won't be very accurate if you're relying on unofficial ballpark figures from an internet forum.

    True, but I see Journalists relying on such figures regularly.

    But, anecdotal evidence from regular Marathon runners and club members who help organise and volunteer at Marathons of how often they have seen it happen is probably the best information available, as long as it is clear that its only anecdotal evidence.
    Jerks, one and all- either pay the entry (which pays for the facilities), or run the course yourself another day.

    Agreed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 brando1980


    thanks for the info kurt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 brando1980


    cool will have a chat with a few runners i know in a club, i know its estimated in boston abt 2000 bandit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,340 ✭✭✭TFBubendorfer


    brando1980 wrote: »
    cool will have a chat with a few runners i know in a club, i know its estimated in boston abt 2000 bandit

    Boston is well known for its high number of bandits, and they are somewhat tolerated there.

    The figure in Dublin will be a magnitude lower, and they are NOT tolerated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭WithCheesePlease


    Has a sponsor been agreed for this? The National Lottery bailed, didn't they?

    Also, is it still the case that there'll be no tv coverage? Wouldn't / won't stop me doing it, just curious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 154 ✭✭SnailsPace


    http://dublinmarathon.ie/map-2012.pdf

    Route for 2012 is up at last

    This looks very similar to 2011 - any changes??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 327 ✭✭The_Boy_Wonder


    SnailsPace wrote: »
    http://dublinmarathon.ie/map-2012.pdf

    Route for 2012 is up at last

    This looks very similar to 2011 - any changes??

    Very similar. The route through the park is different, less North Road and Ordance Survery Rd, replaced with up Chesterfield and down Furze Rd. Can't see remember any other changes.
    Hopefully traffic calming bollards/island outside Chapelizod Gate won't catch anyone out, but I guess there's a lot more considerations and issues to be balanced to come up with the route


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,989 ✭✭✭Trampas


    strange that each road used in the park is in the opposite direction that you run in the race series.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    Has a sponsor been agreed for this? The National Lottery bailed, didn't they?
    Also, is it still the case that there'll be no tv coverage?

    No sponsor, no tv


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,340 ✭✭✭TFBubendorfer


    Very similar. The route through the park is different, less North Road and Ordance Survery Rd, replaced with up Chesterfield and down Furze Rd. Can't see remember any other changes.

    Basically back to 2010. North Road was only on last year because of the roadworks on Chesterfield Avenue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 978 ✭✭✭JohnnyCrash


    Hi guys,running my first marathon but dont need training advice.Am registering online and was wondering what time i should be selecting? Im targeting 3.45 but on the day hopefully will do a wee bit better.Should i select under 3.45 or 3.45 to 4.15? ie I will be with the 3.45 pacer. Cheers


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,361 ✭✭✭Kurt Godel


    Hi guys,running my first marathon but dont need training advice.Am registering online and was wondering what time i should be selecting? Im targeting 3.45 but on the day hopefully will do a wee bit better.Should i select under 3.45 or 3.45 to 4.15? ie I will be with the 3.45 pacer. Cheers

    They will start at the front of the 3:45-4:15 group.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,842 ✭✭✭Micilin Muc


    Kurt Godel wrote: »
    They will start at the front of the 3:45-4:15 group.

    If that's the case, I would prefer to be at the back of the group leaving before (3:15-3:45 or whatever). Having a pacer is nice, but it can get congested, whereas being at the back of the previous group, faster runners in front of you will open up a gap and you'll have more space ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 978 ✭✭✭JohnnyCrash


    Cheers for that,thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 978 ✭✭✭JohnnyCrash


    If that's the case, I would prefer to be at the back of the group leaving before (3:15-3:45 or whatever). Having a pacer is nice, but it can get congested, whereas being at the back of the previous group, faster runners in front of you will open up a gap and you'll have more space ...
    Ha ha ha,now im confused:confused: The plan is to stay with the 3.45 and see how it goes.If theres plenty in the tank after half way,i'll take it from there;),so i guess ill be selecting 3.45 to 4.15 then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,340 ✭✭✭TFBubendorfer


    If that's the case, I would prefer to be at the back of the group leaving before (3:15-3:45 or whatever). Having a pacer is nice, but it can get congested, whereas being at the back of the previous group, faster runners in front of you will open up a gap and you'll have more space ...

    That's completely the wrong way round.

    If you start at the front of the next wave you have free road and no congestion at all. If, on the other hand, you start at the back of the previous wave you have to fight your way through all the runners who signed up for a wave that's too fast for them (and believe me, there are a lot of them).
    Ha ha ha,now im confused The plan is to stay with the 3.45 and see how it goes.If theres plenty in the tank after half way,i'll take it from there,so i guess ill be selecting 3.45 to 4.15 then?

    Yes, your best bet is to go with the 3:45 pacers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 978 ✭✭✭JohnnyCrash


    Cheers for that.One more quickie.Registered online,looked like it didnt go through,error came up,re did it again. Voila!!! was debited twice.Is this easily rectified? Who do i contact?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,340 ✭✭✭TFBubendorfer


    Cheers for that.One more quickie.Registered online,looked like it didnt go through,error came up,re did it again. Voila!!! was debited twice.Is this easily rectified? Who do i contact?

    office@dublinmarathon.ie
    Tel: 00 353 1 6232250
    Fax: 00 353 1 6263757


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,842 ✭✭✭Micilin Muc



    That's completely the wrong way round.

    If you start at the front of the next wave you have free road and no congestion at all. If, on the other hand, you start at the back of the previous wave you have to fight your way through all the runners who signed up for a wave that's too fast for them (and believe me, there are a lot of them).

    That's true! I suppose it's worked for me in smaller races (IMRA) but not big city races!


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    That's completely the wrong way round.

    If you start at the front of the next wave you have free road and no congestion at all. If, on the other hand, you start at the back of the previous wave you have to fight your way through all the runners who signed up for a wave that's too fast for them (and believe me, there are a lot of them).

    Doesn't that just make you one of the people starting in the wrong place and getting in people who are in the right wave but half way down with their Pace group, I'm not saying that we can have everyone in the perfect position but I did think that last years Bay 10k the waves worked really well, they were very strict letting you in.

    Maybe they should use the race series as qualifying times similar to the Women's Mini Marathon (Hate that term its 10k dammit). Logistically should be doable as the numbers are pick up only. Not sure how to look after non Dublin runners but a public race result could be checked.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,536 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    hmm, given I want to run this I should really register soon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,340 ✭✭✭TFBubendorfer


    liamog wrote: »
    Doesn't that just make you one of the people starting in the wrong place and getting in people who are in the right wave but half way down with their Pace group, I'm not saying that we can have everyone in the perfect position but I did think that last years Bay 10k the waves worked really well, they were very strict letting you in.

    If you want to run 3:45 and you start at the front of the 3:45-4:15 wave, how on earth would that make you one of the people starting in the wrong place? :confused::confused::confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,554 ✭✭✭Mr Slow


    T you have to fight your way through all the runners who signed up for a wave that's too fast for them (and believe me, there are a lot of them).
    That's true! I suppose it's worked for me in smaller races (IMRA) but not big city races!

    I ran with the 3:30 group last year, we were at the start of wave two, within 4 miles we had caught people from the '3:30 or faster' wave and one of them said '3:30, Good Luck' as we ran past. You can bank on a high proportion of stupidity in a crowd of 13,000 people.:)


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    If you want to run 3:45 and you start at the front of the 3:45-4:15 wave, how on earth would that make you one of the people starting in the wrong place? :confused::confused::confused:

    Must of misread the original post, I thought you were saying to start ahead of the wave so you don't get stuck behind people who are starting too far ahead. Nevermind :-D

    I'm looking forward to this year really want to break that 4 hour mark. Did 4:24 last year but if I'm honest my training fell off in September. Either that or you could say I took the taper too seriously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 seanie_m


    Hi, this is going to be my first marathon, I'm planning on starting proper training on Monday. Was wondering if anyone could recommend a good training plan to follow, I really don't have a clue.
    Ran the Connemara half this year in 93 mins, just to give you an idea of what standard I'm coming from.
    Also would anyone happen to know what kind of time I should be aiming towards considering my time in the Connemarathon? Like should I double my time and add 15%, or are there any set targets that people usually work towards?
    Thank you.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 20,366 Mod ✭✭✭✭RacoonQueen


    One of the problems with the waves actually is that DCM is the national marathon championships, for team prizes this goes on guntime. I started in the second wave but was the third scorer for our team and had an extra 15(?) minutes lobbed on my time. We still wouldn't have medaled but would have finished 4th team instead of 5th had I run the same time and started somewhere in the first wave. No way to get around this other than to start in the first wave...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭pansophelia


    Hi, this is going to be my first marathon, I'm planning on starting proper training on Monday. Was wondering if anyone could recommend a good training plan to follow, I really don't have a clue.
    Ran the Connemara half this year in 93 mins, just to give you an idea of what standard I'm coming from.
    Also would anyone happen to know what kind of time I should be aiming towards considering my time in the Connemarathon? Like should I double my time and add 15%, or are there any set targets that people usually work towards?
    Thank you.

    Hey,
    Check out the Dublin Marathon Mentored Novices Thread over in the Training Logs part of the forum - full of pages and pages of useful information from resident experts. You'll find lots of fellow newbies of varying standards there. Great time for the half!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 seanie_m


    Hey,
    Check out the Dublin Marathon Mentored Novices Thread over in the Training Logs part of the forum - full of pages and pages of useful information from resident experts. You'll find lots of fellow newbies of varying standards there. Great time for the half!

    Thanks pansophelia!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭KielyUnusual


    Hi, this is going to be my first marathon, I'm planning on starting proper training on Monday. Was wondering if anyone could recommend a good training plan to follow, I really don't have a clue.
    Ran the Connemara half this year in 93 mins, just to give you an idea of what standard I'm coming from.
    Also would anyone happen to know what kind of time I should be aiming towards considering my time in the Connemarathon? Like should I double my time and add 15%, or are there any set targets that people usually work towards?
    Thank you.
    I started running about this time last year in preparation for the marathon too. I didn't follow any plan but had a look at the plans and just followed the general trend of what they were doing. Ran 96 minutes in the half marathon as part of the series, one month out from the marathon proper. Ran three and a half hours in the marathon then. So, I'm guessing that from my experience you could be aiming for some time under 3hr 30m depending on how well your training goes over the next few months


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 118 ✭✭jahaco


    Rule of thumb is to double your half marathon time and add 10-20 minutes. Has worked for me. So 93 in the half would in principle get you between 3.16 and 3.26 in the full. But anything can happen!;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 seanie_m


    I started running about this time last year in preparation for the marathon too. I didn't follow any plan but had a look at the plans and just followed the general trend of what they were doing. Ran 96 minutes in the half marathon as part of the series, one month out from the marathon proper. Ran three and a half hours in the marathon then. So, I'm guessing that from my experience you could be aiming for some time under 3hr 30m depending on how well your training goes over the next few months

    jahaco wrote: »
    Rule of thumb is to double your half marathon time and add 10-20 minutes. Has worked for me. So 93 in the half would in principle get you between 3.16 and 3.26 in the full. But anything can happen!;)

    Thanks for the replies, I guess I have my target set for me now! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 173 ✭✭kandikane


    seanie_m wrote: »
    Hi, this is going to be my first marathon, I'm planning on starting proper training on Monday. Was wondering if anyone could recommend a good training plan to follow, I really don't have a clue.
    Ran the Connemara half this year in 93 mins, just to give you an idea of what standard I'm coming from.
    Also would anyone happen to know what kind of time I should be aiming towards considering my time in the Connemarathon? Like should I double my time and add 15%, or are there any set targets that people usually work towards?
    Thank you.
    halhigdon has some good novice training programs worth checking out and easy to follow:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 seanie_m


    kandikane wrote: »
    halhigdon has some good novice training programs worth checking out and easy to follow:)

    Thank you, I've been working off his intermediate 1 schedule since last Monday, so far so good! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 64 ✭✭jim0


    RayCun wrote: »
    I don't know of anyone who collects those figures, or how you'd even go about it...



    It's a good first marathon - not too tough a course, lots of support along the way, pace groups to follow, good organisation. The only downside is that it can get a bit crowded in places.

    Can I ask about the "not too tough a course" comment? Specifically, are the hills around the back of UCD not enough to elevate it into at least the "a little bit difficult" category? They're certainly tough on the novices at a challenging stage of the event!

    I suppose this all depends on how that terrain compares with other nearby marathons. I have only experienced Berlin and Dublin, but I assume that most of the other big urban marathons are flatter than Dublin?

    Oh, and I completely agree with the other comments: great support, pacers and organisation, as far as I could make out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    jim0 wrote: »
    Can I ask about the "not too tough a course" comment? Specifically, are the hills around the back of UCD not enough to elevate it into at least the "a little bit difficult" category? They're certainly tough on the novices at a challenging stage of the event!

    They're not serious hills though, really. Enough to say that those couple of miles are a bit difficult, but not enough to make the whole course difficult.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,402 ✭✭✭ger664


    jim0 wrote: »
    Can I ask about the "not too tough a course" comment? Specifically, are the hills around the back of UCD not enough to elevate it into at least the "a little bit difficult" category? They're certainly tough on the novices at a challenging stage of the event!

    I suppose this all depends on how that terrain compares with other nearby marathons. I have only experienced Berlin and Dublin, but I assume that most of the other big urban marathons are flatter than Dublin?

    Oh, and I completely agree with the other comments: great support, pacers and organisation, as far as I could make out.

    Have a look at the elavation profile for Athens:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,554 ✭✭✭Mr Slow


    ger664 wrote: »
    Have a look at the elavation profile for Athens:D

    Someday Ger, someday! ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,053 ✭✭✭opus


    Posted off my entry form today, couldn't see why I should pay an extra €3 for the online entry so sent them an email to get a form posted out to me.

    Week 1 of the FIRST training plan finished this evening, 15 to go!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement