Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

IFJ Crop Protection Mag

  • 04-05-2012 10:37am
    #1
    brian_t
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,788 ✭✭✭


    In this weeks Journal there is a whole page of corrections to their Crop Protection Magazine given out a couple of weeks ago.

    They tell us that there are a number of errors and inaccuracies in the 2012 tables which mean that the information present should not be relied on.

    Some products listed are not registered for use
    Some products were omitted
    Some products listed have wrong PCS numbers
    Some products listed have incorrect rates


    I would have thought an apology would have been in order.


Comments

  • #2
    Conflats
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Conflats


    To be fair if your applying or advising the use of agro chemials you should really read the can,(always advised to do this) its a secondary source not the primary and the excuse to the pesticide control service if you have done something wrong ' it was wrote like this in the journal' wouldnt stand up, further more if it was compiled by the department and then found to be wrong an apology should be issued


  • #3
    brian_t
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,788 ✭✭✭brian_t


    Conflats wrote: »
    To be fair if your applying or advising the use of agro chemials you should really read the can,(always advised to do this) its a secondary source not the primary and the excuse to the pesticide control service if you have done something wrong ' it was wrote like this in the journal' wouldnt stand up, further more if it was compiled by the department and then found to be wrong an apology should be issued

    I agree with all that. I just feel that it was a bit careless on the part of the IFJ.


Advertisement