Season 3: Week 1 **Simmed**

Raoul

Post availability here

Pudsy33

Can I play my cpu game now?

helimachoptor

Pudsy33 wrote: »

Can I play my cpu game now?

No, Raoul made a mistake Gameweek 1 has been simmed

adrian522

beat the seahawks ...

Pudsy33

Can i go ahead with my week 2 game?

NekoChan

adrian522 wrote: »

beat the seahawks ...

you got lucky!

helimachoptor

yeah if its CPU, just syncing the rosters now pudsy so just wait a couple and then do your depth chart

god damn cowboys was looking forward to a game with them

adrian522

ravens wr out for season same for redskins cb...

Paully D

Sebastian Victorious Luck wrote: »

god damn cowboys was looking forward to a game with them

Same here mate. Peterson is out for the season by the way!

helimachoptor

Depth chart doesnt match at all to LM

Raoul

helimachoptor wrote: »

No, Raoul made a mistake Gameweek 1 has been simmed

Yeah sorry lads, total f*ck up on my part.

helimachoptor

I wouldnt worry Raoul, though McG is pretty pi$$ed, he lost to the Jags!

Paully D

Paully D wrote: »

Same here mate. Peterson is out for the season by the way!

its saying he is in the injurys section but hes ok im my depth chart i dont mind if its just a loss mistakes happen but if petersons gone for the year my seasons f***ed

Paully D

Someone might as well get the week 2 thread up I suppose then :pac:

helimachoptor

Even if he's injured he'll be in the depth chart

helimachoptor

helimachoptor wrote: »

Even if he's injured he'll be in the depth chart

ya but hes not showing up as injured in the depth chart

mikemac1

Ravens lost and their best receiver out for the year :rolleyes:




Remember, roster limit is 56

When LM is updated you can easily check your team

so can we just play away with the week 2 games?

Paully D

Sebastian Victorious Luck wrote: »

ya but hes not showing up as injured in the depth chart

He won't mate. Go to ''injury report'' and it says he's out for the year. Nothing will show up on the depth chart though.

Paully D

Paully D wrote: »

He won't mate. Go to ''injury report'' and it says he's out for the year. Nothing will show up on the depth chart though.

well **** anyway

matthew8

Raoul is literally worse than Pete Rozelle

For those who don't know, Rozelle is the man who kept the Raiders in that kip most of you know as the coliseum.

can we just play the week 2 games i want to check if it will let me play peterson

yup gone for the year sickening

(no hard feelings btw raoul mistakes happen)

so im screwd at cb again anyone got one or 2 available

theres def no way to reset the season no

Raoul

Sebastian Victorious Luck wrote: »

theres def no way to reset the season no

Nope, sorry. Advance the whole season???

Raoul

Raoul wrote: »

Nope, sorry. Advance the whole season???

thats not fair on anyone with older players then
il give it a game or 2 i reckon my defence will be paper the i mite sit it out till madden 13

madalig12

Sebastian Victorious Luck wrote: »

yup gone for the year sickening

(no hard feelings btw raoul mistakes happen)

so im screwd at cb again anyone got one or 2 available

I will give you Munnerlyn if you want him...78 he's just ok like but surplus to requirements at st.louis
oh jeez I just saw how good peterson is...that's a bit of terrible luck right there....awh well, must get vick's long bomb arm warmed up for the skins games.

madalig12

madalig12 wrote: »

I will give you Munnerlyn if you want him...78 he's just ok like but surplus to requirements at st.louis

ya better than nothing cheers man hel be my no 2 anything at the bottom of my roster i can give back

madalig12

Sebastian Victorious Luck wrote: »

ya better than nothing cheers man hel be my no 2 anything at the bottom of my roster i can give back

Dropping now. hope he last's more than one game.

Raoul

Lads, whoever lost players for the season, can trade with me if other people want for a player in the same position as me. As in Johnson for Peterson. I lost Jackson last season so I know how it can **** up your whole season. What do people think as an idea to make up for the cockup.

Danger_dave1

Raoul wrote: »

Lads, whoever lost players for the season, can trade with me if other people want for a player in the same position as me. As in Johnson for Peterson. I lost Jackson last season so I know how it can **** up your whole season. What do people think as an idea to make up for the cockup.

Dont be silly Raoul. Honest mistake... things happen... how much for marshawn lynch now Falcons? :pac:

Raoul

Raoul wrote: »

Lads, whoever lost players for the season, can trade with me if other people want for a player in the same position as me. As in Johnson for Peterson. I lost Jackson last season so I know how it can **** up your whole season. What do people think as an idea to make up for the cockup.

theres no point in you messing up your season for one mistake either i guess we could do a poll about advancing the whole season but i dont think everyone would go for it

madalig12

Raoul wrote: »

Lads, whoever lost players for the season, can trade with me if other people want for a player in the same position as me. As in Johnson for Peterson. I lost Jackson last season so I know how it can **** up your whole season. What do people think as an idea to make up for the cockup.

I'm thinking, yeah its messy but you made a simple mistake it can happen, you can't just throw away your season out of guilt. It's EA's fault really for making them go out for the season. It's unlucky for redskins as he's a top player....maybe Berty should loan them Davis till the play-offs???:P

mikemac1

Meh, mistakes happen

I did the mock draft in AF forum and made mistakes all the time


If a player is out for the season do I get them back for the playoffs?

Raoul

Raoul wrote: »

Lads, whoever lost players for the season, can trade with me if other people want for a player in the same position as me. As in Johnson for Peterson. I lost Jackson last season so I know how it can **** up your whole season. What do people think as an idea to make up for the cockup.

I really do think that this would be fair. I would enjoy the season more if other people werent suffering like i did last season because of DeSean. Its only a game so so what if i have a crap season. Better that the two or three other guys get a fair crack at having a good season.

Would really be happy to do it. So if others wouldnt be annoyed...

adrian522

mikemac1 wrote: »

Meh, mistakes happen

I did the mock draft in AF forum and made mistakes all the time


If a player is out for the season do I get them back for the playoffs?

Most optimistic post ever...


No, gone until next season and seeing as how this is our last season you may as well drop him to FA and use the roster spot elsewhere.

In fairness lads injuries happen every week so its not raoul's fault that players got injured.

Raoul

Raoul wrote: »

I really do think that this would be fair. I would enjoy the season more if other people werent suffering like i did last season because of DeSean. Its only a game so so what if i have a crap season. Better that the two or three other guys get a fair crack at having a good season.

Would really be happy to do it. So if others wouldnt be annoyed...

genuinely man its unfair on you youve put in the work setting up the league and last season got destroyed for you i mite look at the non player teams and switch since its the last season that way everyones happy

adrian522

maybe the 2 lads should be allowed trade with a CPU team for a player in the position theylost or any other player with the same OVR rating?

Raoul

adrian522 wrote: »

maybe the 2 lads should be allowed trade with a CPU team for a player in the position theylost or any other player with the same OVR rating?

That could be a good idea!

what are the cpu teams and il have a look

ibmax

Raoul wrote: »

adrian522 wrote: »

maybe the 2 lads should be allowed trade with a CPU team for a player in the position theylost or any other player with the same OVR rating?

That could be a good idea!

You just need to be careful you're not setting a precedent here. Players will be unavailable some weeks and there can be connection problems on others. Either way, there will be more games simmed throughout the season and more players will be lost to injuries due to it - I believe the Giants lost Brees during a sim game down to connection problems last year.

While its very harsh on the lads who've been affected this could lead to a situation where every time a team loses a player during simmed games they look to the CPU teams. This'll further weaken these teams who seem to lose most of the time as it is.

In saying all that, I'm not sure if there is an alternate solution!!!

adrian522

I think this is a different situation where the games were simmed accidently. If people are having connection problems or just can't get their games organised there should be no comeback.

I don't mind either way but its a terrible way for your season to be decided especially in week 1.

Danger_dave1

Think thats a great idea Adrian... I'd say the vikings would be a prime example for a running back (Falcons) and a corner back (Redskins)... to go to the 2 teams...

The vikings wouldnt be allowed to be picked in this season anyway. To many divisions with only 2 players.

There never getting out of there division. I think its fair and would work.

etloveslsd

Danger_dave1 wrote: »

Think thats a great idea Adrian... I'd say the vikings would be a prime example for a running back (Falcons) and a corner back (Redskins)... to go to the 2 teams...

The vikings wouldnt be allowed to be picked in this season anyway. To many divisions with only 2 players.

There never getting out of there division. I think its fair and would work.

Its a good idea but playing with injuy is also a bit of education. Without brees last year i had to learn to run effectivly and game manage with smith.

mikemac1

adrian522 wrote: »

Most optimistic post ever...

Ravens won the division twice and won one wildcard game in the first two seasons of BFL

Realistic more then optimistic

ibmax wrote: »

You just need to be careful you're not setting a precedent here. Players will be unavailable some weeks and there can be connection problems on others. Either way, there will be more games simmed throughout the season and more players will be lost to injuries due to it - I believe the Giants lost Brees during a sim game down to connection problems last year.

While its very harsh on the lads who've been affected this could lead to a situation where every time a team loses a player during simmed games they look to the CPU teams. This'll further weaken these teams who seem to lose most of the time as it is.

In saying all that, I'm not sure if there is an alternate solution!!!

I understand your point
But if a game gets simmed during the season it's always agreed or the players have input into it.
And if one person can't make it the other can play the CPU

I'll go along with whatever the others decide, would have lost to the Bills anyway and Edelman is a good WR for the Ravens but I'm deep there. Ravens don't feel hard done by

However the GM who lost Peterson, that's ridiculously harsh

etloveslsd

mikemac1 wrote: »

adrian522 wrote: »

Most optimistic post ever...

Ravens won the division twice and won one wildcard game in the first two seasons of BFL

Realistic more then optimistic

ibmax wrote: »

You just need to be careful you're not setting a precedent here. Players will be unavailable some weeks and there can be connection problems on others. Either way, there will be more games simmed throughout the season and more players will be lost to injuries due to it - I believe the Giants lost Brees during a sim game down to connection problems last year.

While its very harsh on the lads who've been affected this could lead to a situation where every time a team loses a player during simmed games they look to the CPU teams. This'll further weaken these teams who seem to lose most of the time as it is.

In saying all that, I'm not sure if there is an alternate solution!!!

I understand your point
But if a game gets simmed during the season it's always agreed or the players have input into it.
And if one person can't make it the other can play the CPU

I'll go along with whatever the others decide, would have lost to the Bills anyway and Edelman is a good WR is the Ravens but I'm deep there. Ravens don't feel hard done by

However the GM who lost Peterson, that's ridiculously harsh

Your forgetting the falcons lost stephen jackson, thats harsh!

mikemac1

I'm not doing a list here
Just picked the most obvious example and that was Peterson

Of course there are others, not trying to overlook them

helimachoptor

I think Adrian's idea is good. But this is an exceptional situation not a precedent.

notyalc666

Danger_dave1 wrote: »

Raoul wrote: »

Lads, whoever lost players for the season, can trade with me if other people want for a player in the same position as me. As in Johnson for Peterson. I lost Jackson last season so I know how it can **** up your whole season. What do people think as an idea to make up for the cockup.

Dont be silly Raoul. Honest mistake... things happen... how much for marshawn lynch now Falcons? :pac:

I blame drew brees for Stephen Jacksons injury. Somewhere in new York he is laughing.

matthew8

The Stephen Jackson injury sends a message out to teams. Don't play your stars against the Raiders.