"Slutty girl" - My definition

elpipe

This term is being abused and misunderstood a lot so I decided to tell the truth. The short definition would be: Slut = Natural and sexually liberated girl.

When a guy says, "she's a slut", it basically means "I want sex so bad and she has sex with everyone except me!".

When a girls says the same thing, it basically means "I have passed so many sexual opportunities just to not be too promiscuous in the eyes of the society that I can't deal with someone not following these norms and get away with it. They must be punished!"

The thing is, humans, girls and guys, are highly sexual creatures. We want sex so bad, and preferably not just with one partner. We are by nature promiscuous. Now some want to be faithful to their partner but that is just because of societies norms and superficial ideas that have been planted into your brain since early childhood. We were not made to be monogamous. Just try being married for 10 years and then come back and tell me you never felt sexual desire for anyone other than your partner.

Basically, if we were to not give a F and stop following societies norms, the whole planet would be a gigantic F-fest.

Some guys here probably go, "but girls don't want sex as much as guys". I can tell you straight away that you are very wrong. Guys and girls are just a bit different, let me explain:

Imagine that sexual partners are like chocolate. Guys love chocolate and while they prefer luxury chocolate they don't mind some low quality milk-chocolate either. Girls on the other look at milk-chocolate with distaste but luxury chocolate on the other hand, the enjoyment they get from this kind of chocolate is something I believe is beyond any guys comprehension.


With that said: Lets be a little bit more accepting of them "sluts". If they cheat on you that is bad but at least leave those who are single and free alone and do what they want to do without getting judged.

Gummy Panda

This thread is now about Panda Wrestling

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVCW-xtwEXM

Hell in a Cell style

ChunkyLover_53

elpipe wrote: »

Imagine that sexual partners are like chocolate. Guys love chocolate and while they prefer luxury chocolate they don't mind some low quality milk-chocolate either. Girls on the other look at milk-chocolate with distaste but luxury chocolate on the other hand, the enjoyment they get from this kind of chocolate is something I believe is beyond any guys comprehension.

What about the girls who like Dark chocolate and have 3 or 4 bars at the same time?

Jarren

Pics or never happened!

elpipe

ChunkyLover_53 wrote: »

What about the girls who like Dark chocolate and have 3 or 4 bars at the same time?

A liberated girl who looooves dark chocolate.

Radharc na Sleibhte

The OP got laid last nite.
Nice :cool:

Encrypted Pigeon

Gummy Panda wrote: »

This thread is now about Panda Wrestling

VIDEO

Hell in a Cell style

My money is on the biter

ChunkyLover_53

Jarren wrote: »

Pics or never happened!

you need a Gold account to view them :mad:

HAHA

antodeco

If I could be any type of gun in the world, I'd be a laser. See, im the type of guy who sees a girl and shoots her, I mean, layser

For Forks Sake

My brain hurts from trying to read that OP.

Did it have something to do with chocolate sluts?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHRERLEM2eE

theteal

Gummy Panda wrote: »

This thread is now about Panda Wrestling


Hell in a Cell style

i was expecting to see a flying dropkick from the top of the box, i am disappoint

Richard Hillman

I use slut as a term of endearment now. Kind of like when you say something girl looks filthy etc

Mr. Rager

You're a bit of a whore, aren't you OP?

amacachi

Gummy Panda wrote: »

This thread is now about Panda Wrestling

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVCW-xtwEXM

Hell in a Cell style

I prefer interspecies stuff meself. Put these guys in an arena and it'd spill out into the parking lot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lA7u6fTXw8

theteal

elpipe wrote: »

This term is being abused and misunderstood a lot so I decided to tell the truth. The short definition would be: Slut = Natural and sexually liberated girl.

When a guy says, "she's a slut", it basically means "I want sex so bad and she has sex with everyone except me!".

When a girls says the same thing, it basically means "I have passed so many sexual opportunities just to not be too promiscuous in the eyes of the society that I can't deal with someone not following these norms and get away with it. They must be punished!"

The thing is, humans, girls and guys, are highly sexual creatures. We want sex so bad, and preferably not just with one partner. We are by nature promiscuous. Now some want to be faithful to their partner but that is just because of societies norms and superficial ideas that have been planted into your brain since early childhood. We were not made to be monogamous. Just try being married for 10 years and then come back and tell me you never felt sexual desire for anyone other than your partner.

Basically, if we were to not give a F and stop following societies norms, the whole planet would be a gigantic F-fest.

Some guys here probably go, "but girls don't want sex as much as guys". I can tell you straight away that you are very wrong. Guys and girls are just a bit different, let me explain:

Imagine that sexual partners are like chocolate. Guys love chocolate and while they prefer luxury chocolate they don't mind some low quality milk-chocolate either. Girls on the other look at milk-chocolate with distaste but luxury chocolate on the other hand, the enjoyment they get from this kind of chocolate is something I believe is beyond any guys comprehension.


With that said: Lets be a little bit more accepting of them "sluts". If they cheat on you that is bad but at least leave those who are single and free alone and do what they want to do without getting judged.

ha ha april fool. . .

DarkJager

A key that opens many locks is a master key. A lock that opens with many keys is a pretty ****ty lock.

mawk

I'm confused. is OP a slut?

Born to Die

Gummy Panda wrote: »

This thread is now about Panda Wrestling

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVCW-xtwEXM

Hell in a Cell style

You just made my life hell. My grandson wants a panda for his birthday.

bronte

I would like some pandas.

elpipe

mawk wrote: »

I'm confused. is OP a slut?

I'm a guy. If I had been a girl I would have been a super-slut though

booboo88

Born to Die wrote: »

You just made my life hell. My grandson wants a panda for his birthday.

tell him he cant have one, cuz IM getting one



so darn cute:D:o

CL7

I think an unthank button would be a good idea. Maybe it would slow down the number of utter ****e threads created on After Hours every 60 seconds.

BBDBB

so women are like chocolate......


mostly creamy and sweet with the occasional fruit and nut

gotcha!

Born to Die

booboo88 wrote: »

tell him he cant have one, cuz IM getting one



so darn cute:D:o

Get two, I'll take one off you. He has twigged that the skunk I had lined up is not a Panda. Damn smart kid.

44leto

I like sluts, I just wouldn't go out with one.

Dudess

DarkJager wrote: »

A key that opens many locks is a master key. A lock that opens with many keys is a pretty ****ty lock.

Omg, that's almost as sharp and original as "You need a licence for a dog but not for a child" - and also reduces women (because ya ain't talking about men) to inanimate objects to be merely f'ucked. Bravo!

solerina

OP....Can I have a synopsis ??? Lost you after the 2nd line !!

howsyourtusk

Dudess wrote: »

Omg, that's almost as sharp and original as "You need a licence for a dog but not for a child" - and also reduces women (because ya ain't talking about men) to inanimate objects to be merely f'ucked. Bravo!

Dudess, in all the years I've been here, you can never resist hammering these idiots. Love you :P

As for the post you quoted, classy, bet your lock snapped off in a key years ago and you've been bitter about it ever since

elpipe

Dr. Strange wrote: »

I think an unthank button would be a good idea. Maybe it would slow down the number of utter ****e threads created on After Hours every 60 seconds.

Take a look at your own post before posting. You are saying that an un-thank button should be implemented but that is not what this thread is about which make your post off-topic.

And I have no problem with anyone saying the thread is ****, but if you do that you also need to explain why it is **** (which you didn't), otherwise your post is ****.

Doc Ruby

DarkJager wrote: »

A key that opens many locks is a master key. A lock that opens with many keys is a pretty ****ty lock.

Go stick your flute in a keyhole and tell us how you got on. We expect a full report.

I'm fully with the OP here, leave jealousy behind, it's a very negative and destructive emotion. People just are not wired for monogamy. The whole slut/stud thing has been done to death, but really that's the way society is going and long may it last.

Here's to sluts!

blatantrereg

Not everybody thinks with their genitals. Thinking with their genitals doesn't mean someone is liberated.

It makes them easily manipulated. It means they bond and have kids with people based only on physical attraction, regardless of whether the partner has anything else going, or is even a remotely decent person. It lets them form and stay in relationships with abusive people. It makes them high risk for unplanned pregnancy and for disease. It makes them flakey and unreliable.

Your dismissal of anyone who disagrees with you as just being jealous is a bit ridiculous too. I've ended relationships with people who are extremely attractive physically - certainly more attractive than I am - because I didn't like aspects of their behaviour. It wasn't to do with social pressure, from the outside things looked great.

Plenty of people are deeply and genuinely repulsed by unselective or unfaithful women, and with good reason.

AngryBollix

I wpuldnt mind some chocolate slag later

Dudess

Tbh, promiscuity - by either men or women - can be for the wrong reasons. I'm not that liberated about it - I really don't see anything good about people just ****ing around rampantly like feral cats for the sake of it, even with people they don't fancy. I think it's skanky tbh.

But a fair few partners because you actually fancy them/like them and aren't going off bragging to your mates etc and there's no game-playing, manipulation, disrespect and so on involved - would be awesome if everyone was like that about sex.

Doc Ruby

Dudess wrote: »

I really don't see anything good about people just ****ing around rampantly like feral cats for the sake of it, even with people they don't fancy.

Orgasms are good.

WindSock

bronte wrote: »

I would like some pandas.

What a sluttish thing to say.

DarkJager

Dudess wrote: »

DarkJager wrote: »

A key that opens many locks is a master key. A lock that opens with many keys is a pretty ****ty lock.

Omg, that's almost as sharp and original as "You need a licence for a dog but not for a child" - and also reduces women (because ya ain't talking about men) to inanimate objects to be merely f'ucked. Bravo!

Who said anything about men or women? My post was simply about locks and keys filthy minds on here today

Balmed Out

howsyourtusk wrote: »

in all the years I've been here

March 2012 ?

elpipe

blatantrereg wrote: »

Not everybody thinks with their genitals. Thinking with their genitals doesn't mean someone is liberated.

It makes them easily manipulated. It means they bond and have kids with people based only on physical attraction, regardless of whether the partner has anything else going, or is even a remotely decent person. It lets them form and stay in relationships with abusive people. It makes them high risk for unplanned pregnancy and for disease. It makes them flakey and unreliable.

Your dismissal of anyone who disagrees with you as just being jealous is a bit ridiculous too. I've ended relationships with people who are extremely attractive physically - certainly more attractive than I am - because I didn't like aspects of their behaviour. It wasn't to do with social pressure, from the outside things looked great.

Plenty of people are deeply and genuinely repulsed by unselective or unfaithful women, and with good reason.

I never said anything about being un-selective though. A girl can selective and still F around a lot. Like, she may only go for 1 in 20 guys, but that means that in a city of 100 k people there will be loads of guys she will be open to.

44leto

Originally Posted by Dudess
I really don't see anything good about people just ****ing around rampantly like feral cats for the sake of it, even with people they don't fancy.

I know “Sex without love is an empty experience, but as empty experiences go it's one of the best.”

This thread is now about crazy dancing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMbC3F5R7xU

elpipe

44leto wrote: »

I know “Sex without love is an empty experience, but as empty experiences go it's one of the best.”

Haha, Woody, what a genius!

44leto

elpipe wrote: »

Haha, Woody, what a genius!

Still is, more a philosopher then a comic.

jd007

thread needs more panda

Dudess

Doc Ruby wrote: »

Dudess wrote: »

I really don't see anything good about people just ****ing around rampantly like feral cats for the sake of it, even with people they don't fancy.

Orgasms are good.

True. And I'm not saying you should have to be in love with the person, but for many, there has to be at least physical attraction. To have sex (sober) with someone whom you don't fancy and who doesn't turn you on is very unappealing. And hardly a recipe for good sex. If you're promiscuous because you actually fancy all the people you shag and the sex is good, then I see nowt wrong with it though.

howsyourtusk

Balmed Out wrote: »

March 2012 ?

Re-reg

Doc Ruby

Dudess wrote: »

To have sex (sober) with someone whom you don't fancy and who doesn't turn you on

Does anyone actually do that though other than compensated prostitutes?

Born to Die

howsyourtusk wrote: »

Re-reg

Banned

44leto

Doc Ruby wrote: »

Does anyone actually do that though other than compensated prostitutes?

Yeah I am afraid I do, or did.

howsyourtusk

Dudess wrote: »

True. And I'm not saying you should have to be in love with the person, but for many, there has to be at least physical attraction. To have sex (sober) with someone whom you don't fancy and who doesn't turn you on is very unappealing. And hardly a recipe for good sex. If you're promiscuous because you actually fancy all the people you shag and the sex is good, then I see nowt wrong with it though.

Exactly, once everyone is a consenting adult and no one is being used and a bit of chemistry exists then go for it.

Dudess

Doc Ruby wrote: »

Dudess wrote: »

To have sex (sober) with someone whom you don't fancy and who doesn't turn you on

Does anyone actually do that though other than compensated prostitutes?

Hell yeah - "I ****ed a fat bird last night, hole is goal" etc.

howsyourtusk

Born to Die wrote: »

Banned

Not that sort of re-reg. One can volunteer to leave these days.