Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Of chronographs and breakfast eggs

  • 21-01-2012 11:14pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭


    I like my (boiled) breakfast egg done in a certain way. Solid egg-white, with the yoke just solidified at the edge but still runny in the middle.

    On our electrical cooker at home the perfect egg is achieved by dropping it into just boiling water, turning off the cooker and taking the egg out after exactly 6 minutes and 30 seconds. Six minutes and the egg-white is still runny, give it seven and the yoke starts to solidify ...so 6.5 minutes, please.

    Having recently aquired a mechanical chronograph which I wore this morning while on kitchen duty, I was (I think justifiably) looking forward to the perfectly timed egg.

    The water came to the boil, the egg was carefully immersed in the boiling liquid, while I pressed the start button on the chrono ...not without lovinglingly admiring the precise clicking action, I must admit.

    Having activated the chronograph function naturally I did not take any notice whatsoever of the actual time, as this was deemed unecessary.

    BIG MISTAKE, as it turns out.

    Unthinkingly I had immersed the egg at some minutes past the hour and then gone on with other breakfast preparations. When checking the chronograph some minutes later, the minute hand had moved over the elapsed minutes dial, obscuring the hand :eek:

    It was impossible to tell if it was 5, 6 or even seven minutes that had passed.

    I took the egg out at 30 seconds past the minute ...but as it turned out (several minutes later when the big minute hand had finally moved out of the way) it was after 7 and a half minutes not six and a half.

    Breakfast ruined ! :mad:

    Useless piece of kit ...I need a digital chrono !



    (or perhaps an egg timer :D)


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,857 ✭✭✭Reloc8


    Argh !

    I agree - the only possible solution is another watch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,663 ✭✭✭Nolimits


    While I can see that you have an almost foolproof system, for my boiled eggs this has been invaluable if anyone else is interested http://www.amazon.co.uk/Egg-Perfect-Colour-Changing-Timer/dp/B0000CFGB5


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,912 ✭✭✭sparrowcar


    Did you also know that the time it takes to boil an egg differs depending on the altitude you are at.

    See here for guidance

    http://www.altitude.org/boil_egg.php

    :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭CarltonBrowne


    I have a Lemania stop watch permanently available in the kitchen for this precise purpose; found on Ebay with a broken crystal for £4. Stop watches, even with military markings etc, go for a steal on Ebay. I have a picture somewhere which I'll dig out. When the season comes around I have an asparagus recipe that involves semi-soft quail's eggs where timing is even more important.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    I have a stopwatch too ...it has some strap issues though :D

    189418.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,775 ✭✭✭Zagato


    Did you ever get a russian chrono? There's a russian one similar enough to the german one you got last year on WUS

    http://forums.watchuseek.com/f29/fs-aviator-chrono-2x-atlantic-militec-tritium-h3-diver-breil-depthmeter-637698.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭CarltonBrowne


    Mine's also a 30 second jobby; you already seem to have this covered. You've also got the advantage that you don't have to ask yourself every morning whether you need to boil an egg that day.
    Lemania.JPG


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    Zagato wrote: »
    Did you ever get a russian chrono?

    I've got two Chronographs ... one half Russian, one fully Russian.
    Both can be equally guilty of spoiling brekfast eggs due to rather wide hands obscuring the sub-dial


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,629 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    peasant wrote: »
    I like my (boiled) breakfast egg done in a certain way. Solid egg-white, with the yoke just solidified at the edge but still runny in the middle.

    On our electrical cooker at home the perfect egg is achieved by dropping it into just boiling water, turning off the cooker and taking the egg out after exactly 6 minutes and 30 seconds. Six minutes and the egg-white is still runny, give it seven and the yoke starts to solidify ...so 6.5 minutes, please.

    Having recently aquired a mechanical chronograph which I wore this morning while on kitchen duty, I was (I think justifiably) looking forward to the perfectly timed egg.

    The water came to the boil, the egg was carefully immersed in the boiling liquid, while I pressed the start button on the chrono ...not without lovinglingly admiring the precise clicking action, I must admit.

    Having activated the chronograph function naturally I did not take any notice whatsoever of the actual time, as this was deemed unecessary.

    BIG MISTAKE, as it turns out.

    Unthinkingly I had immersed the egg at some minutes past the hour and then gone on with other breakfast preparations. When checking the chronograph some minutes later, the minute hand had moved over the elapsed minutes dial, obscuring the hand :eek:

    It was impossible to tell if it was 5, 6 or even seven minutes that had passed.

    I took the egg out at 30 seconds past the minute ...but as it turned out (several minutes later when the big minute hand had finally moved out of the way) it was after 7 and a half minutes not six and a half.

    Breakfast ruined ! :mad:

    Useless piece of kit ...I need a digital chrono !



    (or perhaps an egg timer :D)

    INitial reading made me think that there was something wrong with the watch. I think this is a classic blame the worker not the tools scenario!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,990 ✭✭✭squonk


    I think this is a real example of a First World problem :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    squonk wrote: »
    I think this is a real example of a First World problem :)
    In relation to breakfast eggs certainly :D

    But generally speaking this design with the elapsed minute counter isn't a particularly clever one. Unless the main hands of the watch are see-through, there is a chance that you won't be able to read an important measurement because it's covered by one or even two hands. So basically ...if you want to be sure of your measurement at first glance ...use a designated stopwatch instead. So why get a chronograph at all (other than it looks purdy) if it can't really do what it's meant to do at all times (of the day)?

    I haven't got a picture of the main hands obscuring the minute counter (and I'm not going to stage one now) but the attached pic of hands obscuring the small second dial should help explain what I'm on about.

    189594.jpg


    baaah ...it just dawned on my why this particular watch (originally issued to Soviet navy graduates) has those blue markings through the center ...they show the area the main hands of the watch mustn't be in when you want to use the stopwatch accurately (in order not to run your ship onto a reef for example, or when you want to time a torpedo run ...that kind of thing) :D:D


Advertisement