Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Let's Replace our Government with a SuperComputer

  • 04-01-2012 3:28pm
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭


    Do you think we could replace our government with a supercomputer ?
    Could a program be written to deal with such a task ?

    For major decisions a referendum could be done at almost every major decision. Just a matter of logging in & casting your vote, none of this paper ballet crap.

    The supercomputer would then caculate it's decsion based on the votes.

    The supercomputer would not be corrupt, make ill informed decisions and could mass email the Irish people when money is running tight or when we're borrowing too much.

    If a program that runs on a supercomputer can calculate world wide weather algorithms then why not replace a governement with it.

    This pc would sure get my vote over any of the rest anyway.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,559 ✭✭✭✭AnonoBoy


    - Fix the economy!

    "I'm sorry Stiffler2, I'm afraid I can't do that."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    well considering they couldnt get electronic voting off the line Im going to say no


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    I can't let you do that Dave.............


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 789 ✭✭✭The Internet Explorer


    That's all well and good, but computers can't bend you over and fuck you in the ass.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭Stiffler2


    Saila wrote: »
    well considering they couldnt get electronic voting off the line Im going to say no

    Ye well that's fair enough but that's because we're just tarded.
    What if the germans came over and installed it for us then or the Japs ?
    or any country that is excellent with such things.

    If it can calculate global weather forecasts then surely it can do this ?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭Stiffler2


    That's all well and good, but computers can't bend you over and fuck you in the ass.

    ehh - that's kind of my point.:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,582 ✭✭✭✭TheZohanS


    Well if we're replacing like-for-like all we'll need is a Tamagotchi.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 847 ✭✭✭Proxy


    Apart from Skynet etc (See Cameron, Schwarzenegger et. al.) A computer no matter how smart or how many heuristics involved would just calculate that X is greater than Y and cut X to a breakeven point. You can't program empathy, ethics, or anything as complex as running a country.

    Seriously, the more I think of this suggestion... /facepalm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    Stiffler2 wrote: »
    If it can calculate global weather forecasts then surely it can do this ?

    and look how accurate they are :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,295 ✭✭✭✭Duggy747


    "SuperComputer has recovered Ireland from an unexpected economic crash. Would you like to send a report?"

    *Clicks Cancel*

    ...............

    *Clicks on Solitare*


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,062 ✭✭✭number10a


    Estonia, a country that only has democracy for 20 years, has online voting for years now. If they can manage it, we can surely bring it in overnight!!!




    Oh shìt, forgot where I live. We will still be using the paper and pencil to vote at the turn of the next century.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,473 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    Hasta la vista.......recession.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,001 ✭✭✭recylingbin


    10 ENABLE BRIBE FUNCTION
    20 RUN
    30 LOOP


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,048 ✭✭✭✭Snowie


    skynet :eek:


    are you crazy op :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 899 ✭✭✭djk1000


    Proxy wrote: »
    Apart from Skynet etc (See Cameron, Schwarzenegger et. al.) A computer no matter how smart or how many heuristics involved would just calculate that X is greater than Y and cut X to a breakeven point. You can't program empathy, ethics, or anything as complex as running a country.



    We can't seem to get that going with a human Government either...




    .


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭Stiffler2


    Proxy wrote: »
    Apart from Skynet etc (See Cameron, Schwarzenegger et. al.) A computer no matter how smart or how many heuristics involved would just calculate that X is greater than Y and cut X to a breakeven point. You can't program empathy, ethics, or anything as complex as running a country.

    Seriously, the more I think of this suggestion... /facepalm

    why can't ethics be programmed, it's just a set of rules as well ??
    perhaps it should be a sub program though so it only takes ethics into account last. I think it would do a far superior job than any government the irish can churn out.

    The computer could borrow for us and once it hits breakeven point it stops borrowing. No salaries involved either + it could be programmed not to listen to the public sector unions whom hold this country to ransom.

    No more TD's, ambassadors, or ministers, for it to work properly though everything would have to be electronic.

    example beds in hospitals could have sensors on them. Once the limit is reached the supercomputer could borrow some money to purchase some beds based on the calulations of how many are in a hospital at any given time, time of year etc..

    No more bankhanders, corruption or people like Bertie or Charlie.

    It'd be a Win Win


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,333 ✭✭✭jonnyfingers


    We don't need a super computer just flip a coin for every decision and let that decide our future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭KerranJast


    You realise it would just say

    - increase taxes
    - cut spending

    Damn you logic!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,762 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,543 ✭✭✭JerryHandbag


    We can't afford a supercomputer so we'll just have to make do with an Atari Jaguar


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,205 ✭✭✭Benny_Cake


    Stiffler2 wrote: »
    Do you think we could replace our government with a supercomputer ?
    Could a program be written to deal with such a task ?

    For major decisions a referendum could be done at almost every major decision. Just a matter of logging in & casting your vote, none of this paper ballet crap.

    The supercomputer would then caculate it's decsion based on the votes.

    The supercomputer would not be corrupt, make ill informed decisions and could mass email the Irish people when money is running tight or when we're borrowing too much.

    If a program that runs on a supercomputer can calculate world wide weather algorithms then why not replace a governement with it.

    This pc would sure get my vote over any of the rest anyway.

    It sounds like what you are proposing is direct democracy through popular referendums, since all the supercomputer would seem to be doing is rallying votes. That would hardly require a supercomputer, my old Atari ST could probably manage it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    Stiffler2 wrote: »
    why can't ethics be programmed, it's just a set of rules as well ??

    You don't really think these things through, do you?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭Stiffler2


    You don't really think these things through, do you?

    The problem is I think too much but the question I have for you is have you really thought this through ?

    Ethics are not emotions, they are a set of rules, (eg)
    Stem Cells = programmed to say NO
    Doctor telling a friend about his patient is bad ethics - pc programmed for this as well. Anything that falls into the ethics category can be programmed, simple as that.

    things that can't be programmed ( yet ) emotions, smells. etc..

    Have you even watched the matrix or looked at this article - http://www.futuretimeline.net/

    Anything is possible but certainly not with YOUR attitude


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Stiffler2 wrote: »
    The problem is I think too much but the question I have for you is have you really thought this through ?

    Ethics are not emotions, they are a set of rules, (eg)
    Stem Cells = programmed to say NO
    Doctor telling a friend about his patient is bad ethics - pc programmed for this as well. Anything that falls into the ethics category can be programmed, simple as that.

    things that can't be programmed ( yet ) emotions, smells. etc..

    Ethics change over time. What is unacceptable today will be more than acceptable in 100 years!

    Also, Ethics take human judgement into account.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,808 ✭✭✭✭chin_grin


    Twenty five posts and not one mention of Deep Thought. After Hours, I am disappoint!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭Stiffler2


    chin_grin wrote: »
    Twenty five posts and not one mention of Deep Thought. After Hours, I am disappoint!

    A great man once said and I do not rememeber who he is but he said ::

    I don't look at things that are and ask Why
    I look at things that aren't and ask why not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,389 ✭✭✭mattjack


    And just who would unplug it at night ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    Stiffler2 wrote: »
    The problem is I think too much but the question I have for you is have you really thought this through ?

    Ethics are not emotions, they are a set of rules, (eg)
    Stem Cells = programmed to say NO
    Doctor telling a friend about his patient is bad ethics - pc programmed for this as well. Anything that falls into the ethics category can be programmed, simple as that.

    things that can't be programmed ( yet ) emotions, smells. etc..

    Have you even watched the matrix or looked at this article - http://www.futuretimeline.net/

    Anything is possible but certainly not with YOUR attitude

    Grow up kid.

    Your "ethics" aren't hard coded rules, their a series of presumptions and axioms that, if you're not a total waste of flesh, will be challenged, changed, replaced and amended over the course of your life.

    Now, instead of asking have I seen the "the matrix" I'd like you to propose how your computer system is going to solve and create a reliable solution to one of the holy grails of artificial intelligence?
    Or you could just whine on about other people pointing out how bloody stupid your plan is.

    Either is good, but I imagine I know which you'll opt for.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭Nothingbetter2d


    We can't afford a supercomputer so we'll just have to make do with an Atari Jaguar

    dont be silly we need a microsoft windows 95 machine to be our government

    it will say "windows explorer has performed an illegal operation and needs to close" everytime it attempts to count the electorate votes.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭Stiffler2


    Grow up kid.

    Your "ethics" aren't hard coded rules, their a series of presumptions and axioms that, if you're not a total waste of flesh, will be challenged, changed, replaced and amended over the course of your life.

    Now, instead of asking have I seen the "the matrix" I'd like you to propose how your computer system is going to solve and create a reliable solution to one of the holy grails of artificial intelligence?
    Or you could just whine on about other people pointing out how bloody stupid your plan is.

    Either is good, but I imagine I know which you'll opt for.

    ethics are hard coded rules, granted they change over time which is just a bit of re-programming to be done or maintenance.

    It's not an AI computer, it bases its decisions on the referendums but mostly just the economy and money situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Stiffler2 wrote: »
    ethics are hard coded rules, granted they change over time ..............


    .........


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,808 ✭✭✭✭chin_grin


    Stiffler2 wrote: »
    A great man once said and I do not rememeber who he is but he said ::

    I don't look at things that are and ask Why
    I look at things that aren't and ask why not.

    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy
    Misattributed

    There are those that look at things the way they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?
    Though Kennedy stated that he was quoting George Bernard Shaw when he said this, he is often thought to have originated the expression, which actually paraphrases a line delivered by the Serpent in Shaw's play Back To Methuselah : “You see things; and you say, ‘Why?’ But I dream things that never were; and I say, ‘Why not?’". Robert's brother Edward famously quoted it (paraphrasing it even further), to conclude his eulogy to his late brother after his assassination (8 June 1968): Some men see things as they are and say why? I dream things that never were and say why not? - (Eulogy in CBS news video)

    Also Deep Thought is from The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. I'd highly recommend giving them a read.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    Stiffler2 wrote: »
    ethics are hard coded rules, granted they change over time which is just a bit of re-programming to be done or maintenance.

    It's not an AI computer, it bases its decisions on the referendums but mostly just the economy and money situation.

    What you're talking about is an Expert System, which is, in fact, an Artifical Intelligence.
    People just see the word "AI" and start thinking HAL or star treks Data and we end up with people trying to make the sort of useless distinctions you are.

    But you're throwing sci-fi films at me, so it's not unusual that you'd make that mistake. Most people who are pulling stuff out of their arse tend to.

    Also, as has been pointed out this gem of a line
    ethics are hard coded rules, granted they change over time

    Really shows you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    chin_grin wrote: »
    Also Deep Thought is from The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. I'd highly recommend giving them a read.

    Talented computer that! It later made a self-titled documentary about it's life in the porn industry, before going on to beat Gary Kasparov at Chess in 1997!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,210 ✭✭✭Tazz T


    A broken calculator from a €1.50 shop with no battery would run the country better than the government.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 847 ✭✭✭Proxy


    I'm calling Troll on this one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Tazz T wrote: »
    A broken calculator from a €1.50 shop with no battery would run the country better than the government.

    Excuse me Mr.Minister, what is your answer to the economic crisis??

    80085!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,349 ✭✭✭✭starlit


    Might actually work OP, what have you in mind to create such a supercomputer will have to have bigger brains and more power than the government but can a supercomputer outsmart a human?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    Proxy wrote: »
    I'm calling Troll on this one.

    Link probably related.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,512 ✭✭✭Ellis Dee


    number10a wrote: »
    Estonia, a country that only has democracy for 20 years, has online voting for years now. If they can manage it, we can surely bring it in overnight!!!




    Oh shìt, forgot where I live. We will still be using the paper and pencil to vote at the turn of the next century.


    Estonia has had online voting for years, but the overwhelming majority of people (84% in last year's general election) still go to polling stations and use paper and pencils. :)

    Electronic voting is practicable in Estonia only because the country has the Estonian ID Card, which is a regular and mandatory document featuring a smart card enabling both secure remote authentication and legally binding digital signatures. Naturally, the public infrastructure to support this is in place. :D

    I am not at all certain that attempts to introduce such an ID document in Ireland would be enthusiastically received by everyone, although I personally favour it. :rolleyes:

    And that, of course, is only the voting - i.e. choosing the people to run the country. They still do the decision making the traditional way - assembling in the Riigikogu (parliament), forming parties, a governing coalition, an opposition --- and using their heads for thinking and computers only as aids.:cool:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭entropi


    1. Replace the government with Cleverbot

    2. ????????

    3. Profit?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,375 ✭✭✭DoesNotCompute


    Stiffler2 wrote: »
    Do you think we could replace our government with a supercomputer ?
    Could a program be written to deal with such a task ?

    For major decisions a referendum could be done at almost every major decision. Just a matter of logging in & casting your vote, none of this paper ballet crap.

    The supercomputer would then caculate it's decsion based on the votes.

    The supercomputer would not be corrupt, make ill informed decisions and could mass email the Irish people when money is running tight or when we're borrowing too much.

    If a program that runs on a supercomputer can calculate world wide weather algorithms then why not replace a governement with it.

    This pc would sure get my vote over any of the rest anyway.

    Hrmm... Sounds like Deus Ex: Invisible War:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBeoreJr4Yc&feature=youtu.be&t=2m36s


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,323 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins



    Pretty apt username for the thread.


Advertisement