Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

1963 Land Cruiser - £16,675!

  • 05-12-2011 11:38am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,884 ✭✭✭


    A 1963 Toyota Land Cruiser, previously owned by Rover for evaluation work, has sold at auction for £16,675.

    It was purchased and registered by Rover in 1966 and is believed to have been used in development work for the Range Rover.

    Unused since 1970, the Toyota had covered minimal mileage and had recently undergone a through rebuild with an owner in North Yorkshire.

    Lively bidding at Bonham's Harrogate sale saw the Toyota sail past the estimate of £6,000 - £8,000, much to the surprise of many present - including Toyota GB, who were outbidded

    http://www.landroveraddict.com/news/2011/11/24/former-rover-engineering-land-cruiser-sells-for-16675/


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 233 ✭✭txpjl


    So the brits copied the japs, nice. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    Thought a vehicle like that would go for a lot more. Especially with the story behind it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,884 ✭✭✭101sean


    When Land Rover were looking at developing the Range Rover they bought examples of most of the opposition which was mainly American,there's pics of an International Scout amongst others at Eastnor Castle, their main testing ground.

    They of course ultimately proved they can do it better than anyone else with the Range Rover. Unfortunately they then dropped the ball and didn't find it again until the 90s :rolleyes:

    Incidentally, the main reason BMW bought Rover in the 90s was to gain Land Rover's 4x4 expertise. Got what they wanted and sold it on when they developed the inferior X5.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭Fishtits


    101sean wrote: »
    Incidentally, the main reason BMW bought Rover in the 90s was to gain Land Rover's 4x4 expertise.

    Correct.

    However, it would be incorrect to say the X5 wearing mud tyres (as per any self respecting LR) is not a capable 4x4.

    Its friggin scary what electronics can do for traction... even with limited clearance. Think automatic finger brakes...

    fishtits, ex Solihull trained appentice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,884 ✭✭✭101sean


    However, it would be incorrect to say the X5 wearing mud tyres (as per any self respecting LR) is not a capable 4x4.

    Agreed, but I'm I'm biased! :D


  • Advertisement
Advertisement