Family tree: 1901 and 1911 census

paky

hi im in the middle of a family tree project at the moment and i have come across something unusual.

the 1911 census states that my great grandfather is 46 years old and married with 2 children. his mother is living with him aswel and she is aged 72. however the 1901 census states that he is only 30 and his mother 55 when it should be 36 and 62. his father is alive at this time but not in the 1911 census. his father is aged 60 in 1901.
i went through the national archives register of births and it would appear that the 1911 census is the accurate one.

does anyone have any idea to why there ages are altered in the first census?
i am only assuming that maybe it had something to do with his mother marrying at a young age or maybe altering their ages to qualify for some sort of scheme or perhaps they just didnt keep a record of their ages? anyone have any ideas?

shanew

Ages are not always accurate on census returns - particularly those for adults. People didn't keep track of the dates and years as we do know. Another issue that sometimes occurs with census returns is when the person filling in the form doesn't know accurate details.

Ages for children tended to be more accurate - especially those very young.

Another factor for older people's ages being inaccurate in 1911 was the introduction on the Old Age Pension in 1908 - resulting is some people adding a few years to their to try to qualify.


Shane

paky

shanew wrote: »

Ages are not always accurate on census returns - particularly those for adults. People didn't keep track of the dates and years as we do know. Another issue that sometimes occurs with census returns is when the person filling in the form doesn't know accurate details.

Ages for children tended to be more accurate - especially those very young.

Another factor for older people's ages being inaccurate in 1911 was the introduction on the Old Age Pension in 1908 - resulting is some people adding a few years to their to try to qualify.


Shane

:pac: that would make a lot of sense

Maudi

paky wrote: »

shanew wrote: »

Ages are not always accurate on census returns - particularly those for adults. People didn't keep track of the dates and years as we do know. Another issue that sometimes occurs with census returns is when the person filling in the form doesn't know accurate details.

Ages for children tended to be more accurate - especially those very young.

Another factor for older people's ages being inaccurate in 1911 was the introduction on the Old Age Pension in 1908 - resulting is some people adding a few years to their to try to qualify.


Shane

:pac: that would make a lot of sense

hi im looking at a reference map of wicklow and it shows a symbol for a portsl tomb south of wicklow town.near blainroe.magherabeag.ballydowling sort of area.anybody know of this?i thought i knew them all in wickla

annieoburns

Regarding odd age in census, have you looked at the actual handwritten form? Sometimes the transcription is not correct and the mistake is obvious with other background information to hand.