Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why didnt Ireland buy the Ango bonds nstead of guaranteeing them?

  • 02-11-2011 8:25am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,951 ✭✭✭


    Maybe it is easy to be clever in hindsight but it looks to me that we (as a country) should have bought those bonds at the low rates considering we were going to give a banket guarantee on them.

    At lease we wouldnt have being handing an easy profit to some specualators.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,934 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I'm sure there were many things we could have done with Anglo and the other banks that would have been better than what came to pass. However, I also believe that those very same profiteers had something to do with the advice the two Brians decided to listen to.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,474 ✭✭✭Crazy Horse 6




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    the ones being paid out now are not guaranteed

    as per parallel thread there is no good reason to pay it, or at least not pay out the interest (13%) portion of it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,951 ✭✭✭dixiefly


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    the ones being paid out now are not guaranteed

    as per parallel thread there is no good reason to pay it, or at least not pay out the interest (13%) portion of it

    I understand that there are probaby a number of reasons that what i am saying couldnt have happened.

    It is still extremey galling to say the least that some speculators made a fortune by buying our bonds at knockdown prices after our guarantee....at least that is my reading of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 485 ✭✭eric hoone


    wouldn't it have been a bit like insider trading?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,951 ✭✭✭dixiefly


    eric hoone wrote: »
    wouldn't it have been a bit like insider trading?

    I am not sure but it would be interesting how much money these specuators that bought after Anglo were known to be going / gone bust made on the punt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,581 ✭✭✭Voltex


    I suppose it will be for the same reasons the Goverment will sell its share in the banks as soon as possible. The Goverment are not bankers...but stepped in with a Goverment like response to an unfolding situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭Wider Road


    dixiefly wrote: »
    Maybe it is easy to be clever in hindsight but it looks to me that we (as a country) should have bought those bonds at the low rates considering we were going to give a banket guarantee on them.

    At lease we wouldnt have being handing an easy profit to some specualators.



    Judging by Enda's reply in the Dail on Wednesday, he doesn't know either!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,378 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    eric hoone wrote: »
    wouldn't it have been a bit like insider trading?

    It would in the sense that the government would be perceived as manipulating the markets by issuing an edict and then slyly taking advantage. Very soon the country would be viewed as being untrustworthy to lend money to let alone be credit worthy.


Advertisement