Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

IranAir 727 Landing - no nose gear!

  • 26-10-2011 3:38pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭


    Apologies if this has been posted already.


    Just one week ago on October 18th, an IranAir Boeing 727 landed at Tehran's Mehrabad airport without the use of its front landing gear, after the bay of the nose gear failed to open on approach.

    The crew performed a landing without the nose gear on runway 29L and came to a stand still on both the main gear and the nose of the aircraft. The flight, traveling from Moscow to Iran, held 94 passengers and 19 crew members; none were injured in the landing.

    Amazing pilot skill on an older aircraft, even better than the Jet blue i reckon because at least they had the gear down.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 Turbo Porter


    Delta Kilo wrote: »
    Amazing pilot skill on an older aircraft, even better than the Jet blue i reckon because at least they had the gear down.

    The Iran Air landing would have been easier than the Jetblue one.The nose wheel was down in the Jetblue but was rotated at 90 degree angle serious friction here as opposed to a little belly scraping with the Iran air.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Delta Kilo


    I dont know, its pretty debatable.

    At least the jet blue aircraft had stability and the friction would have aided in stopping the aircraft. Think of how accurate the pilot had to be in this case with his use of spoiler, elevator, reverse thrust and braking force to keep everything in balance. Get it wrong and slam the nose into the runway soon after touchdown potentially causing the fuselage to break up, or get it wrong the other way and you end up gliding along and ending up off the end of the runway.

    Lots of margin for error but the pilot got it bang on.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 333 ✭✭alan85


    Delta Kilo wrote: »
    I dont know, its pretty debatable.

    At least the jet blue aircraft had stability and the friction would have aided in stopping the aircraft. Think of how accurate the pilot had to be in this case with his use of spoiler, elevator, reverse thrust and braking force to keep everything in balance. Get it wrong and slam the nose into the runway soon after touchdown potentially causing the fuselage to break up, or get it wrong the other way and you end up gliding along and ending up off the end of the runway.

    Lots of margin for error but the pilot got it bang on.
    I think you should learn how to fly both types and know the weather conditions on the given days before saying. If it was me, as a P.P.L. pilot, I'd want the 727 over the A320 with stuck nose gear. The thing about the stuck gear was that the tires had blown and ended up with metal on tarmac creating sparks. It didn't look pretty to me and given the right circumstances I think could have ended up a lot worse. At least with no nose gear you have greater directional authority because you have greater time between flare and the nose touching the runway than had you the nose gear down... in my opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,240 ✭✭✭CaptainSkidmark


    Spectacular landing!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,875 ✭✭✭Buffman


    Pilot did an excellent job, he kept the nose up a lot longer than I was expecting, even with the break in the video at 0.37 sec. Looks like minimal damage caused, maybe EP-IRR might even fly again.

    1999588.jpg

    FYI, if you move to a 'smart' meter electricity plan, you CAN'T move back to a non-smart plan.

    You don't have to take a 'smart' meter if you don't want one, opt-out is available.

    Buy drinks in 3L or bigger plastic bottles or glass bottles or cartons to avoid the DRS fee.



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,258 ✭✭✭MUSEIST


    Amazing stuff from the pilot.Kept that nose up as long as possible and put it down smootly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Buffman wrote: »
    Pilot did an excellent job, he kept the nose up a lot longer than I was expecting, even with the break in the video at 0.37 sec. Looks like minimal damage caused, maybe EP-IRR might even fly again.

    1999588.jpg
    Is that two 707's in the background?


    Not including ground transport this photo could have been taken over 40 years ago. :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭charlemont


    Awesome skill from the pilot.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    charlemont wrote: »
    Awesome skill from the pilot.
    In par with Sullenberger, also both caught on cam.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,005 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    When I first read the headline (on another site) I thought it was a nosewheel collapse or similar.

    That was an amazing piece of flying. What steady handling of the aircraft. It looked like he wasn't going to drop the nose at all!!

    I assume as this was a B727 (with no Boeing support for 30+ years) it was completely hands-on?


    And it relation to the retro feel, yep. IranAir operate 3 A320, everything else is old. B727, B747-200, B747SP, A300, A310. The cannot get access to modern aircraft due to the embargo against Iran. The have recently ordered 35 TU-204.
    Also remember that the Iranian Air Force still have F-14 Tomcat's, F-4 Phantom's and F-5's in service!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Tenger wrote: »
    When I first read the headline (on another site) I thought it was a nosewheel collapse or similar.

    That was an amazing piece of flying. What steady handling of the aircraft. It looked like he wasn't going to drop the nose at all!!

    I assume as this was a B727 (with no Boeing support for 30+ years) it was completely hands-on?


    And it relation to the retro feel, yep. IranAir operate 3 A320, everything else is old. B727, B747-200, B747SP, A300, A310. The cannot get access to modern aircraft due to the embargo against Iran. The have recently ordered 35 TU-204.
    Also remember that the Iranian Air Force still have F-14 Tomcat's, F-4 Phantom's and F-5's in service!!!
    Any under wing engine pod aircraft would probably be in a ball of flames with the engines ripped off as soon as the nose touched the ground. There is something to be said for aft engines although they had their own problems.

    I wonder will the pilot and crew have a reception with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,875 ✭✭✭Buffman


    Tenger wrote: »
    Also remember that the Iranian Air Force still have F-14 Tomcat's, F-4 Phantom's and F-5's in service!!!

    Yep, in the background of the video there are a couple of Chinooks, something that looks like a Huey or Cobra, possible a C-130 and 5 747's.

    FYI, if you move to a 'smart' meter electricity plan, you CAN'T move back to a non-smart plan.

    You don't have to take a 'smart' meter if you don't want one, opt-out is available.

    Buy drinks in 3L or bigger plastic bottles or glass bottles or cartons to avoid the DRS fee.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭xflyer


    I wonder will the pilot and crew have a reception with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. :p
    Haven't they suffered enough stress?:( It's about time he found himself 'caught in crossfire'.

    If the Iranians ever get over this crazy anti western mentality they would be one of the most modern countries in that region. Now they're forever trapped in 1979.

    As for the landing, in fact it would be relatively straightforward if rather tense. Set up a stable approach on a long runway, maybe a slightly higher approach speed, keep the nose up. Avoid use of thrust reversers or brakes and gently lower the nose before it falls of it's own accord. Better for the pilot to place the nose down rather than have it fall abruptly.

    That is not to minimise the skills required to carry that off. Nice job.


Advertisement