Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Taoiseach's advisors exceed pay cap

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 7golfer


    tyipical ,,, of two -faced politicians,,
    say one thing to the press, then do the oppisite behind everyones back,
    is he going to change this??
    dont vote for f.gael gay mitchel
    let the voters speak!!!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manach


    My understanding is that Labour ministers are also paying such rates. Don't vote Michael D. then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 7golfer


    yeah,, if that's what it takes,
    labour no better,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭conorhal


    I wonder will they now buckle on the pay cap for bank executives?
    It would seem that they don't have much of a moral high ground on which to stand when it comes to extraordinary exemptions and such.

    Typical politicians, do as I say not as I do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,207 ✭✭✭meditraitor


    Manach wrote: »
    My understanding is that Labour ministers are also paying such rates. Don't vote Michael D. then?

    Link?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,207 ✭✭✭meditraitor


    7golfer wrote: »
    yeah,, if that's what it takes,
    labour no better,

    Usual nonesense, a valid and perfectly reasonable compalint about the behaviour of FG gets derailed with cries of

    "Labour are worse"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭RMD


    Even before the general election it was clear to see FG were just the same as FF, they just hadn't the necessary power to prove it yet. Doesn't matter what party is in power in this country, they'll still do a half assed job of running it as they know no better.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    I have no problem with this - assuming the guys n girls they are paying these high salaries to are worth it

    People get up in arms when they see somebody earning a lot of money - I personally have no problem with it as long as they are worth it to the organisation.

    I would rather pay 1 person good money and get a good job done than 5 people decent money and get a rubbish job done. It usually works out cheaper in the short and long run that way

    There was an interesting interview with Michael Summers, formerly of the NTMA on RTE late on Monday night. I would like to see his methods of managing a public entity used in all public sector areas - we might see some value for our money then


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manach




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,207 ✭✭✭meditraitor


    Manach wrote: »

    There is nothing in that article to say labour are breaking the pay cap!

    There is one tweet on the replies that imply it........ do I have to explain why I find posting a twitter rumour disingenuous in the contest of this forum?

    Please provide proof to the claim that Labour are overshooting the pay ceiling for secretary/advisors or recind the remark!


    Oh....And if they are, shame on them.......... the whole bloody lot of them


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 Crochet


    Tipp Man wrote: »
    I personally have no problem with it as long as they are worth it to the organisation.

    Yeah but nearly always they are not worth it. Like the bankers they were all 'worth it' till we realised that they were indeed not worth it. A persons ability to 'adivse' is not worth these kind of sums - this is nonsense. I would rather put five people in there and take 5 people off the live register.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manach


    There is nothing in that article to say labour are breaking the pay cap!
    My apologies to you, in that I should have stated it was in the opinion sector.
    The following is a link from the Examiner, political section, which does mention the cap being broken by the Tánaiste's advisers. link.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    Crochet wrote: »
    Yeah but nearly always they are not worth it. Like the bankers they were all 'worth it' till we realised that they were indeed not worth it. A persons ability to 'adivse' is not worth these kind of sums - this is nonsense. I would rather put five people in there and take 5 people off the live register.

    Regardless of the quality of the work?? Plenty of people earn big money and are worth every penny of it

    You remind me of the FAS scheme in my local village - get as many idiots as you can to look busy and pay them well while they're at it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 Crochet


    Eh Tipp man - Why did you immediately pick idiots to employ. Thats odd. There are plenty of people of the calibre of these advisers (people who only offer opinions) who would work for a fraction of their wages.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    Crochet wrote: »
    Eh Tipp man - Why did you immediately pick idiots to employ. Thats odd. There are plenty of people of the calibre of these advisers (people who only offer opinions) who would work for a fraction of their wages.

    I have nothing to do with any FAS scheme so have no influence over who gets on it or not - it wouldn't bother me only for the fact it is costing a pure fortune to the taxpayer and is hiding people who are unemployed from the real unemployment numbers

    So you want the cheapest people advising the government as opposed to the best people advising the government?? That is pure nuts and is so short sighted its unbelievable. A short term small gain but with huge potential downside which could cost a fortune

    Note i am not saying that the government have hired or are paying for the best people, my point is that if they are very good then they should be paid accordingly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    Tipp Man wrote: »
    I have no problem with this - assuming the guys n girls they are paying these high salaries to are worth it

    People get up in arms when they see somebody earning a lot of money - I personally have no problem with it as long as they are worth it to the organisation.

    I would rather pay 1 person good money and get a good job done than 5 people decent money and get a rubbish job done. It usually works out cheaper in the short and long run that way

    There was an interesting interview with Michael Summers, formerly of the NTMA on RTE late on Monday night. I would like to see his methods of managing a public entity used in all public sector areas - we might see some value for our money then

    I agree with you about Michael Summers but I must say the main problem I have with these appointments to breach salary caps is that there is no process for them or assessment of whether a person is worth such a wage. The Taoiseach is saying they are worth it but where has he put down on paper a request to breach the wage cap and his justification for doing so sent to an independent body for assessment?

    Maybe the media just aren't showing us it but not much point of a salary cap you can breach at will with no paper trail on how it was decided they worth breaching the cap for.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    thebman wrote: »
    I agree with you about Michael Summers but I must say the main problem I have with these appointments to breach salary caps is that there is no process for them or assessment of whether a person is worth such a wage. The Taoiseach is saying they are worth it but where has he put down on paper a request to breach the wage cap and his justification for doing so sent to an independent body for assessment?

    Maybe the media just aren't showing us it but not much point of a salary cap you can breach at will with no paper trail on how it was decided they worth breaching the cap for.

    Oh i agree completely

    The processes and accountability (lack of) in government and public service are an absolute disgrace. Yet they make every other business in the country bend over backwards with rules and regulations


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,990 ✭✭✭JustAddWater


    It's an absolute DISGRACE

    Now none other than 9, yes NINE department advisors are exceeding the pay cap, INCLUDING that of Joan Burton's department

    The tainiste's are not even 1k or 2k over but f**king €63k to €75k over EACH

    €75k is almost enough to pay for another advisor (who would be paid €80k - €92k within the cap)

    The double standards and hypocrisy of these shower of pure buffoons is nothing short of rubbing our face in it.

    These are the muppets who said to the bankers that they must their chiefs within the banking pay cap. Well, I have news for you clowns, it's called LEAD BY EXAMPLE! :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

    Link: http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/nine-ministers-exceed-pay-cap-for-advisors-524023.html
    It is reported that nine Ministers are paying their special advisers more than the money-saving pay cap announced by Government.

    The normal pay scale is €80,000 to €92,000, but nine Departments have secured exemptions.

    Sinn Féin said it was ironic that advisers to Joan Burton's department of Social Protection were on higher rates "while the department is doggedly pursuing fraud".

    The Taoiseach's two advisers earn €168,000 each while the Tánaiste's advisors earn €168,000 and €155,000. They are not subject to the pay ceilings.

    one more for good measure: :mad:



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,148 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Crochet wrote: »
    There are plenty of people of the calibre of these advisers (people who only offer opinions) who would work for a fraction of their wages.

    Somehow I doubt that.

    They're not offering "only opinions". They're offering informed opinions based on their expertise and experience.


Advertisement