Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Passat 1.6FSI or 1.4 TSI or anything bigger?

  • 25-09-2011 8:50am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭


    hi
    in the market for a car. i have come down to Passat (purely on the decision from heart rather than brain).
    looking for something 2007 and later and petrol only
    i can see plenty of 1.6FSI engines.
    searched through this boards forum and have seen not many good comments on it. :-( big car with small engine.
    should i go for 1.8FSI or bigger?
    or should i try for 1.4 TSI which has very good reviews with its Turbo engine which has fixed many of FSI defects.
    also there are very few TSIs and are nearly 10k+ in price.

    what about mileage on these cars?
    there are 2008 cars with 190k kms. how can one drive so much in 3 years???


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    There are not too many TSI engines around I think due to high demand, however there are quite a few of the 2.0 FSI engines around if tax isn't a big problem, although I have heard from people that he 1.6 is acceptable...

    As for 190k km It's only about 40k miles a year which isn't too bad, could be reps driving length and breath of the country on a weekly basis. Nice car to do 190k km in though.

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Volkswagen/Passat/VW-PASSA/201136204376653/advert?channel=CARS


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭bittihuduga


    thanks for the guidance.
    i believe that big motorway mileage with good handling of car is better than small city mileage with rough driving.
    what kind of mileage is acceptable on a passat?
    are there any known FSI problems other than small engine in big car?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,694 ✭✭✭✭L-M


    My dad has one from 06-10, put 29,000kms on it. I drove it a good bit and found it grand. He has a 1.4 TSI and it's a better engine alright.

    I wouldn't bother with a 07 2.0, they're a 150 bhp engine and I can't imagine them to have a good resale value in a few years time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭EPM


    I've driven a few rental 1.4tsi Passats for about a thousand miles in total and never found them wanting for power. Can easily keep up with traffic and not too uneconomical driven sensibly. Feels livelier than my fathers 2 litre petrol Mondeo despite it having 20bhp more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭pajo1981


    From my ownership experience, the 1.6 FSI is a dog. Avoid.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,025 ✭✭✭✭-Corkie-


    Get the 1.4 tsi. The 2.0/1.8/1.6 fsi are only pigs of things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    Would a 1.4 TSI come under the OP's budget which I'm guessing is around 10k..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭bittihuduga


    166man wrote: »
    Would a 1.4 TSI come under the OP's budget which I'm guessing is around 10k..

    as of now, NO as my budget is 8k.

    i heard the similar(negative reviews) on 1.6 Mondeo Zetec (new model) too.
    i don't know why these car makers make these small engines :-(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,347 ✭✭✭si_guru


    ..i don't know why these car makers make these small engines :-(

    Road tax.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    as of now, NO as my budget is 8k.

    i heard the similar(negative reviews) on 1.6 Mondeo Zetec (new model) too.
    i don't know why these car makers make these small engines :-(

    Yeah not sure if you will find a 1.4 TSI for 8k... There are plenty of nice cars out there for 8k though!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭bittihuduga


    166man wrote: »
    Yeah not sure if you will find a 1.4 TSI for 8k... There are plenty of nice cars out there for 8k though!

    if you don't mind, can you please share some suggestions?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    if you don't mind, can you please share some suggestions?

    You would like a petrol family saloon then with low enough tax, that right?

    Something maybe like this it is a bit older though

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Mercedes-Benz/C-Class/C180-AUT/131677114679137/advert?channel=CARS


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,363 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    Passat 1.4 TSi has a turbo and produces 122bhp. That engine is well able to move the Passat around. It replaced the 1.6 FSi which had only 115bhp. The 1.6 FSi engine was not great and really had a short shelf life in the VAG range. If looking at the 2.0 FSi just remember there is very little market for these cars in this country and they are hard to sell on, so be prepared to keep it until it dies.

    Also take note that the B6 Passat suffered from alot of problems that were not really ironed out until early 2008 so 2008 should be the minimum you should be looking at. BTW you will not buy a decent 1.4 TSi Passat for €8k.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭bittihuduga




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,025 ✭✭✭✭-Corkie-



    The second one is the base model which is poverty spec. I would have the 1.8 if the tax isnt crazy on it. On second thoughts the mileage is crazy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,694 ✭✭✭✭L-M


    The 1.8 looks like something that was run by a fleet company, ie. Properly maintained. Can't see any major issue once you get a warranty and the tax is cheap.

    As for the BOG spec 1.4... LOL


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭bittihuduga




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    is this any good compared to the above?
    http://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/cars/2207256

    To me it looks expensive for what it is though I don't know what they cost new.. It's still the most basic Mondeo that's near 5 years old with more than 100k miles on it... pricey.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭bittihuduga


    thanks for the views 166man.
    the problem is all those mondeos/passats are pricey :-(
    its difficult to find a low mileage car within the budget


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    thanks for the views 166man.
    the problem is all those mondeos/passats are pricey :-(
    its difficult to find a low mileage car within the budget

    This is a bit left field and the tax might be a bit high but a fine car nonetheless

    http://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/cars/2535131


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,533 ✭✭✭Zonda999


    Lads, why were some people diss'ing the 1.8TSi earlier in th thread? Afaik, that engine only launched in late 2006, does it have reliability issues or whatever. I ask, because I've driven that engine twice, both in Octavia's. Always thought it was a lovely engine, very very quiet for a petrol and not as bad on fuel as a 160bhp petrol would suggest


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭bittihuduga


    166man wrote: »
    This is a bit left field and the tax might be a bit high but a fine car nonetheless

    http://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/cars/2535131

    thats very cheap for that mileage.
    how can i know if the mileage is genuine and not clocked?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,309 ✭✭✭VolvoMan


    166man wrote: »
    This is a bit left field and the tax might be a bit high but a fine car nonetheless

    http://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/cars/2535131

    +1

    Excellent car.

    Pisses all over the Passat. It's just the general Irish public are too stupid to know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,694 ✭✭✭✭L-M


    Of course it pisses all over the Passat, it's a much bigger, turbo'd version that cost alot more and is now worth even less than an equivalent Passat!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,309 ✭✭✭VolvoMan


    Of course it pisses all over the Passat, it's a much bigger, turbo'd version that cost alot more and is now worth even less than an equivalent Passat!

    It was 35k new and is smaller than a Passat in overall length (after checking there very quickly, it is in fact over 100mm shorter). These were also turbocharged throughout the range.

    I think you're thinking this is an S80.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    thats very cheap for that mileage.
    how can i know if the mileage is genuine and not clocked?

    I think you can run a motorcheck on it online or cartell. Or just read the service history carefully...:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,694 ✭✭✭✭L-M


    VolvoMan wrote: »
    It was 35k new and is smaller than a Passat in overall length (after checking there very quickly, it is in fact over 100mm shorter).

    I think you're thinking this is an S80.

    That was 35k new? Even with the leather etc.? Jesus... Not bad value, pity it was a really old design in 06. Still looking lovely now, though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,309 ✭✭✭VolvoMan


    That was 35k new? Even with the leather etc.? Jesus... Not bad value, pity it was a really old design in 06. Still looking lovely now, though.

    They came down to 35k around '06 for the standard 2.0T S.

    I'd still say that particular one was a bit less than 40k brand new. I think SE spec only added about 2-3k to the price.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    If that car was infact 35k new then may I reiterate my original post and say that it looks like excellent value for money and yes I second the 'pisses on a passat' statement..:D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,309 ✭✭✭VolvoMan


    166man wrote: »
    If that car was infact 35k new then may I reiterate my original post and say that it looks like excellent value for money and yes I second the 'pisses on a passat' statement..:D

    They were indeed.

    Sure I remember it was one of the reasons my father backed out of buying an 18 month old T5; it was priced more than a brand new 2.0T.

    People probably remember that up until quite recently, SE spec in Volvo's got you leather and everything for a minimum outlay. It was a major selling point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,575 ✭✭✭166man


    VolvoMan wrote: »
    They were indeed.

    Sure I remember it was one of the reasons my father backed out of buying an 18 month old T5; it was priced more than a brand new 2.0T.

    People probably remember that up until quite recently, SE spec in Volvo's got you leather and everything for a minimum outlay. It was a major selling point.


    I always think that I would love a nice S60 D5 auto with leather in a few years time. Always had a soft spot for Volvo's in general. I do like that S60 petrol one too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,712 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    That was 35k new? Even with the leather etc.? Jesus... Not bad value, pity it was a really old design in 06. Still looking lovely now, though.

    Some clever person in here decided to throw away all the Car Sales Guides from before 2007 (had most months going back to 98 :mad:) so earliest I can find was Feb 07.

    2.0T S lists at €41,400. Sport at €42,400 and SE at €44,400. Full leather was an option on the Sport, but I don't know how much.

    If that S60 checks out, that's savage value. If it weren't for the fuel consumption, I'd be tempted myself (even though I really don't like the look of the spaceball gear knob).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭bittihuduga


    is it a mondeo engine inside S60?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,694 ✭✭✭✭L-M


    R.O.R wrote: »
    Some clever person in here decided to throw away all the Car Sales Guides from before 2007 (had most months going back to 98 :mad:) so earliest I can find was Feb 07.

    2.0T S lists at €41,400. Sport at €42,400 and SE at €44,400. Full leather was an option on the Sport, but I don't know how much.

    If that S60 checks out, that's savage value. If it weren't for the fuel consumption, I'd be tempted myself (even though I really don't like the look of the spaceball gear knob).

    €42,400 plus delivery plus metallic I'm assuming?

    A bit shy of 10k under valued there Mr. Volvoman. I've a few of those Guides too, but I the earliest would also be 07.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,712 ✭✭✭✭R.O.R


    €42,400 plus delivery plus metallic I'm assuming?

    A bit shy of 10k under valued there Mr. Volvoman. I've a few of those Guides too, but I the earliest would also be 07.

    Aye - ex. works are the figues I quoted. Possible it's Black Stone (NCO), but that still leaves delivery, leather and any other extra's on that particular car.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,694 ✭✭✭✭L-M


    You would of gotten alot of Passat for that money in 07!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,309 ✭✭✭VolvoMan


    R.O.R wrote: »
    2.0T S lists at €41,400. Sport at €42,400 and SE at €44,400. Full leather was an option on the Sport, but I don't know how much.
    €42,400 plus delivery plus metallic I'm assuming?

    I just checked there and up to '06 the range started at 39,995 for a 2.0T S. It then went down to 38,400 thereafter, so I'm about 2k off.

    Bear in mind that large discounts were also able to be had at this stage in the car's life.
    is it a mondeo engine inside S60?

    Uggghhhh...

    I can't deal with this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,025 ✭✭✭✭-Corkie-


    VolvoMan wrote: »
    +1

    Excellent car.

    Pisses all over the Passat. It's just the general Irish public are too stupid to know.

    Definitley does pisx all over the Passat. Thats a seriously cheap car given the spec etc. I bought a brand new Passat in 07 with a few extras and only a good weekend away with the change out of 36k


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,309 ✭✭✭VolvoMan


    -Corkie- wrote: »
    Definitley does pisx all over the Passat. Thats a seriously cheap car given the spec etc. I bought a brand new Passat in 07 with a few extras and only a good weekend away with the change out of 36k

    That said, I'm not denying the Passat is a decent car in its own right.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,025 ✭✭✭✭-Corkie-


    VolvoMan wrote: »
    That said, I'm not denying the Passat is a decent car in its own right.

    They are decent but I couldnt see myself buying one again. For example I have the very same steering wheel and stereo as my mates Caddy van..:rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,096 ✭✭✭johnos1984


    -Corkie- wrote: »
    They are decent but I couldnt see myself buying one again. For example I have the very same steering wheel and stereo as my mates Caddy van..:rolleyes:
    It must be a very nice van so :D


Advertisement